You couldn't disprove anything that I posted so you use silly insults.
Too bad you aren't man enough to admit you are wrong.
OK Chrissy, What percentage of homes in Germany have no furnaces??
Where do the Danes get the other 80% of their energy??
Israel and 5% solar?? My My. Tell me Chrissy...why not nuclear energy. Why not bring up that France gets a large chunk of their energy from nuclear energy. I'm all for that kind of clean energy. But, somehow I feel Chrissy isn't for that.
It took all that to get you to talk about real issues.
The Israelis are trying to go all solar by 2030. I don't know if they will make it, but that is their goal.
Nuclear is a good question, but I am not sure they have solved the problem of nuclear waste yet. The French want to store their nuclear waste in America.
What percentage of homes in Germany don't have furnaces?
Who cares? We have to start where we are.
The point is that the technology is there. All it takes is the political will to move us in the right direction.
You really like sensationalized data, at least as long as it supports only your claims. France wants to put their waste here because we have a disposal site and system already to use, it's just sitting there wasting money right now. It's been looked over thousands of times and proven to be 100% safe, but since we aren't using it we may as well rent it out to pay for it, and France just happens to have money to give us, but you fools are stopping it out of really ancient fears (wake up, it's the 21st century).
They have one small "test" district in Germany, there are more factors to think of, first, ALL houses are almost air tight when they are new, however after wear and tear they eventually break down. Thus why it's still a "test" project. Even then, so what? Show how much it will help versus cost, then factor in all the chemicals used to make it. Just because a product is "green" doesn't mean safe for the environment, it doesn't even mean safe for humans, it simply means they did their best to make it as safe as possible. However, many "green" products have a much bigger impact on the environment near the factories than you fools care to admit.
5% ... not even a drop in a bucket. 20% ... that's a little better, but then you are ignoring the impact on the populace, the fact that they have a LOT of wind compared to most areas, as well as the only reason it's not higher is because they only operate when there is wind.
For solar, you really need to learn more about that. It's not environmentally sound in the least, either you have to use highly toxic chemicals to make even a little energy or take up huge amounts of space for the same amount of energy. Do you even understand the concept and theory of solar power? Doubt it.
The really funny thing is that if you environuts knew how all this "green" stuff was made you'd be screaming bloody murder ... well ... at least at yourselves.