Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 55,211
- 16,849
- 2,250
Which you can't dispute.I have the definition of the word...You're demented -- I pay for everything I have. I get nothing from the government.
Your dementia aside, I showed you a definition for the word, "general," and I see nothing in it which excludes, "social." I can only conclude by your refusal to explain why it would exclude it that you can't. So you do your silly little conservative dance instead.
You support others who didn't earn it getting it. If you cared so much, you'd provide it to them and the government wouldn't be involved.
You SEE nothing that excludes it? That means you WANT it to include social but have nothing to back it up but what you say.
gen·er·al
ˈjen(ə)rəl/
adjective
1. affecting or concerning all or most people, places, or things; widespread
You have your interpretation of what you said was vague.
What I can dispute is that it means social welfare. You can't prove that they mean the same thing. You can only interpret based on your bleeding heart mentality.
And what is 'social welfare'? So far, the only thing you've done is change the word 'general' to 'social'. You haven't demonstrated a qualitative difference.