bendog
Diamond Member
I'll be shocked, shocked I tell ya, if there isn't a showing of direct information sharing from Russia to Trump's campaign. And I won't be shocked if there's witness accounts and even documents tying Trump personally to it. And there cannot be any actual doubt that Russia actively helped Trump, and there's some % of chance that without it, Hillary would be potus.Seriously, have any if you looked at this not as a series of discreet events, but as a whole pattern?
An interesting and compelling look from NY Magazine
What If Trump Has Been a Russian Asset Since 1987?
A little snip from the opening. Read the rest at the link and discuss.
The unfolding of the Russia scandal has been like walking into a dark cavern. Every step reveals that the cave runs deeper than we thought, and after each one, as we wonder how far it goes, our imaginations are circumscribed by the steps we have already taken. The cavern might go just a little farther, we presume, but probably not much farther. And since trying to discern the size and shape of the scandal is an exercise in uncertainty, we focus our attention on the most likely outcome, which is that the story goes a little deeper than what we have already discovered. Say, that Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort told their candidate about the meeting they held at Trump Tower with a Russian lawyer after they were promised dirt on Hillary Clinton; and that Trump and Kushner have some shady Russian investments; and that some of Trump’s advisers made some promises about lifting sanctions.
But what if that’s wrong? What if we’re still standing closer to the mouth of the cave than the end?
The media has treated the notion that Russia has personally compromised the president of the United States as something close to a kook theory. A minority of analysts, mostly but not exclusively on the right, have promoted aggressively exculpatory interpretations of the known facts, in which every suspicious piece of evidence turns out to have a surprisingly innocent explanation. And it is possible, though unlikely, that every trail between Trump Tower and the Kremlin extends no farther than its point of current visibility.
However, Trump's dislike of Nato and free trade is nothing new. He shares more in common in terms of democratic ideals with Putin than with the founding fathers. He's had 50 years in the public eye to demonstrate that, and he has.
America will survive Trump. Whether he permanently injures or relations with other democracies, or whether the Russia Empire will swallow more parts of eastern Europe .... dunno.
He's probably right on trade with Jina, although his and Ivanka's commercial dealings with Jina are conveniently undisturbed by his trade policy.
And Jina is playing Kim, but Kim's self interest precludes a unilateral attack on anyone.