Zone1 Where does atheist morality come from?

Sorry but faith is for suckers as is prayer.
I think not. My best example is the Beatitudes. I had enough faith in Christ and his teachings in the Beatitudes to apply them to specific circumstances in my own life--and then watch them at work. The Commandments work in the same way, also the parables. I never had enough faith to parachute out of a plane, and oddly enough I have never pursued parachuting out of a plane. My daughter even has faith in that, and has jumped quite often. Faith is amazing, the beginning of all things. Prayer in God's will and in his name bring that amazement as well.

When my husband was a little boy, and his dad suffered a heart attack and died, my husband faithfully prayed for God to bring his dad back to life. When this didn't happen, he gave up God and gave up prayer.
 
What is there to fear? The Church teaches that hell is eternal separation from God. And, the Church teaches how to remain close to God. Each person has a choice and freely makes a choice. We were taught God sends no one to hell--people choose hell (complete separation from God). You appear to have chosen complete separation from God many years ago. You say you are happy with this choice, and you appear to want people to join you in your choice.
You are as usual 100% wrong:

The Catholic Church teaches that hell is eternal separation from God, rather than a place of torture for non-belief alone. According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, those who die in a state of mortal sin—which includes rejecting God—experience eternal punishment, described as "eternal fire


1034 Jesus often speaks of "Gehenna" of "the unquenchable fire" reserved for those who to the end of their lives refuse to believe and be converted, where both soul and body can be lost.<a name="-1C3" href="Part One Section Two I. The Creeds Chapter Three I Believe In The Holy Spirit Article 12 I Believe In Life Everlasting IV. Hell">612</a> Jesus solemnly proclaims that he "will send his angels, and they will gather . . . all evil doers, and throw them into the furnace of fire,"<a name="-1C4" href="Part One Section Two I. The Creeds Chapter Three I Believe In The Holy Spirit Article 12 I Believe In Life Everlasting IV. Hell">613</a> and that he will pronounce the condemnation: "Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire!"<a name="-1C5" href="Part One Section Two I. The Creeds Chapter Three I Believe In The Holy Spirit Article 12 I Believe In Life Everlasting IV. Hell">614</a>

1035 The teaching of the Church affirms the existence of hell and its eternity. Immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell, where they suffer the punishments of hell, "eternal fire."<a name="-1C6" href="Part One Section Two I. The Creeds Chapter Three I Believe In The Holy Spirit Article 12 I Believe In Life Everlasting IV. Hell">615</a> The chief punishment of hell is eternal separation from God, in whom alone man can possess the life and happiness for which he was created and for which he longs.

Now, tell me...just who is that doesn't know their Catechism???
 
Already solved. God is not a genii granting wishes, but works according to his will. We pray, Your will be done, not My will be done. Abraham Lincoln said it well when he answered the question, "Do you believe God is on your side (when it came to the Union). President Lincoln replied, "It is better that I am on God's side."

Before entering into prayer, my best prayer experiences come when I am first centered on Your will be done. It is also useful to have in mind, that we are not to use the Lord's name in vain. Praying My will be done is a really great example of using the Lord's name in vain. He is God, not my genii. Remove the genii from prayer life, and the change is great.
I told you before I had a thread on another site where this was debated and Christians like you were flailing and failing. You cannot know this thing you call "God's will" (a dumb concept) so if it is NOT God's "will" all the praying in the world will do nothing. If it IS God's will why do you need to pray for it?
 
Now, tell me...just who is that doesn't know their Catechism???
So you think that knowing how to copy and paste a section of the Catechism equates to knowing the entire Catechism? First, when Jesus referenced 'Gehenna' what was that reference point? Second, there is something that occurs when one dies, whether in the state of mortal sin or not. What occurs? Third, for a sin to be mortal, what must one's state of mind be?

If you can answer these without looking for something to copy and paste (or even if you do), you will note my answer is in complete agreement with the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Where do you think the disagreement is?
 
I told you before I had a thread on another site where this was debated and Christians like you were flailing and failing. You cannot know this thing you call "God's will" (a dumb concept) so if it is NOT God's "will" all the praying in the world will do nothing. If it IS God's will why do you need to pray for it?
I am not failing. Nor am I the one flailing. If you don't like the word 'will' perhaps God's 'complete plan' will shed a better light for you? As you don't pray, you can't know and experience what can come about through joining with God through prayer. You would simply be a happy hooter that you could claim my prayer was not answered and you would remain blinded by the rest.

