What happens when your leader is a prolific liar

[westwall]

There is not one Muslim country that isn’t on the verge of going to war with their next door neighbor.

Or the US

WTF are we doing there?

We should be everywhere with no Rules of Engagement.
Jihad is global.
I can’t believe you worked for the government and know dipshit.

I worked for the Department of Defense

Made me see how vast our global deployments were

Janitors don't see much so your claim is a lie. On the other hand, anybody with internet, and a brain, can quickly figure out where we are positioned.

But, Trump didn't lie about what happened. Unlike your festering hero, the obummer did.

Trump didn’t lie about what happened?

Then why did he claim “an imminent threat “ and then back down when asked to identify the threat ?

Geee, let's consider, a prominent enemy general on a battlefield. A battlefield in a country he has been at war with for over 20 years, and you think there is no imminent threat?

How retarded are you?

 

[rightwinger]

No, imminent means time is of the essence
It means you have identified a specific threat

Trump said he had and now is walking it back

Try a different dictionary, not that he or any other politician has displayed perfect word use, he is certainly no wordsmith.
We have all heard predictions of earthquakes describe as imminent, that did not occur for years.
imminent (adj.)
1520s, from Middle French imminent (14c.) and directly from Latin imminentem (nominative imminens) "overhanging; impending," present participle of imminere "to overhang, lean towards," hence "be near to," also "threaten, menace, impend, be at hand, be about to happen," from assimilated form of in- "into, in, on, upon" (from PIE root *en "in") + -minere "jut out," which is related to mons "hill" (from PIE root *men- (2) "to project"). Related: Imminently.

Does anyone doubt, Iran and/or proxies would strike again, on American or allied targets? It has been common enough in the past, kind of like earthquake predictions.

I had no doubt. I have no real regret at his action.

Difference between eventual and imminent

Iran wasn’t striking US targets before Trump

Not accurate. True, they increased greatly after he walked away from the agreement (a poor move in my opinion) and his continually spoke in a bellicose manner, as has too often been his nature (his charm to his supporters [I almost said rightwing, rewording due to your screen name]) but, strike they repeatedly have, and make no mistake, they would have (and still might) strike again. I am encouraged by his speech this morning, as should be you.

His speech offered nothing to Iran
They can’t trust what he says anyway

Iran offers nothing to us but misery and terror. Screw 'em.

Iran is the key to stability in the region

Obama negotiated a path for Iran to begin a way back. Demilitarization in return for reduced economic sanctions

In his obsession to destroy Obama’s legacy, Trump has destabilized the whole region

 

[Sun Devil 92]

No, imminent means time is of the essence
It means you have identified a specific threat

Trump said he had and now is walking it back

Try a different dictionary, not that he or any other politician has displayed perfect word use, he is certainly no wordsmith.
We have all heard predictions of earthquakes describe as imminent, that did not occur for years.
imminent (adj.)
1520s, from Middle French imminent (14c.) and directly from Latin imminentem (nominative imminens) "overhanging; impending," present participle of imminere "to overhang, lean towards," hence "be near to," also "threaten, menace, impend, be at hand, be about to happen," from assimilated form of in- "into, in, on, upon" (from PIE root *en "in") + -minere "jut out," which is related to mons "hill" (from PIE root *men- (2) "to project"). Related: Imminently.

Does anyone doubt, Iran and/or proxies would strike again, on American or allied targets? It has been common enough in the past, kind of like earthquake predictions.

I had no doubt. I have no real regret at his action.

Difference between eventual and imminent

Iran wasn’t striking US targets before Trump

Not accurate. True, they increased greatly after he walked away from the agreement (a poor move in my opinion) and his continually spoke in a bellicose manner, as has too often been his nature (his charm to his supporters [I almost said rightwing, rewording due to your screen name]) but, strike they repeatedly have, and make no mistake, they would have (and still might) strike again. I am encouraged by his speech this morning, as should be you.

His speech offered nothing to Iran
They can’t trust what he says anyway

Iran offers nothing to us but misery and terror. Screw 'em.

