What Retaliation For Soleimani's Death Would Justify War With Iran?

1553990516281-1292215322.jpg

No retaliation is needed. When Iran, Russia, and Turkey come down to meet their other Islamic Allies and converge on Israel to Destroy it, God intervenes with Hell Fire and Brimstone, and 90% of their combined Armies of that Islamic Coalition are BURNED ALIVE, or are crushed by enormous hail stones. The rest die from a plague, and the remainder turn on each other in insanity and kill their allies and each other.

There are so many bodies it takes 7 months to bury them, and so much wreckage it takes 7 years to remove it from The Battlefield.

But God is not done there. He sends Holy Fire upon those nations and burns them, leaving only a few remnants in each Nation who then turn to God.

Iran, Turkey and Russia have already sealed their fate, and they will be No More.

Isaiah 17, Ezekiel 38 & 39, Revelation 20.
gog-and-magog_retaliates4.jpg


Gog and Magog - Wikipedia


Live Updates: Iran Vows ‘Forceful Revenge’ After U.S. Kills General

How big a splash will Iran's retaliation for the killing of their Qud leader have to be to justify our nation going to war with Iran?

How many dead Americans would you say?

How many will you accept without going to war?

If they just kill...four...Americans, will that not be enough?
 
Last edited:
Iran is skilled at assassination. Suppose they kill an American commensurate with Soleimani's value. Say Pompano. Would that be an act of war?
Yes it would be an act of war, just as Donnie’s murdering the General was an act of war.
It was a terrorist act.
Killing the general was an act of terrorism.

Here is a good outline of what might happen next...


The US paints itself – and Iran – into a corner

The Iranians simply had no other choice than to declare that there will be a retaliation. There are a few core problems with what happens next. Let’s look at them one by one:

  1. First, it is quite obvious from the flagwaving claptrap in the US that Uncle Shmuel is “locked and loaded” for even more macho actions and reaction. In fact, Secretary Esper has basically painted the US into what I would call an “over-reaction corner” by declaring that “the game has changed” and that the US will take “preemptive action” whenever it feels threatened. Thus, the Iranians have to assume that the US will over-react to anything even remotely looking like an Iranian retaliation.
  2. No less alarming is that this creates the absolutely perfect conditions for a false flag à la “USS Liberty. Right now, the Israelis have become at least as big a danger for US servicemen and facilities in the entire Middle-East as are the Iranians themselves. How? Simple! Fire a missile/torpedo/mine at any USN ship and blame Iran. We all know that if that happens the US political elites will do what they did the last time around: let US servicemen die and protect Israel at all costs (read up on the USS Liberty if you don’t know about it)
  3. There is also a very real risk of “spontaneous retaliations” by otherparties (not Iran or Iranian allies). In fact, in his message, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has specifically declared that “Martyr Suleimani is an international face to the Resistance and all lovers of the Resistance share a demand in retaliation for his blood. All friends – as well as all enemies – must know the path of Fighting and Resistance will continue with double the will and the final victory is decidedly waiting for those who fight in this path.” He is right, Soleimani was loved and revered by many people all over the globe, some of whom might decided to avenge his death. This means that we might well see some kind of retaliation which, of course, will be blamed on Iran but which might not be the result of any Iranian actions at all.
  4. Finally, should the Iranians decide not to retaliate, then we can be absolutely sure that Uncle Shmuel will see that as a proof of his putative “invincibility” and take that as a license to engage in even more provocative actions.
Soleimani murder: what could happen next?

It's real simple.
If Iraq retaliates we hit em so hard their ancestors will feel it.
They do it again we double our efforts.
That’s crazy. You want more dead women and children murdered by the Empire, for the benefit of the 1%.

Have Americans lost their fucking minds?

What empire?
 
1553990516281-1292215322.jpg

No retaliation is needed. When Iran, Russia, and Turkey come down to meet their other Islamic Allies and converge on Israel to Destroy it, God intervenes with Hell Fire and Brimstone, and 90% of their combined Armies of that Islamic Coalition are Burned alive. The rest die from a plague, and the remainder turn on each other in insanity and kill their allies.

