What happens when we tax the rich.

Money is taken from people that produce goods, services, and employment and is given to people who don't.

Hey Middle Class ... money to produce goods, services and employment is already tax deductible ... we tax income, not revenue or capital ... we tax the money that doesn't produce goods, services and employment ... the earnings ...

That's okay ... this government shutdown is what will pay for the tax breaks for The Rich ... starting with the repeal of the 3.8% Medicaid Surtax on unearned income over a few million IIRC ... the Middle Class will have to start paying for their own health care ...

This is what we voted for ...
 
Very quaint idea that simply isn't true anymore. there aren't a lot of large sole owner companies. The investor class largely invests for profits. They don't produce anything. They have no production vision and will gladly move from one company to another if the money is better.
You're talking about the stock market I assume. I agree somewhat. Stock trading doesn't produce anything.
 
We already have a tariff tax, and a sales tax on every item. How about politicians stop overspending?
Citizens have to do their part by reducing consumer debt.
 
Our economy is built on three things.

Mass production.
Mass marketing.
Consumer credit.

A perfect storm. :omg:
 
Money is taken from people that produce goods, services, and employment and is given to people who don't.
A stupid lie, of course.

I'm pretty sure even peole who work use roads, need Healthcare, want to retire without liv8ng in a box, etc.
 
You're talking about the stock market I assume. I agree somewhat. Stock trading doesn't produce anything.
Even private companies i.e. "venture capital" does it, perhaps even more so. They'll buy off some division of a company thinking they can make money, and if they can't, they'll just offload it onto someone else and take their investment dollars elsewhere. Dyson is the only company I can think of off the top of my head that genuinely has an owner that produces a lot of goods and hires a lot of people. I think they have 14-15K workers and $6B in annual revenue.
 
A stupid lie, of course.

I'm pretty sure even people who work use roads, need Healthcare, want to retire without liv8ng in a box, etc.
Working people largely provide those things for themselves.
 
What "rich" people are not presently taxed, one way or another?
The childishly ridiculous idea that taxing the rich would pay down the national debt and/or alleviate other taxation has so basis in math. A reasonable management of the total "wealth pie" is something that we could discuss, and it is clear that too much of that pie is immobilized by too few participants. Taxes may not be the term to use. A little intelligence on the part of those "too few participants" would lead them to learn from history, stay ahead of the curve, and just, simply, share. They would still remain tremendously wealthy while also maintaining their health.
The rich share the milk, but not the cow.
 
15th post
The middle class is being "hollowed out". Many are advancing to the upper class.
But are they really when you think about it? I mean technically my wife and I have made that jump but in the end we won't be by the time we put 3 kids through college, retire a little early, and have to start paying taxes on all that tax-deferred money we have piled into the retirement accounts. From my perspective we are just locked into the comfortably middle class for the rest of our lives. If you take into account future realistic expenses, we are really just pre-paying for the ordinary.
 
What "rich" people are not presently taxed, one way or another?
The childishly ridiculous idea that taxing the rich would pay down the national debt and/or alleviate other taxation has so basis in math. A reasonable management of the total "wealth pie" is something that we could discuss, and it is clear that too much of that pie is immobilized by too few participants. Taxes may not be the term to use. A little intelligence on the part of those "too few participants" would lead them to learn from history, stay ahead of the curve, and just, simply, share. They would still remain tremendously wealthy while also maintaining their health.
Neither the rich nor the government will solve our economic problems. Therefore, the people must step up. We must reduce our debts, care for our health, and stay out of prison.
 
Why are liberals not demonizing and threatening the rich in their party?
Rich celebrities who take millions in order to tell you who to vote for. Why are liberals not shaming these people and demanding they do this stuff for free and stop taking tax breaks?
 
The trouble with the rich and the tax code is that the tax on wealth is low or non-existent, while the tax on income is high. Those who's labor provides their income are hit with the highest tax rates.

I prefer no tax on wealth at all and that all actual income be taxed equally, regardless of where the money comes from. I'm for a single tax rate but let's not discriminate one source of money over any other. If we've to level the field, it should be level in all regards.

For example, the federal tax liability should be no less for a person inheriting $90,000 than for somebody who has labored to earn $90,000. A tax base universally broad and wide provides the ability for the lowest tax rate needed for federal revenue.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom