What Complete Nonsense

[Ray From Cleveland]

Are you saying the judge is ruling on what Trump said, and not on the contents of the EO?

Possibly the ruling was based upon intent.

Nobody can say Trump's intent was to keep Muslims out of the country when most of the worlds Muslims are still allowed in.

Obviously 2 judges did.

Yes, activist judges who are usurping our legislative process. The law is very clear and not in the least way ambiguous. If we allow these tyrants to create law on the bench, the country is doomed. Both should be removed from their position.

Spoken like a true asshole who knows zero about our judicial system

If you believe that judges have the right to decide against laws simply because they don't like them or because it doesn't fit their political agenda it's you that knows nothing about our judicial system yet alone understand the rolls of government branches.

 

[Billo_Really]

Trump should order DHS, ICE and other agencies to comply in full with the first EO, right now. and make a short statement that until these judges can provide proof of their constitutional authority to override HIS clear constitutional authority, their rulings on this matter will be ignored.

Trump Admin Challenges Hawaii Judge’s Halt On New Travel Ban

I we supposed to call Trump Chancellor now?

 

[brummelben]

Trump cannot order anyone to comply with his EO. To do so, would create an immediate avenue to his impeachment

Please explain your contention using any legal statutes or mandates you choose.

Look up abuse of power, sweetie

Using the language contained in the EO and any other legal statutes or mandates you may choose to prove your contention of an abuse of power.

Jeez, you people just say stuff for the hell of it, don't you.

Just what does your kind know or even care about mandates or statutes?

Obviously more than your kind.

tell us about your legal credentials?

 

[brummelben]

Possibly the ruling was based upon intent.

Nobody can say Trump's intent was to keep Muslims out of the country when most of the worlds Muslims are still allowed in.

Obviously 2 judges did.

Yes, activist judges who are usurping our legislative process. The law is very clear and not in the least way ambiguous. If we allow these tyrants to create law on the bench, the country is doomed. Both should be removed from their position.

Spoken like a true asshole who knows zero about our judicial system

If you believe that judges have the right to decide against laws simply because they don't like them or because it doesn't fit their political agenda it's you that knows nothing about our judicial system yet alone understand the rolls of government branches.

Its not what I believe, **** face, its what the judges rule

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Trump should order DHS, ICE and other agencies to comply in full with the first EO, right now. and make a short statement that until these judges can provide proof of their constitutional authority to override HIS clear constitutional authority, their rulings on this matter will be ignored.

So Donald Trump should unconstitutionally go around the courts because you don't agree that the first EO was halted on a constitutional basis?

Please explain the constitutional basis upon which either of the EOs was stopped.

Since Trump's constitutional authority in this matter is applied at HIS discretion, there was no unconstitutional action.

 

[brummelben]

Trump should order DHS, ICE and other agencies to comply in full with the first EO, right now. and make a short statement that until these judges can provide proof of their constitutional authority to override HIS clear constitutional authority, their rulings on this matter will be ignored.

So Donald Trump should unconstitutionally go around the courts because you don't agree that the first EO was halted on a constitutional basis?

Please explain the constitutional basis upon which either of the EOs was stopped.

Since Trump's constitutional authority in this matter is applied at HIS discretion, there was no unconstitutional action.

I think you are wrong

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Please explain your contention using any legal statutes or mandates you choose.

Look up abuse of power, sweetie

Using the language contained in the EO and any other legal statutes or mandates you may choose to prove your contention of an abuse of power.

Jeez, you people just say stuff for the hell of it, don't you.

Just what does your kind know or even care about mandates or statutes?

Obviously more than your kind.

tell us about your legal credentials?

Sufficient to the task.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Trump should order DHS, ICE and other agencies to comply in full with the first EO, right now. and make a short statement that until these judges can provide proof of their constitutional authority to override HIS clear constitutional authority, their rulings on this matter will be ignored.

So Donald Trump should unconstitutionally go around the courts because you don't agree that the first EO was halted on a constitutional basis?

