What The Mueller Report ACTUALLY States

[Faun]

It is NOT 'copy & paste' jack ass.

I compiled it in a WORD file; go **** yourself.

did mueller give Barr the last word in his report to decide the obstruction? yes or no.

Mueller could tell The Congress that point; not me.

You should go ask Mueller.

No input eh? Seems you should drop out of the discussion then

re: post #294

pay attention

I asked you a question, you refuse to answer, I give two shits about post 294.

How about 3 shits? Do you give 3 shits?

 

[jc456]

Barr always had the last word. A Special Counsel can't prosecute.

Current DOJ OLC determines a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted.

Not that Barr would shit on his meal ticket.

So again I ask what do you expect to happen?
Are you lobbying your congressman for impeachment?
Let's get it on...

Congress has the responsibility to proceed with articles of impeachment, IMO

They have more than enuff evidence of multiple attempts of obstruction documented by the SC investigation

Until such time as Congress initiates the process, Trump is above the law

Even if the Senate won't vote to impeach, the process is required under The Constitution

A clear message must be sent

Why do you supposed they haven’t given your point ? I can tell you, but you’re not smart enough to understand . No charges were presented for them to use

I'm not a member of Congress so, I can't say

And yet you’re in here why? You have no comment

 

[jc456]

Congress has the responsibility to proceed with articles of impeachment, IMO

Absent a provable crime - impeach him for what?

He’ll say he has to ask congress, so he’s a puppet

 

[M14 Shooter]

And yet you’re in here why? You have no comment

Or understanding of the law, or willingness to accept the truth.

 

[jc456]

And yet you’re in here why? You have no comment

Or understanding of the law, or willingness to accept the truth.

Or have an actual discussion

 

[caddo kid]

And yet you’re in here why? You have no comment

Or understanding of the law, or willingness to accept the truth.

Or have an actual discussion

I have brought the greater majority of factual info to the thread

All you have brought is your bullshit troll scheme

 

[caddo kid]

did mueller give Barr the last word in his report to decide the obstruction? yes or no.

Mueller could tell The Congress that point; not me.

You should go ask Mueller.

No input eh? Seems you should drop out of the discussion then

re: post #294

pay attention

I asked you a question, you refuse to answer, I give two shits about post 294.

How about 3 shits? Do you give 3 shits?

He has nothing to contribute here except bullshit troll crap

 

[skookerasbil]

Lol....these posts by progressives. Do these people realize we are almost to mid-2019?

Durham has already convened grand jury's. Yuk....yuk....three illegal FISA warrants!! The coming nut sack kick to progressives is going to be profound....funniest shit I'll have seen in my lifetime. I might shit my pants from laughing so hard when the criminal referrals start dropping like MOAB's....this whole Russia thing will paint every progressive as a mental case inside 5 minutes. I'm gonna need some new shorts s0ns!!

 

[Wry Catcher]

twas the night before christmas. twas the steele dossier. now we have the mueller dossier!

Funny how quickly Mueller gets thrown under the bus when his be-all tell-all end-all report doesn't say what the Democrats want to hear.

Yes, it's obvious now that Nunes is referring to the Mueller report as the Mueller dossier & fantasy, a document the GOP talking heads has already declared DOA, that the GOP is becoming desperate because they know Congress is gonna ream Trump's lying, obstructing ass.

LOFL ...................

I really hope Nunes is indicted for obstruction of justice and witness tampering.

It states members of Congress contacted Flynn in attempts to influence his position in regard to the Mueller investigation.

The question begs: If Trump & his associates were innocent of any conspiracy with any Russian persons, why did these people act like they were guilty?

/——/ You’re confusing acting guilty with total outrage at being false accused and having his family attacked. But you’re simple minded and can’t tell the difference.

Dumb ^^^.

Stop attacking the messenger and try to be logical. If anyone on this post is 'simple minded' it is you. Trump does not provide a defense, he attacks everyone, from the press, to the media, to the Justice Dept, to the FBI, to his attorney's, to the Democrats and Republicans who don't kiss his ass. He lies constantly and has no idea how inept he is as a communicator.

Of course people like you don't care that he lies, for he tells you and them what you want to hear. I have one question for you: Is your ignorance of Trump Willful, or are you a biddable fool?

/——/,What lies?

"What lies?" That's the stupidest rebuttal yet.

From the get go: "Mexico will pay for the wall", followed by 10,000 plus other efforts to mislead the public:

• on his taxes,
• the size of the crowd when he took the other of office,
• on his wealth,
• on his extra-marital affairs,
• on his successes with Kim, Putin and XI.

