Very good
Now if that's all they were, why can't anyone from the Trump camp come forward with documentation of what the meetings were about and who was there?
If that is all that happened, why are they taking the fifth and why has Trump lawyered up?
Because in THIS country, you are innocent until proven guilty. Trump is under NO obligation to prove he is innocent. And excuse me... can you tell me the last time in the past 40 years Trump
hasn't been "lawyered up"? ...This is so funny.... NOW, just having a lawyer means you're guilty of something?
Why do you think impeachment and the trial of a President before Congress is even remotely like a trial in a court for criminal offenses? Congress is a separate and equal branch of government and can make their own rules about how impeachment proceedings are conducted and what is allowed and not allowed during those proceedings. They have the authority to tell lawyers representing the President to STFU.
Uhm... no, they really CAN'T "make up their own rules" because there is a Constitution that outlines the criteria of "high crimes and misdemeanors." That means, dumbass, that they cannot impeach for things that AREN'T crimes.
At this point, you lack ANYTHING to even bring Articles of Impeachment up for a vote in the House. You're not going to have anything until you prove some crime has been committed and Trump is guilty. Not liking him because he's a buffoon who's fat and orange, isn't enough....Sorry!
OK person who calls other people "dumb ass". Define "High Crimes". Which laws does the constitution stipulate are "High Crimes"?
I've already addressed this once. How many times do I have to do it? The first clue is in the ******* name... High
CRIMES. Obviously, things that are not crimes, can't be High Crimes. Now, I don't know what you THINK the term means... maybe you think it means "crimes" you dream up while high from smoking pot? But those of us who have read the Federalist Papers and studied the Constitution, understand that it means crimes that are significant in nature. In other words, not small insignificant crimes. For example, you couldn't impeach a president for jaywalking or overdue library books... those are not "high crimes". Now, it's true that the threshold is somewhat ambiguous and is left to the House to determine. Let's say the president didn't properly secure classified information and violated the Espionage Act.... perhaps he/she didn't
intend to violate the law? Maybe the House wouldn't find that to be a "high crime" worthy of impeachment? Maybe some in the House would think so but they would deliberate and have a vote.
In ANY event, there has to first be a CRIME. At this point there is no crime. You all keep throwing out "obstruction of justice" but that's going to be a tough sell since justice has not been obstructed. The investigations continue, Comey never reported any obstruction attempts and his firing didn't impede any ongoing investigation. Not to mention, the investigations are regarding intelligence and not criminal. There isn't even a motive for Trump to impede an investigation that isn't criminal and doesn't involve him personally.
Let me explain what is happening here.... You all have listened to some idiot reporter who doesn't know what the **** they're talking about. You believe with all your heart that there is some evidence floating around out there which will indict Trump and it's just a matter of time before it gets uncovered. Again, if this were Hillary, that would be a reliable bet. But there is really not anything and Trump has nothing to hide.
I don't care if you want to call me names and attack me as being some loyalist to Trump.... you can go look up my threads, I didn't vote for Trump and I have issues with many of his policies. I would MUCH rather have a President Pence! That would suit me just fine! But I am not going to give in to this absolute idiotic lunacy because I am not a lunatic. I know enough about the Constitution and history to understand you don't have a case for impeachment here. As much as you all wish there were, there just isn't. So you can go ahead and keep beating this dead horse for the next year and a half, then when the American electorate resoundingly voices their displeasure, you can sit and spin that into something else to avoid admitting you've fucked up.
