1. No felonies were committed against him.
FISA judges have approved 99.8% of all warrant applications. Their approval of these warrants only proves how corrupt the FISA court process is.
You’re a ******* idiot. Witch hunt. Lol.
You deal strictly in conspiracy theories because not one thing you have said has been verified by any reliable valid sources. Not one.
If you are going to call names, please try your best to sound intelligent.
he did get justice, nutter butter. he got a guilty plea.
and he sure thought he committed a crime or he wouldn't have taken a plea, wackadoodle.
If you are going to call names, please try your best to sound intelligent.
he did get justice, nutter butter. he got a guilty plea.
and he sure thought he committed a crime or he wouldn't have taken a plea, wackadoodle.
If you are going to call names, please try your best to sound intelligent.
he did get justice, nutter butter. he got a guilty plea.
and he sure thought he committed a crime or he wouldn't have taken a plea, wackadoodle.
If you are going to call names, please try your best to sound intelligent.
he did get justice, nutter butter. he got a guilty plea.
and he sure thought he committed a crime or he wouldn't have taken a plea, wackadoodle.
What is not lintelligent about not letting people like him (and apparently you) make up insane nonsense?
Again, Flynn already took a plea. There was nothing illegal in obtaining that plea except in the delusional minds of trump worshippers.
So next time you interject, perhaps you should make sure you actually have something to say.
Thanks.
If you are going to call names, please try your best to sound intelligent.
he did get justice, nutter butter. he got a guilty plea.
and he sure thought he committed a crime or he wouldn't have taken a plea, wackadoodle.
If you are going to call names, please try your best to sound intelligent.
he did get justice, nutter butter. he got a guilty plea.
and he sure thought he committed a crime or he wouldn't have taken a plea, wackadoodle.
What is not lintelligent about not letting people like him (and apparently you) make up insane nonsense?
Again, Flynn already took a plea. There was nothing illegal in obtaining that plea except in the delusional minds of trump worshippers.
So next time you interject, perhaps you should make sure you actually have something to say.
Thanks.
Again, I ask the same question----------->
The government had access to everything Trump because of the Carter Paige FISA warrants. According to LAW, if someone has a FISA warrant on them, the FBI has the legal right to monitor anyone they communicate with 2 hops out. It used to be 3, which meant that if you had 40 distinctly separate people you communicated with, that meant the FBI had access to 1.2 MILLION distinctly, separate people. At 2 hops, I would assume that drops to around 3 to 400,000! And so, all anyone from the campaign had to do was e-mail, or call him one time for ANY reason, and the whole campaign could be surveilled!
Why?
Because Carter Paige is the source of the warrant. 1 hop would be someone from the campaign e-mailing or calling Paige. Hop 2 would be anyone within the campaign that the person IN the campaign corresponded with, meaning basically everyone. And if the e-mail or call was NOT personal but from someone doing campaign business, then the campaign would be seen as an entity, meaning the whole campaign and its dealings would then be subject under FISA.
So what is the point?
They already have everything, meaning the FBI. They already know what happened. They have access to phone, e-mail, texts, computers, EVERYTHING. What more does the FBI need? Look how easy it was to catch the coosome-twosome, Ohr and his wife, Strozk, Mcabe, and the rest of the crew over there. And yet, with all the evidence on TAPE. With all the evidence in writing. With all the computer evidence. And I am sure they have everyones income tax returns also. With all the transcripts, what have they gotten? Process crimes, nothing else, and not a whiff on the President!
How much evidence do they need?
Tell everyone here------->with everything they have, the only thing they could NOT have is............Trump personally sending an envoy under his direction, to collude with Russia. That is it, because anything done under communication is already in their possession. So if that is the case, then Leftists, tell us, WHO did Trump send for the meeting-) It wasn't him, lol, so it had to be someone else, AND since there is no electronic record whatsoever or Trump or that person would already be indicted, that means you better start figuring out who that shadowy figure is, lol!
If you are going to call names, please try your best to sound intelligent.
he did get justice, nutter butter. he got a guilty plea.
and he sure thought he committed a crime or he wouldn't have taken a plea, wackadoodle.
