When Communism Seems So….Sensible

[PoliticalChic]

That’s when you know you’ve been converted by government school to make government your god.


Here's the premise: environmentalism is simply a way to hide the real reason for laws, regulations, statutes that end was is meant to be private property.


1.Government school and Democrat government both have collectivism as their guiding principle….everyone is merely a cog in a machine, and just as replaceable. The Founders envisioned a nation based on individualism, differences in views, traditions, opinions, with the idea of ‘checks and balances’ to balance opposing factions.

Communism, Liberalism, Socialism, etc. all need those cogs to be identical in their views. Government school is the mechanism to carry out Lenin’s plan:

In October 1919, Lenin paid a secret visit to the laboratory of the great physiologist I. P. Pavlov, a Russian physiologist known chiefly for the concept of the conditioned reflex. In his classic experiment, he found that a hungry dog can be trained to associate the sound of a bell with food and will salivate at the sound even in the absence of food. Lenin wanted to find out if his work on the conditional reflexes of the brain might help the Bolsheviks control European behaviour. “I want the masses of Russia to follow a Communistic pattern of thinking and reacting,” Lenin explained. Pavlov was astounded. It seemed that Lenin wanted him to do for humans what he had already done for dogs. “Do you mean that you would like to standardise the population of Russia? Make them all behave in the same way?” he asked. “Exactly” replied Lenin. “Man can be corrected. Man can be made what we want him to be.” Orlando Figes, "A People's Tragedy," p.732-733

Lenin could do it, because he simply killed those who didn’t march in lock-step. Here, the Left uses simplistic arguments and doesn’t allow rebuttal, opposing views….and uses the media and pop culture for a constant drum beat.





2. “Begging the question” means that one starts out with the conclusion as a given. Begging the question is also called arguing in a circle.” (Google)

One prominent example is Global Warming. There is no proof, yet the media, the schools, pop culture simply assume it to be true, and demands that everyone accept that ‘truth’.

In his book on the Supreme Court, Liberal guru Thom Hartmann shows how it’s done:

“There are three principal ways that activists are using the law to try to slow down and even reverse the destruction of our planet by climate change.

The first is through the political process and regulation, which the Trump administration has shown us can be a thin reed, subject to the vagaries of politics. Its rollback of previous administrations’ rules and regulations to reduce poisons in our air and water, and carbon dioxide and methane (and chlorofluorocarbons) in our atmosphere, shows how fragile this strategy can be without strong and clear legislation from Congress.

The second is the property rights movement, claiming that the right of people to enjoy their environment and the stability of their lives—a logical extension of property rights as envisioned by Locke and Jefferson all the way to today—is infringed on by pollution and climate change. This is largely the “public trust doctrine….

The third is the human rights argument. This posits that the core human rights referenced in both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution (particularly as amended by the Bill of Rights) include the right to safety and happiness, which require a stable climate and a nontoxic environment.” “The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America,” Thom Hartmann, P. 108

All three of these are attacks on private property.



The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property. Karl Marx





If one stipulates the truth of the Global Warming Scam….well, then….communism seems so sensible….

 

[JoeB131]

Wow... that's kind of nuts.

If you are environmentalist, you are really a Communist.

Um. Okay. That's kind of nuts even by your standards.

Here's a big hint. We don't have another planet to go to right now if we mess this one up.

 

[pknopp]

There isn't a single school teaching that Communism is sensible. Whoever is teaching you this idea is the one we should be wary about.

It should be noted that Trump supports as do almost every politician the right of the government to take your property.

 

[ReinyDays]

Been swimming in the East River again? ... gubbermint skool doktors told you about that ...

 

[Taz]

That’s when you know you’ve been converted by government school to make government your god.


Here's the premise: environmentalism is simply a way to hide the real reason for laws, regulations, statutes that end was is meant to be private property.


1.Government school and Democrat government both have collectivism as their guiding principle….everyone is merely a cog in a machine, and just as replaceable. The Founders envisioned a nation based on individualism, differences in views, traditions, opinions, with the idea of ‘checks and balances’ to balance opposing factions.

Communism, Liberalism, Socialism, etc. all need those cogs to be identical in their views. Government school is the mechanism to carry out Lenin’s plan:

In October 1919, Lenin paid a secret visit to the laboratory of the great physiologist I. P. Pavlov, a Russian physiologist known chiefly for the concept of the conditioned reflex. In his classic experiment, he found that a hungry dog can be trained to associate the sound of a bell with food and will salivate at the sound even in the absence of food. Lenin wanted to find out if his work on the conditional reflexes of the brain might help the Bolsheviks control European behaviour. “I want the masses of Russia to follow a Communistic pattern of thinking and reacting,” Lenin explained. Pavlov was astounded. It seemed that Lenin wanted him to do for humans what he had already done for dogs. “Do you mean that you would like to standardise the population of Russia? Make them all behave in the same way?” he asked. “Exactly” replied Lenin. “Man can be corrected. Man can be made what we want him to be.” Orlando Figes, "A People's Tragedy," p.732-733

Lenin could do it, because he simply killed those who didn’t march in lock-step. Here, the Left uses simplistic arguments and doesn’t allow rebuttal, opposing views….and uses the media and pop culture for a constant drum beat.





2. “Begging the question” means that one starts out with the conclusion as a given. Begging the question is also called arguing in a circle.” (Google)

One prominent example is Global Warming. There is no proof, yet the media, the schools, pop culture simply assume it to be true, and demands that everyone accept that ‘truth’.

In his book on the Supreme Court, Liberal guru Thom Hartmann shows how it’s done:

“There are three principal ways that activists are using the law to try to slow down and even reverse the destruction of our planet by climate change.

The first is through the political process and regulation, which the Trump administration has shown us can be a thin reed, subject to the vagaries of politics. Its rollback of previous administrations’ rules and regulations to reduce poisons in our air and water, and carbon dioxide and methane (and chlorofluorocarbons) in our atmosphere, shows how fragile this strategy can be without strong and clear legislation from Congress.

The second is the property rights movement, claiming that the right of people to enjoy their environment and the stability of their lives—a logical extension of property rights as envisioned by Locke and Jefferson all the way to today—is infringed on by pollution and climate change. This is largely the “public trust doctrine….

The third is the human rights argument. This posits that the core human rights referenced in both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution (particularly as amended by the Bill of Rights) include the right to safety and happiness, which require a stable climate and a nontoxic environment.” “The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America,” Thom Hartmann, P. 108

All three of these are attacks on private property.



The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property. Karl Marx





If one stipulates the truth of the Global Warming Scam….well, then….communism seems so sensible….

Global warming is happening, just ask NASA.
Climate Change Evidence: How Do We Know?