Why pray? Why follow Jesus, his Beatitudes, Parables, Commandments?

Contemplate: When someone recommends you see the Caribbean Sea, glaciers in Alaska, meet someone, take a class, taste a wonderful new recipe, are you doing that to benefit the Caribbean, the glaciers, the class you are taking, for the benefit of the new acquaintance or new recipe? No. You do all of that for your own benefit, and some of what I listed may not have any benefit at all to them. God wants my prayers, not to benefit him, so that they may benefit me. And they do.
 
So you think that knowing how to copy and paste a section of the Catechism equates to knowing the entire Catechism? First, when Jesus referenced 'Gehenna' what was that reference point? Second, there is something that occurs when one dies, whether in the state of mortal sin or not. What occurs? Third, for a sin to be mortal, what must one's state of mind be?

If you can answer these without looking for something to copy and paste (or even if you do), you will note my answer is in complete agreement with the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Where do you think the disagreement is?
This is ridiculous, Meriweather. I get the proof and you say I engaged in copy and paste. My PROOF was straight from the Catholic church and not from Atheist Weekly. You insisted that hell was just a separation from your god and that I didn't know what I was talking about because I was not a Catholic. Now, you come up with Gehenna as if I am some dope and didn't know it was a dump[ that was always on fire because of it being a dump.

This is the thing, Meriweather. You have met your match here, and you don't like it because you are used to running roughshod over those who haven't memorized the Bible and learned Hebrew like you have. This is what humans do to control others. They rely on authority figures, and in your case, YOU are the authority figure. You lambast and ridicule me as if I am just some uneducated peon who isn't as knowledgeable as you are like a master would do to a slave to keep him on the farm.

I don't CARE what the CHURCH claims is a mortal sin or not. Catholics don't know what is. I proved to you the existence of eternal torture and a real hell which you said didn't exist and I did it in style....with proof with a link from the source.

Now then, would you like the moral sins that get one into hell? Or would me doing that be met with "Oh, you don't know the correct translation from Hebrew." One of them is not believing your story. The other is adultery and still another is talking smack against the fictional bible God. YOUR church, Meriweather, was ingenious. They were the original cancel culture and so extreme, you would be killed for not agreeing with an authority figure like a priest, bishop, cardinal.
 
This is ridiculous, Meriweather. I get the proof and you say I engaged in copy and paste. My PROOF was straight from the Catholic church and not from Atheist Weekly. You insisted that hell was just a separation from your god and that I didn't know what I was talking about because I was not a Catholic. Now, you come up with Gehenna as if I am some dope and didn't know it was a dump[ that was always on fire because of it being a dump.

This is the thing, Meriweather. You have met your match here, and you don't like it because you are used to running roughshod over those who haven't memorized the Bible and learned Hebrew like you have. This is what humans do to control others. They rely on authority figures, and in your case, YOU are the authority figure. You lambast and ridicule me as if I am just some uneducated peon who isn't as knowledgeable as you are like a master would do to a slave to keep him on the farm.

I don't CARE what the CHURCH claims is a mortal sin or not. Catholics don't know what is. I proved to you the existence of eternal torture and a real hell which you said didn't exist and I did it in style....with proof with a link from the source.

Now then, would you like the moral sins that get one into hell? Or would me doing that be met with "Oh, you don't know the correct translation from Hebrew." One of them is not believing your story. The other is adultery and still another is talking smack against the fictional bible God. YOUR church, Meriweather, was ingenious. They were the original cancel culture and so extreme, you would be killed for not agreeing with an authority figure like a priest, bishop, cardinal.
So you think we are in some kind of match. Interesting.

In regards I haven't the faintest idea where you think I am wrong. You do have the idea that God tortures people in hell, and I don't know how you come up with that. Gehenna fire was also used to describe what happens in the here and now when one is unforgiving towards other. No one is picturing their bodies burning in their city dump when they are holding a grudge against another. It's not an outward physical torturing, it's an eternal burning--one might say a soul-burning, internal burning--and it is a burning one brings upon themselves through their lack of forgiving.

