What guns get banned when they limit magazines to 10 rounds?

If it's a removable magazine, there is no reason why you can't have a smaller magazine is there?


dip stick, magazines are not all universal, some pistols can have short and long magazines, but they have to be small guns that accept longer magazine....like some glocks, the XDs series....but if a gun is made for a 12,15,19 round magazine, a short one won't work....and retooling magazines to be as long but hold only 10 rounds is not worth it to many companies...so if you now own one of those guns...it is now illegal to posses in L.A.








California still has a ten round magazine limit. It is a simple alteration to make a normal capacity into a low capacity magazine. It's stupid, but easy.


Is there a provision that allows that? some states don't allow that...
If it's a removable magazine, there is no reason why you can't have a smaller magazine is there?


dip stick, magazines are not all universal, some pistols can have short and long magazines, but they have to be small guns that accept longer magazine....like some glocks, the XDs series....but if a gun is made for a 12,15,19 round magazine, a short one won't work....and retooling magazines to be as long but hold only 10 rounds is not worth it to many companies...so if you now own one of those guns...it is now illegal to posses in L.A.








California still has a ten round magazine limit. It is a simple alteration to make a normal capacity into a low capacity magazine. It's stupid, but easy.


Is there a provision that allows that? some states don't allow that...





Federal Law mandates that they be allowed to change magazines. In point of fact with laws such as these you are dealing with ex post facto situations so even California allowed owners to keep their magazines so long as they owned them before the law went into effect.


Ahhh..but the new L.A. Law was created to get rid of grandfathered magazines....






In which case Federal Law mandates the government entity pay the owners the fair market value for the items involved otherwise it classifies as an Illegal Taking.
 
Dumbass. How do you think we deal with a Remington 870 when shell count is limited to less than the gun is made for?

Stupid fuck, you can't just load fewer bullets in the mag and be legal...the entire magazine is illegal...and since many models of pistols have specific sized magazines they are now illegal...moron. that is what happened in Colorado.


If it's a removable magazine, there is no reason why you can't have a smaller magazine is there?


dip stick, magazines are not all universal, some pistols can have short and long magazines, but they have to be small guns that accept longer magazine....like some glocks, the XDs series....but if a gun is made for a 12,15,19 round magazine, a short one won't work....and retooling magazines to be as long but hold only 10 rounds is not worth it to many companies...so if you now own one of those guns...it is now illegal to posses in L.A.








California still has a ten round magazine limit. It is a simple alteration to make a normal capacity into a low capacity magazine. It's stupid, but easy.


Is there a provision that allows that? some states don't allow that...


Which states don't allow that?
 
Stupid fuck, you can't just load fewer bullets in the mag and be legal...the entire magazine is illegal...and since many models of pistols have specific sized magazines they are now illegal...moron. that is what happened in Colorado.


If it's a removable magazine, there is no reason why you can't have a smaller magazine is there?


dip stick, magazines are not all universal, some pistols can have short and long magazines, but they have to be small guns that accept longer magazine....like some glocks, the XDs series....but if a gun is made for a 12,15,19 round magazine, a short one won't work....and retooling magazines to be as long but hold only 10 rounds is not worth it to many companies...so if you now own one of those guns...it is now illegal to posses in L.A.








California still has a ten round magazine limit. It is a simple alteration to make a normal capacity into a low capacity magazine. It's stupid, but easy.


Is there a provision that allows that? some states don't allow that...


Which states don't allow that?


Connecticut..for one...read through the list....

http://www.handgunlaw.us/documents/NoHiCapChemSpray.pdf
 
If it's a removable magazine, there is no reason why you can't have a smaller magazine is there?


dip stick, magazines are not all universal, some pistols can have short and long magazines, but they have to be small guns that accept longer magazine....like some glocks, the XDs series....but if a gun is made for a 12,15,19 round magazine, a short one won't work....and retooling magazines to be as long but hold only 10 rounds is not worth it to many companies...so if you now own one of those guns...it is now illegal to posses in L.A.








California still has a ten round magazine limit. It is a simple alteration to make a normal capacity into a low capacity magazine. It's stupid, but easy.


Is there a provision that allows that? some states don't allow that...


Which states don't allow that?


Connecticut..for one...read through the list....

http://www.handgunlaw.us/documents/NoHiCapChemSpray.pdf


From your link


A "large capacity magazine" is defined as any ammunition feeding device with the capacity to accept more than ten rounds, but does not include any .22 caliber tube ammunition feeding device, any feeding device that has been permanently altered so that it cannot accommodate more than ten rounds, or any tubular magazine that is contained in a lever-action firearm.

I am always amazed at number of links right wingers give that don't say what the right wingers want them to say.
 
To illustrate the ignorance and stupidity of the OP, Smith & Wesson's M&P series AR pattern rifles are available with ten round magazines, making them available in jurisdictions with this requirement, such as Massachusetts and New Jersey.
 
