What do you call a person who threatens violence then fails to follow up when the parameters are met

[miketx]

Raise your hand if you remember Trump saying we would be great friends with Russia and making fun of Hillary's "reset" button

Trump declares US-Russia relations may be at "all-time low"

So is the Trump admin over? Or do you just like to lie?

 

[TheOldSchool]

Raise your hand if you remember Trump saying we would be great friends with Russia and making fun of Hillary's "reset" button

Trump declares US-Russia relations may be at "all-time low"

So is the Trump admin over? Or do you just like to lie?

Look at you lying again. Man, you just can't help yourself.

 

[tycho1572]

I don't think obama realized how much of a ***** he was until Assad crossed his 'red line'.
It wasn't until a real man took office before the world realized the US isn't full of a bunch of pussies.

All they're seeing now is a small group of whiny bitches who cry about everything.

 

[miketx]

Raise your hand if you remember Trump saying we would be great friends with Russia and making fun of Hillary's "reset" button

Trump declares US-Russia relations may be at "all-time low"

So is the Trump admin over? Or do you just like to lie?

Look at you lying again. Man, you just can't help yourself.

This is why no one but other shills will respect you. You never answer a question and you lie on 95 percent of your posts.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Raise your hand if you remember Trump saying we would be great friends with Russia and making fun of Hillary's "reset" button

Trump declares US-Russia relations may be at "all-time low"

So is the Trump admin over? Or do you just like to lie?

Look at you lying again. Man, you just can't help yourself.

This is why no one but other shills will respect you. You never answer a question and you lie on 95 percent of your posts.

You're lying right now. I bet you lie in 100% of your posts.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

When faced with the question of going into Syria, here is how the board reacted less than a year ago:

View attachment 121465

Given now that a republican is in the White House and, like all Republicans has no trouble sending someone else’s kids into the meat grinder, what does that make the members of the board who all of the sudden think war with Syria is cool?

A). Hypocrites
B). Republicans
C). A & B (the same thing)

The poll is based on a false choice. All out war, which the poll implies, was not what was required by the coward known as Obama when his red line was crossed.

Except it doesn’t say any such thing. If you would read the comments…you’d find that most posters—me and conservatives included wanted no part of any war in Syria.

Great, once again we declare ourselves the world's morality police and put our citizens at risk.
Every congressman who votes for this lunacy should be tarred and feathered.

By the way, it’s wonderful how the right wing regards an “act of war” under Obama vs. your messiah:

Who's advocating war? My understanding is that the administration is proposing a limited attack, not a full scale George W. Bush invasion like what happened in Iraq.

If any country shot 200 missiles into US territory would we consider it an act of war? Would we believe that that country had declared war on us? would we retaliate?
are we the neighborhood bully that beats up others because he can? or are we the beat cop who uses his nightstick on drunks that are making too much noise?

And we're not at war in Syria despite Trump making good on the cowards threat.

 

[candycorn]

So much so, they launched attacks from the same air base the next day. Apparently the message wasn’t received.

Did they use chemical weapons?

Does it matter, if a conventional bomb kills a child, that child is just as dead.

Oh ok, so you don't believe in all the international agreements and laws banning chemical weapons then.

So the point had nothing to do with the children that were gassed (as Trump apparently lied about), it was about punishing the perpetrator? And we did that by not hitting the gas or preventing any more air-raids?

The point is when someone violates those agreements, you let them know you won't stand for it. Would you rather they keep using chemical weapons, and normalize the use of them by doing so?

Perhaps you don't know history very well. The Germans invented chemical warfare. Their reasoning for using it in World War I was that it would end the war quickly because it was so horrible. Instead, it caused an arms race as the allies quickly had to make their own chemical warfare program to counter the Germans. As the allies came up with defenses for their chemicals, the Germans would come up with a new horrible way of killing people. Got a gas mask that protects from one type of chemical? Then add in a non-lethal gas that penatrates the mask but makes the person vomit, forcing him to take off his mask and thus inhaling the lethal gas. This is the kind of shit the Germans came up with. Make no mistake, chemical weapons do not just instantly kill people like they show in movies. The victims are rendered defenseless and sick and in complete agony for weeks or even months before death. Imagine an intense burning sensation in your lungs and on your skin, and nothing can be done about it.

This is why the entire civilized world agreed to ban these weapons. You say torture is wrong to use on terrorists? Yet chemical weapons on civilians is just fine.

If we let these barbarians get comfortable using chemical weapons, they will all start using them. You think random AK-47 and truck attacks are horrible, wait until the Muzzies start gassing schools. Trump is putting these barbarians on notice, he won't tolerate that shit, even if you would.