And if they screw with us.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Imminent is a relative term, you'll agree. Not worth quibbling in the long run.

No, imminent means time is of the essence
It means you have identified a specific threat

Trump said he had and now is walking it back

Try a different dictionary, not that he or any other politician has displayed perfect word use, he is certainly no wordsmith.
We have all heard predictions of earthquakes describe as imminent, that did not occur for years.
imminent (adj.)
1520s, from Middle French imminent (14c.) and directly from Latin imminentem (nominative imminens) "overhanging; impending," present participle of imminere "to overhang, lean towards," hence "be near to," also "threaten, menace, impend, be at hand, be about to happen," from assimilated form of in- "into, in, on, upon" (from PIE root *en "in") + -minere "jut out," which is related to mons "hill" (from PIE root *men- (2) "to project"). Related: Imminently.

Does anyone doubt, Iran and/or proxies would strike again, on American or allied targets? It has been common enough in the past, kind of like earthquake predictions.

I had no doubt. I have no real regret at his action.

Difference between eventual and imminent

Iran wasn’t striking US targets before Trump

Not accurate. True, they increased greatly after he walked away from the agreement (a poor move in my opinion) and his continually spoke in a bellicose manner, as has too often been his nature (his charm to his supporters [I almost said rightwing, rewording due to your screen name]) but, strike they repeatedly have, and make no mistake, they would have (and still might) strike again. I am encouraged by his speech this morning, as should be you.

His speech offered nothing to Iran
They can’t trust what he says anyway

You are worried about what they can trust ?

Whose side are you on ?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Try a different dictionary, not that he or any other politician has displayed perfect word use, he is certainly no wordsmith.
We have all heard predictions of earthquakes describe as imminent, that did not occur for years.
imminent (adj.)
1520s, from Middle French imminent (14c.) and directly from Latin imminentem (nominative imminens) "overhanging; impending," present participle of imminere "to overhang, lean towards," hence "be near to," also "threaten, menace, impend, be at hand, be about to happen," from assimilated form of in- "into, in, on, upon" (from PIE root *en "in") + -minere "jut out," which is related to mons "hill" (from PIE root *men- (2) "to project"). Related: Imminently.

Does anyone doubt, Iran and/or proxies would strike again, on American or allied targets? It has been common enough in the past, kind of like earthquake predictions.

I had no doubt. I have no real regret at his action.

Difference between eventual and imminent

Iran wasn’t striking US targets before Trump

Not accurate. True, they increased greatly after he walked away from the agreement (a poor move in my opinion) and his continually spoke in a bellicose manner, as has too often been his nature (his charm to his supporters [I almost said rightwing, rewording due to your screen name]) but, strike they repeatedly have, and make no mistake, they would have (and still might) strike again. I am encouraged by his speech this morning, as should be you.

His speech offered nothing to Iran
They can’t trust what he says anyway

Iran offers nothing to us but misery and terror. Screw 'em.

Iran is the key to stability in the region

Obama negotiated a path for Iran to begin a way back. Demilitarization in return for reduced economic sanctions

In his obsession to destroy Obama’s legacy, Trump has destabilized the whole region

Meaning they are controlling petulant brat that Obama tried to pacify.

They don't get favored treatment.

And if they kill Americans, they get a hellfire up the ass.

 

[White 6]

Try a different dictionary, not that he or any other politician has displayed perfect word use, he is certainly no wordsmith.
We have all heard predictions of earthquakes describe as imminent, that did not occur for years.
imminent (adj.)
1520s, from Middle French imminent (14c.) and directly from Latin imminentem (nominative imminens) "overhanging; impending," present participle of imminere "to overhang, lean towards," hence "be near to," also "threaten, menace, impend, be at hand, be about to happen," from assimilated form of in- "into, in, on, upon" (from PIE root *en "in") + -minere "jut out," which is related to mons "hill" (from PIE root *men- (2) "to project"). Related: Imminently.