 

[Ray9]

Much of Trump's opposition comes from conditioned urbanites. There is a plan to seed low income housing into America's northern and midwestern suburban areas where that opposition can be invaded with foreign interlopers and overwhelmed with meth labs and crack houses like the cities. The elimination of the concept of private poperty is a key initiative. They don't even try to hide it.

Biden Seeks to Abolish America's Suburban Communities

Joe Biden's radical proposal for the Democrat Party platform for 2020 seeks to put an end to America's suburban communities.

www.breitbart.com

 

[bluzman61]

That’s when you know you’ve been converted by government school to make government your god.


Here's the premise: environmentalism is simply a way to hide the real reason for laws, regulations, statutes that end was is meant to be private property.


1.Government school and Democrat government both have collectivism as their guiding principle….everyone is merely a cog in a machine, and just as replaceable. The Founders envisioned a nation based on individualism, differences in views, traditions, opinions, with the idea of ‘checks and balances’ to balance opposing factions.

Communism, Liberalism, Socialism, etc. all need those cogs to be identical in their views. Government school is the mechanism to carry out Lenin’s plan:

In October 1919, Lenin paid a secret visit to the laboratory of the great physiologist I. P. Pavlov, a Russian physiologist known chiefly for the concept of the conditioned reflex. In his classic experiment, he found that a hungry dog can be trained to associate the sound of a bell with food and will salivate at the sound even in the absence of food. Lenin wanted to find out if his work on the conditional reflexes of the brain might help the Bolsheviks control European behaviour. “I want the masses of Russia to follow a Communistic pattern of thinking and reacting,” Lenin explained. Pavlov was astounded. It seemed that Lenin wanted him to do for humans what he had already done for dogs. “Do you mean that you would like to standardise the population of Russia? Make them all behave in the same way?” he asked. “Exactly” replied Lenin. “Man can be corrected. Man can be made what we want him to be.” Orlando Figes, "A People's Tragedy," p.732-733

Lenin could do it, because he simply killed those who didn’t march in lock-step. Here, the Left uses simplistic arguments and doesn’t allow rebuttal, opposing views….and uses the media and pop culture for a constant drum beat.





2. “Begging the question” means that one starts out with the conclusion as a given. Begging the question is also called arguing in a circle.” (Google)

One prominent example is Global Warming. There is no proof, yet the media, the schools, pop culture simply assume it to be true, and demands that everyone accept that ‘truth’.

In his book on the Supreme Court, Liberal guru Thom Hartmann shows how it’s done:

“There are three principal ways that activists are using the law to try to slow down and even reverse the destruction of our planet by climate change.

The first is through the political process and regulation, which the Trump administration has shown us can be a thin reed, subject to the vagaries of politics. Its rollback of previous administrations’ rules and regulations to reduce poisons in our air and water, and carbon dioxide and methane (and chlorofluorocarbons) in our atmosphere, shows how fragile this strategy can be without strong and clear legislation from Congress.

The second is the property rights movement, claiming that the right of people to enjoy their environment and the stability of their lives—a logical extension of property rights as envisioned by Locke and Jefferson all the way to today—is infringed on by pollution and climate change. This is largely the “public trust doctrine….

The third is the human rights argument. This posits that the core human rights referenced in both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution (particularly as amended by the Bill of Rights) include the right to safety and happiness, which require a stable climate and a nontoxic environment.” “The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America,” Thom Hartmann, P. 108

All three of these are attacks on private property.



The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property. Karl Marx





If one stipulates the truth of the Global Warming Scam….well, then….communism seems so sensible….

Wonderful post, PC. Thank you.

 

[Mac1958]

There isn't a single school teaching that Communism is sensible. Whoever is teaching you this idea is the one we should be wary about.
It should be noted that Trump supports as do almost every politician the right of the government to take your property.

They (finally) figured out that "socialism" was no longer scaring each other enough, so now they're on to "communism". So this was inevitable.

It's like children who like scary movies, even though they know, at some level, they're not real.

What I'm really looking forward to is what comes next, after they wear "communism" out.

 

[Ray9]

That’s when you know you’ve been converted by government school to make government your god.


Here's the premise: environmentalism is simply a way to hide the real reason for laws, regulations, statutes that end was is meant to be private property.


1.Government school and Democrat government both have collectivism as their guiding principle….everyone is merely a cog in a machine, and just as replaceable. The Founders envisioned a nation based on individualism, differences in views, traditions, opinions, with the idea of ‘checks and balances’ to balance opposing factions.

Communism, Liberalism, Socialism, etc. all need those cogs to be identical in their views. Government school is the mechanism to carry out Lenin’s plan:

In October 1919, Lenin paid a secret visit to the laboratory of the great physiologist I. P. Pavlov, a Russian physiologist known chiefly for the concept of the conditioned reflex. In his classic experiment, he found that a hungry dog can be trained to associate the sound of a bell with food and will salivate at the sound even in the absence of food. Lenin wanted to find out if his work on the conditional reflexes of the brain might help the Bolsheviks control European behaviour. “I want the masses of Russia to follow a Communistic pattern of thinking and reacting,” Lenin explained. Pavlov was astounded. It seemed that Lenin wanted him to do for humans what he had already done for dogs. “Do you mean that you would like to standardise the population of Russia? Make them all behave in the same way?” he asked. “Exactly” replied Lenin. “Man can be corrected. Man can be made what we want him to be.” Orlando Figes, "A People's Tragedy," p.732-733

Lenin could do it, because he simply killed those who didn’t march in lock-step. Here, the Left uses simplistic arguments and doesn’t allow rebuttal, opposing views….and uses the media and pop culture for a constant drum beat.





2. “Begging the question” means that one starts out with the conclusion as a given. Begging the question is also called arguing in a circle.” (Google)

One prominent example is Global Warming. There is no proof, yet the media, the schools, pop culture simply assume it to be true, and demands that everyone accept that ‘truth’.

In his book on the Supreme Court, Liberal guru Thom Hartmann shows how it’s done:

“There are three principal ways that activists are using the law to try to slow down and even reverse the destruction of our planet by climate change.

The first is through the political process and regulation, which the Trump administration has shown us can be a thin reed, subject to the vagaries of politics. Its rollback of previous administrations’ rules and regulations to reduce poisons in our air and water, and carbon dioxide and methane (and chlorofluorocarbons) in our atmosphere, shows how fragile this strategy can be without strong and clear legislation from Congress.

The second is the property rights movement, claiming that the right of people to enjoy their environment and the stability of their lives—a logical extension of property rights as envisioned by Locke and Jefferson all the way to today—is infringed on by pollution and climate change. This is largely the “public trust doctrine….