To illustrate the ignorance and stupidity of the OP, Smith & Wesson's M&P series AR pattern rifles are available with ten round magazines, making them available in jurisdictions with this requirement, such as Massachusetts and New Jersey.

Wow moron...I served in the national guard and we usually carried 10 rounders before we got 30 rounders dipstick...I am addressing pistols for one thing and any limit that is stupid and pointless needs to be fought.
 
and of course they have to lie as they pas the L.A. Law......the shooting at sandy hook the shooter changed magazines several times and still killed 27 people...this anti gun group claims that 11 kids were saved because of this...but no one ever stated this...the police said they think it is possible that it happened but not one witness confirmed this...they made it up....

L.A. Mayor Eric Garcetti signs law banning large-capacity gun magazines
 
and of course they have to lie as they pas the L.A. Law......the shooting at sandy hook the shooter changed magazines several times and still killed 27 people...this anti gun group claims that 11 kids were saved because of this...but no one ever stated this...the police said they think it is possible that it happened but not one witness confirmed this...they made it up....

L.A. Mayor Eric Garcetti signs law banning large-capacity gun magazines


And here is the article....notice, they have no idea what happened...

Sandy Hook Shooter s Pause May Have Aided Students Escape - tribunedigital-thecourant



Based on initial statements from surviving children and the fact that unfired bullets from Lanza's rifle were found on the ground, detectives suspect that some students were able to run to safety when Lanza stopped firing, probably for a short period of time, the officials said.

It is possible that Lanza, who reloaded the rifle frequently, mishandled or dropped a magazine and unfired bullets fell to the floor, they said.

But it also is possible, they said, that the mechanism that fed bullets into the rifle jammed, causing Lanza to remove the magazine and clear the weapon. Unfired bullets could have fallen to the classroom floor during that process as well, law enforcement officials said.

The six children who escaped Lanza's rampage ran to a home a short distance from the school. Upon reaching the home, one of the boys told the owner that "we obeyed the rules, we stayed on the sidewalk," one of the officials said.

The authorities have learned generally from the children who ran away that something may have happened to Lanza's rifle that caused him to stop firing. The substance of the statements, which are not entirely consistent, is that a piece of the weapon, probably a magazine holding live bullets, was dropped or fell to the classroom floor.

Investigators have decided not to formally interview the children, based on advice from Yale child psychologists. Given the chaotic nature of the scene, it is also possible that some children escaped while Lanza was shooting others in the room.

Not one diffinitive statement....

They have no idea...the only real evidence is that he reloaded several times, in the 5 minutes of killing and murdered 27 people.......the size of the magazine made no difference since many of the magazines were still partially full, pointing to him doing a combat reload.
 
Last edited:
dip stick, magazines are not all universal, some pistols can have short and long magazines, but they have to be small guns that accept longer magazine....like some glocks, the XDs series....but if a gun is made for a 12,15,19 round magazine, a short one won't work....and retooling magazines to be as long but hold only 10 rounds is not worth it to many companies...so if you now own one of those guns...it is now illegal to posses in L.A.








California still has a ten round magazine limit. It is a simple alteration to make a normal capacity into a low capacity magazine. It's stupid, but easy.


Is there a provision that allows that? some states don't allow that...


Which states don't allow that?


Connecticut..for one...read through the list....

http://www.handgunlaw.us/documents/NoHiCapChemSpray.pdf


From your link


A "large capacity magazine" is defined as any ammunition feeding device with the capacity to accept more than ten rounds, but does not include any .22 caliber tube ammunition feeding device, any feeding device that has been permanently altered so that it cannot accommodate more than ten rounds, or any tubular magazine that is contained in a lever-action firearm.

I am always amazed at number of links right wingers give that don't say what the right wingers want them to say.


And I guess you missed this part....

Sec. 24. (d) Any person who moves into the state in lawful possession of a large capacity magazine shall, within ninety days, either render the large capacity magazine permanently inoperable, sell the large capacity magazine to a licensed gun dealer or remove the large capacity magazine from this state,
 
California still has a ten round magazine limit. It is a simple alteration to make a normal capacity into a low capacity magazine. It's stupid, but easy.


Is there a provision that allows that? some states don't allow that...


Which states don't allow that?


Connecticut..for one...read through the list....

http://www.handgunlaw.us/documents/NoHiCapChemSpray.pdf


From your link


A "large capacity magazine" is defined as any ammunition feeding device with the capacity to accept more than ten rounds, but does not include any .22 caliber tube ammunition feeding device, any feeding device that has been permanently altered so that it cannot accommodate more than ten rounds, or any tubular magazine that is contained in a lever-action firearm.

I am always amazed at number of links right wingers give that don't say what the right wingers want them to say.


