http://www.ipcc.ch/news_and_events/docs/factsheets/FS_what_ipcc.pdf
This is a link to a UN factsheet, in English, giving a brief (1.5 pages) overview of the purpose, nature and function of the IPCC.
As you read this, consider how many of these comments regarding the available resources and the QA applied, would be found in an objective examination of your sources. Note also lines such as "IPCC assessments are written by hundreds of leading scientists who volunteer their time and expertise as Coordinating Lead Authors and Lead Authors of the reports" and "The assessments are policy-relevant but not policy-prescriptive: they may present projections of future climate change based on different scenarios and the risks that climate change poses and discuss the implications of response options, but they do not tell policymakers what actions to take" before presenting the standard, denier charges that climate scientists find AGW because it makes them rich and that liberals push AGW because it gives them control.
This is a link to a UN factsheet, in English, giving a brief (1.5 pages) overview of the purpose, nature and function of the IPCC.
As you read this, consider how many of these comments regarding the available resources and the QA applied, would be found in an objective examination of your sources. Note also lines such as "IPCC assessments are written by hundreds of leading scientists who volunteer their time and expertise as Coordinating Lead Authors and Lead Authors of the reports" and "The assessments are policy-relevant but not policy-prescriptive: they may present projections of future climate change based on different scenarios and the risks that climate change poses and discuss the implications of response options, but they do not tell policymakers what actions to take" before presenting the standard, denier charges that climate scientists find AGW because it makes them rich and that liberals push AGW because it gives them control.