The third is the human rights argument. This posits that the core human rights referenced in both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution (particularly as amended by the Bill of Rights) include the right to safety and happiness, which require a stable climate and a nontoxic environment.” “The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America,” Thom Hartmann, P. 108

All three of these are attacks on private property.



The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property. Karl Marx





If one stipulates the truth of the Global Warming Scam….well, then….communism seems so sensible….

Global warming is happening, just ask NASA.
Climate Change Evidence: How Do We Know?

If the wind blows, blame your neighbor. If earthquakes happen it is the fault of infidels. Floods? You know who to accuse. The government is the only thing that can save you according to Culural Marxism. The science apparently proves the Earth is warming. Mars is currently experiencing global warming. Does this mean problematic people on Earth are destroying the Solar System?

 

[PoliticalChic]

There isn't a single school teaching that Communism is sensible. Whoever is teaching you this idea is the one we should be wary about.

It should be noted that Trump supports as do almost every politician the right of the government to take your property.

Let's check and see what government school is teaching:

1. "Third-Grade Teacher Has Students Write ‘Get Well’ Cards To Cop Killer Mumia Abu-Jamal A third-grade teacher at a public school in New Jersey is under fire after she encouraged her students to write letters to notorious convicted cop killer Mumia Abu-Jamal, who recently fell ill in prison.

Marylin Zuniga teaches language arts and social studies at Forest Street School in Orange, N.J."

Third-Grade Teacher Has Students Write ‘Get Well’ Cards To Cop Killer Mumia Abu-Jamal



2. - School's Nation of Islam Handout Paints Founding Fathers as Racists


"School's Nation of Islam Handout Paints Founding Fathers as Racists
The teacher also told Sommer that her son was not supposed to take the Nation of Islam handout home. It was supposed to stay in the classroom. That bit of news caused her great alarm.
“The fact that students were cautioned against allowing their parents to see anything is deeply troubling,” West told me. “The only reasonable explanation is they don’t want parents to know what it is their children are learning.”

3. Under pressure from transgender activists, progressive politicians, teacher unions, and the education establishment, and despite parents’ opposition, America’s public schools are capitulating to ideologues and implementing the radical transgender agenda with full force.
...regardless of biological sex, .... Activists want every child, from kindergarten on, to learn that “sex” is something “assigned at birth” rather than a biological reality. They want children to think that individuals get to choose their own “gender identity” (not limited to male or female), and that everyone else must affirm that “gender identity” as true.


...nothing that parents (or teachers) can do to prevent the schools from imposing policies designed to indoctrinate children with gender ideology.

In public education, the “deep state” describes a coalition of various groups – including teachers’ unions, progressive advocacy groups, major corporations, and philanthropists --that work together to promote the progressive worldview..."
America’s Public Education System: The Ultimate Deep State





4. The National Education Association approved a new "business item" expressing support for abortion access during its annual conference in Houston.

"[T]he NEA will include an assertion of our defense of a person's right to control their own body, especially for women, youth, and sexually marginalized people," the resolution states. "The NEA vigorously opposes all attacks on the right to choose and stands on the fundamental right to abortion under Roe v. Wade."

The NEA is the largest teachers' union in the U.S. with more than 3 million members. It collected nearly $400 million from American educators in 2018, according to federal labor filings. The union is also one of the most politically active in the country, spending $70 million on politics and lobbying in 2017 and 2018. Nearly all of the union's political action committee spending went to Democrats during the midterm cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.


NEA's 2019 adopted New Business Items (NBIs) reveal what savvy teachers have known for decades: state and national teachers' unions are essentially the political action committee of the Far-Left,"
Largest U.S. Teachers' Union Endorses Abortion




5. the 20-minute video being shown in American classrooms entitled The

Story of Stuff; a catchy title to appeal to grade school kids. This piece of anti-capitalist propaganda was

put together by Greenpeace member Annie Leonard.







6. NYC schools allow kids to go on #ClimateStrike
“TEN YEARS. We have ten years to save the planet,” Mayor Bill de Blasio cautioned in a tweet. “Today’s leaders are making decisions for our environment that our kids will have to live with. New York City stands with our young people. They’re our conscience. We support the 9/20 #ClimateStrike.”

Legions of adolescent activists across the globe are expected to demand immediate action to combat climate change in advance of a major UN conference on the issue next week.

As long as mom and dad sanction their principled truancy, absent kids won’t have attendance records dinged, the DOE said.

The September 20th event will feature Sweden’s “Climate Crisis” sweetheart, 16-year old Greta Thunberg.

Teen activist and Swedish sensation Greta Thunberg, who recently docked her zero-emissions sailboat in New York, will speak at the event which will snake its way through lower Manhattan to Battery Park.

Kids with parental permission to attend will be granted excused absences from school, Education Department officials tweeted Thursday.

The infamous “Green New Deal” will be promoted as well.

The New York City climate strike is backed by more than 100 environmental and political activist groups and other institutions, including New York Communities for Change, The New School and the Sierra Club.

The protesters’ demands include a “Green New Deal” that would end fossil fuel extraction and move the nation onto entirely renewable energy sources by 2030. Green New Deal policies have been backed by the likes of U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Personally, if I were one of the kids, I might argue about going to school at all. After all, if the Earth only has 10 more years before we are going to die, wouldn’t it be better to spend the time having fun or spending quality time with family?

On the other hand, if the New York City school officials were really invested in solving the climate crisis, wouldn’t they emphasize science and math? Perhaps keeping the kids in school and having them conduct experiments or perform calculations would inspire an interest in real climate science.

One theory that seems to prove true and is certainly consistent with what is happening with the New York City schools: When global problems are emphasized by locals, serious local matters are being ignored.

Case in point: New York state test results for third- through eighth-grade public school students are out, and the results are underwhelming.

Statewide, more than half the kids flunked yet again: Just 45.4% were deemed proficient in reading and 46.7% in math. In the city, 47.4% passed the reading test, while 45.6% got by in math.

Think the problem’s skimpy funding? Sorry: In 2017, the Empire Center’s E.J. McMahon reported in May, New York shelled out 89% more per kid than the national average. And that gap has been growing fast: In 1997, per-pupil outlays here were just 45% above average.

…In the city Thursday, Mayor Bill de Blasio and Schools Chancellor Richard Carranza tried to spin the results positively. The pass rate in English, they noted, is up 0.7 percentage points — and three whole points in math.

“Growth counts for something,” Carranza insisted.

Huh? That paltry uptick is what they’re proud of? Even though more than half the kids bombed? Please.

Notably, kids in the one category of public schools de Blasio and Carranza (and their union pals) don’t run — i.e., the charters — beat their counterparts in the regular schools by more than 10 percentage points in both English and math.