Your fantasies about what I wrote and what I did write are quite different. Sending an effective message would stop their capability to do the same thing in the future. Assad has that ability. It was a ***** move made by someone wanting to change the subject from his ties to Russia. That you cheer such impotence is not surprising. Had Obama did it, you guys would be all over him for doing it without Congress's approval (as Trump did in 2013) or missing the runways and munitions used in the attack (as Trump did last week).

 

[candycorn]

When faced with the question of going into Syria, here is how the board reacted less than a year ago:

View attachment 121465

Given now that a republican is in the White House and, like all Republicans has no trouble sending someone else’s kids into the meat grinder, what does that make the members of the board who all of the sudden think war with Syria is cool?

A). Hypocrites
B). Republicans
C). A & B (the same thing)

The poll is based on a false choice. All out war, which the poll implies, was not what was required by the coward known as Obama when his red line was crossed.

Except it doesn’t say any such thing. If you would read the comments…you’d find that most posters—me and conservatives included wanted no part of any war in Syria.

Great, once again we declare ourselves the world's morality police and put our citizens at risk.
Every congressman who votes for this lunacy should be tarred and feathered.

By the way, it’s wonderful how the right wing regards an “act of war” under Obama vs. your messiah:

Who's advocating war? My understanding is that the administration is proposing a limited attack, not a full scale George W. Bush invasion like what happened in Iraq.

If any country shot 200 missiles into US territory would we consider it an act of war? Would we believe that that country had declared war on us? would we retaliate?
are we the neighborhood bully that beats up others because he can? or are we the beat cop who uses his nightstick on drunks that are making too much noise?

And we're not at war in Syria...

Hope Syria sees it that way. Dunno...sending 59 missiles into a nation sounds like an act of war to me. I'm sure they will forget all about it and whatever terror cells are already here will have nothing to say about it either.

despite Trump making good on the cowards threat.

The same "cowardice" that nearly everyone on both sides of the aisle supported?

 

[theHawk]

Did they use chemical weapons?

Does it matter, if a conventional bomb kills a child, that child is just as dead.

Oh ok, so you don't believe in all the international agreements and laws banning chemical weapons then.

So the point had nothing to do with the children that were gassed (as Trump apparently lied about), it was about punishing the perpetrator? And we did that by not hitting the gas or preventing any more air-raids?

The point is when someone violates those agreements, you let them know you won't stand for it. Would you rather they keep using chemical weapons, and normalize the use of them by doing so?

Perhaps you don't know history very well. The Germans invented chemical warfare. Their reasoning for using it in World War I was that it would end the war quickly because it was so horrible. Instead, it caused an arms race as the allies quickly had to make their own chemical warfare program to counter the Germans. As the allies came up with defenses for their chemicals, the Germans would come up with a new horrible way of killing people. Got a gas mask that protects from one type of chemical? Then add in a non-lethal gas that penatrates the mask but makes the person vomit, forcing him to take off his mask and thus inhaling the lethal gas. This is the kind of shit the Germans came up with. Make no mistake, chemical weapons do not just instantly kill people like they show in movies. The victims are rendered defenseless and sick and in complete agony for weeks or even months before death. Imagine an intense burning sensation in your lungs and on your skin, and nothing can be done about it.

This is why the entire civilized world agreed to ban these weapons. You say torture is wrong to use on terrorists? Yet chemical weapons on civilians is just fine.

If we let these barbarians get comfortable using chemical weapons, they will all start using them. You think random AK-47 and truck attacks are horrible, wait until the Muzzies start gassing schools. Trump is putting these barbarians on notice, he won't tolerate that shit, even if you would.

Your fantasies about what I wrote and what I did write are quite different. Sending an effective message would stop their capability to do the same thing in the future. Assad has that ability. It was a ***** move made by someone wanting to change the subject from his ties to Russia. That you cheer such impotence is not surprising. Had Obama did it, you guys would be all over him for doing it without Congress's approval (as Trump did in 2013) or missing the runways and munitions used in the attack (as Trump did last week).

If Obama had done it, you would be cheering it. I never complained about Obama dropping bombs on Muslims. I only pointed out the hypocrisy of the left supporting Obama doing it knowing full well if it was a Republican you'd be howling about it. And here you are howling about it....

 

[candycorn]

Does it matter, if a conventional bomb kills a child, that child is just as dead.

Oh ok, so you don't believe in all the international agreements and laws banning chemical weapons then.

So the point had nothing to do with the children that were gassed (as Trump apparently lied about), it was about punishing the perpetrator? And we did that by not hitting the gas or preventing any more air-raids?

The point is when someone violates those agreements, you let them know you won't stand for it. Would you rather they keep using chemical weapons, and normalize the use of them by doing so?

