- Moderator
- #41
Get back on topic please.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Palestinians consistently call for peace based on international law.Israel has consistently tried to play the nice guy in the middle east conflict.
But what if the Israeli's accepted the war for what it is, acted within the Geneva Conventions and completed the war process. The most humane solution is to end the conflict ASAP, Clearly negotiating with the terrorist isn't working so obviously the fastest way to peace is to finish the war.
Anyone who is in any way familiar with the Geneva conventions and the UN charter would realize that Israel is well within its rights to defend itself. Since the Arab League declared war in 1948 a condition of war has existed. So why not follow it to its natural conclusion. Victory.
Why not take the pali terrorist enclaves one at a time and utterly defeat them. Start small, one of the smaller enclaves where terrorist activity exists. The security walls are perfect for isolating each enclave and from there all aid distribution in terms of food and medicine should be distributed just outside the security area in determination centers where combatants, those who assist combatants and those suspected of being or aiding combatants can be detained as POWs. The rest can be remanded to detention centers not unlike the centers the US set up for the Japanese in WW2. Any of them that refuse to come out to receive their aid can rot. Embargo all entry into the given area, no goods of any kind. Lay siege to enclaves one at a time until complete capitulation is achieved.
Anyone designated a POW according to the Geneva conventions should be repatriated to a neutral third country exactly as specified within the conventions.
Anyone designated a civilian or a refugee can be legally removed from the war zones until such time as its safe to return them.
Rinse and repeat
Once all pali enclaves have been swept for persons having forfeited their protected status, then the rest should be offered the opportunity for unconditional surrender. Should they refuse I'm pretty sure they can be held under military law by the controlling military power or repatriated to a neutral third country.
Regardless its time for the Israeli's to stop pussy footing around and end the war.
A negotiated solution has clearly failed. Which leaves us continuing the war to its logical conclusion. Unconditional surrender
They must be wrong because according to your own postings EVERYONE hates Israel and yet not ONE nation is acting upon this supposed international law.Palestinians consistently call for peace based on international law.Israel has consistently tried to play the nice guy in the middle east conflict.
But what if the Israeli's accepted the war for what it is, acted within the Geneva Conventions and completed the war process. The most humane solution is to end the conflict ASAP, Clearly negotiating with the terrorist isn't working so obviously the fastest way to peace is to finish the war.
Anyone who is in any way familiar with the Geneva conventions and the UN charter would realize that Israel is well within its rights to defend itself. Since the Arab League declared war in 1948 a condition of war has existed. So why not follow it to its natural conclusion. Victory.
Why not take the pali terrorist enclaves one at a time and utterly defeat them. Start small, one of the smaller enclaves where terrorist activity exists. The security walls are perfect for isolating each enclave and from there all aid distribution in terms of food and medicine should be distributed just outside the security area in determination centers where combatants, those who assist combatants and those suspected of being or aiding combatants can be detained as POWs. The rest can be remanded to detention centers not unlike the centers the US set up for the Japanese in WW2. Any of them that refuse to come out to receive their aid can rot. Embargo all entry into the given area, no goods of any kind. Lay siege to enclaves one at a time until complete capitulation is achieved.
Anyone designated a POW according to the Geneva conventions should be repatriated to a neutral third country exactly as specified within the conventions.
Anyone designated a civilian or a refugee can be legally removed from the war zones until such time as its safe to return them.
Rinse and repeat
Once all pali enclaves have been swept for persons having forfeited their protected status, then the rest should be offered the opportunity for unconditional surrender. Should they refuse I'm pretty sure they can be held under military law by the controlling military power or repatriated to a neutral third country.
Regardless its time for the Israeli's to stop pussy footing around and end the war.
A negotiated solution has clearly failed. Which leaves us continuing the war to its logical conclusion. Unconditional surrender
Israel absolutely rejects that proposal.
That doesn't match your post.
The People and government lackeys are two different groups of people.They must be wrong because according to your own postings EVERYONE hates Israel and yet not ONE nation is acting upon this supposed international law.Palestinians consistently call for peace based on international law.Israel has consistently tried to play the nice guy in the middle east conflict.
