What ever happened to that ridiculous climate change hoax.

Hey stupid IT'S THE WEATHER that is why the veggies are dry

You do not have to be a babbling moron but it' helps when you spew that crap from your blowhole
 
It's welcome has worn out.
The hysterically motivated flocked
as lemmings to the promise of controlling weather.

But it's going to take a lot of money

The Welcome Demise of Climate Change Catastrophism - Newsweek The Welcome Demise of Climate Change Catastrophism

Anyway we do have better things to do with our time and money.
Our money

It was as stupid
as the drowning polar bear
with al gore

It was a manifestation of hysteria,
as always,
driven by the fake news indies.

The longer Trump is in office, the more the leftoid lunatics leave behind their previous lies and scams about non-Trump subjects in favor of creating MORE lies and scams about Trump.
 
A "historic" snowstorm for the east coast. Snow and ice fir over 35 states. Record cold and possibly 18 inches of snow for DC

I thought the earth was warming up? Al Gore screamed the oceans were boiling. Where the hell is that global warming?

View attachment 1209462

This is your fault for believing everything you read in Time Magazine ... you should know better ...
 
This is your fault for believing everything you read in Time Magazine ... you should know better ...
Or anything in the liberal media

Or anything from a mucking liberal

01KFGGNAW22E5J3XH04KJH6FG7.webp
 
Or anything in the liberal media

Or anything from a mucking liberal

View attachment 1209635

If you're interested ... you should read the scientific media ...

I can't believe you called EMH a Climate Crusader ... I'm going to laugh at that for the rest of the day ...

Hey stupid IT'S THE WEATHER that is why the veggies are dry

Right on ... that'll be the truest thing posted in this useless thread ...
 
If you're interested ... you should read the scientific media ...

I can't believe you called EMH a Climate Crusader ... I'm going to laugh at that for the rest of the day ...
I am not

It is CALLED THE WEATHER
 
LOL!!

Algebra equation.

When there is no land near the poles and Earth has little to no ice, what happens...

Warmer, wetter, Surface Air Pressure 3-5 times higher than today.

Temperature is 10-20F higher. The rest of the SAP increase is the added gas trapped in ice now.

No data.

*****.
 
This is your fault for believing everything you read in Time Magazine ... you should know better ...
That's true, people in my circle read that poison, fueled the fire.
Time and newsweek used to be pretty good.
No they are a 10 page leftist shell.
 
Libs blamed numerous fires in CA on "climate change" when.it was arson

The real reason is actually lack of forest and wildland management.

You see, that is the amazing thing about most of nature, and most specifically California. Fire is such a constant threat there and has been for millions of years that a significant number of plants have actually evolved to live in an area with a constant threat of fire. In fact, a great many of the plants actually require fire in order to reproduce.

People just need to think about that for a minute. Unless you completely reject science and evolution, the obvious conclusion is that kind of evolutionary traits only evolve where fires occur almost constantly. After all, you do not find pyrophytes in SE Asia or the Amazon rainforest. That kind of evolutionary trait only evolves where fires are so common that it is just part of the environment.

But going back to that, if you spend decades stopping all fires as soon as possible, then there is nothing removing the dead trees, the underbrush grows out of control, and animals that need environments like meadows start to drop in numbers.

In other words, you allow occasional fires to keep nature in balance, or humans have to step up and do those things themselves. They need to clear out the underbrush. They need to go in and remove the dead and dying trees.

And they must set occasional fires themselves so the plants that require fire can be replaced by newer generations.

California has been failing at that job for decades. Then it gets worse because a great many places will actually punish homeowners who are not doing the job the state should be doing.

From his backyard, Amado Nera can see the beautiful Los Peñasquitos Canyon Preserve. It encompasses thousands of acres of sensitive nature habitat with hundreds of unique plant and animal species, many of which are classified as endangered or threatened. In May of 2021, Nera also saw that preserve, with its dry vegetation, as a wildfire threat. It was one based on his experience.

In an effort to create defensible space, as well as prevent the possible future loss of his homeowner’s insurance, Nera told us he took it upon himself to clear away brush around his home.

More than a year and a half later, in October of 2022, the family received another letter from the city detailing the damage to the preserve and fining them $53,367.70.

Or in the very area ravaged by fire a year ago there is a bizarre labyrinth of getting permits to clear the brush that the city mandates.

Impatient with government bureaucracy, including a $150 fee for permission to remove brush from state parkland, some of Josephson’s neighbors cleared it on their own.

“They neglect it,” said Bart Young, president of a Palisades neighborhood group that became so fed up with official inaction that it raised $140,000 to fund its own brush cleanup.

The group hired private contractors to pull out dead trees, rake pine needles and clear vegetation on nearby state park land.
 
The real reason is actually lack of forest and wildland management.

You see, that is the amazing thing about most of nature, and most specifically California. Fire is such a constant threat there and has been for millions of years that a significant number of plants have actually evolved to live in an area with a constant threat of fire. In fact, a great many of the plants actually require fire in order to reproduce.

People just need to think about that for a minute. Unless you completely reject science and evolution, the obvious conclusion is that kind of evolutionary traits only evolve where fires occur almost constantly. After all, you do not find pyrophytes in SE Asia or the Amazon rainforest. That kind of evolutionary trait only evolves where fires are so common that it is just part of the environment.

But going back to that, if you spend decades stopping all fires as soon as possible, then there is nothing removing the dead trees, the underbrush grows out of control, and animals that need environments like meadows start to drop in numbers.

In other words, you allow occasional fires to keep nature in balance, or humans have to step up and do those things themselves. They need to clear out the underbrush. They need to go in and remove the dead and dying trees.

And they must set occasional fires themselves so the plants that require fire can be replaced by newer generations.

California has been failing at that job for decades. Then it gets worse because a great many places will actually punish homeowners who are not doing the job the state should be doing.



Or in the very area ravaged by fire a year ago there is a bizarre labyrinth of getting permits to clear the brush that the city mandates.



California fires are a sign of "climate stability" or some such ... all these catastrophic weather events have been within the existing climate ... not signs of any change ... Houston is supposed to flood every other year ... normal climate ...

The greatest fire threat is during wet years ... go figure ...
 
15th post
It's the evidence for temperature and according to you it's fudge.Shame on you for relying on fudge.



You and Toddster need to get the CO2 FRAUD Faux Skeptic routine down.

Your problem is that those ancient flying dinosaurs required 3 to 5 times current SAP to fly. Are you arguing that would happen without a temperature increase? LOL!!! Toddster claims there isn't any gas trapped in Antarctic ice. If you don't have a temperature increase, you would need a huge amount of gas to get to 3-5 times current SAP.
 
You and Toddster need to get the CO2 FRAUD Faux Skeptic routine down.

Your problem is that those ancient flying dinosaurs required 3 to 5 times current SAP to fly. Are you arguing that would happen without a temperature increase? LOL!!! Toddster claims there isn't any gas trapped in Antarctic ice. If you don't have a temperature increase, you would need a huge amount of gas to get to 3-5 times current SAP.

Toddster claims there isn't any gas trapped in Antarctic ice.

You're full of shit, as usual.

How much gas is trapped? Show your work.

I mean, show the work of someone much, much smarter than you.
 
Back
Top Bottom