Second, fire is used as a purifier--gold tested in fire. It is the impurities that are burned--and anyone who has had great difficulties ridding themselves of a bad habit knows this as well.

For a sin to be mortal (we learned this in second grade, before our first confession/communion) one must do it with full consent of the will and the knowledge and consent this will separate one from God. Perhaps, when the class was discussing their choices for Confirmation Saint someone spoke of St. Teresa of Avila, who was given a vision of hell, where she was shown the place devils had prepared for her had she chosen a life of vice instead. She described the place devils wanted for her as dark, reptilian, and closed in.

Recall the verse where Jesus warned Peter that Satan had asked to sift all the Apostles like wheat. That is comparing wheat on the threshing floor, where it is tossed into the air so that the chaff drifts away and the wheat falls back to to the floor. A lot of chaff flew off Peter the eve of the crucifixion, but the good remained, and was rescued. Judas...a lot of chaff flew off him as well, but nothing remained to rescue.

If you want to believe God is lying in wait to toss you and others into hell and torture you and others forever--and that is the news you proclaim--you have failed to find God. More sorrowful is that this appears to be what you want God to be like. Why?

And you want to picture me as someone who "lambasts, ridicules, sees you as an uneducated peon" when I don't see you that way at all. I see us as two people sharing and conversing about two different perspectives. Remember that saying that much of what we don't like about another is actually traits we don't like about ourselves? Perhaps what you are actually seeing is the mirror image of yourself lambasting, ridiculing and treating me as an uneducated peon?

If you do want to have a match with someone, I understand there is a place called the "Bull Ring". I don't go there and never will. I'm not here to fight--I'm here to simply exchange differing ideas and perspectives. Yours is quite interesting. I keep think there must be a particular, specific, personal event that gave you this perspective. I would be interested in that as well...what shaped this perspective, what convinced you that you do not want to know God.
 
So you think we are in some kind of match. Interesting.

In regards I haven't the faintest idea where you think I am wrong. You do have the idea that God tortures people in hell, and I don't know how you come up with that. Gehenna fire was also used to describe what happens in the here and now when one is unforgiving towards other. No one is picturing their bodies burning in their city dump when they are holding a grudge against another. It's not an outward physical torturing, it's an eternal burning--one might say a soul-burning, internal burning--and it is a burning one brings upon themselves through their lack of forgiving.

Second, fire is used as a purifier--gold tested in fire. It is the impurities that are burned--and anyone who has had great difficulties ridding themselves of a bad habit knows this as well.

For a sin to be mortal (we learned this in second grade, before our first confession/communion) one must do it with full consent of the will and the knowledge and consent this will separate one from God. Perhaps, when the class was discussing their choices for Confirmation Saint someone spoke of St. Teresa of Avila, who was given a vision of hell, where she was shown the place devils had prepared for her had she chosen a life of vice instead. She described the place devils wanted for her as dark, reptilian, and closed in.

Recall the verse where Jesus warned Peter that Satan had asked to sift all the Apostles like wheat. That is comparing wheat on the threshing floor, where it is tossed into the air so that the chaff drifts away and the wheat falls back to to the floor. A lot of chaff flew off Peter the eve of the crucifixion, but the good remained, and was rescued. Judas...a lot of chaff flew off him as well, but nothing remained to rescue.

If you want to believe God is lying in wait to toss you and others into hell and torture you and others forever--and that is the news you proclaim--you have failed to find God. More sorrowful is that this appears to be what you want God to be like. Why?

And you want to picture me as someone who "lambasts, ridicules, sees you as an uneducated peon" when I don't see you that way at all. I see us as two people sharing and conversing about two different perspectives. Remember that saying that much of what we don't like about another is actually traits we don't like about ourselves? Perhaps what you are actually seeing is the mirror image of yourself lambasting, ridiculing and treating me as an uneducated peon?

If you do want to have a match with someone, I understand there is a place called the "Bull Ring". I don't go there and never will. I'm not here to fight--I'm here to simply exchange differing ideas and perspectives. Yours is quite interesting. I keep think there must be a particular, specific, personal event that gave you this perspective. I would be interested in that as well...what shaped this perspective, what convinced you that you do not want to know God.
My perspective is from being raised by nuns and a very large Catholic family who believed and expected all of us to believe. Many of those who are Catholics did not have the upbringing that I did and believe what they were told by their parents. As I stated even among Catholics there are disagreements about the concept of hell. You previously whitewashed it as being nonexistent and a separation from God. That is not what the Roman Catholics teach and despite you contending that being burned just means a purifying that also is not part of any Roman Catholic teaching about hell I ever heard of.

