When are you or your children's constitutional rights at risk?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Supposn

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
2,813
Reaction score
416
Points
130
When are you or your children's constitutional rights at risk?
Where federal enforcement agents are legally or illegally acting is dependent upon the federal court that has jurisdiction of the district where agent's operating.

Three different federal court districts judges, randomly chosen to adjudicate the cases, issued preliminary national injunctions prohibiting presidential executive Order 14160 regarding a persons being forcibly deported before their cases are legally adjudicated.

The 6/9 Supreme Court's majority decision effectively enables federal agents to deny persons' their constitutionally protected right of “due [legal] process” anywhere in the United States, other than within jurisdictions of Maryland's, New Jersey's, and Western Washington's federal districts' courts. Within the remainder of the United states, ALL, (U.S. Citizens and non-citizens) may be denied what the U.S. Constitution's explicitly stated entitlement of “due process”.

Legal determination for a person arrested within the state of Washington depends upon federal agent's statements regarding which side of the state's East and West line of demarcation the arrest was made and/or where the prisoner was incarcerated? If a federal prisoner is carried over or through the Eastern portion of Washington State, does it affect the prisoner's constitutional rights?
Respectfully, Supposn
 
When are you or your children's constitutional rights at risk?
Where federal enforcement agents are legally or illegally acting is dependent upon the federal court that has jurisdiction of the district where agent's operating.

Three different federal court districts judges, randomly chosen to adjudicate the cases, issued preliminary national injunctions prohibiting presidential executive Order 14160 regarding a persons being forcibly deported before their cases are legally adjudicated.

The 6/9 Supreme Court's majority decision effectively enables federal agents to deny persons' their constitutionally protected right of “due [legal] process” anywhere in the United States, other than within jurisdictions of Maryland's, New Jersey's, and Western Washington's federal districts' courts. Within the remainder of the United states, ALL, (U.S. Citizens and non-citizens) may be denied what the U.S. Constitution's explicitly stated entitlement of “due process”.

Legal determination for a person arrested within the state of Washington depends upon federal agent's statements regarding which side of the state's East and West line of demarcation the arrest was made and/or where the prisoner was incarcerated? If a federal prisoner is carried over or through the Eastern portion of Washington State, does it affect the prisoner's constitutional rights?
Respectfully, Supposn
Misinformation.

Read the SCOTUS decision.
 
The asylum seekers were given due process when they were given a court date.
But they rejected due process when the failed to appear for their court date.
 
THREAD CLOSED, LACKS REQUIRED LINK/S TO SUPPORT STATEMENTS OF FACT IN THE OP
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom