When do the mass resignations begin?

At least she refrained from calling him a n!&&3r. Thank Gawd for small favors.
That's because the case against Adams has nothing to do with his race. It has to do with the fact he broke the law. Something Bove did not dispute when he corruptly told Sassoon to drop the charges against him.

But you already knew all that. You just can't resist being a cuck.
 
That's because the case against Adams has nothing to do with his race. It has to do with the fact he broke the law. Something Bove did not dispute when he corruptly told Sassoon to drop the charges against him.

But you already knew all that. You just can't resist being a cuck.
It has to do with him going against the demofks. He lost his protections and his money. Demofks expect compliance or else. I've explained it to everyone since I got on this message board. Talk about loyalty!
 
That's because the case against Adams has nothing to do with his race.
Racists always say that
It has to do with the fact he broke the law. Something Bove did not dispute when he corruptly told Sassoon to drop the charges against him.

But you already knew all that. You just can't resist being a cuck.
The timing is suspect to put it mildly, coming right after he announced his concerns about illegal immigration.

Democrats are very transparent, unintentionally.

Federal regulations are a tangle of vague and often contradictory requirements and prohibitions. Once Adams was identified as not following the Party Line, it was easy to find rules he could be accused of breaking so he could be subjected to endless investigation.

Not the first time the DOJ has done that obviously.
 
Last edited:
Once Adams was identified as not following the Party Line, it was easy to find rules he could be accused of breaking so he could be subjected to endless investigation.
You need to tap dance much faster than that. This has nothing to do with any party line. It has to do with violations of law.

Danielle Sassoon, the acting U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York, told Attorney General Pam Bondi that she could not in good faith ask a judge to drop the charges against Adams, “because the law does not support a dismissal, and because I am confident that Adams has committed the crimes with which he is charged.”
 
You need to tap dance much faster than that. This has nothing to do with any party line. It has to do with violations of law.
Then why was he never prosecuted when he was in line?
Danielle Sassoon, the acting U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York, told Attorney General Pam Bondi that she could not in good faith ask a judge to drop the charges against Adams, “because the law does not support a dismissal, and because I am confident that Adams has committed the crimes with which he is charged.”
Of course they are not going to admit their corruption and racism.

The American voter saw through it, luckily. That’s why you’re losing so badly.
 
Then why was he never prosecuted when he was in line?

Of course they are not going to admit their corruption and racism.

The American voter saw through it, luckily. That’s why you’re losing so badly.
You need to tap dance much faster than that. This has nothing to do with any party line. It has to do with violations of law.

The idea that Adams had been investigated due to his stance on illegal immigrants is just another unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. But you already knew that. You just can't resist being a cuck.
 
“You lost sight of the oath that you took when you started at the Department of Justice by suggesting that you retain discretion to interpret the Constitution in a manner inconsistent with the policies of a democratically elected President and a Senate-confirmed Attorney General,” he wrote, according to a copy of the letter obtained by The Washington Post.

Bove is the one who has lost sight of his obligation to fulfill his oath to the people of the US. He should be fired.
 
It has to do with him going against the demofks. He lost his protections and his money. Demofks expect compliance or else. I've explained it to everyone since I got on this message board. Talk about loyalty!


It has nothing to do with "going against the Democrats" and everything to do with taking bribes from foreign countries.

Loyalty???? You think it's "disloyal" to charge criminals if they're your friends and allies??? You do realize that Adams has been doing the old "flatter for favours" that works so well with Trump. He flew to Mar-a-Lago after the election, and dropped everything to go to the Inauguration at the last minute.

Last but not least, the charges were dropped "without prejudice" which means they can be reinstated at any time. If Adams is in any way "disloyal" to Trump, the charges will be back. If Adams doesn't toe the line and do EVERY illegal thing Donnie asks him to do, Adams is fucked.
 
It has nothing to do with "going against the Democrats" and everything to do with taking bribes from foreign countries.

Loyalty???? You think it's "disloyal" to charge criminals if they're your friends and allies??? You do realize that Adams has been doing the old "flatter for favours" that works so well with Trump. He flew to Mar-a-Lago after the election, and dropped everything to go to the Inauguration at the last minute.

Last but not least, the charges were dropped "without prejudice" which means they can be reinstated at any time. If Adams is in any way "disloyal" to Trump, the charges will be back. If Adams doesn't toe the line and do EVERY illegal thing Donnie asks him to do, Adams is fucked.
But, but............HUNTER!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
You need to tap dance much faster than that. This has nothing to do with any party line. It has to do with violations of law.

The idea that Adams had been investigated due to his stance on illegal immigrants is just another unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. But you already knew that. You just can't resist being a cuck.
Now you are just repeating your unsubstantiated claims.

Racist and hyper partisan actions like the indictment of Adams don’t get the benefit of the doubt in my book.

Show proof af ANY act by Adams that ANY loyal Democrat has been prosecuted for.

The indictment talks about things like accepting discounts. Show me any white Democrat prosecuted for that.
 
Now you are just repeating your unsubstantiated claims.

Racist and hyper partisan actions like the indictment of Adams
Now you're just repeating unsubstantiated claims. If there were any evidence of either Bove would have made the case for dismissing the charges based on it. He didn't. He never once disputed the evidence against Adams or made any reference to misconduct by the SDNY.