If you are going to call names, please try your best to sound intelligent.
he did get justice, nutter butter. he got a guilty plea.
and he sure thought he committed a crime or he wouldn't have taken a plea, wackadoodle.
What is not lintelligent about not letting people like him (and apparently you) make up insane nonsense?
Again, Flynn already took a plea. There was nothing illegal in obtaining that plea except in the delusional minds of trump worshippers.
So next time you interject, perhaps you should make sure you actually have something to say.
Thanks.
Again, I ask the same question----------->
The government had access to everything Trump because of the Carter Paige FISA warrants. According to LAW, if someone has a FISA warrant on them, the FBI has the legal right to monitor anyone they communicate with 2 hops out. It used to be 3, which meant that if you had 40 distinctly separate people you communicated with, that meant the FBI had access to 1.2 MILLION distinctly, separate people. At 2 hops, I would assume that drops to around 3 to 400,000! And so, all anyone from the campaign had to do was e-mail, or call him one time for ANY reason, and the whole campaign could be surveilled!
Why?
Because Carter Paige is the source of the warrant. 1 hop would be someone from the campaign e-mailing or calling Paige. Hop 2 would be anyone within the campaign that the person IN the campaign corresponded with, meaning basically everyone. And if the e-mail or call was NOT personal but from someone doing campaign business, then the campaign would be seen as an entity, meaning the whole campaign and its dealings would then be subject under FISA.
So what is the point?
They already have everything, meaning the FBI. They already know what happened. They have access to phone, e-mail, texts, computers, EVERYTHING. What more does the FBI need? Look how easy it was to catch the coosome-twosome, Ohr and his wife, Strozk, Mcabe, and the rest of the crew over there. And yet, with all the evidence on TAPE. With all the evidence in writing. With all the computer evidence. And I am sure they have everyones income tax returns also. With all the transcripts, what have they gotten? Process crimes, nothing else, and not a whiff on the President!
How much evidence do they need?
Tell everyone here------->with everything they have, the only thing they could NOT have is............Trump personally sending an envoy under his direction, to collude with Russia. That is it, because anything done under communication is already in their possession. So if that is the case, then Leftists, tell us, WHO did Trump send for the meeting-) It wasn't him, lol, so it had to be someone else, AND since there is no electronic record whatsoever or Trump or that person would already be indicted, that means you better start figuring out who that shadowy figure is, lol!
you shouldn't assume that.
No one is going to go for the big fish unless they know they can beat him ten times over. That is how federal prosecutions work. Watergate took two years of meticulously building a case. This one has only been going on for months... and months where the White House and it's cronies have done nothing but try to keep things from going forward. you have no clue what they have and what they don't have. we know Bannon has said there is no way that don jr didn't go from the Russia meeting into Donald's office. and you don't know what else he said when he spoke with mueller this week.
the other things you don't know...
what testimony Flynn exchanged for his deal
what testimony Papadopoulos exchanged for his deal
what testimony Rick gates will give for the deal he is close to taking
assume Gates' testimony will put Manafort away for a very long time...
what position does that put Manafort in and who does he give up to save his butt
I'll also point out that obstruction of justice is a crime in and of itself. And there are a lot of people who already think that Donald can be nailed on that. It is the charge that made Nixon walk away and the one that was the first article of impeachment when the GOP went after Clinton.
I have a lot to say but one thing I will not do is make myself sound like a total idiot. I’ll research the facts first unlike you. You want to ignore the facts... I only worship God not Trump. However, I do support him. He is for America unlike you..If you are going to call names, please try your best to sound intelligent.
he did get justice, nutter butter. he got a guilty plea.
and he sure thought he committed a crime or he wouldn't have taken a plea, wackadoodle.
What is not lintelligent about not letting people like him (and apparently you) make up insane nonsense?
Again, Flynn already took a plea. There was nothing illegal in obtaining that plea except in the delusional minds of trump worshippers.
So next time you interject, perhaps you should make sure you actually have something to say.
Thanks.