You seemingly want to paper over church dogma even when I post it straight from the horse's mouth. If they believed what you do they could have and would have said so. Their dogma in writing says that:
"We cannot be united with God unless we freely choose to love him." This is a lie. If someone doesn't believe the story, he is "united" with God. This means he goes to hell. How can someone freely love an entity he doesn't believe in? It's like a cult saying, "Jibfer the all-powerful loves you and wants a relationship but unless you believe what I am saying you are burned for an eternity. This is not my idea. It is what Jibner says."

The Catholic church also says "Jesus often speaks of "Gehenna" of "the unquenchable fire" reserved for those who to the end of their lives refuse to believe and be converted, where both soul and body can be lost." This says you have to believe and convert or you go to hell. Again, a cultish admonition meant to scare people into a belief.

They go on to say that "Jesus solemnly proclaims that he "will send his angels, and they will gather . . . all evildoers, and throw them into the furnace of fire and that he will pronounce the condemnation: "Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire!" Once again, a coercive claim that unless you buy into what the cult says, you suffer eternal agony.

They continue that "The teaching of the Church affirms the existence of hell and its eternity. Immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell, where they suffer the punishments of hell, "eternal fire"

As you can see the Catholic church tries to cover all bases to influence and indoctrinate humans to buy what they are selling. On the one hand, they speak of hell for those who are "evildoers{ (without defining that term), and for those who have committed mortal sins (disagreements on what a mortal sin is), and also for those who refuse to believe. This is to warn people of what is in store for nonbelievers.

There is no doubt that the Catholics preach of a real hell. Being that it is real, God created it as he is the creator. Thus, I have demonstrated that nonbelievers go there according to church dogma. You want to insert your own beliefs into the equation probably to justify the Catholic Church dogma that they just forgot to say that hell COULD be purification by fire.
 
You previously whitewashed it as being nonexistent
You know I did not say hell is nonexistent. Once more an example of you not reading what I write.
How can someone freely love an entity he doesn't believe in?
Love of Law leads to love of God. Love of God leads to love of Law. Have you considered the teaching that one cannot love God if one does not love his/her neighbor. That's a two-way street. Love of one's neighbor also leads to love of God.
There is no doubt that the Catholics preach of a real hell. Being that it is real, God created it as he is the creator. Thus, I have demonstrated that nonbelievers go there according to church dogma. You want to insert your own beliefs into the equation probably to justify the Catholic Church dogma that they just forgot to say that hell COULD be purification by fire.
You forgot the part of the Catechism that states the Church does not know who--if anyone--is in hell. It points out God's ability to reach those the Church fails to reach.
 
LOL. In between these posts I am working on rutting in sprinklers and walkways in my garden which is bigger than the trailer you live in.

You just make claims such as "Faith, like prayer, alters the fabric of our identity such that we seek truth in all things." You have zero proof of that. It is a claim only. This is what believers do. They pretend they are know it alls and have the truth and to prove it they make CLAIMS. Often they use the bible to back up their claims as if the bible isn't also a book of CLAIMS by ignorant moronic tribal warriors who imagined God loved THEM but not the other guys. Kinda like Christians, who imagine Jesus loves them cause they are special; cause they believe and have faith.
I'm sure you think your house isn't just a trailer. Your posts are not the posts of a person who has been successful in life. Your posts show an angry bitter person lashing out against life. I think you are a ticking time bomb waiting to explode.
 
Sorry but faith is for suckers as is prayer.
According to George Washington, you are no patriot.

“Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports...In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens...”

“…And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion...reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.”

George Washington, Farewell Address, Sept 17, 1796,
The Will of the People: Readings in American Democracy (Chicago: Great Books Foundation, 2001), 38.
 
Sorry but faith is for suckers as is prayer.
That's how Karl Marx saw it too.

