What do liberals think about Trump's statement he was spied on now?

[Faun]

Page had virtually no connection to the Trump Campaign.

If he "virtually no connection to the Trump Campaign" (which IS mostly true) why did HIS name come up as the "mark" to monitor to get to Trump colluding with the Russians? Nice that you KNOW he wasn't connected to the campaign anyways. But you could have stopped CNN from about 100 hours of airtime claiming he was the KEY to dethroning Trump..

Again, for the hard of learning, there were so many others they could have spied on if their intent was to spy on Trump. There were many people attached to the Trump campaign who had connections to Russia; anyone of whom had closer ties to Trump other than Page -- who never once even spoke with Trump.

 

[Faun]

Could the FBI find evidence without THAT FISC order? Sure- if they have the ability to get a FISC on anyone- they could have requested one for each of Trump's campaign inner circle.

No. Actually they couldn't do that. The topic was "collusion with the Russians" and Page was their best bet on that play. Except that his contribution to the Trump Campaign was very near zero. Never attended a committee meeting. Never talked to the upper reaches of the Campaign staff.

No way the FISC would approve a request based on Russian collusion for just ANY member of the team..

Page lived in Russia while he opened Merrill Lynch over there. Is a Russian expert on their energy reserves and had COOPERATED with the FBI many times in the past. They USED him as an "unwitting" informant in their zest to get dirt on the Republican campaign staff.

Bullshit.

Page had almost no connection to the Trump campaign. There are 100 other people they could have spied on if their goal was to spy on Trump. His doorman would have yielded more information than Page.

They needed an excuse to get the FISA warrant approved. Page went to Russia. That was their excuse.

Bullshit. Page had virtually no connection to the Trump campaign.

You've said that MANY TIMES. But in reality, it means nothing. Page didn't even have to talk to anyone in the campaign. If they even sent him an offer to be an adviser --- they already HAVE a linked association to a high campaign official. Announcements of meetings that he never attended, would be another connection opened. Campaign officials communicating amongst themselves with messages like "Who the **** is Carter Page" are another line that can lead surveillance on those people in the campaign.

EVERY ONE of those mentions --- gives them legal excuse to go off in another direction..

That's how you infiltrate a conspiracy with spy tools and the law the way it is.

If Page had never talked to anyone in the campaign, how the **** do you think they spied on Trump by proxy of Page?

 

[flacaltenn]

They needed an excuse to get the FISA warrant approved. Page went to Russia. That was their excuse.

Bullshit. Page had virtually no connection to the Trump campaign.

How does that change the fact that they needed an excuse to spy on someone in the Trump campaign?

You really should stop lying. They didn't spy on anyone in the Trump campaign.

Saying that 10,000 times won't make it true.

Page left the campaign in September, 2016.

The warrant to spy on him was issued in October, 2016.

Just how big of a ******* moron are you to not know that after all this time?

Told you why that doesn't matter.. My GAWD you're dense. And Clueless and apparently gullible..

 

[kaz]

Bullshit.

Page had almost no connection to the Trump campaign. There are 100 other people they could have spied on if their goal was to spy on Trump. His doorman would have yielded more information than Page.

They needed an excuse to get the FISA warrant approved. Page went to Russia. That was their excuse.

Bullshit. Page had virtually no connection to the Trump campaign.

It's like I'm saying 'A' therefor 'B,' and you're saying "there's nothing lovelier than a tree."

Li'l Kim may not actually speak English. He posts hating points from his North Korean commanders, but there is little evidence that he has any grasp of what the shit he posts means.

He's just a troll.

He seldom addresses your points. He usually just attacks you personally, or he harps on some trivial and irrelevant error in your post.

Leftists have to attack you personally because if they didn't, they'd have nothing

 

[flacaltenn]

No. Actually they couldn't do that. The topic was "collusion with the Russians" and Page was their best bet on that play. Except that his contribution to the Trump Campaign was very near zero. Never attended a committee meeting. Never talked to the upper reaches of the Campaign staff.

No way the FISC would approve a request based on Russian collusion for just ANY member of the team..

Page lived in Russia while he opened Merrill Lynch over there. Is a Russian expert on their energy reserves and had COOPERATED with the FBI many times in the past. They USED him as an "unwitting" informant in their zest to get dirt on the Republican campaign staff.

Bullshit.