There are no facts. There is NOTHING. There have been Six Investigations all concluding there is NO COLLUSION!I have a lot to say but one thing I will not do is make myself sound like a total idiot. I’ll research the facts first unlike you. You want to ignore the facts... I only worship God not Trump. However, I do support him. He is for America unlike you..If you are going to call names, please try your best to sound intelligent.
he did get justice, nutter butter. he got a guilty plea.
and he sure thought he committed a crime or he wouldn't have taken a plea, wackadoodle.
What is not lintelligent about not letting people like him (and apparently you) make up insane nonsense?
Again, Flynn already took a plea. There was nothing illegal in obtaining that plea except in the delusional minds of trump worshippers.
So next time you interject, perhaps you should make sure you actually have something to say.
Thanks.
If you are going to call names, please try your best to sound intelligent.
he did get justice, nutter butter. he got a guilty plea.
and he sure thought he committed a crime or he wouldn't have taken a plea, wackadoodle.
If you are going to call names, please try your best to sound intelligent.he did get justice, nutter butter. he got a guilty plea.
and he sure thought he committed a crime or he wouldn't have taken a plea, wackadoodle.
What is not lintelligent about not letting people like him (and apparently you) make up insane nonsense?
Again, Flynn already took a plea. There was nothing illegal in obtaining that plea except in the delusional minds of trump worshippers.
So next time you interject, perhaps you should make sure you actually have something to say.
Thanks.
Again, I ask the same question----------->
The government had access to everything Trump because of the Carter Paige FISA warrants. According to LAW, if someone has a FISA warrant on them, the FBI has the legal right to monitor anyone they communicate with 2 hops out. It used to be 3, which meant that if you had 40 distinctly separate people you communicated with, that meant the FBI had access to 1.2 MILLION distinctly, separate people. At 2 hops, I would assume that drops to around 3 to 400,000! And so, all anyone from the campaign had to do was e-mail, or call him one time for ANY reason, and the whole campaign could be surveilled!
Why?
Because Carter Paige is the source of the warrant. 1 hop would be someone from the campaign e-mailing or calling Paige. Hop 2 would be anyone within the campaign that the person IN the campaign corresponded with, meaning basically everyone. And if the e-mail or call was NOT personal but from someone doing campaign business, then the campaign would be seen as an entity, meaning the whole campaign and its dealings would then be subject under FISA.
So what is the point?
They already have everything, meaning the FBI. They already know what happened. They have access to phone, e-mail, texts, computers, EVERYTHING. What more does the FBI need? Look how easy it was to catch the coosome-twosome, Ohr and his wife, Strozk, Mcabe, and the rest of the crew over there. And yet, with all the evidence on TAPE. With all the evidence in writing. With all the computer evidence. And I am sure they have everyones income tax returns also. With all the transcripts, what have they gotten? Process crimes, nothing else, and not a whiff on the President!
How much evidence do they need?
Tell everyone here------->with everything they have, the only thing they could NOT have is............Trump personally sending an envoy under his direction, to collude with Russia. That is it, because anything done under communication is already in their possession. So if that is the case, then Leftists, tell us, WHO did Trump send for the meeting-) It wasn't him, lol, so it had to be someone else, AND since there is no electronic record whatsoever or Trump or that person would already be indicted, that means you better start figuring out who that shadowy figure is, lol!
you shouldn't assume that.
No one is going to go for the big fish unless they know they can beat him ten times over. That is how federal prosecutions work. Watergate took two years of meticulously building a case. This one has only been going on for months... and months where the White House and it's cronies have done nothing but try to keep things from going forward. you have no clue what they have and what they don't have. we know Bannon has said there is no way that don jr didn't go from the Russia meeting into Donald's office. and you don't know what else he said when he spoke with mueller this week.
the other things you don't know...
what testimony Flynn exchanged for his deal
what testimony Papadopoulos exchanged for his deal
what testimony Rick gates will give for the deal he is close to taking
assume Gates' testimony will put Manafort away for a very long time...
what position does that put Manafort in and who does he give up to save his butt
I'll also point out that obstruction of justice is a crime in and of itself. And there are a lot of people who already think that Donald can be nailed on that. It is the charge that made Nixon walk away and the one that was the first article of impeachment when the GOP went after Clinton.
You exhume Watergate, big difference Jillian.
Why?
