What is the Lame Zone?

[random3434]

Grow up. The only possible consequence from your threats are your own criminal charges. However, you having been in the military does make you more dangerous as it seems military people either sign up to avoid drug charges or develop 'army disease' once in.

And how long did you serve in the military?

Just because you think he's a dick, that still doesn't matter.

I don't think of him at all.

 

[Hillbilly]

My grandfather must be one of the few people I know who isn't a Holocaust denier if being an eyewitness to something is a requirement for knowledge. Isn't this one of those strawman things or red dogs or something?

argumentum ad hominem.

Thar ain't no need for that kinda language, y'hear?

 

[Hillbilly]

And how long did you serve in the military?

My grandfather must be one of the few people I know who isn't a Holocaust denier if being an eyewitness to something is a requirement for knowledge. Isn't this one of those strawman things or red dogs or something?

That's great your grandfather served in the military. Did you? I myself have not, so I can't make generalizations about those who have. Now, for those that have served, like many of the fine men and women who post on here, maybe they can tell you if what you say is true.

I'm sure you'll get a whole lot of honest answers that way.

They say black people eat fried chicken for a reason. Because they eat a ton of it. They call drug addiction army disease for a reason too. Everyone I know who's joined the military over the last 10 years did so to get off drug charges. They and all the Persian Gulf vets I've known have told stories about all the drugs they did in the service.

 

[KittenKoder]

My grandfather must be one of the few people I know who isn't a Holocaust denier if being an eyewitness to something is a requirement for knowledge. Isn't this one of those strawman things or red dogs or something?

That's great your grandfather served in the military. Did you? I myself have not, so I can't make generalizations about those who have. Now, for those that have served, like many of the fine men and women who post on here, maybe they can tell you if what you say is true.

I'm sure you'll get a whole lot of honest answers that way.

They say black people eat fried chicken for a reason. Because they eat a ton of it. They call drug addiction army disease for a reason too. Everyone I know who's joined the military over the last 10 years did so to get off drug charges. They and all the Persian Gulf vets I've known have told stories about all the drugs they did in the service.

For someone who lives in a city, you sure don't know many people.

 

[random3434]

My grandfather must be one of the few people I know who isn't a Holocaust denier if being an eyewitness to something is a requirement for knowledge. Isn't this one of those strawman things or red dogs or something?

That's great your grandfather served in the military. Did you? I myself have not, so I can't make generalizations about those who have. Now, for those that have served, like many of the fine men and women who post on here, maybe they can tell you if what you say is true.

I'm sure you'll get a whole lot of honest answers that way.

They say black people eat fried chicken for a reason. Because they eat a ton of it. They call drug addiction army disease for a reason too. Everyone I know who's joined the military over the last 10 years did so to get off drug charges. They and all the Persian Gulf vets I've known have told stories about all the drugs they did in the service.

Wow, then I guess that DOES make you an expert!

 

[DamnYankee]

I flat DARE you to open a forum where NO flaming and NO trolling... No foul Langauage etc... are the hard and fast rules...

MOST of your mods will be completely incapable of participating; which is going to make it fairly difficult for them to be objective in their function as 'moderators...'

Cut a sticky which defines FLAMING, TROLLING, FOUL LANGUAGE, Etc..

What you're going to find is that the "Moderate position" is destroyed... that the Centrists will have their asses handed to them at every point and that the "FORBIDDEN ISSUES" will come to the table for debate and that YOUR STATED POINT OF VIEW ON THESE ISSUES will be eviscerated...

You're trying to moderate THOUGHT, Admin... Not the means by which that thought is imparted... which is to say that while you seem to believe that the problem is the WAY the debate takes place; that the means by which the participants engage in debate, in and of itself, creates "EXTREMISM"... the fact is you simply 'feel' that some conclusions which contest your own, on your pet issues are wrong; and that your patented 10-15 word quips aren't accepted on the same authority as 'The Sacred Tablets' ... makes ya nuts...

But PULEASE! I am BEGGING YOU! Open a FORUM FOR PURE DEBATE... DEFINE THE RULES CLEARLY...

Towards that end, I suggest that the basic rules for formal debate be posted... that invalid reasoning be established as disqualifying argument... fallacies of every stripe, to include non sequiturs, the litanny of ad hoc conclusions, ad hom, ingorantum, populum...

Require that where an assertion of reason is advanced and challenged that where the member fails to support it through reasoned argument they must withdraw or condede... and that where they fail to formally rescind the assertion that they concede by default; and where such is determined, where they return to the point, they are banned from the thread... and where an assertion of fact is advanced, citiations from credible resources sustaining that assertion must be provided and so on...


Let the games... BEGIN!

Is the obtuseness deliberate or a result of ignorance?

 

[KittenKoder]

I flat DARE you to open a forum where NO flaming and NO trolling... No foul Langauage etc... are the hard and fast rules...

