What's Up With Sanctuary Cities?

Sanctuary cities are worse than you let on.
It isn’t a question of better or worse, compelling arguments can also be made about gun violence.

It is picking and choosing: supporting breaking laws for one sanctuary purpose while condemning it for the other.

The right claims to be all about law and order as I recall.
 
"2A ā€œsanctuariesā€ essentially pass resolutions stating they won’t enforce state gun laws."

a right guaranteed in the Constitution.

"Sanctuary cities pass resolutions stating they won’t enforce immigration laws."

meaning they have no problem harboring criminals as defined by federal law

same reason I approve of the death penalty, but abortion only in specific instances.

Death penalty--found guilty by a judge and jury (usually 13 people)

Abortion-- fetus found guilty by mother and doctor.
It is about time we round up those illegals and send them back to where they came from.
 
It isn’t a question of better or worse, compelling arguments can also be made about gun violence.

It is picking and choosing: supporting breaking laws for one sanctuary purpose while condemning it for the other.

The right claims to be all about law and order as I recall.

Can we please stop about the gun stuff already? You're derailing my subject and breaking one of your own rules in doing so.
 
It isn’t a question of better or worse, compelling arguments can also be made about gun violence.

It is picking and choosing: supporting breaking laws for one sanctuary purpose while condemning it for the other.

The right claims to be all about law and order as I recall.
The right claims to be all about law and order as I recall.
isn't' refusing to house illegal immigrants upholding the law?
 
"2A ā€œsanctuariesā€ essentially pass resolutions stating they won’t enforce state gun laws."

a right guaranteed in the Constitution.
No right is unlimited. Gun laws have passed Constitutional challenges. So are you approving selectively not enforcing Constitutional laws for ideological reasons?


"Sanctuary cities pass resolutions stating they won’t enforce immigration laws."

meaning they have no problem harboring criminals as defined by federal law
Meaning they are choosing to selectively not enforce laws which means, guess what? They are harboring criminals.

same reason I approve of the death penalty, but abortion only in specific instances.

Death penalty--found guilty by a judge and jury (usually 13 people)

Abortion-- fetus found guilty by mother and doctor.
All of that is a whole other arguement.
 
No right is unlimited. Gun laws have passed Constitutional challenges. So are you approving selectively not enforcing Constitutional laws for ideological reasons?



Meaning they are choosing to selectively not enforce laws which means, guess what? They are harboring criminals.


All of that is a whole other arguement.
Meaning they are choosing to selectively not enforce laws which means, guess what?

they are in violation of local law. they are within their rights under Federal law.

which Ca, Mass, Chicago and NY has found out in the last couple years.
 
Can we please stop about the gun stuff already? You're derailing my subject and breaking one of your own rules in doing so.
I’m making comparisons to make a point, and reference sanctuary cities in every post. I’m not arguing about gun laws. I’m arguing about the selectively applied support for ā€œsanctuaryā€ cities and breaking the law.

To go back to your OP…you call the Dems ā€œthe party of criminalsā€ because they support the existence of ā€œsanctuary citiesā€ that refuse to enforce immigration laws but you don’t call Repubs the party of criminals for supporting ā€œsanctuary citiesā€ that refuse to enforce gun laws.
 
I’m making comparisons to make a point, and reference sanctuary cities in every post. I’m not arguing about gun laws. I’m arguing about the selectively applied support for ā€œsanctuaryā€ cities and breaking the law.

To go back to your OP…you call the Dems ā€œthe party of criminalsā€ because they support the existence of ā€œsanctuary citiesā€ that refuse to enforce immigration laws but you don’t call Repubs the party of criminals for supporting ā€œsanctuary citiesā€ that refuse to enforce gun laws.

Oh I see. So both parties are breaking the law then but no Republican would house illegal immigrants so my point still stands.

Acknowledge what?

That illegal aliens should be deported. I've been waiting for you to say this phrase for a very long time now.
 
15th post
Oh I see. So both parties are breaking the law then but no Republican would house illegal immigrants so my point still stands.



That illegal aliens should be deported. I've been waiting for you to say this phrase for a very long time now.
Ah…I see. This is your ā€œtestā€ of why don’t I say x y z.

Illegal aliens should be deported. And there is a legal process for doing so and certain rights our laws give them during the process.

I do not support deporting those who were brought in as children. They had no choice, they culturally American, and they shouldn’t be punished for the actions of their parents.
 
Back
Top Bottom