At least the kids won’t be flying private jets to attend the event. That makes them substantially less hypocritical than the celebrities who will be indoctrinating them during the Manhattan event.



NYC schools allow kids to go on #ClimateStrike



7. “Fifth-grade teacher defends wearing 'Columbus was a murderer' shirt to school” https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/oct/16/fifth-grade-teacher-defends- earing-columbus-was-a/
8. “Seattle Public Schools Say Math Is Racist
The Seattle Public Schools Ethnic Studies Advisory Committee (ESAC) released a rough draft of notes for its Math Ethnic Studies framework in late September, which attempts to connects math to a history of oppression.” Seattle Public Schools Say Math Is Racist

9. “The sex and gender revolutionaries have officially taken over the Austin Independent School District without firing a single shot. In spite of overwhelming opposition from parents and pastors, the district’s trustees voted early Tuesday morning to implement a pornographic sex education policy that includes instruction on anal sex and how to place a condom on an erect penis.

The father of a fifth grader demanded to know who gave the school district the right to teach his child how to have anal and oral sex.” Texas School District Implements Pornographic Sex Education Policy

10.” It appears the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU), which held a solidarity rally this Saturday afternoon, …. seemed more like a convention of far-left radicals than the image of clean-cut teachers the CTU would like to project. Thousands of red-shirted Chicago Teachers Union members flooded into Chicago’s aptly named Union Square Park at noon today to demonstrate for solidarity and workers’ rights. Protesters embraced radical revolutionary imagery, wearing shirts with Che Guevara on them and holding signs emblazoned with the “iron fist.”

Occupy Chicago and anarchist groups as well as the Progressive Labor Party, International Socialists, SEIU, AFL-CIO, and others stood alongside teachers chanting for solidarity…” Radical left coalesces around Chicago Teacher protest


More



In the vid, teacher’s union with the Socialist iron fist banner…







11. “Racial Literacy Curriculum,” elementary schools in Virginia, North Carolina, New Jersey, New York, California, Rhode Island, Missouri, and Illinois have all adopted the mind-blowing, politically-charged brainwash that they tout as education. Topics for Kindergarten to Grade 8 include: implicit bias, white privilege, intersectionality, LGBTQ issues, racism as a “primary institution of the US,” and other such leftist agenda talking points.” EXCLUSIVE: New Leftist ‘Racial Literacy Curriculum’ Brainwashing Elementary School Children

12. The Pollyana Curriculum…nationwide

“Beginning in Grade 3, the Pollyanna "Racial Literacy Curriculum" asks students to become activists in order to achieve leftist goals. The 3rd Grade chapter is entitled "Stories of Activism – How One Voice Can Change a Community." The expected result is for students to understand "how we can be agents of communal, social, political, and environmental change."

…Pollyanna takes leftist activism to new heights, fabricating an image of a racist America that children are taught to rebel against.

By Grade 8,after nine years of acute indoctrination, the children are ready to fight on behalf of leftists in America. "tudents will set commitments for rectifying current social ills, such as learning and planning how to carry out anti-racist activism and/or social advocacy in their communities and/or to improve their everyday lives." The 8th Grade chapter is entitled "Racism as a Primary 'Institution' of the U.S. – How We May Combat Systemic Inequality." EXCLUSIVE: Leftist Activism Is A Requirement Of New Elementary School Curriculum



13. “Minnesota ‘Teacher of the Year’ takes knee during National Anthem at NCAA title game” Minnesota ‘Teacher of the Year’ takes knee during National Anthem at NCAA title game | The College Fix

14. "School in Brooklyn Hands Out “Drag Queen in Training” Stickers to 4-Year-Olds” School in Brooklyn Hands Out “Drag Queen in Training” Stickers to 4-Year-Olds

15. “Teacher: “No Regrets” for Desecrating American Flag in Classroom” Teacher: “No Regrets” for Desecrating American Flag in Classroom | Todd Starnes


16. “He Teaches Social Studies: Suspect Who Vandalized Columbus Statue in Rhode Island is Elementary Teacher Leftists believe Columbus is evil for discovering the New World in 1492. It makes you wonder what the angry felon was teaching the kids at school.” He Teaches Social Studies: Suspect Who Vandalized Columbus Statue in Rhode Island is Elementary Teacher

17. A Black Lives Matter-supporting teacher took to Twitter to assert that 2+2 only = 4 because of “western imperialism.”
Yes, really.
Brittany Marshall’s tweet went viral after she claimed during the course of a discussion about racism, “Nope the idea of 2 + 2 equaling 4 is cultural and because of western imperialism/colonization, we think of it as the only way of knowing.”
Marshall, who includes her pronouns in her bio, lists her occupation as “teacher, scholar, social justice change agent” and apparently is studying for a PhD at Rutgers."
BLM Teacher Says 2+2 Only = 4 Because of “Western Imperialism”

Sorry, what?

summit.news



So you're a government school grad?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Been swimming in the East River again? ... gubbermint skool doktors told you about that ...

Been swimming in the East River again? ... gubbermint skool doktors told you about that ...

Sorry.....no liars allowed in this thread.

Move on.

 

[pknopp]

I'm not going to quote that entire mess. (you are only suppose to post small blurbs with a link to the story) but your complaint was in the government take over of property.

Look Who’s Trying to Seize Private Property

Factchecker: Donald Trump supports eminent domain

 

[PoliticalChic]

That’s when you know you’ve been converted by government school to make government your god.


Here's the premise: environmentalism is simply a way to hide the real reason for laws, regulations, statutes that end was is meant to be private property.


1.Government school and Democrat government both have collectivism as their guiding principle….everyone is merely a cog in a machine, and just as replaceable. The Founders envisioned a nation based on individualism, differences in views, traditions, opinions, with the idea of ‘checks and balances’ to balance opposing factions.

Communism, Liberalism, Socialism, etc. all need those cogs to be identical in their views. Government school is the mechanism to carry out Lenin’s plan:

In October 1919, Lenin paid a secret visit to the laboratory of the great physiologist I. P. Pavlov, a Russian physiologist known chiefly for the concept of the conditioned reflex. In his classic experiment, he found that a hungry dog can be trained to associate the sound of a bell with food and will salivate at the sound even in the absence of food. Lenin wanted to find out if his work on the conditional reflexes of the brain might help the Bolsheviks control European behaviour. “I want the masses of Russia to follow a Communistic pattern of thinking and reacting,” Lenin explained. Pavlov was astounded. It seemed that Lenin wanted him to do for humans what he had already done for dogs. “Do you mean that you would like to standardise the population of Russia? Make them all behave in the same way?” he asked. “Exactly” replied Lenin. “Man can be corrected. Man can be made what we want him to be.” Orlando Figes, "A People's Tragedy," p.732-733

Lenin could do it, because he simply killed those who didn’t march in lock-step. Here, the Left uses simplistic arguments and doesn’t allow rebuttal, opposing views….and uses the media and pop culture for a constant drum beat.