Because there was no electronic communication besides phone, and maybe Fax. There was no FISA warrants, and the government was not surveilling Nixon at the time. That is why those missing 18 minutes of tape was so important.
Listen to exactly what some people are saying here, and correct me if I am wrong------------->
1. Because of a FISA warrant and the hops it creates for surveillance, basically the whole Trump team was being watched and looked into for months during the campaign, and after the election, basically until they fled Trump Tower, 10 days after the election.
2. While under direct scrutiny by the FBI, DOJ, NSA, CIA, and the Obama administration, they managed to get with the Russians, collude, beg, and devise a scheme to help Trump win the election, all under the noses of these alphabet soup agencies.
3. These actions they are accused of are treasonous, and yet, with all the evidence they have in their hands, the best they can do are process crimes!
Now let me ask you, and anyone else reading this----------> If any of you were on a jury, and transcripts, recorded phone calls, computer evidence, e-mails, and texts were presented to you that ANY Presidential campaign/Presidential Candidate, was talking with/requesting help from the Russians......or anyone else for that matter......to fix or to influence an election, how would you vote; guilty, or not guilty? Would you even need witnesses if you had that evidence? And if you had that evidence, for the safety of the country, wouldn't you do something BEFORE inauguration day?
I ask people to read that last paragraph, then also ask themselves this---------->
How many of YOU would collude with a foreign power to win a Presidency for someone else? Do you think, oh say, Ivanka would? How about Reince Priebus? Jeff Sessions? Niki Haley? General Kelly? MIKE PENCE! And all of these people were either involved in the campaign, or now have access to all the facts pertaining to this fiasco. What Muehller knows, they know, and yet they aren't heading for the hills, or demanding Trump be removed. To believe what the Left is feeding us, you have to mentally take on the notion that........ALL of these people are traitors, and are going to put their rearends on the line for someone who basically committed treason!
What are the odds of them NOT being patriotic enough for even one of them to throw Trump under the bus?
And finally I ask this----------> Whenever Democrats are asked about the evidence against Trump, they never claim there is. (and when I say Democrats, I mean politicians) They always say there is smoke, or let the investigation continue to its end, etc, etc. We have vast amounts of DEMOCRATIC politicians from House and Senate that have repeatedly stated, "there is NO evidence at this time" when pressed, all on camera.
But now reverse it! What do the Republicans say about if they have evidence that the Obama administration did something shady, or highly unethical? They proclaim, "yep, we got it, and here it is!" (paraphrasing)
So, maybe the Left is correct! Maybe the whole administration are a bunch of traitorous bastards! Maybe all those people are in bed with Russia, or know Trump was, and are now trying to cover it up, NOT knowing how much Muehller really has of the evidence they are aware of because of their positions to see it, and are rolling the dice not on Trumps future, but their own. All of this, and they know the government was watching the campaign and transition team almost the whole time.
OK folks, which one of YOU would do this knowing the special counsel was privy to virtually EVERYTHING that went on? Can I have a show of hands! What, no hands up!
See what I mean-)
There are no facts. There is NOTHING. There have been Six Investigations all concluding there is no Collusion.I have a lot to say but one thing I will not do is make myself sound like a total idiot. I’ll research the facts first unlike you. You want to ignore the facts... I only worship God not Trump. However, I do support him. He is for America unlike you..If you are going to call names, please try your best to sound intelligent.
he did get justice, nutter butter. he got a guilty plea.
and he sure thought he committed a crime or he wouldn't have taken a plea, wackadoodle.
What is not lintelligent about not letting people like him (and apparently you) make up insane nonsense?
Again, Flynn already took a plea. There was nothing illegal in obtaining that plea except in the delusional minds of trump worshippers.
So next time you interject, perhaps you should make sure you actually have something to say.
Thanks.
Tell you what facts were found... Facts that lead to 5 Mueller Team members being fired.
Facts that lead to 7 FBI and DOJ personnel being removed from their post.
There are hard cold facts, financial transactions, real evidence a jury could look at and convict these people of a Conspiracy to Rig an Election, Defraud The American People, and Commit Fraud in a FISA Court.
The left has, nothing but slander and wanting to continue the hoax.