Does anyone doubt, Iran and/or proxies would strike again, on American or allied targets? It has been common enough in the past, kind of like earthquake predictions.

I had no doubt. I have no real regret at his action.

Difference between eventual and imminent

Iran wasn’t striking US targets before Trump

Not accurate. True, they increased greatly after he walked away from the agreement (a poor move in my opinion) and his continually spoke in a bellicose manner, as has too often been his nature (his charm to his supporters [I almost said rightwing, rewording due to your screen name]) but, strike they repeatedly have, and make no mistake, they would have (and still might) strike again. I am encouraged by his speech this morning, as should be you.

His speech offered nothing to Iran
They can’t trust what he says anyway

Iran offers nothing to us but misery and terror. Screw 'em.

Iran is the key to stability in the region

Obama negotiated a path for Iran to begin a way back. Demilitarization in return for reduced economic sanctions

In his obsession to destroy Obama’s legacy, Trump has destabilized the whole region

Wrong. Region has been unstable for as longer than I have been alive (I am officially old), and not necessarily dependent on Iran. Obama may have paid off for relative peace during his administration, but certainly not a lasting peace. Money don't impress for long. You are correct in that, Trump's has systematically tried to kill anything Obama did, whether it was good, bad, or indifferent from policies of previous republican administrations.

 

[rightwinger]

No, imminent means time is of the essence
It means you have identified a specific threat

Trump said he had and now is walking it back

Try a different dictionary, not that he or any other politician has displayed perfect word use, he is certainly no wordsmith.
We have all heard predictions of earthquakes describe as imminent, that did not occur for years.
imminent (adj.)
1520s, from Middle French imminent (14c.) and directly from Latin imminentem (nominative imminens) "overhanging; impending," present participle of imminere "to overhang, lean towards," hence "be near to," also "threaten, menace, impend, be at hand, be about to happen," from assimilated form of in- "into, in, on, upon" (from PIE root *en "in") + -minere "jut out," which is related to mons "hill" (from PIE root *men- (2) "to project"). Related: Imminently.

Does anyone doubt, Iran and/or proxies would strike again, on American or allied targets? It has been common enough in the past, kind of like earthquake predictions.

I had no doubt. I have no real regret at his action.

Difference between eventual and imminent

Iran wasn’t striking US targets before Trump

Not accurate. True, they increased greatly after he walked away from the agreement (a poor move in my opinion) and his continually spoke in a bellicose manner, as has too often been his nature (his charm to his supporters [I almost said rightwing, rewording due to your screen name]) but, strike they repeatedly have, and make no mistake, they would have (and still might) strike again. I am encouraged by his speech this morning, as should be you.

His speech offered nothing to Iran
They can’t trust what he says anyway

You are worried about what they can trust ?

Whose side are you on ?

I’m on the side with a President who has zero credibility at home or abroad. A President who has managed to alienate every one of our allies

 

[playtime]

donny ran his campaign on the premise of being an anti globalist.

y'all who voted for him were duped - why not just accept it instead of trying to spin it?

I define globalism as slave labor.
We shouldn’t be in the ME, but I don’t know enough about how we are economically intertwined: at least I can admit such.

the first overseas state visit donny made wasn't to one of our NATO allies - it was to visit with the saudis.

who, despite what pence is trying to lie about - - - 15 of the 19 animals that hit us on 9/11 were saudi.

that should give you a clue just how intertwined we are.

I am not at all happy that Trump has his head up their asses.

but not unhappy enough to stop supporting him & his lies that might get alot of yer fellow americans killed.

Let’s ponder that...
I support 9 out of 10 things Trump wants and I should stop supporting him.

I suppose you stop dealing with anyone who has even one disagreement with you.

lies. as in multiple.

 

[playtime]

yep - they have for years.... why do you think they have been able to rake in massive amts of profit off the backs of sick people? bigpharma is in on that deal too. donny also promised to rein in drug prices.... how'z that working out for the american people?

'too big to fail' applies to any massive corporation.