...in order to charm the golden birds, out of the pockets of his dearly beloved neighbours in Christ. He puts himself at the service of the other’s most depraved fancies, plays the pimp between him and his need, excites in him morbid appetites, lies in wait for each of his weaknesses – all so that he can then demand the cash for this service of love. (Every product is a bait with which to seduce away the other’s very being, his money; every real and possible need is a weakness which will lead the fly to the glue-pot. General exploitation of communal human nature, just as every imperfection in man, is a bond with heaven – an avenue giving the priest access to his heart; every need is an opportunity to approach one’s neighbour under the guise of the utmost amiability and to say to him: Dear friend, I give you what you need, but you know the conditio sine qua non; you know the ink in which you have to sign yourself over to me; in providing for your pleasure, I fleece you.)

Karl Marx
Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844
3rd paragraph
 
Sorry but faith is for suckers as is prayer.
You seem to see eye to eye with Lenin too.

"...The combating of religion cannot be confined to abstract ideological preaching, and it must not be reduced to such preaching. It must be linked up with the concrete practice of the class movement, which aims at eliminating the social roots of religion..." Vladimir Lenin
 
Sorry but faith is for suckers as is prayer.
Congratulations on your militant atheism and being a dupe of socialism and communism.

“Within the philosophical system of Marx and Lenin, and at the heart of their psychology, hatred of God is the principal driving force, more fundamental than all their political and economic pretensions. Militant atheism is not merely incidental or marginal to Communist policy; it is not a side effect, but the central pivot. To achieve its diabolical ends, Communism needs to control a population devoid of religious and national feeling, and this entails the destruction of faith and nationhood. Communists proclaim both of these objectives openly, and just as openly go about carrying them out.”​

Alexsandr Solzhenitsyn1
 
You know I did not say hell is nonexistent. Once more an example of you not reading what I write.

Love of Law leads to love of God. Love of God leads to love of Law. Have you considered the teaching that one cannot love God if one does not love his/her neighbor. That's a two-way street. Love of one's neighbor also leads to love of God.

You forgot the part of the Catechism that states the Church does not know who--if anyone--is in hell. It points out God's ability to reach those the Church fails to reach.
The Catholic Church states the things that get people into hell with nonbelief being one of them. Why do you ignore the truth Meriweather? I just don't get it.
 
15th post
Incorrect. It's an extremely powerful way of being that you know nothing about.
LOL. I was taught by nus and was an altar boy, etc. and I know nothing about prayer.

You know something? I listen to various people who have converted. Some of those are former pastors and priests who have successful YouTube channels and others are people who were devout and preached it to anyone who would listen. They also were told by many people that they didn't know prayer or Christianity.

For your further education, you should look up the "No true Scotsman" fallacy, confirmation bias, Identity Protection Cognition, and Spiritual Bypassing.
 
According to George Washington, you are no patriot.

“Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports...In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens...”

“…And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion...reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.”

George Washington, Farewell Address, Sept 17, 1796,
The Will of the People: Readings in American Democracy (Chicago: Great Books Foundation, 2001), 38.
WTF does George have to do with me?

Oh, wait! You are using someone "in authority" and because he was I must believe him, just like you believe priests.
 
I'm sure you think your house isn't just a trailer. Your posts are not the posts of a person who has been successful in life. Your posts show an angry bitter person lashing out against life. I think you are a ticking time bomb waiting to explode.
Uh huh. This is another way for believers to avoid facing truth.
 
That's how Karl Marx saw it too.

...in order to charm the golden birds, out of the pockets of his dearly beloved neighbours in Christ. He puts himself at the service of the other’s most depraved fancies, plays the pimp between him and his need, excites in him morbid appetites, lies in wait for each of his weaknesses – all so that he can then demand the cash for this service of love. (Every product is a bait with which to seduce away the other’s very being, his money; every real and possible need is a weakness which will lead the fly to the glue-pot. General exploitation of communal human nature, just as every imperfection in man, is a bond with heaven – an avenue giving the priest access to his heart; every need is an opportunity to approach one’s neighbour under the guise of the utmost amiability and to say to him: Dear friend, I give you what you need, but you know the conditio sine qua non; you know the ink in which you have to sign yourself over to me; in providing for your pleasure, I fleece you.)

Karl Marx
Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844
3rd paragraph
I am the most staunch conservative around and the notions Karl Marx had about economics and politicos were wrong. But I agree with his quote you used. Give me your evidence of why you say he's wrong.

Oh, WAIT! You don't do evidence.
 
Back
Top Bottom