What part of Iran can never be allowed to go nuclear is not understood?

Like I said: keep drinking that Kool-Aid.

Venezuela is not your friend or your ally. Trump is hard to close the embassy and call all American home from Venezuela because things are so dangerous for Americans there.

Destabilizing countries it’s not the same thing as creating allies or taking them over. Naked aggression will isolate the USA more than it’s ever been in its entire existence.

You are now no better than Putin’s Russia or Xi’s China. You’re just a dangerous country being run by a madman.
Denial is poor argument thats all you seem to have
 
A nuclear armed Iran would destabilize the Middle East and usher in a cascade of nuclear proliferation in surrounding nations. Iran’s odious sphere of influence through proxies already kindles a hair-trigger menace in the region. Death to America would surely evolve into death to the world as neighboring nations would immediately move to become nuclear. There would be an instant race to the atom which would result in converting the doomsday clock from minutes to seconds. Trump has moved to stop this but as we know no good deed goes unpunished.

Someone had to do it. Let’s be thankful Trump is doing it.

View attachment 1230026
As if nuclear Israel isn't destabilising factor in the Middle East and the whole world.

Should Trump, Putin and/or Xi destroy Israel's nuclear weapons too and declare Middle East nuclear-free zone?
 
As if nuclear Israel isn't destabilising factor in the Middle East and the whole world.

Should Trump, Putin and/or Xi destroy Israel's nuclear weapons too and declare Middle East nuclear-free zone?
In what way Israel has always been attacked first by Iran. Irans nuclear policy is offensive. As soon as they get a bomb they will set it off in Israel and American cities. Isreal America and the Abraham accords are stabilizing the Middle East by isolating Iran and keeping China and Russia out.
 
All they need is a backpack and a suicide bomber to walk into any American city then boom.
An Iranian nuke would need a heavy duty forklift to move. How big were those relatively small firecrackers we used on Japan? That's the part you just keep ignoring. Why hasn't NK developed these small bombs and put them on those missiles they have? Because they are too big and too damned heavy!
 
They have 900 pounds at 60%. Thats weeks away from 11 bombs. They could smuggle it in by backcback and there would be no way to stop them.
Smugglers are even lesser reliable weapon delivery systems than missiles and America have been successfully coexisting with nuclear Russia for decades. There were treaties like, you know, "we don't bomb you, and you don't bomb us".
I see no great problem to build the new security system of Middle East with equal safety for everyone, based on SC UN resolutions.
 
An Iranian nuke would need a heavy duty forklift to move. How big were those relatively small firecrackers we used on Japan? That's the part you just keep ignoring. Why hasn't NK developed these small bombs and put them on those missiles they have? Because they are too big and too damned heavy!
Highly likely, Iranian nukes will be brand new Russian-design nukes. Pretty compact and effective, mounted on hypersonic cruise missiles delivered by China-made ships.
NATO sell cruise missiles to Ukrainians, why should Russia restrain from selling cruise missiles to Iran? America armed Israel with nukes, why Russia shouldn't arm Iran with nukes?
America attacked Iranian territory, why shouldn't Iran attack American territory (may be even Pearl-Harbour)?

What would you do in the case of a demonstrative nuclear annihilation of Pearl-Harbour base?
 
Smugglers are even lesser reliable weapon delivery systems than missiles and America have been successfully coexisting with nuclear Russia for decades. There were treaties like, you know, "we don't bomb you, and you don't bomb us".
I see no great problem to build the new security system of Middle East with equal safety for everyone, based on SC UN resolutions.
A nuke the size of a watermelon can be put in a backpack and a bomber can just walk in and there is no way to stop him. Russias nuke plan was defensive Irans is offensive they plan to set them off as soon as they can build them as part of their theology.
 
In what way Israel has always been attacked first by Iran.
It is simply not true. Israel started first.

Irans nuclear policy is offensive.
Plain lie. Iran doesn't have any nuclear policy, neither offensive nor defensive. Not yet.

As soon as they get a bomb they will set it off in Israel and American cities.
C'mon, with all their demonstrative prone for martyrdom, they are not suiciders. Their first strikes, highly likely, will be counter-force.

Isreal America and the Abraham accords are stabilizing the Middle East by isolating Iran and keeping China and Russia out.
Of course, "keeping China and Russia out", creating unfair terms in global energy market, is pretty destabilising in global scale.
 
Like I said: keep drinking that Kool-Aid.

Venezuela is not your friend or your ally. Trump had to close the embassy and call all American home from Venezuela because things are so dangerous for Americans there.

Canada is now preparing for an invasion from the USA.

Destabilizing countries and starting WWIII is not the same thing as creating allies. Naked aggression will isolate the USA more than it’s ever been in its entire existence.

You are now no better than Putin’s Russia or Xi’s China. You’re just a dangerous country being run by a madman.
.

Until they start screaming "Death to Canada".

You aren't that different from us.




.
 
You all remember George W's three nations axis of evil. Iraq, Iran and North Korea. Whatever the truth or lie. Perhaps these nations had no interference from the movement to make sure any citizen on the planet can be tracked from the super state. Their citizens are actually free from that. Or were.
 
They have 900 pounds of 60% enriched uranium weeks away from 90%. They can make a small bomb fit in a back pack and walk into any city in America and there is no way to stop them. Unless we do it now
They are human beings (as well as Russians, Chinamen, Frenches and Brits), who prefer keep their citizens alive to killing Americans.
If you don't attack them - they don't attack you.
And no, if you kill them, and they want to survive, and they believe that the only way to stop you is to bring war in your cities - they will find nukes to do it.
 
You all remember George W's three nations axis of evil. Iraq, Iran and North Korea. Whatever the truth or lie. Perhaps these nations had no interference from the movement to make sure any citizen on the planet can be tracked from the super state. Their citizens are actually free from that. Or were.
North Korea managed to got nukes and now it is perfectly safe and independent. Iraq agreed not to make nukes and was destroyed. Now Iran has a choice - to buy nukes and become safe and independent as North Korea, or to continue to refuse to earn nukes and repeat the fate of Iraq.
 
15th post
They are human beings (as well as Russians, Chinamen, Frenches and Brits), who prefer keep their citizens alive to killing Americans.
If you don't attack them - they don't attack you.
And no, if you kill them, and they want to survive, and they believe that the only way to stop you is to bring war in your cities - they will find nukes to do it.
Iran has killed over 1000 Americans 32000 of their own people and started every war in the Middle East with proxies. THeur goal is to dominate the entire Middle East by destroying Israel and setting off nukes in American cities. They rent defending themselves they are the offenders. They believe an apocalypse with bring forth the great prophet and convert the world to Islam. Their nukes create that. They intend to use them as soon as they can make them. I wouldnt call them human beings
 
Iran has killed over 1000 Americans 32000 of their own people and started every war in the Middle East with proxies.
So what? Americans killed much more Americans, Arabs and Persians.

THeur goal is to dominate the entire Middle East by destroying Israel and setting off nukes in American cities.
If they attack American cities without being attacked themselves - they won't be dominating. They will be dead. And no, even if they defeat America - there are some bigger fish in the pond. Like Russia and China. Even if they became minor nuclear power (like DPRK, France, Israel or Britain) it can't guarantee them any dominance.

They rent defending themselves they are the offenders. They believe an apocalypse with bring forth the great prophet and convert the world to Islam.
Who told you this? As far as I heard, it's American Evangelical thing - they want to rebuild The Temple and allow antichrist came there.

Their nukes create that. They intend to use them as soon as they can make them.
Who told you this?

I wouldnt call them human beings
You just said that you are a Nazi.
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom