You can't exploit the workers, if they start working together.
Sounds like socialism

Tell me friend, are you a socialist?
Collective bargaining is not socialism.
Sure it is....Collective.....Get it?
BTW, the more accurate term is collective coercion.
Keep spewing bullshit. Collective bargaining is coercion? What a ******* idiot.
Yes it is.....When unions were in their hey day, not only did the collectives have numbers, they also had....now pay close attention....The support of the community at large. Union labor at its peak claimed roughly 35% of Americans
The union bosses spoiled that. They wrecked themselves by demanding too much. Unions got greedy. And with the advent of international competition, unions failed to adjust. Unions exploited their members to make a point. So many businesses had to close their doors. Did it affect the supply of those goods and services? No. Once union bosses began costing jobs, they lost the support of the community. That was the beginning of the steady decline of organized labor.
Unions have become so unpopular that it is nearly impossible for unions to even get a meeting with an employer or the employees. No one want to deal with them.
Anarchists? What do they do...Go to the G * and G 20 Summits, turn over and set afire a few cars, throw flaming bags of dog shit around the streets? And have accomplished what?
I can tell you one goal. Anarchists succeeded in letting the rest of know they they are a bunch of lazy unkempt non working scum buckets that would live in their own piss and shit just to prove their are outside of the "establishment"...
Ya wanna know why the largest and most recent anarchist movement failed so miserably? Humor. We laughed at those idiot OWS jagoffs.