But what if the Israeli's accepted the war for what it is, acted within the Geneva Conventions and completed the war process. The most humane solution is to end the conflict ASAP, Clearly negotiating with the terrorist isn't working so obviously the fastest way to peace is to finish the war.
Anyone who is in any way familiar with the Geneva conventions and the UN charter would realize that Israel is well within its rights to defend itself. Since the Arab League declared war in 1948 a condition of war has existed. So why not follow it to its natural conclusion. Victory.
Why not take the pali terrorist enclaves one at a time and utterly defeat them. Start small, one of the smaller enclaves where terrorist activity exists. The security walls are perfect for isolating each enclave and from there all aid distribution in terms of food and medicine should be distributed just outside the security area in determination centers where combatants, those who assist combatants and those suspected of being or aiding combatants can be detained as POWs. The rest can be remanded to detention centers not unlike the centers the US set up for the Japanese in WW2. Any of them that refuse to come out to receive their aid can rot. Embargo all entry into the given area, no goods of any kind. Lay siege to enclaves one at a time until complete capitulation is achieved.
Anyone designated a POW according to the Geneva conventions should be repatriated to a neutral third country exactly as specified within the conventions.
Anyone designated a civilian or a refugee can be legally removed from the war zones until such time as its safe to return them.
Rinse and repeat
Once all pali enclaves have been swept for persons having forfeited their protected status, then the rest should be offered the opportunity for unconditional surrender. Should they refuse I'm pretty sure they can be held under military law by the controlling military power or repatriated to a neutral third country.
Regardless its time for the Israeli's to stop pussy footing around and end the war.
A negotiated solution has clearly failed. Which leaves us continuing the war to its logical conclusion. Unconditional surrender
Israel absolutely rejects that proposal.
That doesn't match your post.
The People and government lackeys are two different groups of people.They must be wrong because according to your own postings EVERYONE hates Israel and yet not ONE nation is acting upon this supposed international law.Palestinians consistently call for peace based on international law.Israel has consistently tried to play the nice guy in the middle east conflict.
But what if the Israeli's accepted the war for what it is, acted within the Geneva Conventions and completed the war process. The most humane solution is to end the conflict ASAP, Clearly negotiating with the terrorist isn't working so obviously the fastest way to peace is to finish the war.
Anyone who is in any way familiar with the Geneva conventions and the UN charter would realize that Israel is well within its rights to defend itself. Since the Arab League declared war in 1948 a condition of war has existed. So why not follow it to its natural conclusion. Victory.
Why not take the pali terrorist enclaves one at a time and utterly defeat them. Start small, one of the smaller enclaves where terrorist activity exists. The security walls are perfect for isolating each enclave and from there all aid distribution in terms of food and medicine should be distributed just outside the security area in determination centers where combatants, those who assist combatants and those suspected of being or aiding combatants can be detained as POWs. The rest can be remanded to detention centers not unlike the centers the US set up for the Japanese in WW2. Any of them that refuse to come out to receive their aid can rot. Embargo all entry into the given area, no goods of any kind. Lay siege to enclaves one at a time until complete capitulation is achieved.
Anyone designated a POW according to the Geneva conventions should be repatriated to a neutral third country exactly as specified within the conventions.
Anyone designated a civilian or a refugee can be legally removed from the war zones until such time as its safe to return them.
Rinse and repeat
Once all pali enclaves have been swept for persons having forfeited their protected status, then the rest should be offered the opportunity for unconditional surrender. Should they refuse I'm pretty sure they can be held under military law by the controlling military power or repatriated to a neutral third country.
Regardless its time for the Israeli's to stop pussy footing around and end the war.
A negotiated solution has clearly failed. Which leaves us continuing the war to its logical conclusion. Unconditional surrender
Israel absolutely rejects that proposal.
That doesn't match your post.