Perhaps you don't know history very well. The Germans invented chemical warfare. Their reasoning for using it in World War I was that it would end the war quickly because it was so horrible. Instead, it caused an arms race as the allies quickly had to make their own chemical warfare program to counter the Germans. As the allies came up with defenses for their chemicals, the Germans would come up with a new horrible way of killing people. Got a gas mask that protects from one type of chemical? Then add in a non-lethal gas that penatrates the mask but makes the person vomit, forcing him to take off his mask and thus inhaling the lethal gas. This is the kind of shit the Germans came up with. Make no mistake, chemical weapons do not just instantly kill people like they show in movies. The victims are rendered defenseless and sick and in complete agony for weeks or even months before death. Imagine an intense burning sensation in your lungs and on your skin, and nothing can be done about it.

This is why the entire civilized world agreed to ban these weapons. You say torture is wrong to use on terrorists? Yet chemical weapons on civilians is just fine.

If we let these barbarians get comfortable using chemical weapons, they will all start using them. You think random AK-47 and truck attacks are horrible, wait until the Muzzies start gassing schools. Trump is putting these barbarians on notice, he won't tolerate that shit, even if you would.

Your fantasies about what I wrote and what I did write are quite different. Sending an effective message would stop their capability to do the same thing in the future. Assad has that ability. It was a ***** move made by someone wanting to change the subject from his ties to Russia. That you cheer such impotence is not surprising. Had Obama did it, you guys would be all over him for doing it without Congress's approval (as Trump did in 2013) or missing the runways and munitions used in the attack (as Trump did last week).

If Obama had done it, you would be cheering it. ..

**** off. For the record here is what I wrote at the time about Mr. Obama's plans:

Obama should just drop it. It's a tragedy; but American muscle can't prevent every tragedy.
You're making a mistake, Mr. President.

And...

The battle plan should be scrapped. There is no reason to send our military over there and there is no win to be had.
You're making a mistake Mr. President.

Your sock probably agreed with me at the time

 

[theHawk]

Oh ok, so you don't believe in all the international agreements and laws banning chemical weapons then.

So the point had nothing to do with the children that were gassed (as Trump apparently lied about), it was about punishing the perpetrator? And we did that by not hitting the gas or preventing any more air-raids?

The point is when someone violates those agreements, you let them know you won't stand for it. Would you rather they keep using chemical weapons, and normalize the use of them by doing so?

Perhaps you don't know history very well. The Germans invented chemical warfare. Their reasoning for using it in World War I was that it would end the war quickly because it was so horrible. Instead, it caused an arms race as the allies quickly had to make their own chemical warfare program to counter the Germans. As the allies came up with defenses for their chemicals, the Germans would come up with a new horrible way of killing people. Got a gas mask that protects from one type of chemical? Then add in a non-lethal gas that penatrates the mask but makes the person vomit, forcing him to take off his mask and thus inhaling the lethal gas. This is the kind of shit the Germans came up with. Make no mistake, chemical weapons do not just instantly kill people like they show in movies. The victims are rendered defenseless and sick and in complete agony for weeks or even months before death. Imagine an intense burning sensation in your lungs and on your skin, and nothing can be done about it.

This is why the entire civilized world agreed to ban these weapons. You say torture is wrong to use on terrorists? Yet chemical weapons on civilians is just fine.

If we let these barbarians get comfortable using chemical weapons, they will all start using them. You think random AK-47 and truck attacks are horrible, wait until the Muzzies start gassing schools. Trump is putting these barbarians on notice, he won't tolerate that shit, even if you would.

Your fantasies about what I wrote and what I did write are quite different. Sending an effective message would stop their capability to do the same thing in the future. Assad has that ability. It was a ***** move made by someone wanting to change the subject from his ties to Russia. That you cheer such impotence is not surprising. Had Obama did it, you guys would be all over him for doing it without Congress's approval (as Trump did in 2013) or missing the runways and munitions used in the attack (as Trump did last week).

If Obama had done it, you would be cheering it. ..

**** off. For the record here is what I wrote at the time about Mr. Obama's plans:

Obama should just drop it. It's a tragedy; but American muscle can't prevent every tragedy.
You're making a mistake, Mr. President.

And...

The battle plan should be scrapped. There is no reason to send our military over there and there is no win to be had.
You're making a mistake Mr. President.

Your sock probably agreed with me at the time

Good for you. If only all your progressive friends had any courage to say their Dear Leader was wrong.

By the way, do you remember how your Dear Leader dealt with the Syrians using chemical weapons at Ghouta in 2013? He "debated" with Euro allies about retaliating, but instead made an "agreement" with the Russians who promised Syria would turn over all their chemical weapons for destruction. Look how that worked out. Another failed Obama foreign policy disaster that Trump has to clean up.

Ghouta chemical attack - Wikipedia

 

[Billo_Really]

A coward
A democrat
Obama
All of the above

Obama's 'red line' failure assured crisis in Syria

That's a lot better than someone who makes up bullshit reasons to create parameters to cause violence.

