What about the Constitution?

Big Black Dog

Platinum Member
May 20, 2009
23,425
8,069
890
In the last two Presidential debates, Clinton was asked about the appointment of Supreme Court Justices. She never mentioned picking someone who would follow the guidelines of the Constitution. It's pretty apparent that the Constitution is not Important to her. All you Hillary fans defend that if you can.
 
By definition, Justices follow the Constitution

It is their job to interpret it as it pertains to specific cases
 
In the last two Presidential debates, Clinton was asked about the appointment of Supreme Court Justices. She never mentioned picking someone who would follow the guidelines of the Constitution. It's pretty apparent that the Constitution is not Important to her. All you Hillary fans defend that if you can.


She doesn't need to, most of her supporters don't want her too, and the rest of them have no idea what a constitution is.


 
She said justices should represent everyone. What an ignoramus. Justices should represent the law.

Very true

Yet our laws have not always represented everyone. That is why we have courts

Our courts most famous decisions have been in protecting the rights of the minority
 
All you Hillary fans defend that if you can.

Sure. You're trying the usual "Justices that don't agree with my kook-fringe-right bizarre reinterpretation of the Constitution are bad!".

Where in the Constitution does it say "Corporations are people" or "Money is free speech"? Go on, defend those constitution-raping travesties so beloved by all conservatives, if you can. The rest of us, being that we can read plain English, we understand that the Constitution says no such things.
 
In the last two Presidential debates, Clinton was asked about the appointment of Supreme Court Justices. She never mentioned picking someone who would follow the guidelines of the Constitution. It's pretty apparent that the Constitution is not Important to her. All you Hillary fans defend that if you can.
Why didn't she mention that they wear black robes?
 
She said justices should represent everyone. What an ignoramus. Justices should represent the law.

Very true

Yet our laws have not always represented everyone. That is why we have courts

Our courts most famous decisions have been in protecting the rights of the minority
Laws that don't represent everyone are arbitrary. Justices are to represent them regardless.
 
She said justices should represent everyone. What an ignoramus. Justices should represent the law.

Very true

Yet our laws have not always represented everyone. That is why we have courts

Our courts most famous decisions have been in protecting the rights of the minority
Laws that don't represent everyone are arbitrary. Justices are to represent them regardless.

You missed that whole civil rights thing didn't you?
 

Forum List

Back
Top