What Is The Republican Alternative To ObamaCare

[Dante]

for the second time
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-393c3a2.pdf
What the **** is this you ignorant bastard?

The government's lawyer argued a multipronged defense of the mandate.

A majority, including CJ Roberts, ruled the Individual Mandate ...get it yet...was not a valid exercise of the Congress' power to regulate commerce. And a majority of the court ruled the Individual Mandate penalty is a tax and is a valid exercise of Congressional authority under the taxing and spending clause.

So the government's argument that the Individual Mandate is constitutional won.

That is the ruling: Obamacare, the mandate, and the penalty/tax is constitutional.

Now some Justices disagreed, but they are in the minority. The mandate was ruled constitutional.

damn wingnuts! Alternate reality!

note: and some people wonder why I so enjoy usmb

Will someone explain it to the stupid bastard what Justice Roberts said. The mandate is not constitutional what part f that is so hard for you to comprehend. I posted two link that supported what I said. you are a failure for your cause.

Fool, like CNN and FOX News, you need to learn to read his full statement. Robetts ruled the mandate constitutional.

Gawd, you're an imbecilc bore

 

[dblack]

The government's lawyer argued a multipronged defense of the mandate.

A majority, including CJ Roberts, ruled the Individual Mandate ...get it yet...was not a valid exercise of the Congress' power to regulate commerce. And a majority of the court ruled the Individual Mandate penalty is a tax and is a valid exercise of Congressional authority under the taxing and spending clause.

So the government's argument that the Individual Mandate is constitutional won.

That is the ruling: Obamacare, the mandate, and the penalty/tax is constitutional.

Now some Justices disagreed, but they are in the minority. The mandate was ruled constitutional.

damn wingnuts! Alternate reality!

note: and some people wonder why I so enjoy usmb

Will someone explain it to the stupid bastard what Justice Roberts said. The mandate is not constitutional what part f that is so hard for you to comprehend. I posted two link that supported what I said. you are a failure for your cause.

Fool, like CNN and FOX News, you need to learn to read his full statement. Robetts ruled the mandate constitutional.

Gawd, you're an imbecilc bore

Have another drink Dante.

 

[Dante]

The government's lawyer argued a multipronged defense of the mandate.

A majority, including CJ Roberts, ruled the Individual Mandate ...get it yet...was not a valid exercise of the Congress' power to regulate commerce. And a majority of the court ruled the Individual Mandate penalty is a tax and is a valid exercise of Congressional authority under the taxing and spending clause.

So the government's argument that the Individual Mandate is constitutional won.

That is the ruling: Obamacare, the mandate, and the penalty/tax is constitutional.

Now some Justices disagreed, but they are in the minority. The mandate was ruled constitutional.

damn wingnuts! Alternate reality!

note: and some people wonder why I so enjoy usmb

Will someone explain it to the stupid bastard what Justice Roberts said. The mandate is not constitutional what part f that is so hard for you to comprehend. I posted two link that supported what I said. you are a failure for your cause.

Bah ... no point. Dante/Starkey is poo flung against the wall. Sometimes it makes interesting patterns. That is all.

[MENTION=30065]dblack[/MENTION] challenge: publicly say you agree with retardreb that CJ Roberts ruled the Individual Mandate as unconstitutional

 

[Dante]

Wingnuts are stuck focusing on comments and arguments over the validity of the legal arguments regarding the constitutionality of the Individual Mandate as oppossed to the ruling itself

There were multiple arguments. Some were considered invalid, some were ruled valid. But the mandate itself was ruled constitutional.

Frigging wingnut world is too ******* funny

 

[Dante]

Get IT yet girls?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Will someone explain it to the stupid bastard what Justice Roberts said. The mandate is not constitutional what part f that is so hard for you to comprehend. I posted two link that supported what I said. you are a failure for your cause.

Bah ... no point. Dante/Starkey is poo flung against the wall. Sometimes it makes interesting patterns. That is all.

[MENTION=30065]dblack[/MENTION] challenge: publicly say you agree with retardreb that CJ Roberts ruled the Individual Mandate as unconstitutional

stop swimming in the river of denial you wanted the source and I posted it.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Wingnuts are stuck focusing on comments and arguments over the validity of the legal arguments regarding the constitutionality of the Individual Mandate as oppossed to the ruling itself

There were multiple arguments. Some were considered invalid, some were ruled valid. But the mandate itself was ruled constitutional.

Frigging wingnut world is too ******* funny

idiot go back to your village they miss you.

 

[RKMBrown]

Wingnuts are stuck focusing on comments and arguments over the validity of the legal arguments regarding the constitutionality of the Individual Mandate as oppossed to the ruling itself

There were multiple arguments. Some were considered invalid, some were ruled valid. But the mandate itself was ruled constitutional.

Frigging wingnut world is too ******* funny

Sigh. Sometimes I wish I could just slap Roberts. But he ruled correctly. I hate that he did that.

 

[Dante]

Bah ... no point. Dante/Starkey is poo flung against the wall. Sometimes it makes interesting patterns. That is all.

[MENTION=30065]dblack[/MENTION] challenge: publicly say you agree with retardreb that CJ Roberts ruled the Individual Mandate as unconstitutional

stop swimming in the river of denial you wanted the source and I posted it.

