What makes this a RICO case

[MagicMike]

By the way, nothing done by the scumbag j6 committee qualifies as “evidence” of anything for Jerk Smith.

So you don't "believe" The House Select Committee passed it's evidence to Smith for hus file?

 

[BackAgain]

So you don't "believe" The House Select Committee passed it's evidence to Smith for hus file?

It didn’t have any “evidence.” And it won’t be at the trial, either.

 

[konradv]

Except that silly narrative falls flat due to the fact a peaceful transfer of power occurred. Whatever discussions may or may not have happened are irrelevant to that action.

Fake electors anyone?

 

[MagicMike]

It didn’t have any “evidence.” And it won’t be at the trial, either.

I'll mark these words so that when footage and testimony from those committee hearings airs again in inmate #P01135809's courtroom as part of the government's case, I can show them to you when you try to deny that you ever said this BullshittingAgain.

 

[BackAgain]

I'll mark these words so that when footage and testimony from those committee hearings airs again in inmate #P01135809's courtroom as part of the government's case, I can show them to you when you try to deny that you ever said this

Zzz

You’re mighty dim.

 

[Rogue AI]

Fake electors anyone?

Peaceful transfer of power. The only thing that matters. Or do we need to put Hillary in chains for her actions in 2016? You folks can't have it both ways.

 

[BackAgain]

Nothing makes this a “RICO” case except for the delusions of a rabidly partisan political persecutor.

 

[Flopper]

So you think demanding they throw out illegal votes is ' an illegal act'?

The rest of those charges are ridiculous, just more attempts to extort perjury or just outright false, and attempts to intimidate witnesses and pure pettiness.

FYI, election officials investigated claims of voter Fraud in response to legal protests by the Trump campaign. The state of Georgia in response to legal protests investigated dozens of accusation of voter fraud. At the request of the Trump campaign the vote was recounted. In fact the vote was counted 3 times. Each county certified the vote and state certified the vote.

Asking public officials to change the vote count is not legal in Georgia and most other states. There is only one legal way to ask officials to change the vote count and that is through legally filed protests which the Trump Admistraion did.

The counties, the secretary of state, and the governor certified the election so the validity of the election will not be in question, only the actions of the president and his people will be.

 

[Flopper]

Except that silly narrative falls flat due to the fact a peaceful transfer of power occurred. Whatever discussions may or may not have happened are irrelevant to that action.

Trump left the Whitehouse peacefully because the Secret Service agents would have escorted him out because after the inauguration, he would longer be president.

I believe Trump actions in the weeks before the Biden's inauguration was largely responsible for so many presidential documents and classified documents being sent to Mar A Lago. The plan for moving day was suppose to be completed in 1st week of Dec. Trump did not allow his people to work with Biden transition team until after the 2 second week.

A week before the inauguration, the Director of National Archives and his staff would have already been working with the Whitehouse staff to make sure all classified documents were returned and Presidential documents were flagged to go to Mar A Lago. However, Trump told his staff, we aren't going anywhere. Only a couple days before the inauguration was the Whitehouse staff and Trump's staff allowed to pack and get ready for move. This had to be chaotic. It would certainly be easy for presidential documents and classified documents to be sent Mar A Lago.

 

[Flopper]

Nothing makes this a “RICO” case except for the delusions of a rabidly partisan political persecutor.

The Georgia RICO laws allow prosecutors to charge a group of people who commit separate crimes while working towards a common goal. The group does not have to be identified as a criminal organization. The prosecutor has certainly identified the crimes committed by Trump and the top people in his campaign. And they were certainly working toward the common goal of changing vote counts that the Trump campaign filed protests failed to do.

The problem Willis will have is the complexity of the case in which she must tie together the crimes of 19 defendants into a criminal conspiracy. Even if the case is legally sound, convincing a jury that this ex-President's deserves a felony conviction and a mandatory minimum of 5 years in a Georgia penitentiary is going to be difficult.

Smith's case is much different than the Willis case. First it is simple and easy to understand and there is only one defendant, Donald Trump. Also the charges will be easy to understand, conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding; and conspiracy against rights. Since these charged do not carry long mandatory sentences, Trump can be found guilty and serve little or no time in prison. I believe Smith has a better chance of conviction than Willis.

 

[BackAgain]

The Georgia RICO laws allow prosecutors to charge a group of people who commit separate crimes while working towards a common goal. The group does not have to be identified as a criminal organization. The prosecutor has certainly identified the crimes committed by Trump and the top people in his campaign. And they were certainly working toward the common goal of changing vote counts that the Trump campaign filed protests failed to do.

The problem Willis will have is the complexity of the case in which she must tie together the crimes of 19 defendants into a criminal conspiracy. Even if the case is legally sound, convincing a jury that this ex-President's deserves a felony conviction and a mandatory minimum of 5 years in a Georgia penitentiary is going to be difficult.