There are so many bodies it takes 7 months to bury them, and so much wreckage it takes 7 years to remove it from The Battlefield.

But God is not done there. He sends Holy Fire upon those nations and burns them, leaving only a few remnants in each Nation who then turn to God.

Iran, Turkey and Russia have already sealed their fate, and they will be No More.

Isaiah 17, Ezekiel 38 & 39, Revelation 20.
gog-and-magog_retaliates4.jpg


Gog and Magog - Wikipedia


Live Updates: Iran Vows ‘Forceful Revenge’ After U.S. Kills General

How big a splash will Iran's retaliation for the killing of their Qud leader have to be to justify our nation going to war with Iran?

How many dead Americans would you say?

How many will you accept without going to war?

If they just kill...four...Americans, will that not be enough?
If you said Trump is the Anti-Christ, I could almost believe it.
 
1553990516281-1292215322.jpg

No retaliation is needed. When Iran, Russia, and Turkey come down to meet their other Islamic Allies and converge on Israel to Destroy it, God intervenes with Hell Fire and Brimstone, and 90% of their combined Armies of that Islamic Coalition are Burned alive. The rest die from a plague, and the remainder turn on each other in insanity and kill their allies.

There are so many bodies it takes 7 months to bury them, and so much wreckage it takes 7 years to remove it from The Battlefield.

But God is not done there. He sends Holy Fire upon those nations and burns them, leaving only a few remnants in each Nation who then turn to God.

Iran, Turkey and Russia have already sealed their fate, and they will be No More.

Isaiah 17, Ezekiel 38 & 39, Revelation 20.
gog-and-magog_retaliates4.jpg


Gog and Magog - Wikipedia


Live Updates: Iran Vows ‘Forceful Revenge’ After U.S. Kills General

How big a splash will Iran's retaliation for the killing of their Qud leader have to be to justify our nation going to war with Iran?

How many dead Americans would you say?

How many will you accept without going to war?

If they just kill...four...Americans, will that not be enough?
If you said Trump is the Anti-Christ, I could almost believe it.

You're close.
That would be the anti Allah. But you have your God and I have mine.......
 
1553990516281-1292215322.jpg

No retaliation is needed. When Iran, Russia, and Turkey come down to meet their other Islamic Allies and converge on Israel to Destroy it, God intervenes with Hell Fire and Brimstone, and 90% of their combined Armies of that Islamic Coalition are Burned alive. The rest die from a plague, and the remainder turn on each other in insanity and kill their allies.

There are so many bodies it takes 7 months to bury them, and so much wreckage it takes 7 years to remove it from The Battlefield.

But God is not done there. He sends Holy Fire upon those nations and burns them, leaving only a few remnants in each Nation who then turn to God.

Iran, Turkey and Russia have already sealed their fate, and they will be No More.

Isaiah 17, Ezekiel 38 & 39, Revelation 20.
gog-and-magog_retaliates4.jpg


Gog and Magog - Wikipedia


Live Updates: Iran Vows ‘Forceful Revenge’ After U.S. Kills General

How big a splash will Iran's retaliation for the killing of their Qud leader have to be to justify our nation going to war with Iran?

How many dead Americans would you say?

How many will you accept without going to war?

If they just kill...four...Americans, will that not be enough?

I'm sure God appreciates that their Talmud says Jesus is boiling in Hell in excrement.
 
Iran doesn’t need to kill any Americans for there to be war. The CIA could do nice false flag and bingo bango, the Empire’s war profiteers and warmongers will get the war of their dreams.

Most here are too asleep or brainwashed to comprehend that the never-ending wars are based on lies or false flags. Both 'sides' cheer for their warmongering puppet president... as long as he has the appropriate letter by the name. If the letter is correct, then by golly, he did the right thing! If it's the opposite letter, then he did a terrible thing. Sigh. I'm almost to the point where I don't care what happens. People get the government they deserve. And all that comes along with that.
 