Yeah, and you constantly hurl the same irrelvant off topic BS. Any other country that faced what Israel did with the 5000 rockets coming from a neighbor ruled by a Hamas, a terrorist organization, would have carpet bombed the place and freed the people from being ruled by Islamist animals, as the US did with Afghanistan.It's not a war and the UN has already ruled the blockade is collective punishment.Which just goes to show that one must let go of all the revisionist nonsense before the light of day can shine through.
Of course I support the embargo, it helps keep arms from the terrorists, and of course I'd support ending all aid other than in designation centers where terrorists can be segregated from civilians. You also might be curious to know that I'd declare a lot of the people erroneously on the UNWRA payrolls as refugees and employees, civilians.
Removing the UNWRA removes a lot of problems as the organization is designed to perpetuate the issues rather than resolve them. That nonsense about descendants for instance.
So really the embargo and its structures are perfectly positioned to facilitate my suggestion to end the war. Finish it. Couldn't be a more obvious solution to a decades long problem.
Which if you were to actually take the time to read the conventions included the segregation of POWs from civilians and refugees.
The problem is not the Pals, it's the Israeli occupation and blockade. There will be no peace until those end.
yada yada yada. The UN has ruled the blockade to be legal. Deal with it.
One thing is for sure, Ruddy is consistent. He is consistently wrong (or lying).
"UN agencies join in shared call for end to Israeli blockade of Gaza
“For over five years in Gaza, more than 1.6 million people have been under blockade in violation of international law. More than half of these people are children. We, the undersigned, say with one voice: ‘end the blockade now,’” the 50 organizations and agencies said in a joint statement.
The UN agencies involved in Thursday’s joint statement are the office of the Humanitarian Coordination/Resident Coordinator for the occupied Palestinian territory, the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), the UN Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women), and the World Health Organization (WHO)."
UN News - UN agencies join in shared call for end to Israeli blockade of Gaza
It's not a war and the UN has already ruled the blockade is collective punishment.Which just goes to show that one must let go of all the revisionist nonsense before the light of day can shine through.
Of course I support the embargo, it helps keep arms from the terrorists, and of course I'd support ending all aid other than in designation centers where terrorists can be segregated from civilians. You also might be curious to know that I'd declare a lot of the people erroneously on the UNWRA payrolls as refugees and employees, civilians.
Removing the UNWRA removes a lot of problems as the organization is designed to perpetuate the issues rather than resolve them. That nonsense about descendants for instance.
So really the embargo and its structures are perfectly positioned to facilitate my suggestion to end the war. Finish it. Couldn't be a more obvious solution to a decades long problem.
Which if you were to actually take the time to read the conventions included the segregation of POWs from civilians and refugees.
The problem is not the Pals, it's the Israeli occupation and blockade. There will be no peace until those end.
yada yada yada. The UN has ruled the blockade to be legal. Deal with it.
One thing is for sure, Ruddy is consistent. He is consistently wrong (or lying).
"UN agencies join in shared call for end to Israeli blockade of Gaza
“For over five years in Gaza, more than 1.6 million people have been under blockade in violation of international law. More than half of these people are children. We, the undersigned, say with one voice: ‘end the blockade now,’” the 50 organizations and agencies said in a joint statement.
The UN agencies involved in Thursday’s joint statement are the office of the Humanitarian Coordination/Resident Coordinator for the occupied Palestinian territory, the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), the UN Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women), and the World Health Organization (WHO)."
UN News - UN agencies join in shared call for end to Israeli blockade of Gaza
You're too funny.
So now its the UN news you are touting as some kind of international authority LMAO
Sorry but you just don't have a clue what you are talking about and obviously are getting desperate to just say something even if it doesn't make any sense at all.
The UN general assembly has no authority. It can only issue suggestions and moral support. Its the security council that may or may not have binding authority.
In war time The Geneva conventions apply, I've listed the exact statutes Israel could use to end the conflict.
It would be far more humane to end the conflict fast than to let it continue. Think of the innocent civilians stuck in the middle on both sides.
The thing to do is follow the Geneva Conventions.
The People and government lackeys are two different groups of people.They must be wrong because according to your own postings EVERYONE hates Israel and yet not ONE nation is acting upon this supposed international law.Palestinians consistently call for peace based on international law.Israel has consistently tried to play the nice guy in the middle east conflict.
