Hillary's emails were illegally placed on a non-governmental server. From my understanding the documents requested are internal White House counsel documents.
Now if there is a question of privilege here, has any other SC nominee been told or asked to released privileged documentation as part of their process?
If the reasoning is legitimately privilege or national security then I’m fine with not releasing them. If they were withheld amoungst other like documents that were released then there is an issue. If they were withhheld because they have potentially political damning information then I have a problem with that. You should too.
What person or persons would have been damaged by the "
potentially political damning information"?
Not Trump. GWB? So then what? NONE of the documents had anything to do with Kavanaugh's qualifications.
Hey the Democrats created the word "Borked" so will they be responsible for a new word..".Caving Kavanaugh"?
Of course the division in the country is certainly getting worse. Just too bad most Democrat/ANTIFA/Socialists don't understand they are the party of "DESTRUCTION"?
Statement: "NONE of the documents had anything to do with Kavanaugh's qualifications"
Response: He's qualified. But that is not the issue. Let's assume Kavanaugh assured the President, that he would be loyal to him. His background on supporting an "Imperial Presidency" is sufficient to discredit him, and necessary for Trump to have nominated him, and the Senate to reject him.
No one is above the law!
“Looking back to the late 1990s, for example, the nation certainly would have been better off if President Clinton could have focused on Osama bin Laden without being distracted by the Paula Jones sexual harassment case and its criminal investigation offshoots,” mused Kavanaugh in his law-review article, which
proposed that “Congress might consider a law exempting a President—while in office—from criminal prosecution and investigation.”
Brett Kavanaugh Once Argued That a Sitting President Should Be Above the Law
So Kavanaugh with retrospect regarding Clinton's distractions agrees that some issues like Mueller trying to show Trump had direct collusion with the Russians ARE inappropriate.
Now let's ask one simple question regarding the Mueller investigation.
If Trump personally set up a meeting with officials of the Russian government with the idea of having the Russians help find information about Hillary, is that illegal?
Legal experts have pointed to a
possible violation of
federal election laws, which ban taking anything of value – which could include information on a political opponent – from a foreign government trying to influence a U.S. election. The Russian attorney at that meeting, Natalia Veselnitskaya, has close ties to the Kremlin.
The Latest US and World News - USATODAY.com
A) legal experts ..."possible violation"... possible..
B) ban taking anything of value...what information about Hillary was taken? Any proof that the meeting had exchange of "valuable information about Hillary"... NOPE
C) Was there ANY foreign government officials in the meeting? NOPE "close ties" but no foreign officials.
So the point you make is no one is above the law.
- OK What law was broken personally by President Trump?
- Did he attend the meeting with a NON-Foreign official and
- was there valuable information exchanged?