When You've Lost Snopes.......

[PK1]

They attack Trump for all the qualities that Hillary exhibited in spades.

What qualities did Hillary exhibit that compare to Trump?

Well, the compare to Trump only in the sense that you can compare the size of an elephant to the size of a shrew.

Hillary is a pathological liar. Virtually everything she says is a lie. Furthermore, she's a crook. She ran a criminal enterprise in full public view while she was secretary of state. she's married to a sexual predator.

What can you say about Hillary that makes her look good?

Wow, talk about confirmation bias!
You take the cake!
Trump is clearly the biggest lying president of all time.

 

[PK1]

Loony left even too loony for Snopes.
The lies of Donald Trump's critics, and how they shape his many personas.

Glad you referenced Snopes!
Shows how confirmation bias works both ways politically.
Bottom line:
Both Demos & Repubs exhibit emotional biases & cherry pick their "news".
It takes Independent thought with critical thinking skills to objectively evaluate claims, as is modeled by science.
Unfortunately for Repubs, as a whole, they have less respect for science, and exploit their religious voter base.

BWAHAHAHAHA!!

Man, you are funny.

Snowflakes don't even know what science is. They prove that with their constant bleating about "consensus," as if the truth was determine by majority vote.

What are you blabbering about?

See, I knew you didn't understand the slightest thing about science.

Can you be less specific? LOL!

 

[Edgetho]

One thing that is a constant with libturds -- They lie. Always. Constantly, consistently and without letting up.

You catch them in one lie, prove they're lying and they simply drop it and move onto another lie.

The Lies of Donald Trump's Critics, and How They Shape His Many Personas

The entire episode is a remarkable example of something bordering on collective hallucination, most likely brought on by confirmation bias. Here hundreds of thousands of people - including professional journalists working for influential news organizations, and a chat show host with more than three million nightly viewers - literally heard Trump say something he never said, in most cases probably because it confirmed a pre-existing image of the President as a poorly read, culturally ignorant buffoon.

 

[TheDude]

It's cuz they're butt-hurt, never mind intellectually dishonest. Should be noted Snopes is owned by liberals.

 

[mamooth]

Whenever a Trumptard make a weepy butthurt thread like this one, an angel gets his wings.

 

[Syriusly]

One thing that is a constant with libturds -- They lie. Always. Constantly, consistently and without letting up.

You catch them in one lie, prove they're lying and they simply drop it and move onto another lie.

The Lies of Donald Trump's Critics, and How They Shape His Many Personas

The entire episode is a remarkable example of something bordering on collective hallucination, most likely brought on by confirmation bias. Here hundreds of thousands of people - including professional journalists working for influential news organizations, and a chat show host with more than three million nightly viewers - literally heard Trump say something he never said, in most cases probably because it confirmed a pre-existing image of the President as a poorly read, culturally ignorant buffoon.

But...but....the Trumpsters say Snopes is nothing but lies!

LOL

Frankly just reaffirms Snopes accuracy as far as I am concern.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Loony left even too loony for Snopes.
The lies of Donald Trump's critics, and how they shape his many personas.

Glad you referenced Snopes!
Shows how confirmation bias works both ways politically.
Bottom line:
Both Demos & Repubs exhibit emotional biases & cherry pick their "news".
It takes Independent thought with critical thinking skills to objectively evaluate claims, as is modeled by science.
Unfortunately for Repubs, as a whole, they have less respect for science, and exploit their religious voter base.

Good parrot.
Dumbass.

 

[Weatherman2020]

They attack Trump for all the qualities that Hillary exhibited in spades.

What qualities did Hillary exhibit that compare to Trump?

Well, the compare to Trump only in the sense that you can compare the size of an elephant to the size of a shrew.

Hillary is a pathological liar. Virtually everything she says is a lie. Furthermore, she's a crook. She ran a criminal enterprise in full public view while she was secretary of state. she's married to a sexual predator.

What can you say about Hillary that makes her look good?

The left have zero self awareness.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Snopes is dead and nobody uses it unless they want a good laugh. Self inflicted fatal wounds to itself.

Fact-Checking Snopes: Website's Political 'Fact-Checker' Is Just A Liberal Blogger

 

[usmbguest5318]

The OP must not have read the whole article. The central theme of the article is something that should not need ever be said: context is everything.

From the article:

• It has to be acknowledged that since January, many of Trump’s opponents, and even lukewarm supporters, have found considerable fault with his policies and behavior, based on accurate facts. There have been many occasions when Trump himself, undistorted and unfiltered, contributed mightily to the four personas we have outlined.
  -- Donald Trump: International Embarrassment
  -- Trump the Tyrant
  -- Donald Trump: Bully baby
  -- Trump the Buffoon.
  Some of these claims are downright fake, entirely fabricated by unreliable or dubious web sites and presented as satire, or otherwise blatantly false.
• [...] these sorts of massive exaggerations and gross distortions are even more corrosive and destructive than fake news about diarrhea on the golf course [...]

Context matters in analyzing Trump's remarks and behavior. It also matters in deriding it. MacGuill presents and example of that.

The president’s plan to scrap the Community Development Block Grant [CDG] was real, and could very reasonably be expected to have significant consequences across a number of services and programs, including Meals on Wheels. All this is true, but it makes it no less false and no more acceptable to claim, on this basis, that he had singled out Meals on Wheels for elimination. He had not.​

It's one thing to deride Trump's CDG policy because of its impact on Meals on Wheels; however, demonstrative evidence or a sound inferential argument must be presented to substantiate the claim that he wants to specifically eliminate Meals on Wheels. One must be a sound thinker in order to constrain one's remarks to what can be cogently supported.

Now here's a key observation: neither liberals nor conservatives have stronger hold on irrational inference and/or paltering. Many members of both groups are amply willing to ignore context when considering myriad matters. It's inane regardless of who does so.

 

[martybegan]

Well, Shit. It must be a balmy 32 degrees in hell and porcine aeronautics are in full display.

The Lies of Donald Trump's Critics, and How They Shape His Many Personas

There are many articles that exist detailing lies and misleading claims made by the Trump administration. This article is intended as a neutral, reliable analysis of the lies, false allegations and misleading claims made about and against Donald Trump since his inauguration in January 2017. We’ve attempted to strip away the hyperbole, name-calling and generalizations, and examine the patterns and trends at work: what characterizes these lies and exaggerations, the effect they have, what might explain them.

Broadly speaking, most of the falsehoods levelled against Trump fall into one or more of four categories, each of them drawing from and feeding into four public personas inhabited by the President.

They are:

• Donald Trump: International Embarrassment
• Trump the Tyrant
• Donald Trump: Bully baby
• Trump the Buffoon.

Indeed, in many instances the false claims against him carry a grain of truth. The president’s plan to scrap the Community Development Block Grant was real, and could very reasonably be expected to have significant consequences across a number of services and programs, including Meals on Wheels. All this is true, but it makes it no less false and no more acceptable to claim, on this basis, that he had singled out Meals on Wheels for elimination. He had not.

In some ways, these sorts of massive exaggerations and gross distortions are even more corrosive and destructive than fake news about diarrhea on the golf course, because they bear some distant relationship with the truth.

 

[S.J.]

Damage control. They know they're becoming a joke so they have to say something honest.

 

[Ted Frazier]

Loony left even too loony for Snopes.


The lies of Donald Trump's critics, and how they shape his many personas.

Your thread backfired. Snopes debunks false claim that a man committed suicide before testifying in a Clinton-related probe. When You've Lost Snopes.......

Now you have to call Snopes poopyheads again. Haha.