Insurance companies make a profit of about 5%, so your claim is obvious horseshit.

prove that asshole. give me a credible link. in the meantime suck on the true facts:

Axios - Health care earnings spreadsheet

1. Your source is Axios, which is a leftwing propaganda organ.
2. The average profit for all the companies listed is 7.5%. Many of those are drug companies. They aren't insurance companies. There are a lot of other companies on your list that aren't insurance companies. Few people contest the fact that drug companies make high profits. Take out the drug companies and the average is probably less than 5%.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! are you kidding me? you accepted the ramblings of a fellow basket dweller & 'magapill' as a legit site. that list contains info on the healthcare industry INCLUDING the health insurers. aetna, cigna, keiser etc.... you think drug cos make stratospheric profits but not the first health 'corp' you deal with b4 anything else? when those profits are based in the BILLIONS - & the ceos & board of directors are pocketing 10s of MILLIONS after 'administration' costs, you don't get to rationally cheer their profits unless denying coverage whilst collecting premiums is yer job. & BTW... since implementation back in 2012 the ACA MANDATES that 80% of individual plan premiums & 85% of group insurance premiums be used DIRECTLY for the policy holder's healthcare.

that wasn't the case b4 the ACA - - some plans used less that 50% - where the remainder went into the pockets of the pencil pushers. lest ye ferget, they are in the business of making a profit off yer illness'.

sooooooooooooo - let's deduce, m'k? if (even by yer figure) a 5% profit after not accessing 80-85% protected funds is BILLIONS of dollars they take from *you*

i am still waiting for you to cough up a legit site that shows that 5%. c'mon fuckface - where is it?

You babble is totally incoherent. It's just a collection of leftwing rants against the healthcare industry.

BTW, twinkle toes, the subject is insurance companies, not drug companies. Not hospital companies. Not medical device companies. Not any of the other assorted industries you lumped into your spreadsheet.

We aren't discussing CEO pay, nor administrative costs.

The data you supplied proves your claim about insurance industry profits is wrong.

You're a pathetic dumbfuck.

no it didn't and you are yet to prove otherwise with any credible link. any one at all.

so - fuckface - you will CONtinue to be an empty deplorable with nothing for back up.

dis


missed.

 

[playtime]

There is not one Muslim country that isn’t on the verge of going to war with their next door neighbor.

Or the US

WTF are we doing there?

We should be everywhere with no Rules of Engagement.
Jihad is global.
I can’t believe you worked for the government and know dipshit.

I worked for the Department of Defense

Made me see how vast our global deployments were

Janitors don't see much so your claim is a lie. On the other hand, anybody with internet, and a brain, can quickly figure out where we are positioned.

But, Trump didn't lie about what happened. Unlike your festering hero, the obummer did.

Trump didn’t lie about what happened?

Then why did he claim “an imminent threat “ and then back down when asked to identify the threat ?

hence your very accurate thread title that very accurately describes donny..

' prolific liar '.

 

[bripat9643]

Try a different dictionary, not that he or any other politician has displayed perfect word use, he is certainly no wordsmith.
We have all heard predictions of earthquakes describe as imminent, that did not occur for years.
imminent (adj.)
1520s, from Middle French imminent (14c.) and directly from Latin imminentem (nominative imminens) "overhanging; impending," present participle of imminere "to overhang, lean towards," hence "be near to," also "threaten, menace, impend, be at hand, be about to happen," from assimilated form of in- "into, in, on, upon" (from PIE root *en "in") + -minere "jut out," which is related to mons "hill" (from PIE root *men- (2) "to project"). Related: Imminently.

Does anyone doubt, Iran and/or proxies would strike again, on American or allied targets? It has been common enough in the past, kind of like earthquake predictions.

I had no doubt. I have no real regret at his action.

Difference between eventual and imminent

Iran wasn’t striking US targets before Trump

Not accurate. True, they increased greatly after he walked away from the agreement (a poor move in my opinion) and his continually spoke in a bellicose manner, as has too often been his nature (his charm to his supporters [I almost said rightwing, rewording due to your screen name]) but, strike they repeatedly have, and make no mistake, they would have (and still might) strike again. I am encouraged by his speech this morning, as should be you.