Page had almost no connection to the Trump campaign. There are 100 other people they could have spied on if their goal was to spy on Trump. His doorman would have yielded more information than Page.

They needed an excuse to get the FISA warrant approved. Page went to Russia. That was their excuse.

Bullshit. Page had virtually no connection to the Trump campaign.

You've said that MANY TIMES. But in reality, it means nothing. Page didn't even have to talk to anyone in the campaign. If they even sent him an offer to be an adviser --- they already HAVE a linked association to a high campaign official. Announcements of meetings that he never attended, would be another connection opened. Campaign officials communicating amongst themselves with messages like "Who the **** is Carter Page" are another line that can lead surveillance on those people in the campaign.

EVERY ONE of those mentions --- gives them legal excuse to go off in another direction..

That's how you infiltrate a conspiracy with spy tools and the law the way it is.

If Page had never talked to anyone in the campaign, how the **** do you think they spied on Trump by proxy of Page?

JUST TOLD YOU. ANY contact from the Trump campaign to him --- Like his ******* nomination letter or campaign aides DISCUSSING who he is --- now allows them to make queries about THAT TRUMP official.

Take more time to learn to think critically. You're way too slow and dense to get this while typing..

 

[flacaltenn]

Page had virtually no connection to the Trump Campaign.

If he "virtually no connection to the Trump Campaign" (which IS mostly true) why did HIS name come up as the "mark" to monitor to get to Trump colluding with the Russians? Nice that you KNOW he wasn't connected to the campaign anyways. But you could have stopped CNN from about 100 hours of airtime claiming he was the KEY to dethroning Trump..

Again, for the hard of learning, there were so many others they could have spied on if their intent was to spy on Trump. There were many people attached to the Trump campaign who had connections to Russia; anyone of whom had closer ties to Trump other than Page -- who never once even spoke with Trump.

Old CNN propaganda dies hard. Hard to deprogram these droids... Gonna need a lot of sanitariums for the disabled party warriors when this goes to the top of the minds of folks right before mid-terms.. It's gonna be quiet and lonely around here.. We'll miss y'all while youre recuperating from trauma...

 

[flacaltenn]

Today's Intel tip of day for Faun and the other CNN mushrooms is on "reverse targeting"... A well-know surveillance term.. At least to people paying attention the Civil Liberties crisis here.

Pop quiz tomorrow -- read and ask questions..

Rand Paul Is Right: NSA Routinely Monitors Americans’ Communications Without Warrants

Paul explained how the NSA routinely and deliberately spies on Americans’ communications — listens to their calls and reads their emails — without a judicial warrant of any kind:

The way it works is, the FISA court, through Section 702, wiretaps foreigners and then [NSA] listens to Americans. It is a backdoor search of Americans. And because they have so much data, they can tap — type Donald Trump into their vast resources of people they are tapping overseas, and they get all of his phone calls.

And so they did this to President Obama. They — 1,227 times eavesdrops on President Obama’s phone calls. Then they mask him. But here is the problem. And General Hayden said this the other day. He said even low-level employees can unmask the caller. That is probably what happened to Flynn.

They are not targeting Americans. They are targeting foreigners. But they are doing it purposefully to get to Americans.

Paul’s explanation is absolutely correct. That the NSA is empowered to spy on Americans’ communications without a warrant — in direct contravention of the core Fourth Amendment guarantee that “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause” — is the dirty little secret of the U.S. Surveillance State.

 

[Faun]

Today's Intel tip of day for Faun and the other CNN mushrooms is on "reverse targeting"... A well-know surveillance term.. At least to people paying attention the Civil Liberties crisis here.

Pop quiz tomorrow -- read and ask questions..

Rand Paul Is Right: NSA Routinely Monitors Americans’ Communications Without Warrants

Paul explained how the NSA routinely and deliberately spies on Americans’ communications — listens to their calls and reads their emails — without a judicial warrant of any kind:

The way it works is, the FISA court, through Section 702, wiretaps foreigners and then [NSA] listens to Americans. It is a backdoor search of Americans. And because they have so much data, they can tap — type Donald Trump into their vast resources of people they are tapping overseas, and they get all of his phone calls.

And so they did this to President Obama. They — 1,227 times eavesdrops on President Obama’s phone calls. Then they mask him. But here is the problem. And General Hayden said this the other day. He said even low-level employees can unmask the caller. That is probably what happened to Flynn.

