iamwhatiseem
Diamond Member
No, not like that at all.I think your belief is roughly consistent with modern science.
It's like you're trying to throw a war or a fight, and nobody shows up!
It's like starting a war, but won't say why.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, not like that at all.I think your belief is roughly consistent with modern science.
It's like you're trying to throw a war or a fight, and nobody shows up!
Is there still some value in this sort of baiting by the Christians? Or has it become mostly just blowing smoke.
Ask mainstream science when life begins! Science isn't subject to baiting.
Ask Richard Dawkins!
You slandered me by insisting Joes refusal to answer the ultimate question among Americans is just baiting.I've provided the only answer necessary. And now I'll leave you to your spamming and desperation to bait for a disagreement.
Not the side I am on, you are suppose to call me a religious fanatic whacko who hates women.Would it be better if I called you a satanic demon hellbent on killing humans?
You would find that is roughly consistent with mainstream science.
But that's the point at which science begins to differ with religious superstitious beliefs. You'll have to get the full story from somebody like Richard Dawkins.
Yep. Go have a Bald Eagle omelette and watch them scream how you’ve killed an eagle.Mainstream science agrees that life begins at conception. Here is a scientific definition of life:
Life Definition
noun, plural: lives
(1) A distinctive characteristic of a living organism from dead organism or non-living thing, as specifically distinguished by the capacity to grow, metabolize, respond (to stimuli), adapt, and reproduce
![]()
Life Definition and Examples - Biology Online Dictionary
Life definition, characteristics of a living thing, evolutionary history, and more. Test your knowledge - Life - Biology Quiz!www.biologyonline.com
Oblivion? Is that the same as burning in hell for eternityyyyyyyy?Richard Dawkins is a pompous atheist ass who's only reward for being right is Oblivion.
You aren't erring or erroring either. Science has the same answer but in a more nuanced way that you should make yourself aware of.The answer is simple for an atheist with morality.
I’m not sure so I will error on the side of life and assume at the earliest point.
Oblivion? Is that the same as burning in hell for eternityyyyyyyy?
See dumb Marvin's answer. For once he adds something to the discussion instead of acting like a dumb rock.
Uh huh - you are cherry picking.You aren't erring or erroring either. Science has the same answer but in a more nuanced way that you should make yourself aware of.
You haven't found an argument yet, but keep trying.Uh huh - you are cherry picking.
Funny how the definition of life, when talking about non human, begins at fertilization. But when talking about human...oh...uh.. later
It is called "situational thinking" - changing the answer depending on the situation you support.
Science is science. And in science, life begins at fertilization. Which is later than conception, but well the **** earlier than a months old human embryo
That fails as even a strawman argument.You haven't found an argument yet, but keep trying.
Science is o.k. with either, fertilization or conception. Try male ejaculation and see if anybody will bait into that for you.
Go play.That fails as even a strawman argument.
Science has never been ok with conception. When they were heavily influenced by religion years ago - you bet. But now they are heavily influence by pro choice so some in the community will say later.
But the scientific fact is life begins at fertilization.
READ: I won't accept any argument I don't like... typical wet behind the ears SJWGo play.
Nobody can be expected to put up with the spamming nonsense forever!
The answer is simple for an atheist with morality.
I’m not sure so I will error on the side of life and assume at the earliest point.
Joe Biden is a lifelong politician that, like all other political lifers, base their opinions on the current opinions of the voters.Joe Biden is one of the backwards, anti-science nutjobs who believes human life doesn't begin until the fully-developed baby exits the mother's birth canal. Those are the lengths of ignorance the pro-aborts must go to try to justify their bloodlust.
Progs use words to diffuse their agendas into ablur. Science is one of the agendas used to fool the people. But science also says that Biden is at the spore level in cognitive thinking now. Science can and is manipulated with technology used to fool people. The amount of people selling out is enormous for their agendas.You would find that is roughly consistent with mainstream science.
But that's the point at which science begins to differ with religious superstitious beliefs. You'll have to get the full story from somebody like Richard Dawkins.
The answer is simple for an atheist with morality.
I’m not sure so I will error on the side of life and assume at the earliest point.