Grumblenuts
Gold Member
- Oct 16, 2017
- 16,059
- 5,536
- 210
Unsubstantiated "FActs"!70% of all billionaires started out poorWhat evidence do you have to support your alleged facts?FActsHow did you arrive at that idiocy?Trickle down created them
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unsubstantiated "FActs"!70% of all billionaires started out poorWhat evidence do you have to support your alleged facts?FActsHow did you arrive at that idiocy?Trickle down created them
70% of all billionaires started out poorWhat evidence do you have to support your alleged facts?FActsHow did you arrive at that idiocy?Trickle down created them
39 year-old punk thinks he's in The Big Club or something, LMAOI like the inequality. Poor people like you make me feel better about myself. Thanks.
Then you'll be in heaven when the dollar crashes.....
~S~
"Most typically these debates take the market distribution of income as a given, and then ask the extent to which we might want to redistribute to have less inequality...."
FactsinaugurationWhat evidence do you have to support your alleged facts?FActsHow did you arrive at that idiocy?
Liar
Unsubstantiated "FActs"!70% of all billionaires started out poorWhat evidence do you have to support your alleged facts?FActsHow did you arrive at that idiocy?Trickle down created them
Look it upFactsinaugurationWhat evidence do you have to support your alleged facts?
Liar
Liar. Back it up. Provide that data.
Otherwise it is just one more in a long line of lies from you.
Do the richest among us owe their wealth to hard work and high IQs or government monopolies like patents and copyrights, minimum wage laws, or campaign finance contributions?
Should We Have Billionaires?
"The basic story is that if we have a market economy, some people can get very rich.
"If we buy the right-wing story, the super-rich got their money from their great contribution to society.
"If we look at it with clearer eyes, the super-rich got their money because we structured the economy in a way that allowed them to get super-rich..."
"This is a point which seems very obvious, but for some reason is largely ignored in policy debates.
"Most typically these debates take the market distribution of income as a given, and then ask the extent to which we might want to redistribute to have less inequality...."
"But it is completely absurd to treat the market distribution of income as given.
"The market is incredibly flexible and it can literally be structured in an infinite number of different ways."
Instead of arguing over a redistribution of income, restructure markets in such a way that vast private fortunes never come into existence in the first place.
Just think about how much better your life could have been if you spent as much time working to better yourself as you do bitching about how you failed
Is this an example of your definition of success?ust think about how much better your life could have been if you spent as much time working to better yourself as you do bitching about how you failed
I like the inequality. Poor people like you make me feel better about myself. Thanks.You’re a jealous little piggy aren’t you? Asshole.Do the richest among us owe their wealth to hard work and high IQs or government monopolies like patents and copyrights, minimum wage laws, or campaign finance contributions?
Should We Have Billionaires?
"The basic story is that if we have a market economy, some people can get very rich.
"If we buy the right-wing story, the super-rich got their money from their great contribution to society.
"If we look at it with clearer eyes, the super-rich got their money because we structured the economy in a way that allowed them to get super-rich..."
"This is a point which seems very obvious, but for some reason is largely ignored in policy debates.
"Most typically these debates take the market distribution of income as a given, and then ask the extent to which we might want to redistribute to have less inequality...."
"But it is completely absurd to treat the market distribution of income as given.
"The market is incredibly flexible and it can literally be structured in an infinite number of different ways."
Instead of arguing over a redistribution of income, restructure markets in such a way that vast private fortunes never come into existence in the first place.![]()
The Rising Costs of U.S. Income Inequality | HuffPost
Do the richest among us owe their wealth to hard work and high IQs or government monopolies like patents and copyrights, minimum wage laws, or campaign finance contributions?
Should We Have Billionaires?
"The basic story is that if we have a market economy, some people can get very rich.
"If we buy the right-wing story, the super-rich got their money from their great contribution to society.
"If we look at it with clearer eyes, the super-rich got their money because we structured the economy in a way that allowed them to get super-rich..."
"This is a point which seems very obvious, but for some reason is largely ignored in policy debates.
"Most typically these debates take the market distribution of income as a given, and then ask the extent to which we might want to redistribute to have less inequality...."
"But it is completely absurd to treat the market distribution of income as given.
"The market is incredibly flexible and it can literally be structured in an infinite number of different ways."
Instead of arguing over a redistribution of income, restructure markets in such a way that vast private fortunes never come into existence in the first place.
Just think about how much better your life could have been if you spent as much time working to better yourself as you do bitching about how you failedIs this an example of your definition of success?ust think about how much better your life could have been if you spent as much time working to better yourself as you do bitching about how you failed
Should We Have Billionaires?
"One of the ways people get very wealthy is finance is by buying or selling stocks or commodities a short time ahead of the market, thereby pocketing large profits.
"It’s pretty hard to see the contribution to society in this story.
"Their actions mean, for example, that GE’s stock price may adjust to new information about its profits five or ten minutes earlier than might otherwise have been the case.
"The benefit to the economy from this faster adjustment is essentially zero. These high rollers’ profits come at the expense of ordinary traders who are less informed."
Do the richest among us owe their wealth to hard work and high IQs or government monopolies like patents and copyrights, minimum wage laws, or campaign finance contributions?
Should We Have Billionaires?
"The basic story is that if we have a market economy, some people can get very rich.
"If we buy the right-wing story, the super-rich got their money from their great contribution to society.
"If we look at it with clearer eyes, the super-rich got their money because we structured the economy in a way that allowed them to get super-rich..."
"This is a point which seems very obvious, but for some reason is largely ignored in policy debates.
"Most typically these debates take the market distribution of income as a given, and then ask the extent to which we might want to redistribute to have less inequality...."
"But it is completely absurd to treat the market distribution of income as given.
"The market is incredibly flexible and it can literally be structured in an infinite number of different ways."
Instead of arguing over a redistribution of income, restructure markets in such a way that vast private fortunes never come into existence in the first place.
Just think about how much better your life could have been if you spent as much time working to better yourself as you do bitching about how you failedIs this an example of your definition of success?ust think about how much better your life could have been if you spent as much time working to better yourself as you do bitching about how you failed
Should We Have Billionaires?
"One of the ways people get very wealthy is finance is by buying or selling stocks or commodities a short time ahead of the market, thereby pocketing large profits.
"It’s pretty hard to see the contribution to society in this story.
"Their actions mean, for example, that GE’s stock price may adjust to new information about its profits five or ten minutes earlier than might otherwise have been the case.
"The benefit to the economy from this faster adjustment is essentially zero. These high rollers’ profits come at the expense of ordinary traders who are less informed."
So you are saying they are all committing insider trading? That is illegal and if so they will be prosecuted. Maybe they follow the trends and use their knowledge of the news to make trades. They win some and lose some. Most money is made by long term holds, not day trading. Guess who is benefitting from the long term holds.
Not such a difficult phrase to interpret.."One of the ways
Not so hard either..an example of
If people get a lot of money from markets, did they get rich from making great contributions to society or did they prosper because society structured the markets in ways that allowed them to get super rich?People might become billionaires for any number of reasons. But in general it's because people gave them a lot of money.
If people get a lot of money from markets, did they get rich from making great contributions to society or did they prosper because society structured the markets in ways that allowed them to get super rich?People might become billionaires for any number of reasons. But in general it's because people gave them a lot of money.
As Tulsi says, we must first agree on the problem, then we can discuss what best to do about it.