Please explain the constitutional basis upon which either of the EOs was stopped.

Since Trump's constitutional authority in this matter is applied at HIS discretion, there was no unconstitutional action.

I think you are wrong

Very well.

Explain why and how I am wrong.

 

[brummelben]

Look up abuse of power, sweetie

Using the language contained in the EO and any other legal statutes or mandates you may choose to prove your contention of an abuse of power.

Jeez, you people just say stuff for the hell of it, don't you.

Just what does your kind know or even care about mandates or statutes?

Obviously more than your kind.

tell us about your legal credentials?

Sufficient to the task.

zero

 

[brummelben]

Trump should order DHS, ICE and other agencies to comply in full with the first EO, right now. and make a short statement that until these judges can provide proof of their constitutional authority to override HIS clear constitutional authority, their rulings on this matter will be ignored.

So Donald Trump should unconstitutionally go around the courts because you don't agree that the first EO was halted on a constitutional basis?

Please explain the constitutional basis upon which either of the EOs was stopped.

Since Trump's constitutional authority in this matter is applied at HIS discretion, there was no unconstitutional action.

I think you are wrong

Very well.

Explain why and how I am wrong.

Easy- the judge ruled so. End of story

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Trump should order DHS, ICE and other agencies to comply in full with the first EO, right now. and make a short statement that until these judges can provide proof of their constitutional authority to override HIS clear constitutional authority, their rulings on this matter will be ignored.

So Donald Trump should unconstitutionally go around the courts because you don't agree that the first EO was halted on a constitutional basis?

Please explain the constitutional basis upon which either of the EOs was stopped.

Since Trump's constitutional authority in this matter is applied at HIS discretion, there was no unconstitutional action.

I think you are wrong

Now please read this (very slowly if needed) and tell us where we are wrong

 

[Auld Phart]

Trump should order DHS, ICE and other agencies to comply in full with the first EO, right now. and make a short statement that until these judges can provide proof of their constitutional authority to override HIS clear constitutional authority, their rulings on this matter will be ignored.

So Donald Trump should unconstitutionally go around the courts because you don't agree that the first EO was halted on a constitutional basis?

Please explain the constitutional basis upon which either of the EOs was stopped.

Since Trump's constitutional authority in this matter is applied at HIS discretion, there was no unconstitutional action.

I think you are wrong

"I think"

you are wrong

 

[brummelben]

Trump should order DHS, ICE and other agencies to comply in full with the first EO, right now. and make a short statement that until these judges can provide proof of their constitutional authority to override HIS clear constitutional authority, their rulings on this matter will be ignored.

So Donald Trump should unconstitutionally go around the courts because you don't agree that the first EO was halted on a constitutional basis?

Please explain the constitutional basis upon which either of the EOs was stopped.

Since Trump's constitutional authority in this matter is applied at HIS discretion, there was no unconstitutional action.

I think you are wrong

View attachment 117445

Now please read this (very slowly if needed) and tell us where we are wrong

Multiple judges have ruled against Trump. Ask them

 

[brummelben]

Trump should order DHS, ICE and other agencies to comply in full with the first EO, right now. and make a short statement that until these judges can provide proof of their constitutional authority to override HIS clear constitutional authority, their rulings on this matter will be ignored.

So Donald Trump should unconstitutionally go around the courts because you don't agree that the first EO was halted on a constitutional basis?

Please explain the constitutional basis upon which either of the EOs was stopped.

Since Trump's constitutional authority in this matter is applied at HIS discretion, there was no unconstitutional action.

I think you are wrong

"I think"

you are wrong

If I was wrong Rumps ban would be in effect today. Is it?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Trump should order DHS, ICE and other agencies to comply in full with the first EO, right now. and make a short statement that until these judges can provide proof of their constitutional authority to override HIS clear constitutional authority, their rulings on this matter will be ignored.

So Donald Trump should unconstitutionally go around the courts because you don't agree that the first EO was halted on a constitutional basis?

Please explain the constitutional basis upon which either of the EOs was stopped.

