Either way, it doesn't prove that there will be more tax revenue.It used to be called the law of averages. The larger the sample size the more accurate the statistics produced.Hmmm, the "law of large numbers".More people circulating more money means somebody will be making more profit, and potentially hiring more employees. Along with more people generating more indirect tax revenue due to the law of large numbers.You are trying to prove your point by inventing money. You claim that by giving $182 billion in tax dollars the worker's tax burden will go down. That is pure fantasy.
" The law of large numbers, in probability and statistics, states that as a sample size grows, its mean gets closer to the average of the whole population"
Law Of Large Numbers Definition.
Would you care to explain how that law means more people will generate more tax revenue? Or maybe admit it just sounded good so you put it in your post?