Smith's case is much different than the Willis case. First it is simple and easy to understand and there is only one defendant, Donald Trump. Also the charges will be easy to understand, conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding; and conspiracy against rights. Since these charged do not carry long mandatory sentences, Trump can be found guilty and serve little or no time in prison. I believe Smith has a better chance of conviction than Willis.

There were no separate crimes. There were no crimes at all.

 

[MagicMike]

Nothing makes this a “RICO” case except for the delusions of a rabidly partisan political persecutor.

Your dim-witted opinion is duly noted mouth-breather.
However the 12 adults on crapper tweeter's jury will probably see it differently.

 

[Flopper]

There were no separate crimes. There were no crimes at all.

Georgia has a state law against “criminal solicitation to commit election fraud.” That law makes it illegal for a person to intentionally solicit, request, command or otherwise attempt to cause another person to engage in election fraud.

A separate federal law makes it illegal to attempt to “deprive or defraud” people of a “fair and impartially conducted election process.”

The legal experts interviewed by Reuters said Trump may have violated one or both of these laws.

The phone call was a “flagrant federal criminal violation,” said Jessica Levinson, a professor at Loyola Law School in California, adding that it appeared that Trump was using threats to push Raffensperger to alter a legitimate vote count.

Explainer: Did Trump break the law by pressuring a Georgia election official to 'find' votes?

President Donald Trump may have broken a U.S. federal law and a Georgia law against election tampering by pressuring the state's top election official to "find" enough votes to overturn his loss to President-elect Joe Biden in the state, according to some legal experts.

www.reuters.com

 

[BackAgain]

Your dim-witted opinion is duly noted mouth-breather.
However the 12 adults on crapper tweeter's jury will probably see it differently.

Your ignorance and stupidity are on display — constantly.

But if a Trump case does get to trial, it will be a jury who makes the call. Not you, ya cum guzzler.

 

[BackAgain]

Georgia has a state law against “criminal solicitation to commit election fraud.” That law makes it illegal for a person to intentionally solicit, request, command or otherwise attempt to cause another person to engage in election fraud.

So what? That such a law exists doesn’t mean it’s happened.

A separate federal law makes it illegal to attempt to “deprive or defraud” people of a “fair and impartially conducted election process.”

So what? That such a law exists doesn’t mean it has happened here.

The legal experts interviewed by Reuters said Trump may have violated one or both of these laws.

May have. But then again, no. Just a meaningless sound bite.

The phone call was a “flagrant federal criminal violation,” said Jessica Levinson, a professor at Loyola Law School in California, adding that it appeared that Trump was using threats to push Raffensperger to alter a legitimate vote count.

False. It wasn’t a violation at all. And it doesn’t appear that way, either.

You tend toward the gullible. You most easily believe anything that corresponds to what you choose to believe.

 

[MagicMike]

Your ignorance and stupidity are on display — constantly.

But if a Trump case does get to trial, it will be a jury who makes the call. Not you, ya cum guzzler.

Just remember that when a jury pronounces him GUILTY on all counts.

 

[DudleySmith]

FYI, election officials investigated claims of voter Fraud in response to legal protests by the Trump campaign. The state of Georgia in response to legal protests investigated dozens of accusation of voter fraud. At the request of the Trump campaign the vote was recounted. In fact the vote was counted 3 times. Each county certified the vote and state certified the vote.

Asking public officials to change the vote count is not legal in Georgia and most other states. There is only one legal way to ask officials to change the vote count and that is through legally filed protests which the Trump Admistraion did.

The counties, the secretary of state, and the governor certified the election so the validity of the election will not be in question, only the actions of the president and his people will be.

Democrats 'investigated' themselves, so no, they didn't do anything except avoid arresting themselves. they didn't allow a real recount, they excluded auditors from outside and denied the evidences of fraud. You keep claiming asking for a legitimate recount and tossing out illegal votes is 'ordering them to change the vote count', and that lie didn't fly then and it doesn't now. It doesn't fly in several other states claiming it either. this is just more gangster style RICO criminality on the part of Democrats; it is no more credible than their two impeachments, the ignoring of Hunter Biden' and his family's taking bribes from foreign govts., the FBI destroying evidence of felonies committed by leading PArty leaders, the CIA spying on political candidates for the Party and all the rest of the banana republic abuse of power.

 

[DudleySmith]

Nothing makes this a “RICO” case except for the delusions of a rabidly partisan political persecutor.

And partisan grand juries in corrupt states.

 

[Flopper]

There were no separate crimes. There were no crimes at all.

Keeping telling yourself that, it will make the upcoming trials easier to bear.

 

[BackAgain]

Keeping telling yourself that, it will make the upcoming trials easier to bear.

Keep believing. It will keep you warm at night until the acquittals, dismissals or reversals in appeal.