 

[skookerasbil]

John Durham already used a grand jury in Russia origins probe, Joe diGenova says

 

[M14 Shooter]

And yet you’re in here why? You have no comment

Or understanding of the law, or willingness to accept the truth.

Or have an actual discussion

I have brought the greater majority of factual info to the thread

Except, of course, the determination that Mueller believed Trump acted with corrupt intent, and the reason corrupt intent is necessary for a obstruction charge.
That is, you brought little to nothing of value.

 

[skookerasbil]

twas the night before christmas. twas the steele dossier. now we have the mueller dossier!

Funny how quickly Mueller gets thrown under the bus when his be-all tell-all end-all report doesn't say what the Democrats want to hear.

I really hope Nunes is indicted for obstruction of justice and witness tampering.

It states members of Congress contacted Flynn in attempts to influence his position in regard to the Mueller investigation.

The question begs: If Trump & his associates were innocent of any conspiracy with any Russian persons, why did these people act like they were guilty?

/——/ You’re confusing acting guilty with total outrage at being false accused and having his family attacked. But you’re simple minded and can’t tell the difference.

Dumb ^^^.

Stop attacking the messenger and try to be logical. If anyone on this post is 'simple minded' it is you. Trump does not provide a defense, he attacks everyone, from the press, to the media, to the Justice Dept, to the FBI, to his attorney's, to the Democrats and Republicans who don't kiss his ass. He lies constantly and has no idea how inept he is as a communicator.

Of course people like you don't care that he lies, for he tells you and them what you want to hear. I have one question for you: Is your ignorance of Trump Willful, or are you a biddable fool?

/——/,What lies?

"What lies?" That's the stupidest rebuttal yet.

From the get go: "Mexico will pay for the wall", followed by 10,000 plus other efforts to mislead the public:

• on his taxes,
• the size of the crowd when he took the other of office,
• on his wealth,
• on his extra-marital affairs,
• on his successes with Kim, Putin and XI.

Nobody cares about any of that.....except the internet ocd's on community message boards. Doy....this stuff has been effortfAiL for over three years now!

 

[M14 Shooter]

He has nothing to contribute here except bullshit troll crap

Still waiting for you to post Mueller's determination that Trump acted with corrupt intent.
Not that you can...

 

[Wry Catcher]

John Durham already used a grand jury in Russia origins probe, Joe diGenova says

Yawn.

 

[jc456]

And yet you’re in here why? You have no comment

Or understanding of the law, or willingness to accept the truth.

Or have an actual discussion

I have brought the greater majority of factual info to the thread

All you have brought is your bullshit troll scheme

Name one fact you brought in that shows a crime?

 

[jc456]

John Durham already used a grand jury in Russia origins probe, Joe diGenova says

Yawn.

Ditto

 

[jc456]

And yet you’re in here why? You have no comment

Or understanding of the law, or willingness to accept the truth.

Or have an actual discussion

I have brought the greater majority of factual info to the thread

All you have brought is your bullshit troll scheme

Name one fact you brought in that shows a crime?

caddo kid , where’d you go? Where’s that fact I asked from you?

 

[Crepitus]

Mueller addresses INTENT no less than 10 tiimes between pages 227 & 368.

But not once did he mention, describe or declare a corrupt intent.
Not once.
Thus, no obstruction.
Why do you refuse to recognize the fact the crime of obstruction requires corrupt intent, and without said intent, as Mueller said, there can be no obstruction of justice.

Hanging on an adjective. (That's a word that describes another word, like "corrupt" can describe "intent")

You mean "hanging" on the legal definition of obstruction of justice.

The law:
18 U.S. Code § 1505.
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law...
18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

Mueller:
"The term “corruptly” sets a demanding standard. It requires a concrete showing that a person acted with an intent to obtain an improper advantage for himself or someone else, inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others."

LOLOL

You highlighted the wrong word there, Spunky. Here, lemme help ya...

18 U.S. Code § 1505.
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law...​

See that? No matter how many times you insist corruption is a required element of that statute, the statute itself laughs in your face, along with everyone here who understands it; as the way the statute reads, as an example, an individual can simply Tweet something with the intent of influencing the "proper administration of the law" and be violation of that statute without committing any corruption.

Which is pretty much why I stopped answering the guy.

 

[skookerasbil]

Speaking of yawning.....

ABC/WaPo Poll: Impeachment Support Sinks to New Low



Meanwhile..... Bill Barr is very very busy!!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

So, you, along with many others, hate the fact that The Constitution requires Congress to be a check on the executive.

What crime do you suggest he be impeached for?

Impeachment does not require a crime.