What is more important, paying illegal immigrants, or paying our military

[danielpalos]

definitely pay the illegals because what good is a military if the invaders can just come in on United Airlines--they don't need landing craft, ships, LCACS, AAVs--
the invaders can just WALK across the undefended border
and some idiot American traitors leave supplies for the invaders
Aid group: Border Patrol agents destroyed water jugs left for illegal border crossers

We are not at war; our Commerce Clause applies. The right wing needs wartime tax rates, to convince the left wing; in Any conflict of laws.

1. we need to protect our borders--illegal immigration is an ''attack'' on America for many reasons
--we need to post our military there
2. we are at war--with terrorist!! who can just walk across the border or use fake IDs
Enemies at the gate

Then, you need to convince the republicans to enact, wartime tax rates or it is just, phony times of war capitalists can, cash in on with enough capital.

who are we at war with?

why do we need a wall and not a market friendly visa that actually solves this federal problem at the federal borders and not State interiors?

 

[danielpalos]

[QUO

all the right gave us is more debt.

But not the $10 trillion that worthless affirmative action piece of shit Obama gave us. Even more than that if you go back to 2007 and 2008 when the filthy Democrats controlled both houses of Congress.

You are either a confused Moon Bat or a delusional one. Which one is it? In your case probably both.

means nothing; both terms, promote and provide apply to the general welfare.

You claim the right wing cannot fund government; but were able to cut taxes.

Our Commerce Clause applies if the right wing believes it is not real times of War, sufficient for real times of war tax rates. Cutting taxes is the example.

don't need a war to fund our military. see you've been misled for many of years. Security is the government's job. you should educate yourself.

We have a Second Amendment not a need for a Standing Army during times of Peace and lower tax rates and not War and higher tax rates.

 

[jc456]

definitely pay the illegals because what good is a military if the invaders can just come in on United Airlines--they don't need landing craft, ships, LCACS, AAVs--
the invaders can just WALK across the undefended border
and some idiot American traitors leave supplies for the invaders
Aid group: Border Patrol agents destroyed water jugs left for illegal border crossers

We are not at war; our Commerce Clause applies. The right wing needs wartime tax rates, to convince the left wing; in Any conflict of laws.

1. we need to protect our borders--illegal immigration is an ''attack'' on America for many reasons
--we need to post our military there
2. we are at war--with terrorist!! who can just walk across the border or use fake IDs
Enemies at the gate

Then, you need to convince the republicans to enact, wartime tax rates or it is just, phony times of war capitalists can, cash in on with enough capital.

who are we at war with?

why do we need a wall and not a market friendly visa that actually solves this federal problem at the federal borders and not State interiors?

don't you have any better question than posting a rhetorical question? really? LOL

Curious, do you have locks on your doors at home?

 

[jc456]

[QUO

all the right gave us is more debt.

But not the $10 trillion that worthless affirmative action piece of shit Obama gave us. Even more than that if you go back to 2007 and 2008 when the filthy Democrats controlled both houses of Congress.

You are either a confused Moon Bat or a delusional one. Which one is it? In your case probably both.

means nothing; both terms, promote and provide apply to the general welfare.

You claim the right wing cannot fund government; but were able to cut taxes.

Our Commerce Clause applies if the right wing believes it is not real times of War, sufficient for real times of war tax rates. Cutting taxes is the example.

don't need a war to fund our military. see you've been misled for many of years. Security is the government's job. you should educate yourself.

We have a Second Amendment not a need for a Standing Army during times of Peace and lower tax rates and not War and higher tax rates.

surrrrrrrrrre go with that. half the world hates our guts and we get to defend with guns. funny.

 

[Flash]

[QU

Still flying the traitor flag, I see.

You mean like the city flags that you seen in all these sanctuary cites that defy the laws of the United States? It that the kind of traitor flag you are referring to? Because they are the traitors.

 

[hazlnut]

And what will the people choose as the answer in 2020.

Nancy Pelosi will still choose her $2,000.00 shoes, this we know

GOP Senate rejected an amendment that would insure military is paid during shut down.

I guess Fox News isn't reporting that...

Republicans Just Killed The Bill To Make Sure Troops Get Paid During Shutdown

 

[oreo]

And what will the people choose as the answer in 2020.