Meanwhile Strozk is in The FBI Basement looking for his Red Swing Line Stapler playing HR paper pusher.
There are no facts. There is NOTHING. There have been Six Investigations all concluding there is no Collusion.I have a lot to say but one thing I will not do is make myself sound like a total idiot. I’ll research the facts first unlike you. You want to ignore the facts... I only worship God not Trump. However, I do support him. He is for America unlike you..If you are going to call names, please try your best to sound intelligent.he did get justice, nutter butter. he got a guilty plea.
and he sure thought he committed a crime or he wouldn't have taken a plea, wackadoodle.
What is not lintelligent about not letting people like him (and apparently you) make up insane nonsense?
Again, Flynn already took a plea. There was nothing illegal in obtaining that plea except in the delusional minds of trump worshippers.
So next time you interject, perhaps you should make sure you actually have something to say.
Thanks.
Tell you what facts were found... Facts that lead to 5 Mueller Team members being fired.
Facts that lead to 7 FBI and DOJ personnel being removed from their post.
There are hard cold facts, financial transactions, real evidence a jury could look at and convict these people of a Conspiracy to Rig an Election, Defraud The American People, and Commit Fraud in a FISA Court.
The left has, nothing but slander and wanting to continue the hoax.
Meanwhile Strozk is in The FBI Basement looking for his Red Swing Line Stapler playing HR paper pusher.
there there little deluded one... don't cry.
Dear Troll
If you are going to call names, please try your best to sound intelligent.he did get justice, nutter butter. he got a guilty plea.
and he sure thought he committed a crime or he wouldn't have taken a plea, wackadoodle.
Again, I ask the same question----------->
The government had access to everything Trump because of the Carter Paige FISA warrants. According to LAW, if someone has a FISA warrant on them, the FBI has the legal right to monitor anyone they communicate with 2 hops out. It used to be 3, which meant that if you had 40 distinctly separate people you communicated with, that meant the FBI had access to 1.2 MILLION distinctly, separate people. At 2 hops, I would assume that drops to around 3 to 400,000! And so, all anyone from the campaign had to do was e-mail, or call him one time for ANY reason, and the whole campaign could be surveilled!
Why?
Because Carter Paige is the source of the warrant. 1 hop would be someone from the campaign e-mailing or calling Paige. Hop 2 would be anyone within the campaign that the person IN the campaign corresponded with, meaning basically everyone. And if the e-mail or call was NOT personal but from someone doing campaign business, then the campaign would be seen as an entity, meaning the whole campaign and its dealings would then be subject under FISA.
So what is the point?
They already have everything, meaning the FBI. They already know what happened. They have access to phone, e-mail, texts, computers, EVERYTHING. What more does the FBI need? Look how easy it was to catch the coosome-twosome, Ohr and his wife, Strozk, Mcabe, and the rest of the crew over there. And yet, with all the evidence on TAPE. With all the evidence in writing. With all the computer evidence. And I am sure they have everyones income tax returns also. With all the transcripts, what have they gotten? Process crimes, nothing else, and not a whiff on the President!
How much evidence do they need?
Tell everyone here------->with everything they have, the only thing they could NOT have is............Trump personally sending an envoy under his direction, to collude with Russia. That is it, because anything done under communication is already in their possession. So if that is the case, then Leftists, tell us, WHO did Trump send for the meeting-) It wasn't him, lol, so it had to be someone else, AND since there is no electronic record whatsoever or Trump or that person would already be indicted, that means you better start figuring out who that shadowy figure is, lol!
you shouldn't assume that.
No one is going to go for the big fish unless they know they can beat him ten times over. That is how federal prosecutions work. Watergate took two years of meticulously building a case. This one has only been going on for months... and months where the White House and it's cronies have done nothing but try to keep things from going forward. you have no clue what they have and what they don't have. we know Bannon has said there is no way that don jr didn't go from the Russia meeting into Donald's office. and you don't know what else he said when he spoke with mueller this week.
the other things you don't know...
what testimony Flynn exchanged for his deal
what testimony Papadopoulos exchanged for his deal
what testimony Rick gates will give for the deal he is close to taking
assume Gates' testimony will put Manafort away for a very long time...
what position does that put Manafort in and who does he give up to save his butt
I'll also point out that obstruction of justice is a crime in and of itself. And there are a lot of people who already think that Donald can be nailed on that. It is the charge that made Nixon walk away and the one that was the first article of impeachment when the GOP went after Clinton.