2. “Begging the question” means that one starts out with the conclusion as a given. Begging the question is also called arguing in a circle.” (Google)

One prominent example is Global Warming. There is no proof, yet the media, the schools, pop culture simply assume it to be true, and demands that everyone accept that ‘truth’.

In his book on the Supreme Court, Liberal guru Thom Hartmann shows how it’s done:

“There are three principal ways that activists are using the law to try to slow down and even reverse the destruction of our planet by climate change.

The first is through the political process and regulation, which the Trump administration has shown us can be a thin reed, subject to the vagaries of politics. Its rollback of previous administrations’ rules and regulations to reduce poisons in our air and water, and carbon dioxide and methane (and chlorofluorocarbons) in our atmosphere, shows how fragile this strategy can be without strong and clear legislation from Congress.

The second is the property rights movement, claiming that the right of people to enjoy their environment and the stability of their lives—a logical extension of property rights as envisioned by Locke and Jefferson all the way to today—is infringed on by pollution and climate change. This is largely the “public trust doctrine….

The third is the human rights argument. This posits that the core human rights referenced in both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution (particularly as amended by the Bill of Rights) include the right to safety and happiness, which require a stable climate and a nontoxic environment.” “The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America,” Thom Hartmann, P. 108

All three of these are attacks on private property.



The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property. Karl Marx





If one stipulates the truth of the Global Warming Scam….well, then….communism seems so sensible….

Global warming is happening, just ask NASA.
Climate Change Evidence: How Do We Know?

This NASA???


"Air pollution has been another popular topic of alarm. A number of scientists, including a NASA expert and a whole panel convened at Brown University, predicted that "air pollution may obliterate the sun and cause a new ice age in the first third of the next century," in the words of a 1970 Boston Globe report. Air pollution has declined steadily for decades.
In the 1980s, scientists projected both epic floods, with the Maldives under water by the 2010s, and epic droughts, with regions going parched starting in the 1990s. None of these predictions came to pass.

More recent scientists are not immune. The CEI report cites Dr. David Viner, a climate researcher at the University of East Anglia, who in 2000 predicted snowfall would soon become "a very rare and exciting event. … Children just aren't going to know what snow is." In 2008, one NASA scientist told Congress to expect all arctic ice to melt by 2018; that same year, Al Gore predicted it would vanish by 2013. As recently as 2014, the French foreign minister claimed the planet had just "500 days" before climate catastrophe.

Five Decades of Wrong Predictions About the Environmental Apocalypse

Environmentalists' apocalyptic predictions have failed for decades, but that has not stopped top Democrats from panicking, according to a new study.

freebeacon.com

Were you always this gullible?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Much of Trump's opposition comes from conditioned urbanites. There is a plan to seed low income housing into America's northern and midwestern suburban areas where that opposition can be invaded with foreign interlopers and overwhelmed with meth labs and crack houses like the cities. The elimination of the concept of private poperty is a key initiative. They don't even try to hide it.

Biden Seeks to Abolish America's Suburban Communities

Joe Biden's radical proposal for the Democrat Party platform for 2020 seeks to put an end to America's suburban communities.

www.breitbart.com

Yet they've convinced so many property owners to buy it.


Government schooling.

 

[PoliticalChic]

That’s when you know you’ve been converted by government school to make government your god.


Here's the premise: environmentalism is simply a way to hide the real reason for laws, regulations, statutes that end was is meant to be private property.


1.Government school and Democrat government both have collectivism as their guiding principle….everyone is merely a cog in a machine, and just as replaceable. The Founders envisioned a nation based on individualism, differences in views, traditions, opinions, with the idea of ‘checks and balances’ to balance opposing factions.

Communism, Liberalism, Socialism, etc. all need those cogs to be identical in their views. Government school is the mechanism to carry out Lenin’s plan:

In October 1919, Lenin paid a secret visit to the laboratory of the great physiologist I. P. Pavlov, a Russian physiologist known chiefly for the concept of the conditioned reflex. In his classic experiment, he found that a hungry dog can be trained to associate the sound of a bell with food and will salivate at the sound even in the absence of food. Lenin wanted to find out if his work on the conditional reflexes of the brain might help the Bolsheviks control European behaviour. “I want the masses of Russia to follow a Communistic pattern of thinking and reacting,” Lenin explained. Pavlov was astounded. It seemed that Lenin wanted him to do for humans what he had already done for dogs. “Do you mean that you would like to standardise the population of Russia? Make them all behave in the same way?” he asked. “Exactly” replied Lenin. “Man can be corrected. Man can be made what we want him to be.” Orlando Figes, "A People's Tragedy," p.732-733

Lenin could do it, because he simply killed those who didn’t march in lock-step. Here, the Left uses simplistic arguments and doesn’t allow rebuttal, opposing views….and uses the media and pop culture for a constant drum beat.





2. “Begging the question” means that one starts out with the conclusion as a given. Begging the question is also called arguing in a circle.” (Google)

One prominent example is Global Warming. There is no proof, yet the media, the schools, pop culture simply assume it to be true, and demands that everyone accept that ‘truth’.

In his book on the Supreme Court, Liberal guru Thom Hartmann shows how it’s done:

“There are three principal ways that activists are using the law to try to slow down and even reverse the destruction of our planet by climate change.

The first is through the political process and regulation, which the Trump administration has shown us can be a thin reed, subject to the vagaries of politics. Its rollback of previous administrations’ rules and regulations to reduce poisons in our air and water, and carbon dioxide and methane (and chlorofluorocarbons) in our atmosphere, shows how fragile this strategy can be without strong and clear legislation from Congress.

The second is the property rights movement, claiming that the right of people to enjoy their environment and the stability of their lives—a logical extension of property rights as envisioned by Locke and Jefferson all the way to today—is infringed on by pollution and climate change. This is largely the “public trust doctrine….

The third is the human rights argument. This posits that the core human rights referenced in both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution (particularly as amended by the Bill of Rights) include the right to safety and happiness, which require a stable climate and a nontoxic environment.” “The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America,” Thom Hartmann, P. 108

All three of these are attacks on private property.



The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property. Karl Marx





If one stipulates the truth of the Global Warming Scam….well, then….communism seems so sensible….

Global warming is happening, just ask NASA.
Climate Change Evidence: How Do We Know?