MOST of your mods will be completely incapable of participating; which is going to make it fairly difficult for them to be objective in their function as 'moderators...'

Cut a sticky which defines FLAMING, TROLLING, FOUL LANGUAGE, Etc..

What you're going to find is that the "Moderate position" is destroyed... that the Centrists will have their asses handed to them at every point and that the "FORBIDDEN ISSUES" will come to the table for debate and that YOUR STATED POINT OF VIEW ON THESE ISSUES will be eviscerated...

You're trying to moderate THOUGHT, Admin... Not the means by which that thought is imparted... which is to say that while you seem to believe that the problem is the WAY the debate takes place; that the means by which the participants engage in debate, in and of itself, creates "EXTREMISM"... the fact is you simply 'feel' that some conclusions which contest your own, on your pet issues are wrong; and that your patented 10-15 word quips aren't accepted on the same authority as 'The Sacred Tablets' ... makes ya nuts...

But PULEASE! I am BEGGING YOU! Open a FORUM FOR PURE DEBATE... DEFINE THE RULES CLEARLY...

Towards that end, I suggest that the basic rules for formal debate be posted... that invalid reasoning be established as disqualifying argument... fallacies of every stripe, to include non sequiturs, the litanny of ad hoc conclusions, ad hom, ingorantum, populum...

Require that where an assertion of reason is advanced and challenged that where the member fails to support it through reasoned argument they must withdraw or condede... and that where they fail to formally rescind the assertion that they concede by default; and where such is determined, where they return to the point, they are banned from the thread... and where an assertion of fact is advanced, citiations from credible resources sustaining that assertion must be provided and so on...


Let the games... BEGIN!

Is the obtuseness deliberate or a result of ignorance?

I was picturing a 2 year old who lost their binky while reading it myself.

 

[DamnYankee]

I flat DARE you to open a forum where NO flaming and NO trolling... No foul Langauage etc... are the hard and fast rules...

MOST of your mods will be completely incapable of participating; which is going to make it fairly difficult for them to be objective in their function as 'moderators...'

Cut a sticky which defines FLAMING, TROLLING, FOUL LANGUAGE, Etc..

What you're going to find is that the "Moderate position" is destroyed... that the Centrists will have their asses handed to them at every point and that the "FORBIDDEN ISSUES" will come to the table for debate and that YOUR STATED POINT OF VIEW ON THESE ISSUES will be eviscerated...

You're trying to moderate THOUGHT, Admin... Not the means by which that thought is imparted... which is to say that while you seem to believe that the problem is the WAY the debate takes place; that the means by which the participants engage in debate, in and of itself, creates "EXTREMISM"... the fact is you simply 'feel' that some conclusions which contest your own, on your pet issues are wrong; and that your patented 10-15 word quips aren't accepted on the same authority as 'The Sacred Tablets' ... makes ya nuts...

But PULEASE! I am BEGGING YOU! Open a FORUM FOR PURE DEBATE... DEFINE THE RULES CLEARLY...

Towards that end, I suggest that the basic rules for formal debate be posted... that invalid reasoning be established as disqualifying argument... fallacies of every stripe, to include non sequiturs, the litanny of ad hoc conclusions, ad hom, ingorantum, populum...

Require that where an assertion of reason is advanced and challenged that where the member fails to support it through reasoned argument they must withdraw or condede... and that where they fail to formally rescind the assertion that they concede by default; and where such is determined, where they return to the point, they are banned from the thread... and where an assertion of fact is advanced, citiations from credible resources sustaining that assertion must be provided and so on...


Let the games... BEGIN!

Is the obtuseness deliberate or a result of ignorance?

I was picturing a 2 year old who lost their binky while reading it myself.

Really.... I fail to comprehend what part of "selective participation" is incomprehensible....

 

[KittenKoder]

Is the obtuseness deliberate or a result of ignorance?

I was picturing a 2 year old who lost their binky while reading it myself.

Really.... I fail to comprehend what part of "selective participation" is incomprehensible....

PI seems like one of those with no control over their real lives, so he has to challenge authority online. I doubt he would last more than a few posts in such a strictly moderated sub forum himself.

 

[DamnYankee]

I was picturing a 2 year old who lost their binky while reading it myself.

Really.... I fail to comprehend what part of "selective participation" is incomprehensible....

PI seems like one of those with no control over their real lives, so he has to challenge authority online. I doubt he would last more than a few posts in such a strictly moderated sub forum himself.

Would have made a real hit with my former (retired) boss. LOL

 

[globalongoings]

Its ok what you feel you write... expressing ideas is not bad at all...

 

[roomy]

Is the obtuseness deliberate or a result of ignorance?

I was picturing a 2 year old who lost their binky while reading it myself.

Really.... I fail to comprehend what part of "selective participation" is incomprehensible....

Maybe you should go back to school?

 

[DamnYankee]

I was picturing a 2 year old who lost their binky while reading it myself.