His speech offered nothing to Iran
They can’t trust what he says anyway

Iran offers nothing to us but misery and terror. Screw 'em.

Iran is the key to stability in the region

Obama negotiated a path for Iran to begin a way back. Demilitarization in return for reduced economic sanctions

In his obsession to destroy Obama’s legacy, Trump has destabilized the whole region

Then what was the general doing in Iraq?

 

[bripat9643]

Insurance companies make a profit of about 5%, so your claim is obvious horseshit.

prove that asshole. give me a credible link. in the meantime suck on the true facts:

Axios - Health care earnings spreadsheet

1. Your source is Axios, which is a leftwing propaganda organ.
2. The average profit for all the companies listed is 7.5%. Many of those are drug companies. They aren't insurance companies. There are a lot of other companies on your list that aren't insurance companies. Few people contest the fact that drug companies make high profits. Take out the drug companies and the average is probably less than 5%.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! are you kidding me? you accepted the ramblings of a fellow basket dweller & 'magapill' as a legit site. that list contains info on the healthcare industry INCLUDING the health insurers. aetna, cigna, keiser etc.... you think drug cos make stratospheric profits but not the first health 'corp' you deal with b4 anything else? when those profits are based in the BILLIONS - & the ceos & board of directors are pocketing 10s of MILLIONS after 'administration' costs, you don't get to rationally cheer their profits unless denying coverage whilst collecting premiums is yer job. & BTW... since implementation back in 2012 the ACA MANDATES that 80% of individual plan premiums & 85% of group insurance premiums be used DIRECTLY for the policy holder's healthcare.

that wasn't the case b4 the ACA - - some plans used less that 50% - where the remainder went into the pockets of the pencil pushers. lest ye ferget, they are in the business of making a profit off yer illness'.

sooooooooooooo - let's deduce, m'k? if (even by yer figure) a 5% profit after not accessing 80-85% protected funds is BILLIONS of dollars they take from *you*

i am still waiting for you to cough up a legit site that shows that 5%. c'mon fuckface - where is it?

You babble is totally incoherent. It's just a collection of leftwing rants against the healthcare industry.

BTW, twinkle toes, the subject is insurance companies, not drug companies. Not hospital companies. Not medical device companies. Not any of the other assorted industries you lumped into your spreadsheet.

We aren't discussing CEO pay, nor administrative costs.

The data you supplied proves your claim about insurance industry profits is wrong.

You're a pathetic dumbfuck.

no it didn't and you are yet to prove otherwise with any credible link. any one at all.

so - fuckface - you will CONtinue to be an empty deplorable with nothing for back up.

dis


missed.

I proved it wrong using the data you supplied, honeybuns.

 

[White 6]

Difference between eventual and imminent

Iran wasn’t striking US targets before Trump

Not accurate. True, they increased greatly after he walked away from the agreement (a poor move in my opinion) and his continually spoke in a bellicose manner, as has too often been his nature (his charm to his supporters [I almost said rightwing, rewording due to your screen name]) but, strike they repeatedly have, and make no mistake, they would have (and still might) strike again. I am encouraged by his speech this morning, as should be you.

His speech offered nothing to Iran
They can’t trust what he says anyway

Iran offers nothing to us but misery and terror. Screw 'em.

Iran is the key to stability in the region

Obama negotiated a path for Iran to begin a way back. Demilitarization in return for reduced economic sanctions

In his obsession to destroy Obama’s legacy, Trump has destabilized the whole region

Then what was the general doing in Iraq?