You refused (because it doesn't exist) to post quoted text from Roberts' ruling that supports your absurd notion that the Individual Mandate was ruled unconstitutional.



You're demented

 

[Dante]

Wingnuts are stuck focusing on comments and arguments over the validity of the legal arguments regarding the constitutionality of the Individual Mandate as oppossed to the ruling itself

There were multiple arguments. Some were considered invalid, some were ruled valid. But the mandate itself was ruled constitutional.

Frigging wingnut world is too ******* funny

Sigh. Sometimes I wish I could just slap Roberts. But he ruled correctly. I hate that he did that.

Roberts has stated publicly how much he admires CJ Marshall. He is in a league with Marshall...no small feat

 

[bigrebnc1775]

[MENTION=30065]dblack[/MENTION] challenge: publicly say you agree with retardreb that CJ Roberts ruled the Individual Mandate as unconstitutional

stop swimming in the river of denial you wanted the source and I posted it.

You refused (because it doesn't exist) to post quoted text from Roberts' ruling that supports your absurd notion that the Individual Mandate was ruled unconstitutional.



You're demented

you're an ignorant bastard I posted two links move on dumb ass.

 

[dblack]

Will someone explain it to the stupid bastard what Justice Roberts said. The mandate is not constitutional what part f that is so hard for you to comprehend. I posted two link that supported what I said. you are a failure for your cause.

Bah ... no point. Dante/Starkey is poo flung against the wall. Sometimes it makes interesting patterns. That is all.

[MENTION=30065]dblack[/MENTION] challenge: publicly say you agree with retardreb that CJ Roberts ruled the Individual Mandate as unconstitutional

Silly Dante. You don't challenge me.

 

[Dante]

stop swimming in the river of denial you wanted the source and I posted it.

You refused (because it doesn't exist) to post quoted text from Roberts' ruling that supports your absurd notion that the Individual Mandate was ruled unconstitutional.



You're demented

you're an ignorant bastard I posted two links move on dumb ass.

Your link(s) disagree with Roberts.

Post a quote from the ruling that supports your inane position. You won't because you can't. It doesn't exist outside of tbe Rightwing Noise Machine Circle Jerk Chamber

 

[Dante]

Bah ... no point. Dante/Starkey is poo flung against the wall. Sometimes it makes interesting patterns. That is all.

[MENTION=30065]dblack[/MENTION] challenge: publicly say you agree with retardreb that CJ Roberts ruled the Individual Mandate as unconstitutional

Silly Dante. You don't challenge me.

You side with the argument of Dante or retardreb?

 

[dblack]

[MENTION=30065]dblack[/MENTION] challenge: publicly say you agree with retardreb that CJ Roberts ruled the Individual Mandate as unconstitutional

Silly Dante. You don't challenge me.

You side with Dante or retardreb?

Dante, I'm sorry, but I can't take you seriously. Feel free to return the 'favor'.

 

[RKMBrown]

Wingnuts are stuck focusing on comments and arguments over the validity of the legal arguments regarding the constitutionality of the Individual Mandate as oppossed to the ruling itself

There were multiple arguments. Some were considered invalid, some were ruled valid. But the mandate itself was ruled constitutional.

Frigging wingnut world is too ******* funny

Sigh. Sometimes I wish I could just slap Roberts. But he ruled correctly. I hate that he did that.

Roberts has stated publicly how much he admires CJ Marshall. He is in a league with Marshall...no small feat

I'd give my left nut if the rest of the justices were to be as married to the Constitution, over their own personal bias, as he.

 

[Dante]

Silly Dante. You don't challenge me.

You side with Dante or retardreb?

Dante, I'm sorry, but I can't take you seriously. Feel free to return the 'favor'.

[MENTION=30065]dblack[/MENTION] refuses to refute Dante on this one because he knows Dante is correct.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

[MENTION=30065]dblack[/MENTION] challenge: publicly say you agree with retardreb that CJ Roberts ruled the Individual Mandate as unconstitutional

Silly Dante. You don't challenge me.

You side with the argument of Dante or retardreb?

A person who communicates in third person calling me retard?
When a person talks in third person shows a sign of insanity
So the retarded blather that you speak is just that retarded

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You refused (because it doesn't exist) to post quoted text from Roberts' ruling that supports your absurd notion that the Individual Mandate was ruled unconstitutional.



You're demented

you're an ignorant bastard I posted two links move on dumb ass.

Your link(s) disagree with Roberts.

Post a quote from the ruling that supports your inane position. You won't because you can't. It doesn't exist outside of tbe Rightwing Noise Machine Circle Jerk Chamber

page 9
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-393c3a2.pdf

 

[Dante]

Sigh. Sometimes I wish I could just slap Roberts. But he ruled correctly. I hate that he did that.

Roberts has stated publicly how much he admires CJ Marshall. He is in a league with Marshall...no small feat

I'd give my left nut if the rest of the justices were to be as married to the Constitution, over their own personal bias, as he.

The thing I like most about Roberts so far is he hasn't made bizzare comments as Kennedy, Scalia and a few others that would expose him as an out of touch elitist and academic.

Some of the Justices have said things about the world and people in it that just spin my head. They have lived such shelterd and compartmentalized lives it is amazing they can relate to anything the average American experiences