But what if the Israeli's accepted the war for what it is, acted within the Geneva Conventions and completed the war process. The most humane solution is to end the conflict ASAP, Clearly negotiating with the terrorist isn't working so obviously the fastest way to peace is to finish the war.
Anyone who is in any way familiar with the Geneva conventions and the UN charter would realize that Israel is well within its rights to defend itself. Since the Arab League declared war in 1948 a condition of war has existed. So why not follow it to its natural conclusion. Victory.
Why not take the pali terrorist enclaves one at a time and utterly defeat them. Start small, one of the smaller enclaves where terrorist activity exists. The security walls are perfect for isolating each enclave and from there all aid distribution in terms of food and medicine should be distributed just outside the security area in determination centers where combatants, those who assist combatants and those suspected of being or aiding combatants can be detained as POWs. The rest can be remanded to detention centers not unlike the centers the US set up for the Japanese in WW2. Any of them that refuse to come out to receive their aid can rot. Embargo all entry into the given area, no goods of any kind. Lay siege to enclaves one at a time until complete capitulation is achieved.
Anyone designated a POW according to the Geneva conventions should be repatriated to a neutral third country exactly as specified within the conventions.
Anyone designated a civilian or a refugee can be legally removed from the war zones until such time as its safe to return them.
Rinse and repeat
Once all pali enclaves have been swept for persons having forfeited their protected status, then the rest should be offered the opportunity for unconditional surrender. Should they refuse I'm pretty sure they can be held under military law by the controlling military power or repatriated to a neutral third country.
Regardless its time for the Israeli's to stop pussy footing around and end the war.
A negotiated solution has clearly failed. Which leaves us continuing the war to its logical conclusion. Unconditional surrender
Israel absolutely rejects that proposal.
That doesn't match your post.
The People and government lackeys are two different groups of people.They must be wrong because according to your own postings EVERYONE hates Israel and yet not ONE nation is acting upon this supposed international law.Palestinians consistently call for peace based on international law.Israel has consistently tried to play the nice guy in the middle east conflict.
But what if the Israeli's accepted the war for what it is, acted within the Geneva Conventions and completed the war process. The most humane solution is to end the conflict ASAP, Clearly negotiating with the terrorist isn't working so obviously the fastest way to peace is to finish the war.
Anyone who is in any way familiar with the Geneva conventions and the UN charter would realize that Israel is well within its rights to defend itself. Since the Arab League declared war in 1948 a condition of war has existed. So why not follow it to its natural conclusion. Victory.
Why not take the pali terrorist enclaves one at a time and utterly defeat them. Start small, one of the smaller enclaves where terrorist activity exists. The security walls are perfect for isolating each enclave and from there all aid distribution in terms of food and medicine should be distributed just outside the security area in determination centers where combatants, those who assist combatants and those suspected of being or aiding combatants can be detained as POWs. The rest can be remanded to detention centers not unlike the centers the US set up for the Japanese in WW2. Any of them that refuse to come out to receive their aid can rot. Embargo all entry into the given area, no goods of any kind. Lay siege to enclaves one at a time until complete capitulation is achieved.
Anyone designated a POW according to the Geneva conventions should be repatriated to a neutral third country exactly as specified within the conventions.
Anyone designated a civilian or a refugee can be legally removed from the war zones until such time as its safe to return them.
Rinse and repeat
Once all pali enclaves have been swept for persons having forfeited their protected status, then the rest should be offered the opportunity for unconditional surrender. Should they refuse I'm pretty sure they can be held under military law by the controlling military power or repatriated to a neutral third country.
Regardless its time for the Israeli's to stop pussy footing around and end the war.
A negotiated solution has clearly failed. Which leaves us continuing the war to its logical conclusion. Unconditional surrender
Israel absolutely rejects that proposal.
That doesn't match your post.
Are you calling the vast majority of American public that stands shoulder to shoulder with Israel "govt. lackeys"? Maybe you're the lackey, have you thought of that?
