Zone1 What is Wrong with Inequality?

[Monk-Eye]

" Aimless Money Supply Not Elevating Us General Welfare "

* Incapable Of Spending Us Economy Out Of National Debt *

That's called the 'trade turn' or the 'velocity' of money. However, a growing economy requires a growing money supply as well. If each 'trade', and resulting income, is taxed the money will quickly be diminished, thus an infusion of new money is needed.

The infusion of money into an economy through direct spending from government , through grants , contracts and tax breaks targeting infrastructure , has been a policy of us democratic party .

The infusion of money into an economy through indirect spending from government , through general tax breaks to private sector , that is usually without infrastructure targets for economic growth , has been a policy of us republican party .

The difference between party public policy for with or without targeted infrastructure is interrelated with the availability and effective use of money when controlled by either government or private sector .

In general , free market capitalists are globalists and not nationalists , which is why tariffs are applied and which is why public policy for a planned economy through tax breaks to target infrastructure is a failure by republicans , when considering congressional responsibility to general welfare according to article 1 section 8 of us constitution .

 

[Woodznutz]

" Aimless Money Supply Not Elevating Us General Welfare "

* Incapable Of Spending Us Economy Out Of National Debt *

The infusion of money into an economy through direct spending from government , through grants , contracts and tax breaks targeting infrastructure , has been a policy of us democratic party .

The infusion of money into an economy through indirect spending from government , through general tax breaks to private sector , that is usually without infrastructure targets for economic growth , has been a policy of us republican party .

The difference between party public policy for with or without targeted infrastructure is interrelated with the availability and effective use of money when controlled by either government or private sector .

In general , free market capitalists are globalists and not nationalists , which is why tariffs are applied and which is why public policy for a planned economy through tax breaks to target infrastructure is a failure by republicans , when considering congressional responsibility to general welfare according to article 1 section 8 of us constitution .

The infusion of new money into the economy is done by borrowing, thus the very money that supports commerce and growth also indebts the country, to an entity that cares not for the financial security of the nation but only to control it and enrich itself. I speak in these vague terms of the Federal Reserve System.

Congress has ceded control of the economy to an unelected, largely unaccountable entity.

 

[frigidweirdo]

God gives us the rules for success which if followed generally result in (wait for it)..Success!

Like... being born rich....

 

[Lisa558]

Like... being born rich....

View attachment 1132819

There are no slaves in America.

Even the poorest - if they have the right traits and make the right choices- can move from abject poverty to the middle class in one generation.

 

[Woodznutz]

There are no slaves in America.

Even the poorest - if they have the right traits and make the right choices- can move from abject poverty to the middle class in one generation.

True, and poverty for most is only temporary.

 

[Woodznutz]

Like... being born rich....

View attachment 1132819

Thousands of well-paid skilled craftsmen and artisans helped as well. They made out pretty well.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The real question is how can anyone believe inequality is anything good and / or something we should continue to maintain. For GOD 's sake how could anyone be that stupid.

Inequality is not only good, but admirable. Anything else and we live in the world of Harrison Bergeron.

 

[Woodznutz]

Inequality is not only good, but admirable. Anything else and we live in the world of Harrison Bergeron.

There's something wonderful about the unlimited potential for success here in America. Equality would destroy that.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

There's something wonderful about the unlimited potential for success here in America. Equality would destroy that.

Equality would silence Taylor Swift and take one of Simone Biles' legs.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Professional training is good education.

The Sons of the Peasants' Masters Don't Need to Be Paid

If students aren't paid, they fit the definition of "amateurs." The results show it. We're surviving only because other countries won't replace this feudal system with paid professional training.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Doesn't really matter. Statistically speaking most people will not be able to do this. So saying "I did it, so anyone can"... mostly it's down to luck.

The Nobility with No Ability

The tragedy is the people who are able to do it but are not allowed to by a fixed ruling class that fears any talented person who is proud enough to feel he owes nothing to that static class.

 

[Woodznutz]

The Sons of the Peasants' Masters Don't Need to Be Paid

If students aren't paid, they fit the definition of "amateurs." The results show it. We're surviving only because other countries won't replace this feudal system with paid professional training.

?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Ever heard of the L Curve?

The U.S. income distribution looks pretty much like what it would under a communist regime, which in turn looks pretty much like it did under the Roman Empire. lol

The L-Curve 2.0: An Updated Graph of the US Income Distribution

The US Income distribution does not look like a "Bell Curve". It is an "L-Curve": a gradual ramp for 99% of the population forming "horizontal branch" and a steep spike at top reacing beyond stratosphere. The disparity is so great it is difficult to represent on single graph. To comprehend it...

www.lcurve.org

Commies don't like it when theirs looks exactly like the one we have now, the only difference is in which gang of sociopaths is getting it.

Predestination

Those data correlate with the income of the parents, always hiding how much it is based on birth, not worth.

 

[Lisa558]

Predestination

Those data correlate with the income of the parents, always hiding how much it is based on birth, not worth.

And a lot of that has to do with the fact that high-earning parents are more intelligent and educated than average, so their children inherit intelligence (for the most part) and gain by the parents’ value of higher education.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

True equality may be an impossible standard, but it's still a worthy goal to aim for—at least idealistically. Reality imposes a kind of economic ecosystem that stretches from the Musks of the world to the homeless vagabond. The point of striving for greater equality isn’t to punish success, but to reduce the extremes of poverty that make basic dignity feel out of reach for millions.

It's the Fraternal Twin Sides of the RichKid Reich Squeezing Both Ends Against the Middle

 

[dblack]

And a lot of that has to do with the fact that high-earning parents are more intelligent and educated than average, so their children inherit intelligence (for the most part) and gain by the parents’ value of higher education.

It also helps when parents teach their kids that money is something to be managed, rather than something you're always out of.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Yeah, people should probably specify “East Asian”, but when the topic of Asian-Americans as a “model minority” comes up, it is generally understood that one is talking about people from that specific part of Asia.

There is no similarity in economic development between the peoples of East Asia and the people of the Middle East (“west Asia” I guess)

Similarly, it makes no sense to lump North Africans (Arabs) with sub Saharan Africans (black Africans). The gulf between the is too vast to simply say “they’re all Africans”

Cowards, Crooks, and Collaborators


Southeast Asians are far inferior to the Japanese, Koreans, and Chinese. The Chickenhawks and anti-war protesters invited the Vietnamese in as still another insult to the Americans our sheltered rulers sent to die over there.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Not always. Some people put in lots of effort, but can't get a good paying job because they're not capable of doing so.

I see a lot of kids who start off life without the ability to do a lot of things, while their classmates can. That's simple biology.

Reward Up Front Instead of Sacrifice-First

If the people with ability were treated with respect, they could create enough wealth to provide much better wages for the hard workers with no ability. Intramural students such as Bizz-Skule Gradchewits can't do that.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

. In the hardcore Communist nation of North Korea. The poor exist, while the upper inner circle have wealth. Those that push Communism claim that they will "eliminate" the social classes, and they do. They eliminate the middle-class and the wealthy, leaving one very large class, the poor. The exception is of course, the very inner circle of the regime. Such things as taking away large profits, causes a loss of innovation, which is why Communist countries in the past had to keep stealing the west's technological achievements. China has change it a bit by allowing some private ownership in businesses and by doing this has created a middle-class but still doesn't allow individual freedoms or political opposition.

Communist Party Membership Is Hereditary

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

Communist Party Membership Is Hereditary

???