Exactly Right

 

[playtime]

prove that asshole. give me a credible link. in the meantime suck on the true facts:

Axios - Health care earnings spreadsheet

1. Your source is Axios, which is a leftwing propaganda organ.
2. The average profit for all the companies listed is 7.5%. Many of those are drug companies. They aren't insurance companies. There are a lot of other companies on your list that aren't insurance companies. Few people contest the fact that drug companies make high profits. Take out the drug companies and the average is probably less than 5%.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! are you kidding me? you accepted the ramblings of a fellow basket dweller & 'magapill' as a legit site. that list contains info on the healthcare industry INCLUDING the health insurers. aetna, cigna, keiser etc.... you think drug cos make stratospheric profits but not the first health 'corp' you deal with b4 anything else? when those profits are based in the BILLIONS - & the ceos & board of directors are pocketing 10s of MILLIONS after 'administration' costs, you don't get to rationally cheer their profits unless denying coverage whilst collecting premiums is yer job. & BTW... since implementation back in 2012 the ACA MANDATES that 80% of individual plan premiums & 85% of group insurance premiums be used DIRECTLY for the policy holder's healthcare.

that wasn't the case b4 the ACA - - some plans used less that 50% - where the remainder went into the pockets of the pencil pushers. lest ye ferget, they are in the business of making a profit off yer illness'.

sooooooooooooo - let's deduce, m'k? if (even by yer figure) a 5% profit after not accessing 80-85% protected funds is BILLIONS of dollars they take from *you*

i am still waiting for you to cough up a legit site that shows that 5%. c'mon fuckface - where is it?

You babble is totally incoherent. It's just a collection of leftwing rants against the healthcare industry.

BTW, twinkle toes, the subject is insurance companies, not drug companies. Not hospital companies. Not medical device companies. Not any of the other assorted industries you lumped into your spreadsheet.

We aren't discussing CEO pay, nor administrative costs.

The data you supplied proves your claim about insurance industry profits is wrong.

You're a pathetic dumbfuck.

no it didn't and you are yet to prove otherwise with any credible link. any one at all.

so - fuckface - you will CONtinue to be an empty deplorable with nothing for back up.

dis


missed.

I proved it wrong using the data you supplied, honeybuns.

no you didn't. your usage of alternative facts just ain't flying fuckface.

 

[bripat9643]

1. Your source is Axios, which is a leftwing propaganda organ.
2. The average profit for all the companies listed is 7.5%. Many of those are drug companies. They aren't insurance companies. There are a lot of other companies on your list that aren't insurance companies. Few people contest the fact that drug companies make high profits. Take out the drug companies and the average is probably less than 5%.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! are you kidding me? you accepted the ramblings of a fellow basket dweller & 'magapill' as a legit site. that list contains info on the healthcare industry INCLUDING the health insurers. aetna, cigna, keiser etc.... you think drug cos make stratospheric profits but not the first health 'corp' you deal with b4 anything else? when those profits are based in the BILLIONS - & the ceos & board of directors are pocketing 10s of MILLIONS after 'administration' costs, you don't get to rationally cheer their profits unless denying coverage whilst collecting premiums is yer job. & BTW... since implementation back in 2012 the ACA MANDATES that 80% of individual plan premiums & 85% of group insurance premiums be used DIRECTLY for the policy holder's healthcare.

that wasn't the case b4 the ACA - - some plans used less that 50% - where the remainder went into the pockets of the pencil pushers. lest ye ferget, they are in the business of making a profit off yer illness'.

sooooooooooooo - let's deduce, m'k? if (even by yer figure) a 5% profit after not accessing 80-85% protected funds is BILLIONS of dollars they take from *you*

i am still waiting for you to cough up a legit site that shows that 5%. c'mon fuckface - where is it?

You babble is totally incoherent. It's just a collection of leftwing rants against the healthcare industry.

BTW, twinkle toes, the subject is insurance companies, not drug companies. Not hospital companies. Not medical device companies. Not any of the other assorted industries you lumped into your spreadsheet.

We aren't discussing CEO pay, nor administrative costs.

The data you supplied proves your claim about insurance industry profits is wrong.

You're a pathetic dumbfuck.

no it didn't and you are yet to prove otherwise with any credible link. any one at all.

so - fuckface - you will CONtinue to be an empty deplorable with nothing for back up.

dis


missed.