If the wind blows, blame your neighbor. If earthquakes happen it is the fault of infidels. Floods? You know who to accuse. The government is the only thing that can save you according to Culural Marxism. The science apparently proves the Earth is warming. Mars is currently experiencing global warming. Does this mean problematic people on Earth are destroying the Solar System?

The only thing they won't believe without experimental proof .....

...is God.


A cognitive disconnect.

 

[Taz]

That’s when you know you’ve been converted by government school to make government your god.


Here's the premise: environmentalism is simply a way to hide the real reason for laws, regulations, statutes that end was is meant to be private property.


1.Government school and Democrat government both have collectivism as their guiding principle….everyone is merely a cog in a machine, and just as replaceable. The Founders envisioned a nation based on individualism, differences in views, traditions, opinions, with the idea of ‘checks and balances’ to balance opposing factions.

Communism, Liberalism, Socialism, etc. all need those cogs to be identical in their views. Government school is the mechanism to carry out Lenin’s plan:

In October 1919, Lenin paid a secret visit to the laboratory of the great physiologist I. P. Pavlov, a Russian physiologist known chiefly for the concept of the conditioned reflex. In his classic experiment, he found that a hungry dog can be trained to associate the sound of a bell with food and will salivate at the sound even in the absence of food. Lenin wanted to find out if his work on the conditional reflexes of the brain might help the Bolsheviks control European behaviour. “I want the masses of Russia to follow a Communistic pattern of thinking and reacting,” Lenin explained. Pavlov was astounded. It seemed that Lenin wanted him to do for humans what he had already done for dogs. “Do you mean that you would like to standardise the population of Russia? Make them all behave in the same way?” he asked. “Exactly” replied Lenin. “Man can be corrected. Man can be made what we want him to be.” Orlando Figes, "A People's Tragedy," p.732-733

Lenin could do it, because he simply killed those who didn’t march in lock-step. Here, the Left uses simplistic arguments and doesn’t allow rebuttal, opposing views….and uses the media and pop culture for a constant drum beat.





2. “Begging the question” means that one starts out with the conclusion as a given. Begging the question is also called arguing in a circle.” (Google)

One prominent example is Global Warming. There is no proof, yet the media, the schools, pop culture simply assume it to be true, and demands that everyone accept that ‘truth’.

In his book on the Supreme Court, Liberal guru Thom Hartmann shows how it’s done:

“There are three principal ways that activists are using the law to try to slow down and even reverse the destruction of our planet by climate change.

The first is through the political process and regulation, which the Trump administration has shown us can be a thin reed, subject to the vagaries of politics. Its rollback of previous administrations’ rules and regulations to reduce poisons in our air and water, and carbon dioxide and methane (and chlorofluorocarbons) in our atmosphere, shows how fragile this strategy can be without strong and clear legislation from Congress.

The second is the property rights movement, claiming that the right of people to enjoy their environment and the stability of their lives—a logical extension of property rights as envisioned by Locke and Jefferson all the way to today—is infringed on by pollution and climate change. This is largely the “public trust doctrine….

The third is the human rights argument. This posits that the core human rights referenced in both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution (particularly as amended by the Bill of Rights) include the right to safety and happiness, which require a stable climate and a nontoxic environment.” “The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America,” Thom Hartmann, P. 108

All three of these are attacks on private property.



The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property. Karl Marx





If one stipulates the truth of the Global Warming Scam….well, then….communism seems so sensible….

Global warming is happening, just ask NASA.
Climate Change Evidence: How Do We Know?

If the wind blows, blame your neighbor. If earthquakes happen it is the fault of infidels. Floods? You know who to accuse. The government is the only thing that can save you according to Culural Marxism. The science apparently proves the Earth is warming. Mars is currently experiencing global warming. Does this mean problematic people on Earth are destroying the Solar System?

If you want, I can start you a gofundme page to buy yourself a clue?

 

[Taz]

That’s when you know you’ve been converted by government school to make government your god.


Here's the premise: environmentalism is simply a way to hide the real reason for laws, regulations, statutes that end was is meant to be private property.


1.Government school and Democrat government both have collectivism as their guiding principle….everyone is merely a cog in a machine, and just as replaceable. The Founders envisioned a nation based on individualism, differences in views, traditions, opinions, with the idea of ‘checks and balances’ to balance opposing factions.

Communism, Liberalism, Socialism, etc. all need those cogs to be identical in their views. Government school is the mechanism to carry out Lenin’s plan:

In October 1919, Lenin paid a secret visit to the laboratory of the great physiologist I. P. Pavlov, a Russian physiologist known chiefly for the concept of the conditioned reflex. In his classic experiment, he found that a hungry dog can be trained to associate the sound of a bell with food and will salivate at the sound even in the absence of food. Lenin wanted to find out if his work on the conditional reflexes of the brain might help the Bolsheviks control European behaviour. “I want the masses of Russia to follow a Communistic pattern of thinking and reacting,” Lenin explained. Pavlov was astounded. It seemed that Lenin wanted him to do for humans what he had already done for dogs. “Do you mean that you would like to standardise the population of Russia? Make them all behave in the same way?” he asked. “Exactly” replied Lenin. “Man can be corrected. Man can be made what we want him to be.” Orlando Figes, "A People's Tragedy," p.732-733

Lenin could do it, because he simply killed those who didn’t march in lock-step. Here, the Left uses simplistic arguments and doesn’t allow rebuttal, opposing views….and uses the media and pop culture for a constant drum beat.





2. “Begging the question” means that one starts out with the conclusion as a given. Begging the question is also called arguing in a circle.” (Google)

One prominent example is Global Warming. There is no proof, yet the media, the schools, pop culture simply assume it to be true, and demands that everyone accept that ‘truth’.

In his book on the Supreme Court, Liberal guru Thom Hartmann shows how it’s done:

“There are three principal ways that activists are using the law to try to slow down and even reverse the destruction of our planet by climate change.

The first is through the political process and regulation, which the Trump administration has shown us can be a thin reed, subject to the vagaries of politics. Its rollback of previous administrations’ rules and regulations to reduce poisons in our air and water, and carbon dioxide and methane (and chlorofluorocarbons) in our atmosphere, shows how fragile this strategy can be without strong and clear legislation from Congress.

The second is the property rights movement, claiming that the right of people to enjoy their environment and the stability of their lives—a logical extension of property rights as envisioned by Locke and Jefferson all the way to today—is infringed on by pollution and climate change. This is largely the “public trust doctrine….

The third is the human rights argument. This posits that the core human rights referenced in both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution (particularly as amended by the Bill of Rights) include the right to safety and happiness, which require a stable climate and a nontoxic environment.” “The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America,” Thom Hartmann, P. 108

All three of these are attacks on private property.