And I guess you missed this part....

Sec. 24. (d) Any person who moves into the state in lawful possession of a large capacity magazine shall, within ninety days, either render the large capacity magazine permanently inoperable, sell the large capacity magazine to a licensed gun dealer or remove the large capacity magazine from this state,

So? Legal capacity magazines are available, or it can be modified to be a 10 shot maximum capacity. No big deal. Quit whining.
 
Is there a provision that allows that? some states don't allow that...


Which states don't allow that?


Connecticut..for one...read through the list....

http://www.handgunlaw.us/documents/NoHiCapChemSpray.pdf


From your link


A "large capacity magazine" is defined as any ammunition feeding device with the capacity to accept more than ten rounds, but does not include any .22 caliber tube ammunition feeding device, any feeding device that has been permanently altered so that it cannot accommodate more than ten rounds, or any tubular magazine that is contained in a lever-action firearm.

I am always amazed at number of links right wingers give that don't say what the right wingers want them to say.


And I guess you missed this part....

Sec. 24. (d) Any person who moves into the state in lawful possession of a large capacity magazine shall, within ninety days, either render the large capacity magazine permanently inoperable, sell the large capacity magazine to a licensed gun dealer or remove the large capacity magazine from this state,

So? Legal capacity magazines are available, or it can be modified to be a 10 shot maximum capacity. No big deal. Quit whining.


This limit does nothing to address the problems you people bitch about...it won't stop criminals from getting whatever magazines they want, and it won't stop any mass shooters...considering the Santa barbara shooter used the 10 round magazines to do his killling...

So it does absolutely nothing to stop any crime. And yet we are told we just have to put up with it........you guys are assholes....and stupid ones at that...
 
In order to prevent Identity theft we will now limit all information posted on any electronic platform to be limited to 100 characters a day. This will not prevent people from posting or doing any other business on the internet, but it will be a step to curb identity theft....right?
 
Which states don't allow that?


Connecticut..for one...read through the list....

http://www.handgunlaw.us/documents/NoHiCapChemSpray.pdf


From your link


A "large capacity magazine" is defined as any ammunition feeding device with the capacity to accept more than ten rounds, but does not include any .22 caliber tube ammunition feeding device, any feeding device that has been permanently altered so that it cannot accommodate more than ten rounds, or any tubular magazine that is contained in a lever-action firearm.

I am always amazed at number of links right wingers give that don't say what the right wingers want them to say.


And I guess you missed this part....

Sec. 24. (d) Any person who moves into the state in lawful possession of a large capacity magazine shall, within ninety days, either render the large capacity magazine permanently inoperable, sell the large capacity magazine to a licensed gun dealer or remove the large capacity magazine from this state,

So? Legal capacity magazines are available, or it can be modified to be a 10 shot maximum capacity. No big deal. Quit whining.


This limit does nothing to address the problems you people bitch about...it won't stop criminals from getting whatever magazines they want, and it won't stop any mass shooters...considering the Santa barbara shooter used the 10 round magazines to do his killling...

So it does absolutely nothing to stop any crime. And yet we are told we just have to put up with it........you guys are assholes....and stupid ones at that...


Still asinine. See post #13
 
[
At least you're consistent at being a moron.

All manner of firearms come with 10 round magazines by the gun maker for sale in such states and jurisdictions, where no guns are "banned."
and then if a state pulls a mafia Don Cuomo move and limits guns to 7 rounds every modern full size 9mm is illegal until someone comes up with a 7 round magazine. anyone who supports a magazine ban is not only an enemy of America, they are a scumbag who ought to be treated as such
 
That's an asinine statement.
Laws against murder don't prevent all murder.
Laws against rape don't prevent all rapes.
Laws against robbery don't prevent all robbery.
Laws against theft don't prevent all theft.
Laws against DUI don't prevent all DUI.
Laws against assault don't prevent all assault.
Laws against speeding don't prevent all speeding.
Laws against illegal drug sales don't prevent all illegal drug sales.

Are you really going to say all the mentioned laws, and every other law we have are not 100% effective, so we should just do away with them? You're a childish idiot.


you're just too stupid to understand that those laws PUNISH behavior that is harmful to society and others

all magazine bans do is punish people for non harmful behavior.

Shit for brains
 
[

When police agree to the mag limit, then we can talk, until then the government can go pound sand.

yes, any political entity that limits what civilians can own should not be able to arm its civilian employees with higher capacity weapons
 
To illustrate the ignorance and stupidity of the OP, Smith & Wesson's M&P series AR pattern rifles are available with ten round magazines, making them available in jurisdictions with this requirement, such as Massachusetts and New Jersey.

do you support those Limits or are you going to engage in your normal being on both sides of the issue

there is no rational argument in favor of a magazine ban
 

Forum List

Back
Top