What's Up With Sanctuary Cities?

Thanks but Dakota best you to it lol



I was just about to ask if that's what this is about. Trump's talking about getting rid of that dreamer thing.
Actually…I thought Trump changed positions on that and does not support deporting them?
 
You would be deporting a vulnerable young adult to a country he/she may have no connection to.

Yeah but it's a whole LOT better than deporting a two year old right?


 
Yeah but it's a whole LOT better than deporting a two year old right?



Not really. A 2 yr old would be deported with his parents.

18 might technically be adult, but in many ways not really. For example look at what happens to kids who “age out” of the foster care system. Where normally there is a transitioning going on of increasing independence but still parental support, these kids are just boom - 18, you’re on your own unless there is a transition program in place. That is what you would be doing to these young adults only worse, they would be in a country they may have no memory of, they would be be regarded as culturally American, and outsiders with no support system.
 
The dreamers or illegal children in general?.
Dreamers.


In an interview Sunday on NBC’s Meet the Press, President-elect Donald Trump said he is willing to work with Democrats to address the future of Dreamers — undocumented immigrants brought to the United States as children under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. His comments stand in contrast to his hardline approach to broader immigration enforcement and border security.

“We have to do something about the Dreamers,” Trump said during the interview, acknowledging that many DACA recipients have lived in the U.S. for decades, have established careers, and no longer identify with their countries of origin, adding: “I will work with the Democrats on a plan.”

“They were brought into this country many years ago,” he continued. “Some of them are no longer young people, and in many cases they’ve become successful. They have great jobs. In some cases, they have small businesses. Some cases they might have large businesses, and we’re going to have to do something with them.”
 
Not really. A 2 yr old would be deported with his parents.

That one wasn't.

Dreamers.


In an interview Sunday on NBC’s Meet the Press, President-elect Donald Trump said he is willing to work with Democrats to address the future of Dreamers — undocumented immigrants brought to the United States as children under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. His comments stand in contrast to his hardline approach to broader immigration enforcement and border security.

“We have to do something about the Dreamers,” Trump said during the interview, acknowledging that many DACA recipients have lived in the U.S. for decades, have established careers, and no longer identify with their countries of origin, adding: “I will work with the Democrats on a plan.”

“They were brought into this country many years ago,” he continued. “Some of them are no longer young people, and in many cases they’ve become successful. They have great jobs. In some cases, they have small businesses. Some cases they might have large businesses, and we’re going to have to do something with them.”

Sounds very vague to me so it's hard for me to tell what he means.
 
That one wasn't.



Sounds very vague to me so it's hard for me to tell what he means.
The one in your video isn’t being deported, she was an unaccompanied minor crossing the border alone with just a note.
 
Why do Republicans have their pro-gun sanctuary cities?

Why do they support murder in the guise of self defense?

They all have causes they strongly about that someone else opposes but you only call one the “party of criminals”?
LoL! What's a "pro-gun sanctuary city"? Give some examples. You sound severely uneducated. Gun laws are 99% on the state level and if a state is relaxed on guns, that usually applies to the cities in those states as well. If anything. cities are MORE strict about guns than the state they are in. Sanctuary cities that refuse to round up illegals however, are ignoring laws and/or choosing not to enforce them. Therefore they are enabling criminals.

How is preventing myself from being killed or maimed by someone by using deadly force murder? Sounds like something you'd see in some very strict foreign country like China where the government has complete control. Maybe you should move to one of those places. I'm sure you'd be back with your tail between your legs in no time.

Nearly all people who use deadly force to defend themselves still have to prove it was justified in court.
They can't just go home and forget about it.

We call Democrats the party of criminals because they are soft on criminals, thery want criminals and illegals to have the right to vote so the Democrats get more votes (crminals will vote for whoever is softer on them and Dems make sure they are the partty of preference for criminals. Nearly all cities run by Democrats are trashy cess pools full of criminals getting away with stuff left and right.

So, let's hear your examples. :popcorn:
 
The one in your video isn’t being deported, she was an unaccompanied minor crossing the border alone with just a note.


Same difference to me. As the point is that she was alone. Anyways hopefully this video will educate some people on here.


 
Same difference to me. As the point is that she was alone. Anyways hopefully this video will educate some people on here.



There is a difference to me. One is what individual and probably desperate or just unfit parents do. The other is what a country chooses to actively do.
 
There is a difference to me. One is what individual and probably desperate or just unfit parents do. The other is what a country chooses to actively do.

So if their own parents could do it to them why doesn't that make anybody else capable of doing the exact same thing to them?
 
So if their own parents could do it to them why doesn't that make anybody else capable of doing the exact same thing to them?
I’m not sure what you’re asking exactly. Deportation is the act of a nation, their policy. To have a policy of deporting children without their parents is reprehensible. And we, as members of that nation, are collectively responsible for it. We aren’t for what a parent does.
 
I’m not sure what you’re asking exactly. Deportation is the act of a nation, their policy. To have a policy of deporting children without their parents is reprehensible. And we, as members of that nation, are collectively responsible for it. We aren’t for what a parent does.


My point is what I just said. That deportation of very young children could happen because apparently anybody is capable of doing that to them if their own parents are capable of sending them away by themselves.
 
My point is what I just said. That deportation of very young children could happen because apparently anybody is capable of doing that to them if their own parents are capable of sending them away by themselves.
I don’t see your point exactly. As a nation, we operate by laws and I don’t believe our laws allow us to deport a toddler without parents or an adult guardian.
 
I don’t see your point exactly. As a nation, we operate by laws and I don’t believe our laws allow us to deport a toddler without parents or an adult guardian.

Oh yeah and the democrats sure have been following the laws these past four years. 🙄
 
Here's a new thread that I posted that tells exactly why these criminals have to get out of our country.


 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom