^^^^ FOXS NEWS.
What sort of dunce imagines (I almost said 'thinks') that objecting to the source is equal to actually finding a substantive way to object?
Raise your paw.
It's substantive to laugh at your bogus source, making the rest of your post a joke. As usual.
Let's rub your face in it again, a post in which you are unable to find anything .....anything.....to dispute:
1. The origin of every Fascist movement began when Rousseau invested the following in the French Revolution:
'In ‘The Social Contract’ Rousseau advocated death for anyone who did not uphold the common values of the community: the totalitarian view of reshaping of humanity, echoed in communism, Nazism, progressivism. Robespierre: “the necessity of bringing about a complete regeneration and, if I may express myself so, of creating a new people.”
Himmefarb, , “The Roads to Modernity,” p. 167-68.
2. So, once ‘truth’ is determined, anyone who doesn’t accept it was “either insane or wicked and morally evil" and should be dealt with as a wild beast.
3. Antonio Gramsci, Italian
Marxist theoretician and founding member and one-time leader of the
Communist Party of Italy. Gramschi’s motto is that of liberals today: “that
alllife is "political."
4. Check out these headlines:
"CLIMATE CHANGE DENIAL SHOULD BE A CRIME"
Climate change denial should be a crime
"Climate Denialism Is Literally Killing Us
climate denial... [is] premeditated murder..."
Climate Denialism Is Literally Killing Us
5. Fascism, Liberalism, Communism....total agreement or death.
Kill, kill, kill.....
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky
6. Of course, climate experts agree with neither the science nor the politics:
"...those who try to stifle debate are shortchanging science and democracy...."
Inadvertently, you've testified to the veracity of everything in the post.
Now....be gone.