They are not targeting Americans. They are targeting foreigners. But they are doing it purposefully to get to Americans.

Paul’s explanation is absolutely correct. That the NSA is empowered to spy on Americans’ communications without a warrant — in direct contravention of the core Fourth Amendment guarantee that “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause” — is the dirty little secret of the U.S. Surveillance State.

Holyshit!

Your own link!

DICKERSON: Another unanswered question in Washington, what evidence did the president have for his bombshell charge that President Obama had wiretapped Trump Tower during the campaign?

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
DICKERSON: You are the member of the Gang -- the so-called Gang of 8, the top leaders who get this information. Have you seen anything to suggest there are wiretaps?

RYAN: No.​

Now would be an optimal time for you to go **** yourself.

 

[flacaltenn]

How does that change the fact that they needed an excuse to spy on someone in the Trump campaign?

You really should stop lying. They didn't spy on anyone in the Trump campaign.

Saying that 10,000 times won't make it true.

Page left the campaign in September, 2016.

The warrant to spy on him was issued in October, 2016.

Just how big of a ******* moron are you to not know that after all this time?

Told you why that doesn't matter.. My GAWD you're dense. And Clueless and apparently gullible..

Your words are meaningless without any proof to back them up. You really should know that by now.

Then what are your words worth without the monumental effort that I employed to provide LINKS and the incredible patience I exhibit with trolls?

 

[Faun]

You really should stop lying. They didn't spy on anyone in the Trump campaign.

Saying that 10,000 times won't make it true.

Page left the campaign in September, 2016.

The warrant to spy on him was issued in October, 2016.

Just how big of a ******* moron are you to not know that after all this time?

Told you why that doesn't matter.. My GAWD you're dense. And Clueless and apparently gullible..

Your words are meaningless without any proof to back them up. You really should know that by now.

Then what are your words worth without the monumental effort that I employed to provide LINKS and the incredible patience I exhibit with trolls?

I'll use your link...

DICKERSON: Another unanswered question in Washington, what evidence did the president have for his bombshell charge that President Obama had wiretapped Trump Tower during the campaign?

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
DICKERSON: You are the member of the Gang -- the so-called Gang of 8, the top leaders who get this information. Have you seen anything to suggest there are wiretaps?

RYAN: No.​

 

[flacaltenn]

Today's Intel tip of day for Faun and the other CNN mushrooms is on "reverse targeting"... A well-know surveillance term.. At least to people paying attention the Civil Liberties crisis here.

Pop quiz tomorrow -- read and ask questions..

Rand Paul Is Right: NSA Routinely Monitors Americans’ Communications Without Warrants

Paul explained how the NSA routinely and deliberately spies on Americans’ communications — listens to their calls and reads their emails — without a judicial warrant of any kind:

The way it works is, the FISA court, through Section 702, wiretaps foreigners and then [NSA] listens to Americans. It is a backdoor search of Americans. And because they have so much data, they can tap — type Donald Trump into their vast resources of people they are tapping overseas, and they get all of his phone calls.

And so they did this to President Obama. They — 1,227 times eavesdrops on President Obama’s phone calls. Then they mask him. But here is the problem. And General Hayden said this the other day. He said even low-level employees can unmask the caller. That is probably what happened to Flynn.

They are not targeting Americans. They are targeting foreigners. But they are doing it purposefully to get to Americans.

Paul’s explanation is absolutely correct. That the NSA is empowered to spy on Americans’ communications without a warrant — in direct contravention of the core Fourth Amendment guarantee that “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause” — is the dirty little secret of the U.S. Surveillance State.

Holyshit!

Your own link!

DICKERSON: Another unanswered question in Washington, what evidence did the president have for his bombshell charge that President Obama had wiretapped Trump Tower during the campaign?

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
DICKERSON: You are the member of the Gang -- the so-called Gang of 8, the top leaders who get this information. Have you seen anything to suggest there are wiretaps?

RYAN: No.​

Now would be an optimal time for you to go **** yourself.

Not really.. Trump was NOT wiretapped... His campaign was spied on. Folks tend to be very specific on serious charges. And TRUMP DIRECTLY was not surveilled that we KNOW of. Doesn't mean his CAMPAIGN was not spied on..

