Where do you stand on State succession?

[kaz]

Spell it 'secession', and we can go from there.

Any state can leave the Union, provided the other states approve.

Won't happen.

So the poll wasn't about a state being successful? lmao j/k

Yes, it is. Those who secede are the most likely to succeed!

 

[thanatos144]

Spell it 'secession', and we can go from there.

Any state can leave the Union, provided the other states approve.

Won't happen.

So the poll wasn't about a state being successful? lmao j/k

Yes, it is. Those who secede are the most likely to succeed!

How well did the confederate states do again?

tapatalk post

 

[oreo]

Spell it 'secession', and we can go from there.

Any state can leave the Union, provided the other states approve.

Won't happen.

Fuck their approval. Who says the federal government would allow it even if they did approve?

Nothing in the Constitution says a state can't secede. Even if it did, I would say the Constitution has no authority to tell states they can't secede.

The theory that state have no right to secede is just plain bunk.

The problems associating with secession are overwhelming--because the Federal Government is into so much. Social Security/Medicare/Federal highway funds--(our freeways, etc.) Now whether or not the state is willing to take on all that cost--is another question. If so--then yes states should be able to succeed the union if the constituents of that state vote to do so.

But--I really don't see that happening any time soon.

 

[kaz]

So the poll wasn't about a state being successful? lmao j/k

Yes, it is. Those who secede are the most likely to succeed!

How well did the confederate states do again?

tapatalk post

They lost the war and didn't secede. You may have heard, it was in all the news.

 

[bucs90]

I 100% support "state succession". I'd love to see all our states succeed and do well.

But "secession"? Not, I'm not for that.

And thankfully, the trend is right wingers who don't know the difference wont be elected much in the future.

 

[Iceweasel]

I 100% support "state succession". I'd love to see all our states succeed and do well.

But "secession"? Not, I'm not for that.

And thankfully, the trend is right wingers who don't know the difference wont be elected much in the future.

What trend?

 

[thanatos144]

Yes, it is. Those who secede are the most likely to succeed!

How well did the confederate states do again?

tapatalk post

They lost the war and didn't secede. You may have heard, it was in all the news.

That's the point

tapatalk post

 

[The T]

For most of my life, I could not have contemplated the idea that I would support such a thing. But the curve of the country towards socialism and away from liberty is so steep that I would now not only embrace the idea, but move to a State that secession. What say you?

First of all I would look at the Ninth and Tenth Amendments and see how the power of the imperial Federal government has run roughshod over them both...and go from there.

IX: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.​

​

X: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people.​

 

[boilermaker55]

Spoken like a true neo-con(teaparty) even when you know you are completely wrong....never admit it. That is a good way to learn. Educate oneself before being so adamant about your ideology.
But then again!!?

Spell it 'secession', and we can go from there.

Any state can leave the Union, provided the other states approve.

Won't happen.

In this country now you have to secede to succeed! And that's a non answer, the question is what do you support. As if I don't know the answer of a big government "conservative." But I do like the formality.

 

[kaz]

Spoken like a true neo-con(teaparty) even when you know you are completely wrong....never admit it. That is a good way to learn. Educate oneself before being so adamant about your ideology.
But then again!!?

Spell it 'secession', and we can go from there.

Any state can leave the Union, provided the other states approve.

Won't happen.

In this country now you have to secede to succeed! And that's a non answer, the question is what do you support. As if I don't know the answer of a big government "conservative." But I do like the formality.

First of all, how am I not admitting that I made a mistake? You want me to wail and cry and prostrate myself? I think the fact that I'm joking about it shows I don't have a stick up my ass like you do and is fully acknowledging my spelling mistake. You on the other hand are a troll focusing on spelling mistakes.

Second of all, you're a retard. Neocons and tea partiers are contradictory. Tea partiers are fiscal conservatives and neocons are fiscal liberals. Neocons think the wars are the priority and tea parties think they're not. It's not possible to be a neocon/tea partier.