You exhume Watergate, big difference Jillian.
Why?
Because there was no electronic communication besides phone, and maybe Fax. There was no FISA warrants, and the government was not surveilling Nixon at the time. That is why those missing 18 minutes of tape was so important.
Listen to exactly what some people are saying here, and correct me if I am wrong------------->
1. Because of a FISA warrant and the hops it creates for surveillance, basically the whole Trump team was being watched and looked into for months during the campaign, and after the election, basically until they fled Trump Tower, 10 days after the election.
2. While under direct scrutiny by the FBI, DOJ, NSA, CIA, and the Obama administration, they managed to get with the Russians, collude, beg, and devise a scheme to help Trump win the election, all under the noses of these alphabet soup agencies.
3. These actions they are accused of are treasonous, and yet, with all the evidence they have in their hands, the best they can do are process crimes!
Now let me ask you, and anyone else reading this----------> If any of you were on a jury, and transcripts, recorded phone calls, computer evidence, e-mails, and texts were presented to you that ANY Presidential campaign/Presidential Candidate, was talking with/requesting help from the Russians......or anyone else for that matter......to fix or to influence an election, how would you vote; guilty, or not guilty? Would you even need witnesses if you had that evidence? And if you had that evidence, for the safety of the country, wouldn't you do something BEFORE inauguration day?
I ask people to read that last paragraph, then also ask themselves this---------->
How many of YOU would collude with a foreign power to win a Presidency for someone else? Do you think, oh say, Ivanka would? How about Reince Priebus? Jeff Sessions? Niki Haley? General Kelly? MIKE PENCE! And all of these people were either involved in the campaign, or now have access to all the facts pertaining to this fiasco. What Muehller knows, they know, and yet they aren't heading for the hills, or demanding Trump be removed. To believe what the Left is feeding us, you have to mentally take on the notion that........ALL of these people are traitors, and are going to put their rearends on the line for someone who basically committed treason!
What are the odds of them NOT being patriotic enough for even one of them to throw Trump under the bus?
And finally I ask this----------> Whenever Democrats are asked about the evidence against Trump, they never claim there is. (and when I say Democrats, I mean politicians) They always say there is smoke, or let the investigation continue to its end, etc, etc. We have vast amounts of DEMOCRATIC politicians from House and Senate that have repeatedly stated, "there is NO evidence at this time" when pressed, all on camera.
But now reverse it! What do the Republicans say about if they have evidence that the Obama administration did something shady, or highly unethical? They proclaim, "yep, we got it, and here it is!" (paraphrasing)
So, maybe the Left is correct! Maybe the whole administration are a bunch of traitorous bastards! Maybe all those people are in bed with Russia, or know Trump was, and are now trying to cover it up, NOT knowing how much Muehller really has of the evidence they are aware of because of their positions to see it, and are rolling the dice not on Trumps future, but their own. All of this, and they know the government was watching the campaign and transition team almost the whole time.
OK folks, which one of YOU would do this knowing the special counsel was privy to virtually EVERYTHING that went on? Can I have a show of hands! What, no hands up!
See what I mean-)
how is telling you the law, "exhuming" anything? Do you think law ages out? Do I need to have a discussion with you about what "precedent" is in a common law system like ours? Or do you think Donald is somehow exempt from the law
I couldn't care less if the righwinguts rolled their dice on Donald. it is irrelevant to the law and does not permit obstruction of justice.
I also don't care how many people would commit a criminal act by working with a foreign power to corrupt our electoral process. It would be illegal regardless.
I like that whole "folks" thing? Do you think it is somehow relevant what a bunch of internet warriors thing about Donald's criminality? especially on a board where about 80% of the people are trumptards, in opposition to the country, which is in the 30's...
I told you what is happening. I told you what might happen. I pointed out that you're clueless about what mueller has. And the right has no high ground on this issue given they believe in witchunts and using their power for purposes which really are fraudulent.
cheers.