The People and government lackeys are two different groups of people.They must be wrong because according to your own postings EVERYONE hates Israel and yet not ONE nation is acting upon this supposed international law.Palestinians consistently call for peace based on international law.Israel has consistently tried to play the nice guy in the middle east conflict.
But what if the Israeli's accepted the war for what it is, acted within the Geneva Conventions and completed the war process. The most humane solution is to end the conflict ASAP, Clearly negotiating with the terrorist isn't working so obviously the fastest way to peace is to finish the war.
Anyone who is in any way familiar with the Geneva conventions and the UN charter would realize that Israel is well within its rights to defend itself. Since the Arab League declared war in 1948 a condition of war has existed. So why not follow it to its natural conclusion. Victory.
Why not take the pali terrorist enclaves one at a time and utterly defeat them. Start small, one of the smaller enclaves where terrorist activity exists. The security walls are perfect for isolating each enclave and from there all aid distribution in terms of food and medicine should be distributed just outside the security area in determination centers where combatants, those who assist combatants and those suspected of being or aiding combatants can be detained as POWs. The rest can be remanded to detention centers not unlike the centers the US set up for the Japanese in WW2. Any of them that refuse to come out to receive their aid can rot. Embargo all entry into the given area, no goods of any kind. Lay siege to enclaves one at a time until complete capitulation is achieved.
Anyone designated a POW according to the Geneva conventions should be repatriated to a neutral third country exactly as specified within the conventions.
Anyone designated a civilian or a refugee can be legally removed from the war zones until such time as its safe to return them.
Rinse and repeat
Once all pali enclaves have been swept for persons having forfeited their protected status, then the rest should be offered the opportunity for unconditional surrender. Should they refuse I'm pretty sure they can be held under military law by the controlling military power or repatriated to a neutral third country.
Regardless its time for the Israeli's to stop pussy footing around and end the war.
A negotiated solution has clearly failed. Which leaves us continuing the war to its logical conclusion. Unconditional surrender
Israel absolutely rejects that proposal.
That doesn't match your post.
Are you calling the vast majority of American public that stands shoulder to shoulder with Israel "govt. lackeys"? Maybe you're the lackey, have you thought of that?
The People and government lackeys are two different groups of people.They must be wrong because according to your own postings EVERYONE hates Israel and yet not ONE nation is acting upon this supposed international law.Palestinians consistently call for peace based on international law.Israel has consistently tried to play the nice guy in the middle east conflict.
But what if the Israeli's accepted the war for what it is, acted within the Geneva Conventions and completed the war process. The most humane solution is to end the conflict ASAP, Clearly negotiating with the terrorist isn't working so obviously the fastest way to peace is to finish the war.
Anyone who is in any way familiar with the Geneva conventions and the UN charter would realize that Israel is well within its rights to defend itself. Since the Arab League declared war in 1948 a condition of war has existed. So why not follow it to its natural conclusion. Victory.
Why not take the pali terrorist enclaves one at a time and utterly defeat them. Start small, one of the smaller enclaves where terrorist activity exists. The security walls are perfect for isolating each enclave and from there all aid distribution in terms of food and medicine should be distributed just outside the security area in determination centers where combatants, those who assist combatants and those suspected of being or aiding combatants can be detained as POWs. The rest can be remanded to detention centers not unlike the centers the US set up for the Japanese in WW2. Any of them that refuse to come out to receive their aid can rot. Embargo all entry into the given area, no goods of any kind. Lay siege to enclaves one at a time until complete capitulation is achieved.
Anyone designated a POW according to the Geneva conventions should be repatriated to a neutral third country exactly as specified within the conventions.
Anyone designated a civilian or a refugee can be legally removed from the war zones until such time as its safe to return them.
Rinse and repeat
Once all pali enclaves have been swept for persons having forfeited their protected status, then the rest should be offered the opportunity for unconditional surrender. Should they refuse I'm pretty sure they can be held under military law by the controlling military power or repatriated to a neutral third country.
Regardless its time for the Israeli's to stop pussy footing around and end the war.
A negotiated solution has clearly failed. Which leaves us continuing the war to its logical conclusion. Unconditional surrender
Israel absolutely rejects that proposal.