I'm against government spending and I am against the wars in the middle east. I am not a neocon in any aspect. But you call me a neocon because you're too butt stupid to know that words have meanings and actually use those meanings. You don't like neocons even though you vote for them and you don't like tea partiers. They are "bad." And bad is as deep as your limited intelligence grasps. I am directly contradictory to neocon. Calling me a tea partier isn't as stupid because my views aren't as contradictory to theirs, but it's a movement that I don't belong to and as a libertarian I am far more anti-government than they are.

 

[The T]

Spoken like a true neo-con(teaparty) even when you know you are completely wrong....never admit it. That is a good way to learn. Educate oneself before being so adamant about your ideology.
But then again!!?

Spell it 'secession', and we can go from there.

Any state can leave the Union, provided the other states approve.

Won't happen.

In this country now you have to secede to succeed! And that's a non answer, the question is what do you support. As if I don't know the answer of a big government "conservative." But I do like the formality.

OK smartass...EDUCATE US? WHERE he is wrong? Be specific.

 

[kaz]

Spoken like a true neo-con(teaparty) even when you know you are completely wrong....never admit it. That is a good way to learn. Educate oneself before being so adamant about your ideology.
But then again!!?

In this country now you have to secede to succeed! And that's a non answer, the question is what do you support. As if I don't know the answer of a big government "conservative." But I do like the formality.

OK smartass...EDUCATE US? WHERE he is wrong? Be specific.

He thinks my joking about my spelling mistake means I am not admitting I spelled the word wrong. He's trolling.

 

[kaz]

How well did the confederate states do again?

tapatalk post

They lost the war and didn't secede. You may have heard, it was in all the news.

That's the point

tapatalk post

I think it's hilarious how liberals show what trolls you are by endlessly harping on spelling. Your ideas are inane, illogical and unsupported by empirical data. So when someone hands you a spelling mistake to go after, you go back to the well over and over so you can deflect from how inane what you think is and how stupid you look every time you defend it.

OK, you got me in a spelling mistake. Wow, OMG, now I get why we need Marxism. You won, it's over. I can no longer support liberty or freedom because I spelled a word wrong. Are you happy now?

 

[The T]

I 100% support "state succession". I'd love to see all our states succeed and do well.

But "secession"? Not, I'm not for that.

And thankfully, the trend is right wingers who don't know the difference wont be elected much in the future.

Did it ever occur to YOU that the STATES and THE PEOPLE are their own sovereigns?

 

[thanatos144]

They lost the war and didn't secede. You may have heard, it was in all the news.

That's the point

tapatalk post

I think it's hilarious how liberals show what trolls you are by endlessly harping on spelling. Your ideas are inane, illogical and unsupported by empirical data. So when someone hands you a spelling mistake to go after, you go back to the well over and over so you can deflect from how inane what you think is and how stupid you look every time you defend it.

OK, you got me in a spelling mistake. Wow, OMG, now I get why we need Marxism. You won, it's over. I can no longer support liberty or freedom because I spelled a word wrong. Are you happy now?

Not liberal. Nor does not wanting to start another civil war like certain spoiled children make me one

tapatalk post

 

[JWBooth]

I 100% support "state succession". I'd love to see all our states succeed and do well.

But "secession"? Not, I'm not for that.

And thankfully, the trend is right wingers who don't know the difference wont be elected much in the future.

Did it ever occur to YOU that the STATES and THE PEOPLE are their own sovereigns?

That is just WAY too originalist.

 

[thanatos144]

Someone tell the man with the traitorous name he is on ignore

tapatalk post

 

[Mustang]

I'm all for success and succeeding.

 

[Mad_Cabbie]

Anyone wants to seceed, please do. Bye! I'll miss you. take your bullshit with you and anything you want to carry - all debts are forgiven. We will even continue your medicade for the next 20 years.

Not kidding - this is a great idea. Once you're gone, though, you stay gone.

No coming back ... ever.

Now, GTFO.

 

[Rozman]

More power should be given to the states.
And if the power is already there the Federal government needs to back off.