Your spin doctoring isn't working.

On February 10, 2025, I received a memorandum from acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, directing me to dismiss the indictment against Mayor Eric Adams without prejudice, subject to certain conditions, which would require leave of court. I do not repeat here the evidence against Adams that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed federal crimes; Mr. Bove rightly has never called into question that the case team conducted this investigation with integrity and that the charges against Adams are serious and supported by fact and law.
 
Last edited:
  • Thanks
Reactions: cnm
The problem is that mass resignations meant something in the past. It meant political costs would be paid because the people would not stand for it.

Today, the republicans WANT mass resignations. And they are going to get them at some point because Trump is just flatly ignoring the law now.
 
Remember when there were DoJ officials with integrity?

Former DOJ officials detail threatening to resign en masse in meeting with Trump


Witnesses in today's hearing revealed details of a dramatic Oval Office meeting on Jan. 3, 2021, in which top Justice Department officials banded together to prevent Jeffrey Clark, an environmental lawyer at the DOJ, from replacing acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen.

Trump was keen to install Clark, an ally, in order to wield the powers of the DOJ to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

The meeting took place a day after Clark had told Rosen and acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue that Trump had asked him to consider replacing Rosen. Clark doubled down on claims that there had been fraud in the election and acknowledged he had had continued discussions with Trump, despite assuring the pair a week prior that he wouldn't engage in conversations with the president.


People like that aren't going to be around to protest something like this in the new world order.

Trump pardons Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht for online drug scheme


Jan 21 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday pardoned Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht, who was sentenced to life in prison for running an underground online marketplace where drug dealers and others conducted more than $200 million in illicit trade using bitcoin.
The Republican president made good on a campaign pledge to free Ulbricht, 40, who was arrested in 2013 and sentenced in 2015 in what became a landmark U.S. prosecution launched only a few years after the emergence of the popular cryptocurrency.

Prosecutors said some people died due to drugs bought on Silk Road.
The Silk Road website relied on the Tor network to communicate anonymously and accepted bitcoin as payment, which prosecutors said allowed users to conceal their identities and locations.
Prosecutors said Ulbricht ran Silk Road under the alias Dread Pirate Roberts, a reference to a character in the 1987 movie "The Princess Bride," and took extreme steps to protect the marketplace's operation.

Those steps, they said, included soliciting the murders of several people who posed a threat, though they also said no evidence exists that any murders were actually carried out.
Ulbricht acknowledged he created Silk Road, which a defense lawyer at his trial said was intended as a "freewheeling, free market site." But his lawyers contended Ulbricht had later handed off the website to others and was lured back toward its end to become the "fall guy" for its true operators.


Have you guys had enough yet?
Maybe you ought to start packing your bags now. You can be near the front of the line.
 
Now you're just repeating unsubstantiated claims. If there were any evidence of either Bove would have made the case for dismissing the charges based on it. He didn't. He never once disputed the evidence against Adams or made any reference to misconduct by the SDNY.

Your spin doctoring isn't working.

On February 10, 2025, I received a memorandum from acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, directing me to dismiss the indictment against Mayor Eric Adams without prejudice, subject to certain conditions, which would require leave of court. I do not repeat here the evidence against Adams that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed federal crimes; Mr. Bove rightly has never called into question that the case team conducted this investigation with integrity and that the charges against Adams are serious and supported by fact and law.
Wow! You have a very bizarre view of how justice is supposed to work.

Prosecutors do not have to explain why they don’t prosecute this individual or that. They have to explain why they do prosecute this individual or that. That applies even to a black Democrat, who gets on the Democrat shit list.

One of the key components of white privilege is this immediate dismissal when someone observed how racist a particular action or view is.

Show me any white Democrat who has been prosecuted for taking a discount, if that is a very common reason for a federal indictment. If you don’t know of any then, what is the difference with Eric Adams?

I know you know, but you will never admit it.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: cnm
The problem is that mass resignations meant something in the past. It meant political costs would be paid because the people would not stand for it.

Today, the republicans WANT mass resignations. And they are going to get them at some point because Trump is just flatly ignoring the law now.
Really? There was a time when the American people would not stand for mass resignations by federal bureaucrats in response to a president promising to cut the federal bureaucracy?

I’m 62 years old, and I have heard Americans complaining about the preposterous bureaucracy that runs his country at least fifty of those years.

What’s different now is a president who is actually doing something about it.

We will not only stand for it, we will stand up and applaud it as we saw in the recent election.
 
Last edited:
  • Funny
Reactions: cnm
The problem is that mass resignations meant something in the past. It meant political costs would be paid because the people would not stand for it.

Today, the republicans WANT mass resignations. And they are going to get them at some point because Trump is just flatly ignoring the law now.
There is no question this admin wants people with integrity who obey the rule of law to leave. Sassoon's very public resignation and the resignations of 5 other DoJ officials illustrates why.
Folks like Bove do not want attention drawn to their corruption of the dept.
 
  • Fact
Reactions: cnm
Prosecutors do not have to explain why they don’t prosecute this individual or that. They have to explain why they do prosecute this individual or that. That applies even to a black Democrat, who gets on the Democrat shit list.
This will be my last reply to you until you prove the prosecution of Adams was done for any reason other than his violations of the law. I've grown kinda tired of your horseshit.
 
Back
Top Bottom