1553990516281-1292215322.jpg

No retaliation is needed. When Iran, Russia, and Turkey come down to meet their other Islamic Allies and converge on Israel to Destroy it, God intervenes with Hell Fire and Brimstone, and 90% of their combined Armies of that Islamic Coalition are Burned alive. The rest die from a plague, and the remainder turn on each other in insanity and kill their allies.

There are so many bodies it takes 7 months to bury them, and so much wreckage it takes 7 years to remove it from The Battlefield.

But God is not done there. He sends Holy Fire upon those nations and burns them, leaving only a few remnants in each Nation who then turn to God.

Iran, Turkey and Russia have already sealed their fate, and they will be No More.

Isaiah 17, Ezekiel 38 & 39, Revelation 20.
gog-and-magog_retaliates4.jpg


Gog and Magog - Wikipedia


Live Updates: Iran Vows ‘Forceful Revenge’ After U.S. Kills General

How big a splash will Iran's retaliation for the killing of their Qud leader have to be to justify our nation going to war with Iran?

How many dead Americans would you say?

How many will you accept without going to war?

If they just kill...four...Americans, will that not be enough?
If you said Trump is the Anti-Christ, I could almost believe it.
Russia, Iran and Turkey have never been allies until today since 2,500 years ago when this prophecy was written.

The AntiChrist is not revealed until after The Battle of Gog and Magog.

Israel's enemies are all destroyed. Syria, Iran, Turkey, Russia, Algeria, Sudan, Ethiopia, Somalia, and Islam is all but wiped out, sans Saudi Arabia, and Yemen who turn to God afterwards.

Then The AntiChrist offers Israel a Peace Offer they cannot resist, because they feel safe. They Sign "Their Covenant with Death" and at that time the 7 Year Great Tribulation begins.

In the Middle of this treaty, the Anti Christ declares himself god, breaks the treaty, and goes on a mass murdering spree killing 2/3rds of all Jews, and the last 1/3rd flee to the wilderness.

After the 2nd 3 and 1/2 period of the 7 year treaty, The AntiChrist and all his armies converge on the last remaining 1/3rd Jews on Earth, and they cry out to Messiah for the first time in their Nation's History, and Christ appears with his Holy Angels, Slaughters everyone in Bosrah, and then moves up to The Valley of Meggido and fights the Battle of Armageddon, throws Satan, The False Prophet, and AntiChrist in to Hell along with everyone who took the Mark of AntiChrist, completes The Great White Throne Judgment and then begins his 1,000 Year Reign from Jerusalem.
 
Last edited:
Starts a war? As I recall we are in a war on terror. Iran is a terror regime. We are already at war.
Then how come The Slug Brothers Don Jr.& Eric never enlisted? And I mean to fight on our side.
IDK them do you? Why are you asking me? Military service is not mandatory in the US. Did you enlist?
 
Suppose an Iranian assassin shoots at Trump, misses, and hits Melania instead.

Here's my question. Is Melania's face so pumped with botox that she would not be able to grimace?
I think The Secret Service will be paying you a visit soon. Do you think it is funny to wish Death on The First Lady and President?
 
Suppose an Iranian assassin shoots at Trump, misses, and hits Melania instead.

Here's my question. Is Melania's face so pumped with botox that she would not be able to grimace?
I think The Secret Service will be paying you a visit soon. Do you think it is funny to wish Death on The First Lady and President?
"If they just kill you, I am fine with that."

I was not wishing death on anyone. But you were, dipshit.


 
Iran doesn’t need to kill any Americans for there to be war. The CIA could do nice false flag and bingo bango, the Empire’s war profiteers and warmongers will get the war of their dreams.

Most here are too asleep or brainwashed to comprehend that the never-ending wars are based on lies or false flags. Both 'sides' cheer for their warmongering puppet president... as long as he has the appropriate letter by the name. If the letter is correct, then by golly, he did the right thing! If it's the opposite letter, then he did a terrible thing. Sigh. I'm almost to the point where I don't care what happens. People get the government they deserve. And all that comes along with that.
I am at the point of not caring. Our country has lost it’s mind.

