What firearms are protected by the 2nd Amendment

[JakeStarkey]

You doubled back on yourself. Tyranny is tyranny no matter what century it takes place in, and that well trained police force could be used to quell decent with the government.

Not police forces but the standing army, which the founders did not like but on which they had to rely anyway. You are right about tyranny, and you would tyrannize any who came under your dominion. You are disgrace to your southern heritage.

 

[JakeStarkey]

<snip>

The dope offers nothing but his continual lies and continues the laughing stock of the Board.

 

[ConHog]

Our forefathers gave us the right to bear arms so we could overthrow an unjust government.

if that were true they wouldn't have gone on to make treason the only crime included in the constitution.

Treason is only a crime if you fail to win in your bid to overthrow the government.

 

[BrianH]

I have posted over and over the evidence that clearly demonstrates that (1) the Act is an extension, (2) not an expansion of powers, and (3) that your links support my point and destroys yours.

I remember when you are trying to argue that Hitler was a socialist your own pieces of evidence destroyed your premise. A half dozen of us calmly demonstrated that you had destroyed your own argument and watched you self implode.

<snip>

Yeah, whatever. You try this bull shit in the army and you would be thrown out, in business and you would be fired, and at university you would flunk out.

Move out, loser.

1. You're the biggest dumbass on these boards.
2. You have not proven a damn thing you've said on here. You've also either ignored links that I have posted and you've also reworded statements I've made to fit your argument. I made a statement and posted a link of the proof of my statement. You have down-played my statement and link without posting anything of your own. Just because you refuse to believe it doesn't make it false. Giving the government the power to access devices that were previously unaccessible EXPANDS the power of the Act.
3. You have no idea what I've done, whether I have ever been fired, or if I went to college. Screw you and the horse you road in on...
4. Once again you've failed to wage a logical debate. (Big suprise)

You are a

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I have posted over and over the evidence that clearly demonstrates that (1) the Act is an extension, (2) not an expansion of powers, and (3) that your links support my point and destroys yours.

No you haven't, all you have posted is your opinion.

I remember when you are trying to argue that Hitler was a socialist your own pieces of evidence destroyed your premise. A half dozen of us calmly demonstrated that you had destroyed your own argument and watched you self implode

When you're a dictator everything belongs to the state. Their was no free market in nazi germany, everything went to the war effort and to the state. SOCIALISM

The dope offers nothing but his continual lies and continues the laughing stock of the Board.

Whats wrong jake? Does the truth hurt you? Is that why you edited my reply?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You doubled back on yourself. Tyranny is tyranny no matter what century it takes place in, and that well trained police force could be used to quell decent with the government.

Not police forces but the standing army, which the founders did not like but on which they had to rely anyway. You are right about tyranny, and you would tyrannize any who came under your dominion. You are disgrace to your southern heritage.

In New Orleans, who was confiscating weapons? Who was shooting unarmed citizens?

 

[JakeStarkey]

<snip>

Yeah, whatever. You try this bull shit in the army and you would be thrown out, in business and you would be fired, and at university you would flunk out.

Move out, loser.

1. You're the biggest dumbass on these boards.
2. You have not proven a damn thing you've said on here. You've also either ignored links that I have posted and you've also reworded statements I've made to fit your argument. I made a statement and posted a link of the proof of my statement. You have down-played my statement and link without posting anything of your own. Just because you refuse to believe it doesn't make it false. Giving the government the power to access devices that were previously unaccessible EXPANDS the power of the Act.
3. You have no idea what I've done, whether I have ever been fired, or if I went to college. Screw you and the horse you road in on...
4. Once again you've failed to wage a logical debate. (Big suprise)

I know such behavior as you have suggested above what lead to the above results. You have provided no convincing arguments, your logic has been demolished, and you have not been able to rock my solid points.

Move out, trainee.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No you haven't, all you have posted is your opinion.

When you're a dictator everything belongs to the state. Their was no free market in nazi germany, everything went to the war effort and to the state. SOCIALISM

The dope offers nothing but his continual lies and continues the laughing stock of the Board.

Whats wrong jake? Does the truth hurt you? Is that why you edited my reply?

You have posted an opinion only, your evidence blew up on you, Hitler owas not a soncialist, and you are a practicer (a very poor one) of deceit.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You doubled back on yourself. Tyranny is tyranny no matter what century it takes place in, and that well trained police force could be used to quell decent with the government.

Not police forces but the standing army, which the founders did not like but on which they had to rely anyway. You are right about tyranny, and you would tyrannize any who came under your dominion. You are disgrace to your southern heritage.

In New Orleans, who was confiscating weapons? Who was shooting unarmed citizens?

Poor argument and badly cast, as usual, and not to the point. However, police were unable to function in NO. Every precinct station was flooded. One out of five officers left work to care of their families or disappeared. And are you talking about shootings by LEO to keep evacuees out of their towns?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Not police forces but the standing army, which the founders did not like but on which they had to rely anyway. You are right about tyranny, and you would tyrannize any who came under your dominion. You are disgrace to your southern heritage.

In New Orleans, who was confiscating weapons? Who was shooting unarmed citizens?