That doesn't match your post.
Are you calling the vast majority of American public that stands shoulder to shoulder with Israel "govt. lackeys"? Maybe you're the lackey, have you thought of that?
The majority of the American public stood shoulder to shoulder with the racist Apartheid South Africans at one time. Have you thought of that?
The People and government lackeys are two different groups of people.They must be wrong because according to your own postings EVERYONE hates Israel and yet not ONE nation is acting upon this supposed international law.Palestinians consistently call for peace based on international law.Israel has consistently tried to play the nice guy in the middle east conflict.
But what if the Israeli's accepted the war for what it is, acted within the Geneva Conventions and completed the war process. The most humane solution is to end the conflict ASAP, Clearly negotiating with the terrorist isn't working so obviously the fastest way to peace is to finish the war.
Anyone who is in any way familiar with the Geneva conventions and the UN charter would realize that Israel is well within its rights to defend itself. Since the Arab League declared war in 1948 a condition of war has existed. So why not follow it to its natural conclusion. Victory.
Why not take the pali terrorist enclaves one at a time and utterly defeat them. Start small, one of the smaller enclaves where terrorist activity exists. The security walls are perfect for isolating each enclave and from there all aid distribution in terms of food and medicine should be distributed just outside the security area in determination centers where combatants, those who assist combatants and those suspected of being or aiding combatants can be detained as POWs. The rest can be remanded to detention centers not unlike the centers the US set up for the Japanese in WW2. Any of them that refuse to come out to receive their aid can rot. Embargo all entry into the given area, no goods of any kind. Lay siege to enclaves one at a time until complete capitulation is achieved.
Anyone designated a POW according to the Geneva conventions should be repatriated to a neutral third country exactly as specified within the conventions.
Anyone designated a civilian or a refugee can be legally removed from the war zones until such time as its safe to return them.
Rinse and repeat
Once all pali enclaves have been swept for persons having forfeited their protected status, then the rest should be offered the opportunity for unconditional surrender. Should they refuse I'm pretty sure they can be held under military law by the controlling military power or repatriated to a neutral third country.
Regardless its time for the Israeli's to stop pussy footing around and end the war.
A negotiated solution has clearly failed. Which leaves us continuing the war to its logical conclusion. Unconditional surrender
Israel absolutely rejects that proposal.
That doesn't match your post.
Are you calling the vast majority of American public that stands shoulder to shoulder with Israel "govt. lackeys"? Maybe you're the lackey, have you thought of that?
The majority of the American public stood shoulder to shoulder with the racist Apartheid South Africans at one time. Have you thought of that?
Majority of Americans won't blink an eye if Israel annexed Judea and Samaria tomorrow. Nor would they shed a tear if Israel quit being a nice guy and took out every single Hamas or Hezbollah terrorist animal and sent them to their virgins. In fact, they would be happy and throw a party.The People and government lackeys are two different groups of people.They must be wrong because according to your own postings EVERYONE hates Israel and yet not ONE nation is acting upon this supposed international law.Palestinians consistently call for peace based on international law.
Israel absolutely rejects that proposal.
That doesn't match your post.
Are you calling the vast majority of American public that stands shoulder to shoulder with Israel "govt. lackeys"? Maybe you're the lackey, have you thought of that?
The majority of the American public stood shoulder to shoulder with the racist Apartheid South Africans at one time. Have you thought of that?
The majority of Americans don't go to Islamic websites to get their Middle East history.
Have you thought of that?
Sure Israel has a lot of popular support, but that is changing now that the truth is getting out.The People and government lackeys are two different groups of people.They must be wrong because according to your own postings EVERYONE hates Israel and yet not ONE nation is acting upon this supposed international law.Palestinians consistently call for peace based on international law.Israel has consistently tried to play the nice guy in the middle east conflict.
But what if the Israeli's accepted the war for what it is, acted within the Geneva Conventions and completed the war process. The most humane solution is to end the conflict ASAP, Clearly negotiating with the terrorist isn't working so obviously the fastest way to peace is to finish the war.