Besides, I see no "Dickerson" exchange in my link... Provide the quote in relationship to the article I linked.

 

[Rambunctious]

Whether anyone admits it or not...we are all wise enough to know what took place here and why this investigation is happening and how it got started...The left does not like to relinquish power even when they lose as bad as they did to Trump....Prison time needs to be part of this.....The left needs to learn a hard lesson.... Never to try this again....

 

[Faun]

Today's Intel tip of day for Faun and the other CNN mushrooms is on "reverse targeting"... A well-know surveillance term.. At least to people paying attention the Civil Liberties crisis here.

Pop quiz tomorrow -- read and ask questions..

Rand Paul Is Right: NSA Routinely Monitors Americans’ Communications Without Warrants

Paul explained how the NSA routinely and deliberately spies on Americans’ communications — listens to their calls and reads their emails — without a judicial warrant of any kind:

The way it works is, the FISA court, through Section 702, wiretaps foreigners and then [NSA] listens to Americans. It is a backdoor search of Americans. And because they have so much data, they can tap — type Donald Trump into their vast resources of people they are tapping overseas, and they get all of his phone calls.

And so they did this to President Obama. They — 1,227 times eavesdrops on President Obama’s phone calls. Then they mask him. But here is the problem. And General Hayden said this the other day. He said even low-level employees can unmask the caller. That is probably what happened to Flynn.

They are not targeting Americans. They are targeting foreigners. But they are doing it purposefully to get to Americans.

Paul’s explanation is absolutely correct. That the NSA is empowered to spy on Americans’ communications without a warrant — in direct contravention of the core Fourth Amendment guarantee that “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause” — is the dirty little secret of the U.S. Surveillance State.

Holyshit!

Your own link!

DICKERSON: Another unanswered question in Washington, what evidence did the president have for his bombshell charge that President Obama had wiretapped Trump Tower during the campaign?

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
DICKERSON: You are the member of the Gang -- the so-called Gang of 8, the top leaders who get this information. Have you seen anything to suggest there are wiretaps?

RYAN: No.​

Now would be an optimal time for you to go **** yourself.

Not really.. Trump was NOT wiretapped... His campaign was spied on. Folks tend to be very specific on serious charges. And TRUMP DIRECTLY was not surveilled that we KNOW of. Doesn't mean his CAMPAIGN was not spied on..

Besides, I see no "Dickerson" exchange in my link... Provide the quote in relationship to the article I linked.

LOL

You're too ******* stupid to bother with.

I cut and pasted that dialog from your link.

And wtf? You think Ryan doesn't know what you claim to know?

 

[flacaltenn]

Today's Intel tip of day for Faun and the other CNN mushrooms is on "reverse targeting"... A well-know surveillance term.. At least to people paying attention the Civil Liberties crisis here.

Pop quiz tomorrow -- read and ask questions..

Rand Paul Is Right: NSA Routinely Monitors Americans’ Communications Without Warrants

Paul explained how the NSA routinely and deliberately spies on Americans’ communications — listens to their calls and reads their emails — without a judicial warrant of any kind:

The way it works is, the FISA court, through Section 702, wiretaps foreigners and then [NSA] listens to Americans. It is a backdoor search of Americans. And because they have so much data, they can tap — type Donald Trump into their vast resources of people they are tapping overseas, and they get all of his phone calls.

And so they did this to President Obama. They — 1,227 times eavesdrops on President Obama’s phone calls. Then they mask him. But here is the problem. And General Hayden said this the other day. He said even low-level employees can unmask the caller. That is probably what happened to Flynn.

They are not targeting Americans. They are targeting foreigners. But they are doing it purposefully to get to Americans.

Paul’s explanation is absolutely correct. That the NSA is empowered to spy on Americans’ communications without a warrant — in direct contravention of the core Fourth Amendment guarantee that “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause” — is the dirty little secret of the U.S. Surveillance State.

Holyshit!

Your own link!

DICKERSON: Another unanswered question in Washington, what evidence did the president have for his bombshell charge that President Obama had wiretapped Trump Tower during the campaign?

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
DICKERSON: You are the member of the Gang -- the so-called Gang of 8, the top leaders who get this information. Have you seen anything to suggest there are wiretaps?

RYAN: No.​

Now would be an optimal time for you to go **** yourself.

