- May 20, 2014
- 35,020
- 23,445
- 1,945
helps too if the President isn't in on it like Obama letting terrorists sell opioids to fiancé terrorismNo prob, I’ll stick to laws. Just wanted to plant the seed for the parallel to deregulation as there may be some hypocrisy there. Stronger regulation of our citizens from the police via law enforcement vs. less regulation of our businesses... doesn’t really add upBut they are similar. Laws and regulations are set up to protect and serve the general welfare of our citizens. Laws are usingally there to protect people from harm and keep order. Regulations are there to protect people from being abused, deceived, and also harmed. They aren’t so different.That’s fine but it’s also different from your OP. You are objecting to modifying laws because you think it will cater to criminals. But would you sing the same tune with deregulation?
False equivalency bud...regulation / deregulation of industry and commerce has nothing to do with criminality / criminalization.
Don’t try too hard bud.
Do you support more laws and less regulations. If so then why?
Start another thread and I’ll engage. This one is about law and order and not regulations.
Fine but the punishment increases. You traffic or sell drugs, death penalty, summary execution the next day. We'll clean this mess up quickly. Your country traffics drugs into our country we bomb your capital city to rubble.