Really.... I fail to comprehend what part of "selective participation" is incomprehensible....

Maybe you should go back to school?

<chuckle> Your lack of comprehension so noted....

 

[alan1]

And how long did you serve in the military?

Just because you think he's a dick, that still doesn't matter.

I don't think of him at all.

Good point, your mind is probably full of thoughts about me.
I knew you were a deep thinker like that.

 

[Gunny]

Grow up. The only possible consequence from your threats are your own criminal charges. However, you having been in the military does make you more dangerous as it seems military people either sign up to avoid drug charges or develop 'army disease' once in.

Grow up, huh? At least I am what I claim to be. Not some dune-dweller claiming to be a "hillbilly" and trying to talk like Jed Clampett.

btw corky ... you didn't have to avoid drug charges when I enlisted. Nobody cared.

 

[Gunny]

Grow up. The only possible consequence from your threats are your own criminal charges. However, you having been in the military does make you more dangerous as it seems military people either sign up to avoid drug charges or develop 'army disease' once in.

What the fuck are you babbling about?

He's trying to be witty.

 

[Gunny]

Grow up. The only possible consequence from your threats are your own criminal charges. However, you having been in the military does make you more dangerous as it seems military people either sign up to avoid drug charges or develop 'army disease' once in.

And how long did you serve in the military?

My grandfather must be one of the few people I know who isn't a Holocaust denier if being an eyewitness to something is a requirement for knowledge. Isn't this one of those strawman things or red dogs or something?

Not anymore than you dragging your grandpappy into the fray is, strawdog.

 

[DamnYankee]

Grow up. The only possible consequence from your threats are your own criminal charges. However, you having been in the military does make you more dangerous as it seems military people either sign up to avoid drug charges or develop 'army disease' once in.

What the fuck are you babbling about?

He's trying to be witty.

Probably should search for another half wit then.... <snicker>

 

[Gunny]

My grandfather must be one of the few people I know who isn't a Holocaust denier if being an eyewitness to something is a requirement for knowledge. Isn't this one of those strawman things or red dogs or something?

That's great your grandfather served in the military. Did you? I myself have not, so I can't make generalizations about those who have. Now, for those that have served, like many of the fine men and women who post on here, maybe they can tell you if what you say is true.

I'm sure you'll get a whole lot of honest answers that way.

They say black people eat fried chicken for a reason. Because they eat a ton of it. They call drug addiction army disease for a reason too. Everyone I know who's joined the military over the last 10 years did so to get off drug charges. They and all the Persian Gulf vets I've known have told stories about all the drugs they did in the service.

For one thing Jethro, I haven't served a day in the Army. Two, you don't hear that shit from Marines. The Corps will drug test your ass on Friday, then do it again on Monday morning just to see if you think you're as smart as a hillbilly.

Three, I retired 9 years ago, so whatever you're claiming to know ... which sounds like a load of manure ... wouldn't apply to me anyway based on YOUR statement.

Four, you don't know what you're talking about.

NOw, I'll try not to hold it against your ass that besides your attempt to perpetrate a fraud by claiming to be a hillbilly being from where only jackrabbits and horny toads exist, but you also clearly don't know a damned thing about the military and you're willing to talk a bunch of nonsense about it.

Not everybody served their 3-4 and got out. Anyone that stays longer than that and uses any kind of illegal substance is just trying to beat the odds, and obviously isn't very bright. Do the shit and you WILL get caught eventually. Period.

 

[Terral]

Hi PC:

"What Is The Lame Zone?"

I saw that the "Is Dick Cheney a Traitor?" discussion was moved there and one cannot post a reply.

The Lame Zone is the place where lame mods ship 'Controversial Topics' for which they have run out of arguments and the deliberation process itself is about to transform them into a fool. The original Topic is moved to kill the discussion, because those running diversion for the USMB "Agenda" must conceal their true motivations by micromanaging member content. The New World Order Propaganda Disinformation Artists are tightening their firm grip on We The Sheeple (pic = more like this), by limiting discussion on key topics; like the fact that Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Richard Meyers (New Pearl Harbor) are 9/11 Inside-Job Bad Guys (my Blog) helping to orchestrate the current U.S./Global Economic Implosion (my Topic) 'and' the Swine/Avian/Human Hybrid Bio-weapon Virus (my Topic) Attack that is now gestating/mutating in the global population in preparation for instituting "Martial Law" (my thread).

Rather and stand in the 'neutral corner' to ensure all registered members have the same opportunity to present their views on a level playing field, the mods are jumping in to take one position or the other; and this silly Mod Lamer Zone is needed to help hide and remove the egg from their collective faces, when those running this place run out of tricks. The "Lame" part describes the people moving/closing/deleting USMB Member Topics and 'not' a description of the Topic itself. That is the very reason that you see mods out here trying to defend their actions in the first place . . .

GL,

Terral