Since Trump's constitutional authority in this matter is applied at HIS discretion, there was no unconstitutional action.

I think you are wrong

Very well.

Explain why and how I am wrong.

Easy- the judge ruled so. End of story

End of story?

Okay, let's say your mother or sister got raped and they caught the guy who did it. He goes to court and even admits to the crime. But the judge doesn't believe rape is really a crime, so he finds the defendant not guilty. Would you say end of story?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Trump should order DHS, ICE and other agencies to comply in full with the first EO, right now. and make a short statement that until these judges can provide proof of their constitutional authority to override HIS clear constitutional authority, their rulings on this matter will be ignored.

So Donald Trump should unconstitutionally go around the courts because you don't agree that the first EO was halted on a constitutional basis?

Please explain the constitutional basis upon which either of the EOs was stopped.

Since Trump's constitutional authority in this matter is applied at HIS discretion, there was no unconstitutional action.

I think you are wrong

View attachment 117445

Now please read this (very slowly if needed) and tell us where we are wrong

Multiple judges have ruled against Trump. Ask them

No, I can't ask them. Since you are here defending their ruling, I'm asking you. After all, that's why you got involved in this thread, isn't it?

 

[brummelben]

So Donald Trump should unconstitutionally go around the courts because you don't agree that the first EO was halted on a constitutional basis?

Please explain the constitutional basis upon which either of the EOs was stopped.

Since Trump's constitutional authority in this matter is applied at HIS discretion, there was no unconstitutional action.

I think you are wrong

Very well.

Explain why and how I am wrong.

Easy- the judge ruled so. End of story

End of story?

Okay, let's say your mother or sister got raped and they caught the guy who did it. He goes to court and even admits to the crime. But the judge doesn't believe rape is really a crime, so he finds the defendant not guilty. Would you say end of story?

My mother or sister were not raped

 

[Auld Phart]

Trump should order DHS, ICE and other agencies to comply in full with the first EO, right now. and make a short statement that until these judges can provide proof of their constitutional authority to override HIS clear constitutional authority, their rulings on this matter will be ignored.

So Donald Trump should unconstitutionally go around the courts because you don't agree that the first EO was halted on a constitutional basis?

Please explain the constitutional basis upon which either of the EOs was stopped.

Since Trump's constitutional authority in this matter is applied at HIS discretion, there was no unconstitutional action.

I think you are wrong

View attachment 117445

Now please read this (very slowly if needed) and tell us where we are wrong

Multiple judges have ruled against Trump. Ask them

But, the judges said...

Why don' you try thinking past your daily talking points?

 

[brummelben]

So Donald Trump should unconstitutionally go around the courts because you don't agree that the first EO was halted on a constitutional basis?

Please explain the constitutional basis upon which either of the EOs was stopped.

Since Trump's constitutional authority in this matter is applied at HIS discretion, there was no unconstitutional action.

I think you are wrong

View attachment 117445

Now please read this (very slowly if needed) and tell us where we are wrong

Multiple judges have ruled against Trump. Ask them

No, I can't ask them. Since you are here defending their ruling, I'm asking you. After all, that's why you got involved in this thread, isn't it?

Don't get me wrong hand job, I would defend any ruling against Rump whether I agreed with it or not. More importantly chill out a bit, these kind of rulings are going to be happening every single day he is the p(R)esident

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Please explain the constitutional basis upon which either of the EOs was stopped.

Since Trump's constitutional authority in this matter is applied at HIS discretion, there was no unconstitutional action.

I think you are wrong

View attachment 117445

Now please read this (very slowly if needed) and tell us where we are wrong

Multiple judges have ruled against Trump. Ask them

No, I can't ask them. Since you are here defending their ruling, I'm asking you. After all, that's why you got involved in this thread, isn't it?

Don't get me wrong hand job, I would defend any ruling against Rump whether I agreed with it or not. More importantly chill out a bit, these kind of rulings are going to be happening every single day he is the p(R)esident

At least we are getting somewhere now. So you are standing up for these judges even though you know they are wrong.