i am in advertising, and work with a lot of gay creative types. They are bright, amusing, and the same as anyone else. There is really nothing to discuss about this. The issue is settled by the u. S. Constitution and the u. S. Supreme court.
there's actually quite a lot to discuss about this. For starters, jude 1 of the bible in the new testament of jesus forbidding any and all of the faithful from enabling the spread of the same type of homosexual culture that overtook sodom; where all its inhabitants, gay or not, were sent to the pit of fire forever.
You cannot force a man to commit a mortal sin of his faith to accomodate a gay wedding and the like.
Secondly, all the legal battles lgbts have initiated are based on a false premise, that they have lulled, deflected or otherwise bamboozled the opposition into overlooking: That they are a loose and incomplete set of deviant sexual
behaviors.....
not an identifiable or even permanent
"race" of people. Think of anne heche for example...
Setting a legal precedent for consideration of deviant behaviors as a race of people is malpractice of the highest sort. Who will come next to make the unsubstantiated-claim-as-fact when trying to get society to legitimize what they
do [not what they are]?
I talk a bit about that last point in this thread:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/curre...wins-gay-legal-challenges-simple-as-that.html
oh, that argument has already been dismissed. Science and news reporting require two separate sources to verify something to call it a fact. We have one old manuscript, (some of it written 200 years after the death of christ) that is as much science fiction as the "twilight zone." it is called the
bible. Until a separate source can verify any of it, it is pure fantasy.
We live in a country where, (thank god), church and state are separate. You need to google and you will learn that our founding fathers, washington, jefferson, adams, and franklin were either agnostic or atheists. Don't take my word for it get off your ass and check it out. Stop quoting your biblical 'mumbo jumbo,' and get out a copy of the u. S. Constitution and read it.
The funny part of all this is that you think the highest source of u. S. Constitution experts, the u. S. Supreme court, do not know as much as you do. The only person using the word "deviant" here is a low-information person ~ you. Why do i suspect one of us did not graduate from high school? :d