Not really.. Trump was NOT wiretapped... His campaign was spied on. Folks tend to be very specific on serious charges. And TRUMP DIRECTLY was not surveilled that we KNOW of. Doesn't mean his CAMPAIGN was not spied on..

Besides, I see no "Dickerson" exchange in my link... Provide the quote in relationship to the article I linked.

LOL

You're too ******* stupid to bother with.

I cut and pasted that dialog from your link.

And wtf? You think Ryan doesn't know what you claim to know?

You talking about the Intercept (Greenberg) link I just posted? Because searching for Ryan returns ZERO hits.

 

[Rambunctious]

LOL

You're too ******* stupid to bother with.

I cut and pasted that dialog from your link.

And wtf? You think Ryan doesn't know what you claim to know?

That time? got it.....you are wrong except it...

 

[Faun]

LOL

You're too ******* stupid to bother with.

I cut and pasted that dialog from your link.

And wtf? You think Ryan doesn't know what you claim to know?

That time? got it.....you are wrong except it...

LOL

Spits the idiot who claims the FBI paid Steele -- and posts not one, but two links stating the FBI didn't pay him.

Why on Earth would I believe anything you say? You're one of the dumbest poster on this site.

 

[Rambunctious]

Spits the idiot who claims the FBI paid Steele -- and posts not one, but two links stating the FBI didn't pay him.

Why on Earth would I believe anything you say? You're one of the dumbest poster on this site.

 

[Faun]

Today's Intel tip of day for Faun and the other CNN mushrooms is on "reverse targeting"... A well-know surveillance term.. At least to people paying attention the Civil Liberties crisis here.

Pop quiz tomorrow -- read and ask questions..

Rand Paul Is Right: NSA Routinely Monitors Americans’ Communications Without Warrants

Paul explained how the NSA routinely and deliberately spies on Americans’ communications — listens to their calls and reads their emails — without a judicial warrant of any kind:

The way it works is, the FISA court, through Section 702, wiretaps foreigners and then [NSA] listens to Americans. It is a backdoor search of Americans. And because they have so much data, they can tap — type Donald Trump into their vast resources of people they are tapping overseas, and they get all of his phone calls.

And so they did this to President Obama. They — 1,227 times eavesdrops on President Obama’s phone calls. Then they mask him. But here is the problem. And General Hayden said this the other day. He said even low-level employees can unmask the caller. That is probably what happened to Flynn.

They are not targeting Americans. They are targeting foreigners. But they are doing it purposefully to get to Americans.

Paul’s explanation is absolutely correct. That the NSA is empowered to spy on Americans’ communications without a warrant — in direct contravention of the core Fourth Amendment guarantee that “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause” — is the dirty little secret of the U.S. Surveillance State.

Holyshit!

Your own link!

DICKERSON: Another unanswered question in Washington, what evidence did the president have for his bombshell charge that President Obama had wiretapped Trump Tower during the campaign?

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
DICKERSON: You are the member of the Gang -- the so-called Gang of 8, the top leaders who get this information. Have you seen anything to suggest there are wiretaps?

RYAN: No.​

Now would be an optimal time for you to go **** yourself.

Not really.. Trump was NOT wiretapped... His campaign was spied on. Folks tend to be very specific on serious charges. And TRUMP DIRECTLY was not surveilled that we KNOW of. Doesn't mean his CAMPAIGN was not spied on..

Besides, I see no "Dickerson" exchange in my link... Provide the quote in relationship to the article I linked.

LOL

You're too ******* stupid to bother with.

I cut and pasted that dialog from your link.

And wtf? You think Ryan doesn't know what you claim to know?

You talking about the Intercept (Greenberg) link I just posted? Because searching for Ryan returns ZERO hits.

I'm talking about the link you posted which contained the dialog from which I cut and pasted here.

C'mon, this isn't rocket science. You posted a link and I used your link to show that Ryan said Trump was full of shit (in not so many words) when he claimed Obama wiretapped him in Trump Tower.

 

[flacaltenn]

Today's Intel tip of day for Faun and the other CNN mushrooms is on "reverse targeting"... A well-know surveillance term.. At least to people paying attention the Civil Liberties crisis here.

Pop quiz tomorrow -- read and ask questions..