I intend to have a good time in the time I have left. I just hope these idiots don’t get us all killed.
 
Live Updates: Iran Vows ‘Forceful Revenge’ After U.S. Kills General

How big a splash will Iran's retaliation for the killing of their Qud leader have to be to justify our nation going to war with Iran?

How many dead Americans would you say?

How many will you accept without going to war?

If they just kill...four...Americans, will that not be enough?

Are you actually trying for some kind of pre-war line in the sand justification? Really? Why? Are you heavy on defense stocks?
I'm just trying to determine where these whiners about "endless wars" stand.

Simple as that.

Notice how cowardly they are in not answering?

I got you, man. I hate the endless wars in the middle east. We should have finish mission in Afghanistan, never gone to Iraq and pricked the boil on the backside of the region, but we did and there we are. OK.
The Iranian military machine is not up to toe to toe combat with the number one super power on the planet. They will (according Command and General Staff School, the last i completed) continue to effectively use asymmetric warfare (non-linear, shoot and scoot, hit and run, hard to pin down) tactics to support their strategy. I see no signs we have had a strategy in the middle east at any time since 9/11. It's been a money maker and a life taker ever since some idiot sold "Regime Change" to Jr., but never with a strategy for successful outcome in the region. I personally think the regime change thing precluded it. We absolutely suck and nation building. It don't go back together as easily as it was taken apart. There ain't a "How To" book and there are too many moving parts, stake holder, friendly and enemy player, etc.
That being the case, putting a lot of troops in the field, they way we deploy offers more targets than rapid response capability or ground holding ability, due to the methods of the enemy tactics. I favor tit for tat pounding of short and long term strategic targets, using drones, manned air, missles, and other fast strike capability without presenting a much of a front, conflagration of troops, equipment and hard targets of our own within easy reach of the enemy. Naturally there would need to be lots of small unit work on the ground for intel and designation of targets. the Special Forces, special team guys, mostly, small team/small footprint. They will not try to take and hold terrain and we should not either. Obviously there is a lot more to it than that, but you get the gist. No large footprint, no committing to take and hold towns, no winning the hearts and minds and most of all NO REGIME CHANGE. But, hey. I am just an old schooled, armature now.
 
Live Updates: Iran Vows ‘Forceful Revenge’ After U.S. Kills General

How big a splash will Iran's retaliation for the killing of their Qud leader have to be to justify our nation going to war with Iran?

How many dead Americans would you say?

How many will you accept without going to war?

If they just kill...four...Americans, will that not be enough?

Are you actually trying for some kind of pre-war line in the sand justification? Really? Why? Are you heavy on defense stocks?
I'm just trying to determine where these whiners about "endless wars" stand.

Simple as that.

Notice how cowardly they are in not answering?

I got you, man. I hate the endless wars in the middle east. We should have finish mission in Afghanistan, never gone to Iraq and pricked the boil on the backside of the region, but we did and there we are. OK.
The Iranian military machine is not up to toe to toe combat with the number one super power on the planet. They will (according Command and General Staff School, the last i completed) continue to effectively use asymmetric warfare (non-linear, shoot and scoot, hit and run, hard to pin down) tactics to support their strategy. I see no signs we have had a strategy in the middle east at any time since 9/11. It's been a money maker and a life taker ever since some idiot sold "Regime Change" to Jr., but never with a strategy for successful outcome in the region. I personally think the regime change thing precluded it. We absolutely suck and nation building. It don't go back together as easily as it was taken apart. There ain't a "How To" book and there are too many moving parts, stake holder, friendly and enemy player, etc.
That being the case, putting a lot of troops in the field, they way we deploy offers more targets than rapid response capability or ground holding ability, due to the methods of the enemy tactics. I favor tit for tat pounding of short and long term strategic targets, using drones, manned air, missles, and other fast strike capability without presenting a much of a front, conflagration of troops, equipment and hard targets of our own within easy reach of the enemy. Naturally there would need to be lots of small unit work on the ground for intel and designation of targets. the Special Forces, special team guys, mostly, small team/small footprint. They will not try to take and hold terrain and we should not either. Obviously there is a lot more to it than that, but you get the gist. No large footprint, no committing to take and hold towns, no winning the hearts and minds and most of all NO REGIME CHANGE. But, hey. I am just an old schooled, armature now.
I think the biggest strategic mistake Bush made in Iraq was standing down the Iraq Army.
 
