Disagree.
The right to arms inherently does not include a right to commit a crime with a gun.
That sort of thing.
My reply was focused on type of arms not on actions with arms.
I would say that as a matter of principle that the "right to keep and bear arms" does not include offensive actions like threatening harm or shooting or killing someone
without justification. Under those circumstances, laws restricting such illegitimate actions can not be defined as a "restriction on the right" because the right is not implicated.