Blaster
Diamond Member
- Sep 9, 2022
- 32,747
- 37,370
- 2,788
So you would rather have a consumption tax?Untrue. Moar people work than do not work. The system is set up to give huge tax breaks to the wealthy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you would rather have a consumption tax?Untrue. Moar people work than do not work. The system is set up to give huge tax breaks to the wealthy.
Money is taken from people that produce goods, services, and employment and is given to people who don't.
You're talking about the stock market I assume. I agree somewhat. Stock trading doesn't produce anything.Very quaint idea that simply isn't true anymore. there aren't a lot of large sole owner companies. The investor class largely invests for profits. They don't produce anything. They have no production vision and will gladly move from one company to another if the money is better.
A stupid lie, of course.Money is taken from people that produce goods, services, and employment and is given to people who don't.
Even private companies i.e. "venture capital" does it, perhaps even more so. They'll buy off some division of a company thinking they can make money, and if they can't, they'll just offload it onto someone else and take their investment dollars elsewhere. Dyson is the only company I can think of off the top of my head that genuinely has an owner that produces a lot of goods and hires a lot of people. I think they have 14-15K workers and $6B in annual revenue.You're talking about the stock market I assume. I agree somewhat. Stock trading doesn't produce anything.
The rich share the milk, but not the cow.What "rich" people are not presently taxed, one way or another?
The childishly ridiculous idea that taxing the rich would pay down the national debt and/or alleviate other taxation has so basis in math. A reasonable management of the total "wealth pie" is something that we could discuss, and it is clear that too much of that pie is immobilized by too few participants. Taxes may not be the term to use. A little intelligence on the part of those "too few participants" would lead them to learn from history, stay ahead of the curve, and just, simply, share. They would still remain tremendously wealthy while also maintaining their health.
But are they really when you think about it? I mean technically my wife and I have made that jump but in the end we won't be by the time we put 3 kids through college, retire a little early, and have to start paying taxes on all that tax-deferred money we have piled into the retirement accounts. From my perspective we are just locked into the comfortably middle class for the rest of our lives. If you take into account future realistic expenses, we are really just pre-paying for the ordinary.The middle class is being "hollowed out". Many are advancing to the upper class.
Neither the rich nor the government will solve our economic problems. Therefore, the people must step up. We must reduce our debts, care for our health, and stay out of prison.What "rich" people are not presently taxed, one way or another?
The childishly ridiculous idea that taxing the rich would pay down the national debt and/or alleviate other taxation has so basis in math. A reasonable management of the total "wealth pie" is something that we could discuss, and it is clear that too much of that pie is immobilized by too few participants. Taxes may not be the term to use. A little intelligence on the part of those "too few participants" would lead them to learn from history, stay ahead of the curve, and just, simply, share. They would still remain tremendously wealthy while also maintaining their health.