Rand Paul Is Right: NSA Routinely Monitors Americans’ Communications Without Warrants

Paul explained how the NSA routinely and deliberately spies on Americans’ communications — listens to their calls and reads their emails — without a judicial warrant of any kind:

The way it works is, the FISA court, through Section 702, wiretaps foreigners and then [NSA] listens to Americans. It is a backdoor search of Americans. And because they have so much data, they can tap — type Donald Trump into their vast resources of people they are tapping overseas, and they get all of his phone calls.

And so they did this to President Obama. They — 1,227 times eavesdrops on President Obama’s phone calls. Then they mask him. But here is the problem. And General Hayden said this the other day. He said even low-level employees can unmask the caller. That is probably what happened to Flynn.

They are not targeting Americans. They are targeting foreigners. But they are doing it purposefully to get to Americans.

Paul’s explanation is absolutely correct. That the NSA is empowered to spy on Americans’ communications without a warrant — in direct contravention of the core Fourth Amendment guarantee that “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause” — is the dirty little secret of the U.S. Surveillance State.

Holyshit!

Your own link!

DICKERSON: Another unanswered question in Washington, what evidence did the president have for his bombshell charge that President Obama had wiretapped Trump Tower during the campaign?

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
DICKERSON: You are the member of the Gang -- the so-called Gang of 8, the top leaders who get this information. Have you seen anything to suggest there are wiretaps?

RYAN: No.​

Now would be an optimal time for you to go **** yourself.

Not really.. Trump was NOT wiretapped... His campaign was spied on. Folks tend to be very specific on serious charges. And TRUMP DIRECTLY was not surveilled that we KNOW of. Doesn't mean his CAMPAIGN was not spied on..

Besides, I see no "Dickerson" exchange in my link... Provide the quote in relationship to the article I linked.

LOL

You're too ******* stupid to bother with.

I cut and pasted that dialog from your link.

And wtf? You think Ryan doesn't know what you claim to know?

You talking about the Intercept (Greenberg) link I just posted? Because searching for Ryan returns ZERO hits.

I'm talking about the link you posted which contained the dialog from which I cut and pasted here.

C'mon, this isn't rocket science. You posted a link and I used your link to show that Ryan said Trump was full of shit (in not so many words) when he claimed Obama wiretapped him in Trump Tower.

WHICH LINK DUFUS? It's not in the last article I posted. Not brain surgery to specify WHICH article I posted.

 

[Faun]

Holyshit!

Your own link!

DICKERSON: Another unanswered question in Washington, what evidence did the president have for his bombshell charge that President Obama had wiretapped Trump Tower during the campaign?

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
DICKERSON: You are the member of the Gang -- the so-called Gang of 8, the top leaders who get this information. Have you seen anything to suggest there are wiretaps?

RYAN: No.​

Now would be an optimal time for you to go **** yourself.

Not really.. Trump was NOT wiretapped... His campaign was spied on. Folks tend to be very specific on serious charges. And TRUMP DIRECTLY was not surveilled that we KNOW of. Doesn't mean his CAMPAIGN was not spied on..

Besides, I see no "Dickerson" exchange in my link... Provide the quote in relationship to the article I linked.

LOL

You're too ******* stupid to bother with.

I cut and pasted that dialog from your link.

And wtf? You think Ryan doesn't know what you claim to know?

You talking about the Intercept (Greenberg) link I just posted? Because searching for Ryan returns ZERO hits.

I'm talking about the link you posted which contained the dialog from which I cut and pasted here.

C'mon, this isn't rocket science. You posted a link and I used your link to show that Ryan said Trump was full of shit (in not so many words) when he claimed Obama wiretapped him in Trump Tower.

WHICH LINK DUFUS? It's not in the last article I posted. Not brain surgery to specify WHICH article I posted.

Ok, I owe you an apology. I was wrong when I said I cut and pasted from your link; it was actually from a link from your link.

The link from which I quoted came from the link you posted. The dialog is not directly on your link.

Your link starts with...

ON SUNDAY’S Face the Nation, Sen. Rand Paul was asked about President Trump’s accusation that President Obama ordered the NSA to wiretap his calls. The Kentucky senator expressed skepticism about the mechanics of Trump’s specific charge, saying: “I doubt that Trump was a target directly of any kind of eavesdropping.”​

was asked took me to Ryan saying there was no evidence to support Trump's claims.