Nancy Pelosi will still choose her $2,000.00 shoes, this we know

You actually believe that Trump is going to make it through his 1st term in office---

31 HOUSE REPUBLICANS have already announced their early retirements and will not seek reelection in 2018. The DNC has announced that it is running candidates for every congressional seat in TEXAS. Ted Cruz is up for reelection. Texas has a legal voting population of 40% Hispanic.
A Record Number of House Republicans Will Not Seek Re-Election in 2018
There's A Democrat Running For Every Texas Congressional Seat Next Year

Democrats have been winning special elections all over this country. Virginia/New Jersey governors went to Democrats. Virginia special election state house just went to Democrats for the 1st time in 25 years. Doug Jones was elected in Alabama. Last week, a state house seat in Wisconsin that was held by Republicans for the last 17 years was won by a Democrat. Scott Walker stated this is a wake up call for Republicans. Scott Walker & Paul Ryan both of Wisconsin are up for reelection this year. The Trump motorcade was boooed in Atlanta, Georgia two weeks ago, and Michael Wolff's "Fire & Fury" is still the number one best seller in this nation, when most people ignore Presidential tell-all books.
Scott Walker on Twitter

So yes--you're going to get Chuck Schummer & Nancy Pelosi in November 2018.

Now when they're seated on January 19, 2019 what in the hell do you think they'll do with Treason, Obstruction & Lies--- Just to remind you House Republicans did 8 investigations into Benghazi.

 

[danielpalos]

We are not at war; our Commerce Clause applies. The right wing needs wartime tax rates, to convince the left wing; in Any conflict of laws.

1. we need to protect our borders--illegal immigration is an ''attack'' on America for many reasons
--we need to post our military there
2. we are at war--with terrorist!! who can just walk across the border or use fake IDs
Enemies at the gate

Then, you need to convince the republicans to enact, wartime tax rates or it is just, phony times of war capitalists can, cash in on with enough capital.

who are we at war with?

why do we need a wall and not a market friendly visa that actually solves this federal problem at the federal borders and not State interiors?

don't you have any better question than posting a rhetorical question? really? LOL

Curious, do you have locks on your doors at home?

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

 

[danielpalos]

[QUO

all the right gave us is more debt.

But not the $10 trillion that worthless affirmative action piece of shit Obama gave us. Even more than that if you go back to 2007 and 2008 when the filthy Democrats controlled both houses of Congress.

You are either a confused Moon Bat or a delusional one. Which one is it? In your case probably both.

means nothing; both terms, promote and provide apply to the general welfare.

You claim the right wing cannot fund government; but were able to cut taxes.

Our Commerce Clause applies if the right wing believes it is not real times of War, sufficient for real times of war tax rates. Cutting taxes is the example.

don't need a war to fund our military. see you've been misled for many of years. Security is the government's job. you should educate yourself.

We have a Second Amendment not a need for a Standing Army during times of Peace and lower tax rates and not War and higher tax rates.

surrrrrrrrrre go with that. half the world hates our guts and we get to defend with guns. funny.

why are we over there and not over here?

 

[jc456]

1. we need to protect our borders--illegal immigration is an ''attack'' on America for many reasons
--we need to post our military there
2. we are at war--with terrorist!! who can just walk across the border or use fake IDs
Enemies at the gate

Then, you need to convince the republicans to enact, wartime tax rates or it is just, phony times of war capitalists can, cash in on with enough capital.

who are we at war with?

why do we need a wall and not a market friendly visa that actually solves this federal problem at the federal borders and not State interiors?

don't you have any better question than posting a rhetorical question? really? LOL

Curious, do you have locks on your doors at home?

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

tax cuts baby

 

[jc456]

But not the $10 trillion that worthless affirmative action piece of shit Obama gave us. Even more than that if you go back to 2007 and 2008 when the filthy Democrats controlled both houses of Congress.

You are either a confused Moon Bat or a delusional one. Which one is it? In your case probably both.

means nothing; both terms, promote and provide apply to the general welfare.

You claim the right wing cannot fund government; but were able to cut taxes.

Our Commerce Clause applies if the right wing believes it is not real times of War, sufficient for real times of war tax rates. Cutting taxes is the example.

don't need a war to fund our military. see you've been misled for many of years. Security is the government's job. you should educate yourself.

We have a Second Amendment not a need for a Standing Army during times of Peace and lower tax rates and not War and higher tax rates.

surrrrrrrrrre go with that. half the world hates our guts and we get to defend with guns. funny.

why are we over there and not over here?

rhetorical.

