Which forensics proved to be false. There were liars there to stick up for their own kind, and honest people who actually seen it.
Their own kind? Tell us again how you aren't racist, Ray, that shit never gets old.
Forensics can't prove if he had his hands up or not. yes, if he had his hand up straight over his head, maybe his shirt would have been pulled up. But if he had his hands up with his upper arms paralell to his shoulders or his hands paralel to his shoulders, not so much.
Tough to have an intelligent conversation with an insane lunatic and hypocrite. So you want me to ignore the court here but believe the court when they said there wasn't any evidence of the election being fixed. Can't have it both ways. Either we believe the courts or we don't.
Here's the thing, guy.... in the Brown case, it was never heard by a court. It was heard by a grand jury where the prosecutor had complete control over what evidence was presented. And as they say on almost any episode of
Law & Order, you can get a Grand Jury to indict a ham sandwich.... Or not indict it.
Meanwhile, Trump specious claims of election fraud were heard by SIXTY- count them SIXTY different courts, including judges appointed by Trump himself.