How do wealthier people stop you from achieving success?
By keeping us in
debt Gator
By lobbying special interest legislation(s) that
only big $$$ can comply with
By monopolizing through political channels
only big $$ has access to
~S~
Lets assume your conspiracy theories are more than theory...
explain how your ability to achieve has been hindered by those who may be lobbying legislators and monopolizing through political channels.
explain this>>>
~S~
haha...you poor twisted fuckers...you should know that wealth is not "DISTRIBUTED"
Wealth is created / generated....start there.
In the meantime, shove you LefTarded beggar videos up your ass.
haha...you poor twisted fuckers...you should know that wealth is not "DISTRIBUTED"
Wealth is created / generated....start there.
In the meantime, shove you LefTarded beggar videos up your ass.
Capitalist markets distribute goods and services based on ability to pay; are you smart enough to perceive any alternatives?
NationStates • View topic - "From each according to his ability......"
There is no such thing as a "capitalist" market in the term you're using, except in abstraction, that's effectively an anarchist argument - and the idea that the nature of an "anarchy" would be capitalist in that sense, unless everyone was an angel who agreed only to voluntarily exchange with others, as opposed to dominate or take things by force, is as utopian as Marxism.
I used to sympathies with the anarchist persuasion, since it was grounded on pure ideals of non-violence and voluntary cooperation, but I eventually accepted that some level of government is necessary due to the evil nature of man, and that anarchists were hypocrites - engaging in aggression to support their ideal of "non-aggression", with "non-aggression" being more or less physically impossible (given that at best, one could minimize aggression, but even using fighting words on the internet, or speaking in a public place in which sound waves aggress on others' ears without consent, are still minute forms of "aggression").
For that matter, I asked the anarchists why they voluntarily participate in government, and their response is that they were afraid of being killed if they left and founded their on voluntary society (which by the same logic, would mean that anyone "depending" on government to any extent is doing the same thing, or that one could easily argue that an association isn't "voluntary" if "the only alternative" is dying). They were also wrong, since there are groups of people such as "Freegans" who do find legal ways to voluntarily "go of the grid".
In addition to that, the anarchists would merely lie, use false dichotomies, or post false information, such as claiming that America's government was "totalitarian" or had become "socialist" (when in reality, if one is an anarchist, then they are anti-American, and the government was always "totalitarian" and socialist by that dishonest definition - in reality It is a Constructional government with checks and balances to prevent power consolidation, not a totalitarian or "tyranny", in which a ruler or monarch has unrestricted power).