I proved it wrong using the data you supplied, honeybuns.

no you didn't. your usage of alternative facts just ain't flying fuckface.

You're like a corpse that doesn't know it's dead.

 

[playtime]

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! are you kidding me? you accepted the ramblings of a fellow basket dweller & 'magapill' as a legit site. that list contains info on the healthcare industry INCLUDING the health insurers. aetna, cigna, keiser etc.... you think drug cos make stratospheric profits but not the first health 'corp' you deal with b4 anything else? when those profits are based in the BILLIONS - & the ceos & board of directors are pocketing 10s of MILLIONS after 'administration' costs, you don't get to rationally cheer their profits unless denying coverage whilst collecting premiums is yer job. & BTW... since implementation back in 2012 the ACA MANDATES that 80% of individual plan premiums & 85% of group insurance premiums be used DIRECTLY for the policy holder's healthcare.

that wasn't the case b4 the ACA - - some plans used less that 50% - where the remainder went into the pockets of the pencil pushers. lest ye ferget, they are in the business of making a profit off yer illness'.

sooooooooooooo - let's deduce, m'k? if (even by yer figure) a 5% profit after not accessing 80-85% protected funds is BILLIONS of dollars they take from *you*

i am still waiting for you to cough up a legit site that shows that 5%. c'mon fuckface - where is it?

You babble is totally incoherent. It's just a collection of leftwing rants against the healthcare industry.

BTW, twinkle toes, the subject is insurance companies, not drug companies. Not hospital companies. Not medical device companies. Not any of the other assorted industries you lumped into your spreadsheet.

We aren't discussing CEO pay, nor administrative costs.

The data you supplied proves your claim about insurance industry profits is wrong.

You're a pathetic dumbfuck.

no it didn't and you are yet to prove otherwise with any credible link. any one at all.

so - fuckface - you will CONtinue to be an empty deplorable with nothing for back up.

dis


missed.

I proved it wrong using the data you supplied, honeybuns.

no you didn't. your usage of alternative facts just ain't flying fuckface.

You're like a corpse that doesn't know it's dead.

you thrive on fake news.

 

[westwall]

Try a different dictionary, not that he or any other politician has displayed perfect word use, he is certainly no wordsmith.
We have all heard predictions of earthquakes describe as imminent, that did not occur for years.
imminent (adj.)
1520s, from Middle French imminent (14c.) and directly from Latin imminentem (nominative imminens) "overhanging; impending," present participle of imminere "to overhang, lean towards," hence "be near to," also "threaten, menace, impend, be at hand, be about to happen," from assimilated form of in- "into, in, on, upon" (from PIE root *en "in") + -minere "jut out," which is related to mons "hill" (from PIE root *men- (2) "to project"). Related: Imminently.

Does anyone doubt, Iran and/or proxies would strike again, on American or allied targets? It has been common enough in the past, kind of like earthquake predictions.

I had no doubt. I have no real regret at his action.

Difference between eventual and imminent

Iran wasn’t striking US targets before Trump

Not accurate. True, they increased greatly after he walked away from the agreement (a poor move in my opinion) and his continually spoke in a bellicose manner, as has too often been his nature (his charm to his supporters [I almost said rightwing, rewording due to your screen name]) but, strike they repeatedly have, and make no mistake, they would have (and still might) strike again. I am encouraged by his speech this morning, as should be you.

His speech offered nothing to Iran
They can’t trust what he says anyway

Iran offers nothing to us but misery and terror. Screw 'em.

Iran is the key to stability in the region

Obama negotiated a path for Iran to begin a way back. Demilitarization in return for reduced economic sanctions

In his obsession to destroy Obama’s legacy, Trump has destabilized the whole region

I agree, as soon as the mad mullahs are killed, then there will be peace in the region.