The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property. Karl Marx





If one stipulates the truth of the Global Warming Scam….well, then….communism seems so sensible….

Global warming is happening, just ask NASA.
Climate Change Evidence: How Do We Know?

If the wind blows, blame your neighbor. If earthquakes happen it is the fault of infidels. Floods? You know who to accuse. The government is the only thing that can save you according to Culural Marxism. The science apparently proves the Earth is warming. Mars is currently experiencing global warming. Does this mean problematic people on Earth are destroying the Solar System?

The only thing they won't believe without experimental proof .....

...is God.


A cognitive disconnect.

There is scientific proof for global warming, check out my link. Did you study science in hom skooll?

 

[PoliticalChic]

That’s when you know you’ve been converted by government school to make government your god.


Here's the premise: environmentalism is simply a way to hide the real reason for laws, regulations, statutes that end was is meant to be private property.


1.Government school and Democrat government both have collectivism as their guiding principle….everyone is merely a cog in a machine, and just as replaceable. The Founders envisioned a nation based on individualism, differences in views, traditions, opinions, with the idea of ‘checks and balances’ to balance opposing factions.

Communism, Liberalism, Socialism, etc. all need those cogs to be identical in their views. Government school is the mechanism to carry out Lenin’s plan:

In October 1919, Lenin paid a secret visit to the laboratory of the great physiologist I. P. Pavlov, a Russian physiologist known chiefly for the concept of the conditioned reflex. In his classic experiment, he found that a hungry dog can be trained to associate the sound of a bell with food and will salivate at the sound even in the absence of food. Lenin wanted to find out if his work on the conditional reflexes of the brain might help the Bolsheviks control European behaviour. “I want the masses of Russia to follow a Communistic pattern of thinking and reacting,” Lenin explained. Pavlov was astounded. It seemed that Lenin wanted him to do for humans what he had already done for dogs. “Do you mean that you would like to standardise the population of Russia? Make them all behave in the same way?” he asked. “Exactly” replied Lenin. “Man can be corrected. Man can be made what we want him to be.” Orlando Figes, "A People's Tragedy," p.732-733

Lenin could do it, because he simply killed those who didn’t march in lock-step. Here, the Left uses simplistic arguments and doesn’t allow rebuttal, opposing views….and uses the media and pop culture for a constant drum beat.





2. “Begging the question” means that one starts out with the conclusion as a given. Begging the question is also called arguing in a circle.” (Google)

One prominent example is Global Warming. There is no proof, yet the media, the schools, pop culture simply assume it to be true, and demands that everyone accept that ‘truth’.

In his book on the Supreme Court, Liberal guru Thom Hartmann shows how it’s done:

“There are three principal ways that activists are using the law to try to slow down and even reverse the destruction of our planet by climate change.

The first is through the political process and regulation, which the Trump administration has shown us can be a thin reed, subject to the vagaries of politics. Its rollback of previous administrations’ rules and regulations to reduce poisons in our air and water, and carbon dioxide and methane (and chlorofluorocarbons) in our atmosphere, shows how fragile this strategy can be without strong and clear legislation from Congress.

The second is the property rights movement, claiming that the right of people to enjoy their environment and the stability of their lives—a logical extension of property rights as envisioned by Locke and Jefferson all the way to today—is infringed on by pollution and climate change. This is largely the “public trust doctrine….

The third is the human rights argument. This posits that the core human rights referenced in both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution (particularly as amended by the Bill of Rights) include the right to safety and happiness, which require a stable climate and a nontoxic environment.” “The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America,” Thom Hartmann, P. 108

All three of these are attacks on private property.



The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property. Karl Marx





If one stipulates the truth of the Global Warming Scam….well, then….communism seems so sensible….

Global warming is happening, just ask NASA.
Climate Change Evidence: How Do We Know?

If the wind blows, blame your neighbor. If earthquakes happen it is the fault of infidels. Floods? You know who to accuse. The government is the only thing that can save you according to Culural Marxism. The science apparently proves the Earth is warming. Mars is currently experiencing global warming. Does this mean problematic people on Earth are destroying the Solar System?

The only thing they won't believe without experimental proof .....

...is God.


A cognitive disconnect.

There is scientific proof for global warming, check out my link. Did you study science in hom skooll?

Watch this:

"... an article by award-winning climate activist Michael Shellenberger, in which he apologizes "for the climate scare we created over the last 30 years."


Authored by Michael Shellenberger via Environmental Progress (emphasis ours)

On Behalf Of Environmentalists, I Apologize For The Climate Scare


On behalf of environmentalists everywhere, I would like to formally apologize for the climate scare we created over the last 30 years. Climate change is happening. It’s just not the end of the world. It’s not even our most serious environmental problem.
I may seem like a strange person to be saying all of this. I have been a climate activist for 20 years and an environmentalist for 30.
But as an energy expert asked by Congress to provide objective expert testimony, and invited by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to serve as Expert Reviewer of its next Assessment Report, I feel an obligation to apologize for how badly we environmentalists have misled the public.
Here are some facts few people know:

• Humans are not causing a “sixth mass extinction”
• The Amazon is not “the lungs of the world”
• Climate change is not making natural disasters worse
• Fires have declined 25% around the world since 2003
• The amount of land we use for meat — humankind’s biggest use of land — has declined by an area nearly as large as Alaska
• The build-up of wood fuel and more houses near forests, not climate change, explain why there are more, and more dangerous, fires in Australia and California
• Carbon emissions are declining in most rich nations and have been declining in Britain, Germany, and France since the mid-1970s
• Adapting to life below sea level made the Netherlands rich not poor
• We produce 25% more food than we need and food surpluses will continue to rise as the world gets hotter
• Habitat loss and the direct killing of wild animals are bigger threats to species than climate change
• Wood fuel is far worse for people and wildlife than fossil fuels
• Preventing future pandemics requires more not less “industrial” agriculture

I know that the above facts will sound like “climate denialism” to many people. But that just shows the power of climate alarmism"

​

Forbes Censors Award-Winning Environmentalist's Apology Over Three-Decade 'Climate Scare' - So Here It Is

"We environmentalists have misled the public."

www.zerohedge.com

 

[Taz]

That’s when you know you’ve been converted by government school to make government your god.


Here's the premise: environmentalism is simply a way to hide the real reason for laws, regulations, statutes that end was is meant to be private property.


1.Government school and Democrat government both have collectivism as their guiding principle….everyone is merely a cog in a machine, and just as replaceable. The Founders envisioned a nation based on individualism, differences in views, traditions, opinions, with the idea of ‘checks and balances’ to balance opposing factions.

