What Kind of Moron Really Thinks This is a "Floors Pancaking" Collapse on 9/11?

How many explosive rigs were found?
How many thermite rigs were found?

Was it zero?
And that's another unanswered question. The piles of rubble were gone over thoroughly by thousands of people around the clock and were monitored around the clock by cameras, yet NO ONE found any sign of explosives, none. The Lockerbie airliner crash was solved by a tiny fragment of paper from a detonator, yet we're supposed to believe that all traces of explosives in the WTC were completely destroyed. Not happening.

And don't even get me started on the ludicrous neutron bomb theory.
 
Those questions have all been answered, but to a person in denial of facts it doesn't matter. You can lead a horse to water, but you cannot make him drink. You can lead a man to knowledge, but you cannot make him think.

They knew where to put the charges because they consulted professional demolition companies like Controlled Demolition Inc, headed up by Mark Loizeaux and brothers. CDI worked regularly with the feds, including at WTC and at OKC in the Murrah Building, another inside job.

They planted the charges during major "elevator" maintenance done at WTC in the months leading up to it. Securacom did security at WTC and United and American airlines, and Securacom was run by Dubya's cousin Wirt Walker.

The number of unoccupied offices in both towers was significant, and the work was done under false cover, Acme Elevator Company.

You've been told all that Hadit, but you're in denial. Christopher Bollyn covered all that and much more in his books written in 2012.

Why are you afraid to read Bollyn's well documented work? Because you're afraid to, that's why.
All o that is absolute fiction without evidence

There is no way to have done it

Bollyns work is NOT documented
 
Those questions have all been answered, but to a person in denial of facts it doesn't matter. You can lead a horse to water, but you cannot make him drink. You can lead a man to knowledge, but you cannot make him think.

They knew where to put the charges because they consulted professional demolition companies like Controlled Demolition Inc, headed up by Mark Loizeaux and brothers. CDI worked regularly with the feds, including at WTC and at OKC in the Murrah Building, another inside job.

They planted the charges during major "elevator" maintenance done at WTC in the months leading up to it. Securacom did security at WTC and United and American airlines, and Securacom was run by Dubya's cousin Wirt Walker.

The number of unoccupied offices in both towers was significant, and the work was done under false cover, Acme Elevator Company.

You've been told all that Hadit, but you're in denial. Christopher Bollyn covered all that and much more in his books written in 2012.

Why are you afraid to read Bollyn's well documented work? Because you're afraid to, that's why.
No they have not been answered

You aere running from them because they destroy your fiction
 
Now you expect us to believe that amateurs flawlessly pulled off the biggest building demolitions in the world. At least you didn't try to claim a professional demo company was in on it and somehow managed to keep hundreds of workers silent.

Now you expect us to believe they left charges unattended for months on end, during which time they could have been discovered accidentally, could have prematurely detonated, or failed to detonate after months of inactivity. And, we're supposed to believe that they knew where the planes were going to hit so they knew where to start blowing up the charges, even though it may not have been optimal to bring down the buildings. That's an AWFUL lot to leave to chance, and I don't buy it.

It doesn't matter. It would only take one curious security guard doing his rounds, one idle employee or tourist wandering in the wrong area to remember seeing something that didn't look right and talking to a reporter after the planes took down the buildings to blow the lid off the conspiracy, yet nothing.

I've been told to accept a theory presented with large leaps of faith that don't match up with reality. There would have to be hundreds if not thousands of people involved in the conspiracy and NO ONE talk, at all. That's not a realistic proposition.
They weren't amateurs silly boy. They were professional and had an unlimited budget and access.
 
They weren't amateurs silly boy. They were professional and had an unlimited budget and access.
Well, you said,

"They knew where to put the charges because they consulted professional demolition companies like Controlled Demolition Inc,"

Now you say, "They were professional". Which is it? Did they consult with professional demolition companies (managing to keep those companies quiet with no one remembering, "Hey, somebody asked us how to wire the WTC for demolition!") or not?
 
15th post
No evidence of explosives or thermite.
Exactly right. Because they never looked.

I've long said that the easiest way to spot a bs conspiracy theory is that whenever a question or talking point is addressed, it raises even more questions -- never ends, because like the OP Kunckle McUncle, munkle said "some people really really are not going to see anything but what they want to see."
 
What if only one tower were hit by a plane?

They would be left with one tower wired to explode that would show up in an investigation
There are far more unanswered questions in the conspiracy theory than in the official account.
 
What if only one tower were hit by a plane?

They would be left with one tower wired to explode that would show up in an investigation
The 'investigation' into the events of 11 September was not needed in the eyes of the corrupt POTUS. He refused to have one for months, until finally political pressure prevailed and he had to do it.

Can you imagine yourself being innocent and being POTUS that day. Would you have ordered such an investigation?

Finally, when Bush caved, he named Henry Kissinger to head it up. In the end the surviving family members and a handful of good congressmen would not allow Kissinger, and eventually the 911 Commission was born, similar in scope and purpose to the Warren Commission. They were formed to protect the guilty parties and manipulate the gullible folks that accept anything the government tells them no matter the facts and evidence.

In its final report, the Commission noted 60+ times that "we found no evidence" to support 60 some odd claims of the official narrative.
 
Back
Top Bottom