You listing a bunch of rather vague claims, not policies.
Let’s take one: doing nothing about ”ramping” shootings. Presumably this refers to Chicago. I always have to laugh at your (as in rightists) fixation on Chicago as “the most violent city” yet it isn’t even in the top five.
You may want to exercise caution if you're thinking of traveling to one of the following 25 cities in the US!
www.escapehere.com
Detroit
Memphis
Birmingham
Baltimore
St Louis
In fact, on this list of ten most dangerous cities, Chicago isn’t on it, but the above five are:
10 Most Dangerous Cities in America | SafeWise
Among the 25 most dangerous cities are these two led by Republican mayors:
Beaumont, TX, Tulsa Oklahoma,
Chicago is not on the list.
The vast majority however have Democrat mayors.
Among the safest cities are these
https://www.usnews.com/news/cities/...looks-at-the-safest-cities-in-america?slide=2 - half of them Dem.
There are a lot of reasons for increased violence in cities: economic opportunities, employment, drugs, community investment, rates of home ownership, size and population density...yet you made a general claim: doing nothing about shootings in a city that even in the top tier of violence.