Live Updates: Iran Vows ‘Forceful Revenge’ After U.S. Kills General

How big a splash will Iran's retaliation for the killing of their Qud leader have to be to justify our nation going to war with Iran?

How many dead Americans would you say?

How many will you accept without going to war?

If they just kill...four...Americans, will that not be enough?

Are you actually trying for some kind of pre-war line in the sand justification? Really? Why? Are you heavy on defense stocks?
I'm just trying to determine where these whiners about "endless wars" stand.

Simple as that.

Notice how cowardly they are in not answering?

I got you, man. I hate the endless wars in the middle east. We should have finish mission in Afghanistan, never gone to Iraq and pricked the boil on the backside of the region, but we did and there we are. OK.
The Iranian military machine is not up to toe to toe combat with the number one super power on the planet. They will (according Command and General Staff School, the last i completed) continue to effectively use asymmetric warfare (non-linear, shoot and scoot, hit and run, hard to pin down) tactics to support their strategy. I see no signs we have had a strategy in the middle east at any time since 9/11. It's been a money maker and a life taker ever since some idiot sold "Regime Change" to Jr., but never with a strategy for successful outcome in the region. I personally think the regime change thing precluded it. We absolutely suck and nation building. It don't go back together as easily as it was taken apart. There ain't a "How To" book and there are too many moving parts, stake holder, friendly and enemy player, etc.
That being the case, putting a lot of troops in the field, they way we deploy offers more targets than rapid response capability or ground holding ability, due to the methods of the enemy tactics. I favor tit for tat pounding of short and long term strategic targets, using drones, manned air, missles, and other fast strike capability without presenting a much of a front, conflagration of troops, equipment and hard targets of our own within easy reach of the enemy. Naturally there would need to be lots of small unit work on the ground for intel and designation of targets. the Special Forces, special team guys, mostly, small team/small footprint. They will not try to take and hold terrain and we should not either. Obviously there is a lot more to it than that, but you get the gist. No large footprint, no committing to take and hold towns, no winning the hearts and minds and most of all NO REGIME CHANGE. But, hey. I am just an old schooled, armature now.
I think the biggest strategic mistake Bush made in Iraq was standing down the Iraq Army.
That was part of that whole regime change screw up.
 
It's hair trigger time. These assholes have been playing this stupid game for years. If we have to take them out, do it now while their country is weakened by sanctions. That goes for NoKo too. It's just a shame that Iran and NoKo have such unstable terrorist leaders. I pity the Iranians because they're good people who have their leaders dragging them into the abyss. Who knows how the dog eaters in China and NoKo really feel. China is the enemy of the world.
 
Suppose an Iranian assassin shoots at Trump, misses, and hits Melania instead.

Here's my question. Is Melania's face so pumped with botox that she would not be able to grimace?
I think The Secret Service will be paying you a visit soon. Do you think it is funny to wish Death on The First Lady and President?
"If they just kill you, I am fine with that."

I was not wishing death on anyone. But you were, dipshit.

Not me...it was you that said, if Iran wanted to kill a bunch of Americans how many would it take for us to retaliate?

I said, i'd have to think about it. I wouldn't have a problem with one. And I named him, you, just like you said you'd like to see Trump and Melania assassinated. I reported you for that.
 
Suppose an Iranian assassin shoots at Trump, misses, and hits Melania instead.

Here's my question. Is Melania's face so pumped with botox that she would not be able to grimace?
Congrats! You just won USMBs Biggest Scumbag Award!
 
Back
Top Bottom