Communism, Liberalism, Socialism, etc. all need those cogs to be identical in their views. Government school is the mechanism to carry out Lenin’s plan:

In October 1919, Lenin paid a secret visit to the laboratory of the great physiologist I. P. Pavlov, a Russian physiologist known chiefly for the concept of the conditioned reflex. In his classic experiment, he found that a hungry dog can be trained to associate the sound of a bell with food and will salivate at the sound even in the absence of food. Lenin wanted to find out if his work on the conditional reflexes of the brain might help the Bolsheviks control European behaviour. “I want the masses of Russia to follow a Communistic pattern of thinking and reacting,” Lenin explained. Pavlov was astounded. It seemed that Lenin wanted him to do for humans what he had already done for dogs. “Do you mean that you would like to standardise the population of Russia? Make them all behave in the same way?” he asked. “Exactly” replied Lenin. “Man can be corrected. Man can be made what we want him to be.” Orlando Figes, "A People's Tragedy," p.732-733

Lenin could do it, because he simply killed those who didn’t march in lock-step. Here, the Left uses simplistic arguments and doesn’t allow rebuttal, opposing views….and uses the media and pop culture for a constant drum beat.





2. “Begging the question” means that one starts out with the conclusion as a given. Begging the question is also called arguing in a circle.” (Google)

One prominent example is Global Warming. There is no proof, yet the media, the schools, pop culture simply assume it to be true, and demands that everyone accept that ‘truth’.

In his book on the Supreme Court, Liberal guru Thom Hartmann shows how it’s done:

“There are three principal ways that activists are using the law to try to slow down and even reverse the destruction of our planet by climate change.

The first is through the political process and regulation, which the Trump administration has shown us can be a thin reed, subject to the vagaries of politics. Its rollback of previous administrations’ rules and regulations to reduce poisons in our air and water, and carbon dioxide and methane (and chlorofluorocarbons) in our atmosphere, shows how fragile this strategy can be without strong and clear legislation from Congress.

The second is the property rights movement, claiming that the right of people to enjoy their environment and the stability of their lives—a logical extension of property rights as envisioned by Locke and Jefferson all the way to today—is infringed on by pollution and climate change. This is largely the “public trust doctrine….

The third is the human rights argument. This posits that the core human rights referenced in both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution (particularly as amended by the Bill of Rights) include the right to safety and happiness, which require a stable climate and a nontoxic environment.” “The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America,” Thom Hartmann, P. 108

All three of these are attacks on private property.



The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property. Karl Marx





If one stipulates the truth of the Global Warming Scam….well, then….communism seems so sensible….

Global warming is happening, just ask NASA.
Climate Change Evidence: How Do We Know?

If the wind blows, blame your neighbor. If earthquakes happen it is the fault of infidels. Floods? You know who to accuse. The government is the only thing that can save you according to Culural Marxism. The science apparently proves the Earth is warming. Mars is currently experiencing global warming. Does this mean problematic people on Earth are destroying the Solar System?

The only thing they won't believe without experimental proof .....

...is God.


A cognitive disconnect.

There is scientific proof for global warming, check out my link. Did you study science in hom skooll?

Watch this:

"... an article by award-winning climate activist Michael Shellenberger, in which he apologizes "for the climate scare we created over the last 30 years."


Authored by Michael Shellenberger via Environmental Progress (emphasis ours)

On Behalf Of Environmentalists, I Apologize For The Climate Scare


On behalf of environmentalists everywhere, I would like to formally apologize for the climate scare we created over the last 30 years. Climate change is happening. It’s just not the end of the world. It’s not even our most serious environmental problem.
I may seem like a strange person to be saying all of this. I have been a climate activist for 20 years and an environmentalist for 30.
But as an energy expert asked by Congress to provide objective expert testimony, and invited by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to serve as Expert Reviewer of its next Assessment Report, I feel an obligation to apologize for how badly we environmentalists have misled the public.
Here are some facts few people know:

• Humans are not causing a “sixth mass extinction”
• The Amazon is not “the lungs of the world”
• Climate change is not making natural disasters worse
• Fires have declined 25% around the world since 2003
• The amount of land we use for meat — humankind’s biggest use of land — has declined by an area nearly as large as Alaska
• The build-up of wood fuel and more houses near forests, not climate change, explain why there are more, and more dangerous, fires in Australia and California
• Carbon emissions are declining in most rich nations and have been declining in Britain, Germany, and France since the mid-1970s
• Adapting to life below sea level made the Netherlands rich not poor
• We produce 25% more food than we need and food surpluses will continue to rise as the world gets hotter
• Habitat loss and the direct killing of wild animals are bigger threats to species than climate change
• Wood fuel is far worse for people and wildlife than fossil fuels
• Preventing future pandemics requires more not less “industrial” agriculture

I know that the above facts will sound like “climate denialism” to many people. But that just shows the power of climate alarmism"

​

Forbes Censors Award-Winning Environmentalist's Apology Over Three-Decade 'Climate Scare' - So Here It Is

"We environmentalists have misled the public."

www.zerohedge.com

NASA, who are smart enough to go to Mars..., beats your lone jackass, I win. And I bet your jackass believes in evolution.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Sadly, there has always been a large pool of those too weak and cowardly, or simply too dumb......to question the lies of environmentalism. They feel so secure siding with the 'vast consensus.'

That makes it sooo much easier for the Bolsheviks....er, Democrats who own and operate the schools.



Now....let's destroy the 'consensus' argument.

3. Well….don’t all the scientists agree about Global Warming?

“… where did that famous “consensus” claim that “98% of all scientists believe in global warming” come from? It originated from an endlessly reported 2009 American Geophysical Union (AGU) survey consisting of an intentionally brief two-minute, two question online survey sent to 10,257 earth scientists by two researchers at the University of Illinois. Of the about 3.000 who responded, 82% answered “yes” to the second question, which like the first, most people I know would also have agreed with.

The first: “When compared with pre-1800s levels, do you think that mean global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant?”

The second question asked: “Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?”

Then of those, only a small subset, just 77 who had been successful in getting more than half of their papers recently accepted by peer-reviewed climate science journals, were considered in their survey statistic. That “98% all scientists” referred to a laughably puny number of 75 of those 77 who answered “yes”. That Scientific Global Warming Consensus...Not!

77 out of 10,257 becomes 98%.
Yup…figures don’t lie, but liars can figure.



Oh….BTW….

“Since 1998, more than 31,000 American scientists from diverse climate-related disciplines, including more than 9,000 with Ph.D.s, have signed a public petition announcing their belief that “…there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.” Included are atmospheric physicists, botanists, geologists, oceanographers, and meteorologists.” Ibid.



Since 1998, more than 31,000 American scientists, have signed a public petition announcing their belief that “…there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.” That Scientific Global Warming Consensus...Not!