 

[Indeependent]

I define globalism as slave labor.
We shouldn’t be in the ME, but I don’t know enough about how we are economically intertwined: at least I can admit such.

the first overseas state visit donny made wasn't to one of our NATO allies - it was to visit with the saudis.

who, despite what pence is trying to lie about - - - 15 of the 19 animals that hit us on 9/11 were saudi.

that should give you a clue just how intertwined we are.

I am not at all happy that Trump has his head up their asses.

but not unhappy enough to stop supporting him & his lies that might get alot of yer fellow americans killed.

Let’s ponder that...
I support 9 out of 10 things Trump wants and I should stop supporting him.

I suppose you stop dealing with anyone who has even one disagreement with you.

lies. as in multiple.

Cool...try addressing my post.

 

[hunarcy]

What happens when your leader is a prolific liar? You admit you're a Hillarybot Democrat

<sob> But....but.......what about Hillary?

Note: This is not Hillary’s mess, Trump created it

I don't blame you for crying when you realize you're a mindless Hillarybot Democrat who wants to malign Trump but keep describing your leader. Kinda' sad, really.

You continue to deflect

Hillary, Obama, Biden or the media has nothing to do with this

Trump upset the apple cart in Iran and now is upset that nobody will help him pick them up

See, there you go with the Democratic lies again. We've been virtually at war with Iran since 1979. They have been attacking the US and murdering Americans since the revolution and that had NOTHING to do with Donald Trump. The fact that he didn't appease the mullahs like Hillary, Obama, Biden or the media seems to upset you. Too bad.

Actually, we had resolved most of the conflict with an international agreement

Trump trashed it

LMAO! You didn't notice that during the "international agreement", Iran was exporting its influence to other nations? You didn't see that Iran was backing Iraqi militias? You weren't aware that its support of Hezbollah increased and attacks in Israel were stepped up? You didn't see that Iran was arming its proxies and giving them missiles to shoot at Saudi Arabia? Obama/Biden/Hillary tried to appease them and buy their affection. It didn't work. Trump is doing something else and we'll see if it ends up being a bit more successful.

 

[hunarcy]

Divine Judgment is coming upon Iran. They lose 90% of their military in a single day. Remember that I told you that when you see it happen.

WOW....... I thought you were going to hide under your blanket.


They (Iran) lose 90% of their military in a single day...... I’m shocked for you to say that despite with all your post all that crap about Trump....... You are this ignorant.

Dude when we start bombing Iraq it’s a piece of cake with minimum resistance.. Bur it took several months of bombing.

Iran is not a weakling Iraq. They been preparing that a rouge inept US president like Trump will come and messed up ME.....
You are right US has the advantages of military fire power.
You drop one bomb in Iran and the whole Persian gulf kiss good bye affecting world wide economy into crisis. You can kiss Saudi Arabia and other countries nearby. That’s the consequences that idiot Donnie and you don’t understand.

America is NEVER going to war with Iran. God is going to destroy Iran by Supernatural Holy Power. Ezekiel 38-39. He is also going to turn Syria in to a pile of Rubble and several other Syrian Cities with it, and it will be uninhabitable. Isaiah 17.

America does not have to lift a finger to do this. It is done by God.

There is even a passage that talks about Arrows (Missiles) being shot up in to the air, and ALL OF THEM, raining down upon the Iranians, Russians and Turks that fired them at Israel.

Repent. Thy Judgment is at hand. Fear God, or be Forever Condemned.

America is never going to war with Iran. With idiot Donnie in the WH?

You are a religious person at the same time you idolize a bad person.
How is that makes you?

We are against bad people. So when judgement come. I thought bad people will be eliminated.

I don't Idolize anyone. I would turn on Donald Trump the moment I thought he was going to turn against the Right to Life, and Israel's right to exist, and God.

But you engage in rebellion and slander, and lies. And those are sins punishable by Hell.

Yes you idolize a pathological liar hypocrite bastard piece of shit president Trump. A total embarrassment for this country.
Trump is not a good person.

I'm sure that is your opinion, based on your hate. But, that just shows you aren't a good person either. Enjoy being irrelevant. Trump is President.