 

[candycorn]

So the point had nothing to do with the children that were gassed (as Trump apparently lied about), it was about punishing the perpetrator? And we did that by not hitting the gas or preventing any more air-raids?

The point is when someone violates those agreements, you let them know you won't stand for it. Would you rather they keep using chemical weapons, and normalize the use of them by doing so?

Perhaps you don't know history very well. The Germans invented chemical warfare. Their reasoning for using it in World War I was that it would end the war quickly because it was so horrible. Instead, it caused an arms race as the allies quickly had to make their own chemical warfare program to counter the Germans. As the allies came up with defenses for their chemicals, the Germans would come up with a new horrible way of killing people. Got a gas mask that protects from one type of chemical? Then add in a non-lethal gas that penatrates the mask but makes the person vomit, forcing him to take off his mask and thus inhaling the lethal gas. This is the kind of shit the Germans came up with. Make no mistake, chemical weapons do not just instantly kill people like they show in movies. The victims are rendered defenseless and sick and in complete agony for weeks or even months before death. Imagine an intense burning sensation in your lungs and on your skin, and nothing can be done about it.

This is why the entire civilized world agreed to ban these weapons. You say torture is wrong to use on terrorists? Yet chemical weapons on civilians is just fine.

If we let these barbarians get comfortable using chemical weapons, they will all start using them. You think random AK-47 and truck attacks are horrible, wait until the Muzzies start gassing schools. Trump is putting these barbarians on notice, he won't tolerate that shit, even if you would.

Your fantasies about what I wrote and what I did write are quite different. Sending an effective message would stop their capability to do the same thing in the future. Assad has that ability. It was a ***** move made by someone wanting to change the subject from his ties to Russia. That you cheer such impotence is not surprising. Had Obama did it, you guys would be all over him for doing it without Congress's approval (as Trump did in 2013) or missing the runways and munitions used in the attack (as Trump did last week).

If Obama had done it, you would be cheering it. ..

**** off. For the record here is what I wrote at the time about Mr. Obama's plans:

Obama should just drop it. It's a tragedy; but American muscle can't prevent every tragedy.
You're making a mistake, Mr. President.

And...

The battle plan should be scrapped. There is no reason to send our military over there and there is no win to be had.
You're making a mistake Mr. President.

Your sock probably agreed with me at the time

Good for you. If only all your progressive friends had any courage to say their Dear Leader was wrong.

Now only if you had the courage to do the same with your messiah?

 

[theHawk]

The point is when someone violates those agreements, you let them know you won't stand for it. Would you rather they keep using chemical weapons, and normalize the use of them by doing so?

Perhaps you don't know history very well. The Germans invented chemical warfare. Their reasoning for using it in World War I was that it would end the war quickly because it was so horrible. Instead, it caused an arms race as the allies quickly had to make their own chemical warfare program to counter the Germans. As the allies came up with defenses for their chemicals, the Germans would come up with a new horrible way of killing people. Got a gas mask that protects from one type of chemical? Then add in a non-lethal gas that penatrates the mask but makes the person vomit, forcing him to take off his mask and thus inhaling the lethal gas. This is the kind of shit the Germans came up with. Make no mistake, chemical weapons do not just instantly kill people like they show in movies. The victims are rendered defenseless and sick and in complete agony for weeks or even months before death. Imagine an intense burning sensation in your lungs and on your skin, and nothing can be done about it.

This is why the entire civilized world agreed to ban these weapons. You say torture is wrong to use on terrorists? Yet chemical weapons on civilians is just fine.

If we let these barbarians get comfortable using chemical weapons, they will all start using them. You think random AK-47 and truck attacks are horrible, wait until the Muzzies start gassing schools. Trump is putting these barbarians on notice, he won't tolerate that shit, even if you would.

Your fantasies about what I wrote and what I did write are quite different. Sending an effective message would stop their capability to do the same thing in the future. Assad has that ability. It was a ***** move made by someone wanting to change the subject from his ties to Russia. That you cheer such impotence is not surprising. Had Obama did it, you guys would be all over him for doing it without Congress's approval (as Trump did in 2013) or missing the runways and munitions used in the attack (as Trump did last week).

If Obama had done it, you would be cheering it. ..

**** off. For the record here is what I wrote at the time about Mr. Obama's plans:

Obama should just drop it. It's a tragedy; but American muscle can't prevent every tragedy.
You're making a mistake, Mr. President.

And...

The battle plan should be scrapped. There is no reason to send our military over there and there is no win to be had.
You're making a mistake Mr. President.

Your sock probably agreed with me at the time

Good for you. If only all your progressive friends had any courage to say their Dear Leader was wrong.

Now only if you had the courage to do the same with your messiah?

I will if Trump ever makes a mistake.