Poor argument and badly cast, as usual, and not to the point. However, police were unable to function in NO. Every precinct station was flooded. One out of five officers left work to care of their families or disappeared. And are you talking about shootings by LEO to keep evacuees out of their towns?

The opinionated commentary is not necessary
Who was shooting unarmed citizens? and who was confiscating any weapons?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The dope offers nothing but his continual lies and continues the laughing stock of the Board.

Whats wrong jake? Does the truth hurt you? Is that why you edited my reply?

You have posted an opinion only, your evidence blew up on you, Hitler owas not a soncialist, and you are a practicer (a very poor one) of deceit.

Are you saying hitler wasn't a dictator? Are you saying that Germany had a free market system and hitler did not dictate everything was to be used for the war effort?

 

[Uncensored2008]

We are talking about firearms not all weapons.

A missile isn't a firearm.

The second amendment is about arms, not firearms. The prohibition of Switchblade knives, butterfly knives, etc. is unconstitutional.

The second covers any PERSONAL arms, i.e. arms that may be born - carried on ones person.

A missile, tank, nuclear bomb is not covered as one cannot bear these.

An "assault rifle" or even a bazooka IS covered, as an average man may bear these.

 

[JakeStarkey]

We are talking about firearms not all weapons.

A missile isn't a firearm.

The second amendment is about arms, not firearms. The prohibition of Switchblade knives, butterfly knives, etc. is unconstitutional.

The second covers any PERSONAL arms, i.e. arms that may be born - carried on ones person.

A missile, tank, nuclear bomb is not covered as one cannot bear these.

An "assault rifle" or even a bazooka IS covered, as an average man may bear these.

Your opinion is constitutional, your opinion is silly.

 

[JakeStarkey]

In New Orleans, who was confiscating weapons? Who was shooting unarmed citizens?

Poor argument and badly cast, as usual, and not to the point. However, police were unable to function in NO. Every precinct station was flooded. One out of five officers left work to care of their families or disappeared. And are you talking about shootings by LEO to keep evacuees out of their towns?

The opinionated commentary is not necessary
Who was shooting unarmed citizens? and who was confiscating any weapons?

The commentary is necessary to expose your fraud. Now answer the questions: Who was shooting unarmed citizens? and who was confiscating any weapons?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Whats wrong jake? Does the truth hurt you? Is that why you edited my reply?

You have posted an opinion only, your evidence blew up on you, Hitler was not a socialist, and you are a practicer (a very poor one) of deceit.

Are you saying hitler wasn't a dictator? Are you saying that Germany had a free market system and hitler did not dictate everything was to be used for the war effort?

Hitler was not a socialist, and you are not a patriot.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Your opinion is constitutional, your opinion is silly.

I understand your hatred of the constitution.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Like I said, your opinions are silly.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

We are talking about firearms not all weapons.

A missile isn't a firearm.

The second amendment is about arms, not firearms. The prohibition of Switchblade knives, butterfly knives, etc. is unconstitutional.

The second covers any PERSONAL arms, i.e. arms that may be born - carried on ones person.

A missile, tank, nuclear bomb is not covered as one cannot bear these.

An "assault rifle" or even a bazooka IS covered, as an average man may bear these.

The second amendment is about arms, not firearms. The prohibition of Switchblade knives, butterfly knives, etc. is unconstitutional.

I do not hink you are correct. Arms is a eighteenth and nineteenth century military term.
to stack arms
(Mil.) to set up a number of muskets or rifles together, with the bayonets crossing one another, and forming a sort of conical pile.


To stack arms - definition of To stack arms by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
Manual of Arms for Infantry
Mar 97 - 2

Arms makers of colonial America - Google Books

 

[Uncensored2008]

Hitler was not a socialist, and you are not a patriot.

{10. It must be the first duty of every Citizen to carry out intellectual or physical work.
Individual activity must not be harmful to the public interest and must be pursued
within the framework of the community and for the general good.
We therefore demand:
11. The abolition of all income obtained without labor or effort.
Breaking the Servitude of Interest
12. In view of the tremendous sacrifices in property and blood demanded of the
Nation by every war, personal gain from the war must be termed a crime against
the Nation. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits.
13. We demand the nationalization of all enterprises (already) converted into
corporations (trusts).
14. We demand profit-sharing in large enterprises.
15. We demand the large-scale development of old-age pension schemes.
16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle class; the immediate
communalization of the large department stores, which are to be leased at low
rates to small tradesmen. We demand the most careful consideration for the
owners of small businesses in orders placed by national, state, or community
authorities.
17. We demand land reform in accordance with our national needs and a law for
expropriation without compensation of land for public purposes. Abolition of
ground rent and prevention of all speculation in land. }

http://users.stlcc.edu/rkalfus/PDFs/026.pdf

You sir, are an uneducated dolt.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You have posted an opinion only, your evidence blew up on you, Hitler was not a socialist, and you are a practicer (a very poor one) of deceit.

Are you saying hitler wasn't a dictator? Are you saying that Germany had a free market system and hitler did not dictate everything was to be used for the war effort?

Hitler was not a socialist, and you are not a patriot.

Hitler was a dictator and leader of the National Socialist German Worker's Party. enough said on that subject.