a child is not born fraudulently what a ridiculous consept ...children are born period and there is no fraud to it. Good freaking grief you really tried to stretch that one. Not only that a natural born citizen, which these children are...do not fall under the fraud characterization because they do not have to apply for citizenship..they are born with it. That statute only applies to naturalized citizens who lie on the naturalization application N 400 I want to know when it was you filled out an N 400 for one of your children?
I never said "born fraudulently", now you're putting words in my mouth. I said their parents willfully came into this country illegally and that constitutes fraud. I am also assuming that illegal immigrants want to become citizens, if that's not true then I can only assume they've come here to "milk the system".
The Fourteenth Amendment does not provide any procedure for revocation of United States citizenship. Under the Supreme Court precedent of Afroyim v. Rusk, loss of 14th-Amendment-based U.S. citizenship is possible only under the following circumstances:
Fraud in the naturalization process. Technically this is not loss of citizenship, but rather a voiding of the purported naturalization and a declaration that the immigrant never was a U.S. citizen.
Voluntary relinquishment of citizenship. This may be accomplished either through renunciation procedures specially established by the State Department or through other actions (e.g., treason) which demonstrate an intention to give up U.S. citizenship. Such an act of expatriation must be accompanied by an intent to terminate American citizenship.
If there were no entitlements, no personal income taxes and an illegal immigrant didn't commit a crime, I personally wouldn't give 2 figs if they were here but as the current system stands we simply can't afford them.
No, I've never had to fill out N400 and I don't understand why that is even relevant to your argument.