 

[harmonica]

The mission of the Department of Defense is to provide the military forces needed to deter war and to protect the security of our country.

About Department of Defense

 

[danielpalos]

Then, you need to convince the republicans to enact, wartime tax rates or it is just, phony times of war capitalists can, cash in on with enough capital.

who are we at war with?

why do we need a wall and not a market friendly visa that actually solves this federal problem at the federal borders and not State interiors?

don't you have any better question than posting a rhetorical question? really? LOL

Curious, do you have locks on your doors at home?

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

tax cuts baby

I guess funding Government is not very important to the right wing.

 

[jc456]

who are we at war with?

why do we need a wall and not a market friendly visa that actually solves this federal problem at the federal borders and not State interiors?

don't you have any better question than posting a rhetorical question? really? LOL

Curious, do you have locks on your doors at home?

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

tax cuts baby

I guess funding Government is not very important to the right wing.

what do tax cuts have to do with funding government. The Money is always there. How much is your problem. I can do without many forms of government.

 

[danielpalos]

why do we need a wall and not a market friendly visa that actually solves this federal problem at the federal borders and not State interiors?

don't you have any better question than posting a rhetorical question? really? LOL

Curious, do you have locks on your doors at home?

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

tax cuts baby

I guess funding Government is not very important to the right wing.

what do tax cuts have to do with funding government. The Money is always there. How much is your problem. I can do without many forms of government.

Why should anyone take the right wing seriously about economics?

It cannot be real times of war without real times of war tax rates.

We subscribe to Capitalism, not Socialism, for the market based metrics.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

definitely pay the illegals because what good is a military if the invaders can just come in on United Airlines--they don't need landing craft, ships, LCACS, AAVs--
the invaders can just WALK across the undefended border
and some idiot American traitors leave supplies for the invaders
Aid group: Border Patrol agents destroyed water jugs left for illegal border crossers

We are not at war; our Commerce Clause applies. The right wing needs wartime tax rates, to convince the left wing; in Any conflict of laws.

Report: U.S.-bound Syrians arrested in Honduras with fake passports

Syrians with fake IDs trying to get to the US--and we shouldn't protect our borders???!!!!!????
from Honduras to Mexico to the US to terrorist bombing

And, You believe we can lower taxes and not raise taxes to at least, green alert level if not yellow alert level?

we need to cut taxes ......there is so much waste...
my dad worked for the government--he said a lot of the workers were plain lazy, would sleep on the job/etc

we can save $$$ by posting the military on the borders:
1. we cut some US overseas bases
2. we stop paying these countries for overseas bases
--stop spending $$ to foreign countries for the maintenance/supplies of these bases/etc etc etc
--stop employing civilian foreigners and employ American civilians
3. the servicemen that come back to the US will spend their $$ in the US and not overseas
4. we don't have to spend $$$ to ship/transport the servicemen overseas--there and back
MUCHO US tax $$$ goes into America and not out of it
win win win for everyone---except the illegals---so the Dems/lefties might not like that

Which ones do you have in mind?

I always love this when people trot this out, not knowing that most of our "bases" overseas are either closed or very small tenants on other military bases.

Know why Benghazi was such a problem? No bases close by.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

[QUO

all the right gave us is more debt.

But not the $10 trillion that worthless affirmative action piece of shit Obama gave us. Even more than that if you go back to 2007 and 2008 when the filthy Democrats controlled both houses of Congress.

You are either a confused Moon Bat or a delusional one. Which one is it? In your case probably both.

I think you mean 2009 and 2010. Obama was not President in 2007 and 2008.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

And what will the people choose as the answer in 2020.

Nancy Pelosi will still choose her $2,000.00 shoes, this we know

GOP Senate rejected an amendment that would insure military is paid during shut down.

I guess Fox News isn't reporting that...

Republicans Just Killed The Bill To Make Sure Troops Get Paid During Shutdown

Why should they get paid? What about the other government workers who are doing without?

The problem is not just pay. My daughter is in the Army and is scheduled for a major training event soon. No funding means, it isn't going to happen, and the troops are still not getting paid!

Pass the damn CR Democrats! Then pass the budget!

 

[Timmy]

Well its a “volunteer “ military ain’t it?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Well its a “volunteer “ military ain’t it?

Down the well ya went again