Anyone who is in any way familiar with the Geneva conventions and the UN charter would realize that Israel is well within its rights to defend itself. Since the Arab League declared war in 1948 a condition of war has existed. So why not follow it to its natural conclusion. Victory.
Why not take the pali terrorist enclaves one at a time and utterly defeat them. Start small, one of the smaller enclaves where terrorist activity exists. The security walls are perfect for isolating each enclave and from there all aid distribution in terms of food and medicine should be distributed just outside the security area in determination centers where combatants, those who assist combatants and those suspected of being or aiding combatants can be detained as POWs. The rest can be remanded to detention centers not unlike the centers the US set up for the Japanese in WW2. Any of them that refuse to come out to receive their aid can rot. Embargo all entry into the given area, no goods of any kind. Lay siege to enclaves one at a time until complete capitulation is achieved.
Anyone designated a POW according to the Geneva conventions should be repatriated to a neutral third country exactly as specified within the conventions.
Anyone designated a civilian or a refugee can be legally removed from the war zones until such time as its safe to return them.
Rinse and repeat
Once all pali enclaves have been swept for persons having forfeited their protected status, then the rest should be offered the opportunity for unconditional surrender. Should they refuse I'm pretty sure they can be held under military law by the controlling military power or repatriated to a neutral third country.
Regardless its time for the Israeli's to stop pussy footing around and end the war.
A negotiated solution has clearly failed. Which leaves us continuing the war to its logical conclusion. Unconditional surrender
Israel absolutely rejects that proposal.
That doesn't match your post.
Are you calling the vast majority of American public that stands shoulder to shoulder with Israel "govt. lackeys"? Maybe you're the lackey, have you thought of that?
Still trying to push that debunked Palmer report, I see.yada yada yada. The UN has ruled the blockade to be legal. Deal with it.
Sure Israel has a lot of popular support, but that is changing now that the truth is getting out.The People and government lackeys are two different groups of people.They must be wrong because according to your own postings EVERYONE hates Israel and yet not ONE nation is acting upon this supposed international law.Palestinians consistently call for peace based on international law.Israel has consistently tried to play the nice guy in the middle east conflict.
But what if the Israeli's accepted the war for what it is, acted within the Geneva Conventions and completed the war process. The most humane solution is to end the conflict ASAP, Clearly negotiating with the terrorist isn't working so obviously the fastest way to peace is to finish the war.
Anyone who is in any way familiar with the Geneva conventions and the UN charter would realize that Israel is well within its rights to defend itself. Since the Arab League declared war in 1948 a condition of war has existed. So why not follow it to its natural conclusion. Victory.
Why not take the pali terrorist enclaves one at a time and utterly defeat them. Start small, one of the smaller enclaves where terrorist activity exists. The security walls are perfect for isolating each enclave and from there all aid distribution in terms of food and medicine should be distributed just outside the security area in determination centers where combatants, those who assist combatants and those suspected of being or aiding combatants can be detained as POWs. The rest can be remanded to detention centers not unlike the centers the US set up for the Japanese in WW2. Any of them that refuse to come out to receive their aid can rot. Embargo all entry into the given area, no goods of any kind. Lay siege to enclaves one at a time until complete capitulation is achieved.
Anyone designated a POW according to the Geneva conventions should be repatriated to a neutral third country exactly as specified within the conventions.
Anyone designated a civilian or a refugee can be legally removed from the war zones until such time as its safe to return them.
Rinse and repeat
Once all pali enclaves have been swept for persons having forfeited their protected status, then the rest should be offered the opportunity for unconditional surrender. Should they refuse I'm pretty sure they can be held under military law by the controlling military power or repatriated to a neutral third country.
Regardless its time for the Israeli's to stop pussy footing around and end the war.
A negotiated solution has clearly failed. Which leaves us continuing the war to its logical conclusion. Unconditional surrender
Israel absolutely rejects that proposal.
That doesn't match your post.
Are you calling the vast majority of American public that stands shoulder to shoulder with Israel "govt. lackeys"? Maybe you're the lackey, have you thought of that?