Name any part of the chart you can defend but only in your own words.Watch how easily I destroy that lie: name any part of the chart you can dispute.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Name any part of the chart you can defend but only in your own words.Watch how easily I destroy that lie: name any part of the chart you can dispute.
Name any part of the chart you can defend but only in your own words.
Ok ill play.Watch how easily I destroy that lie: name any part of the chart you can dispute.
Name any part of the chart you can defend but only in your own words.You can run, but you can't hide.
So saith the Brown Bomber
"Hardly the first time you offered that chart. Go back to your previous offerings and you'll find plenty of corrections to its' load of lies and distortions. And not just by me."
Watch how easily I destroy that lie: name any part of the chart you can dispute.
View attachment 558272
Wrong, but at least you can use your own words. Partial credit.Ok ill play.
The part under "democrats" where it says "hates jews and whites" is incorrect.
you can add minorities to that as well.
Ok ill play.
The part under "democrats" where it says "hates jews and whites" is incorrect.
you can add minorities to that as well.
Name any part of the chart you can defend but only in your own words.
Id be upset too, if she was handing me my ass on a platter like she is you!Wrong, but at least you can use your own words. Partial credit.
Glad you feel that way. Maybe you can explain to me how she can write:Id be upset too, if she was handing me my ass on a platter like she is you!
you answer her question first. then I might give yours a try.Glad you feel that way. Maybe you can explain to me how she can write:
"Have you noticed that those who vote for the party of censorship call the other side Nazis???"and then repeatedly post this graphic:
and then refuse to admit they vote for the party of censorship. PoliticalChic has yet to reconcile it, maybe you can.
Glad you feel that way. Maybe you can explain to me how she can write:
"Have you noticed that those who vote for the party of censorship call the other side Nazis???"and then repeatedly post this graphic:
and then refuse to admit they vote for the party of censorship. PoliticalChic has yet to reconcile it, maybe you can.
You forgot to include the GOP. Donald Trump said that he might pay the legal fees of a man charged with hitting a protester in the face at one of his rallies, it was one of many occasions when appeared to condone or accept violence by supporters.7. ."What does our culture value? One recent survey found that a majority of college students support shouting down speakers with whom they disagree; 23 percent supported the use of violence toward this end. At some colleges, the percentage supporting such violence crept into the 40s.
[You can bet that all of those vote Democrat.]
That is not a culture that values free speech. It is a culture that values freedom from emotional, political, and intellectual disturbance of any kind. These shifts in attitude, which have escaped campus and are spreading quickly, have had a stifling effect, including on news coverage of the pandemic and other major stories. Jim Geraghty wrote this week about “anti-journalism” that hid uncomfortable narratives, regardless of whether they might be true."
What Happens When Free Speech Dies | National Review
We must not let it wither here.www.nationalreview.com
Which of these groups endorse ending free speech:
Bolsheviks
Fascists
Nazis
Progressives
Liberals
Socialists
Democrats.
Right....all of them.
Sorry, but no. When I pointed out the apparent hypocrisy of PoliticalChic, she refused to address the issue and sought to take the conversation into a tangent. I'll tell you what l told her, when my question is answered I'll address new ones but not before.you answer her question first. then I might give yours a try.
Now I understand, it's OK for the Right to call the other side Naziis but the other way round.How could the Right censor anything when the Wehrmacht......er, Democrats own the media????????
You forgot to include the GOP. Donald Trump said that he might pay the legal fees of a man charged with hitting a protester in the face at one of his rallies, it was one of many occasions when appeared to condone or accept violence by supporters.
So you counter current events with ancient history? Trump is still around and probably just as popular in the GOP as ever. Which of those 'lynching' Dems are still alive? Whatever the Southern Dems did in the past appears to be a cause taken up by the GOP of today:OK.....I'll see your "hitting a protester" and raise you with 'lynching.'
It appears the GOP now block every anti-lynching bill the Democrats bring up.Democrats blocked every anti-lynching bill the Republicans brought up???
So you counter current events with ancient history? Trump is still around and probably just as popular in the GOP as ever. Which of those 'lynching' Dems are still alive? Whatever the Southern Dems did in the past appears to be a cause taken up by the GOP of today:
The Justice for Victims of Lynching Act of 2018 was introduced in the US Senate in June 2018 by the body's three Black members: Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, and Tim Scott. The legislation passed the Senate unanimously on December 19, 2018. The bill died because it was not passed by the GOP-controlled House before the 115th Congress ended on January 3, 2019.On February 26, 2020, the Emmett Till Anti-lynching Act, a revised version of the Justice for Victims of Lynching Act, passed the House of Representatives, by a vote of 410–4. GOP Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky has held the bill from passage.