Western feminists ignore Iran and boycott Israel

[Lysistrata]

This dingbat opted to post an article about Western women who stand for equality in their own countries who don't fight the battles of other women in other countries first. This a a rank deflection. The main focus of people's concerns is what is going on in their home countries. It is not that people in other countries are of no concern, but the chief focus of anyone's energies must be on what is happening in their home countries, whether it be in the U.S., the U.K., India, or anywhere else in the world on any other continent. We have enough trouble with the "bible" crappers over here trying to recruit women and girls into a lifestyle of subjugation right here in the U.S.A. using their sick brand of religion. The same seems to be happening in Iran. This sickness is spread across the world.

 

[Aba Incieni]

This dingbat opted to post an article about Western women who stand for equality in their own countries who don't fight the battles of other women in other countries first. This a a rank deflection. The main focus of people's concerns is what is going on in their home countries. It is not that people in other countries are of no concern, but the chief focus of anyone's energies must be on what is happening in their home countries, whether it be in the U.S., the U.K., India, or anywhere else in the world on any other continent. We have enough trouble with the "bible" crappers over here trying to recruit women and girls into a lifestyle of subjugation right here in the U.S.A. using their sick brand of religion. The same seems to be happening in Iran. This sickness is spread across the world.

You miss the point completely. It's that the very people who claim to be feminists also support the muslim religion of female subjugation.

 

[RWNJ]

This dingbat opted to post an article about Western women who stand for equality in their own countries who don't fight the battles of other women in other countries first. This a a rank deflection. The main focus of people's concerns is what is going on in their home countries. It is not that people in other countries are of no concern, but the chief focus of anyone's energies must be on what is happening in their home countries, whether it be in the U.S., the U.K., India, or anywhere else in the world on any other continent. We have enough trouble with the "bible" crappers over here trying to recruit women and girls into a lifestyle of subjugation right here in the U.S.A. using their sick brand of religion. The same seems to be happening in Iran. This sickness is spread across the world.

You miss the point completely. It's that the very people who claim to be feminists also support the muslim religion of female subjugation.

True. The Left has even made the hijab, a symbol of female oppression. into a fashion statement. Some of the women on the Left have even supported the Iranian regime over the protesters. Do they even realize that if Islam and Shariah law ever gain a foothold in America, that they will be the first ones subjugated and made slaves? The property of their husband.

 

[pismoe]

i hope that i'm around to see what happens to these type feminists RWNJ .

--------------------------------------- i can imagine the looks on their faces and it will be the funniest thing as the femnists and femi nazis get what they deserve Odium .

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Perhaps you should stop and think about what the world would be like without israel. And why do you call them antichrist? The real antichrists' hate Israel and want to destroy it. In fact, most of the world, a world in thrall to the Devil, want them gone. Think about that.

A world without Israel? No 9/11? No Iraq war? No middle-east fighting? No billions of US dollars sent in aid to the middle-east. Or, so you mean, without Israel, more of the Devil's Jews would be in America, and destroying our country, as all the Jews on the Supreme Court are singularly focused on, with each of their votes?

2 John 1:7 For many deceivers have gone out into the world, those who do not confess the coming of Jesus Christ in the flesh. Such a one is the deceiver and the antichrist.

Israel, and Jews, deny Jesus Christ. They are by definition Anarchist. What doesn't your zionist-poisoned brain understand?

"Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist..."

"Every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist..."

By what satanic logic do you accuse real Christians of being Antichrist? If you were a Christian, you'd know that the Church is the Israel of God, and you'd agree with Jesus that Jews are children of the devil.

The only reason the world doesn't like Jews is, as the Bible says, they are hostile to all men. The only reason you don't hate the Jews is because you've been indoctrinated with the satanic and stupid lie that they're God's chosen people. God said of the Jews, "You are not my people, and I am not your God." From Hosea 1:9.

If God rejected the faithless children of Jacob, then what in that skull of yours makes you think he accepts faithless gentile Talmudists who call themselves Jews?

If you think all of the violence in the Middle east is because of Jews then you don't understand the problems between the various sects of Islam.

 

[jillian]

This dingbat opted to post an article about Western women who stand for equality in their own countries who don't fight the battles of other women in other countries first. This a a rank deflection. The main focus of people's concerns is what is going on in their home countries. It is not that people in other countries are of no concern, but the chief focus of anyone's energies must be on what is happening in their home countries, whether it be in the U.S., the U.K., India, or anywhere else in the world on any other continent. We have enough trouble with the "bible" crappers over here trying to recruit women and girls into a lifestyle of subjugation right here in the U.S.A. using their sick brand of religion. The same seems to be happening in Iran. This sickness is spread across the world.

You miss the point completely. It's that the very people who claim to be feminists also support the muslim religion of female subjugation.

True. The Left has even made the hijab, a symbol of female oppression. into a fashion statement. Some of the women on the Left have even supported the Iranian regime over the protesters. Do they even realize that if Islam and Shariah law ever gain a foothold in America, that they will be the first ones subjugated and made slaves? The property of their husband.

what are you talking about, idiot?

 

[BulletProof]

[Q
But the Bible also says that the Jews will be redeemed. Israel, and the Jews still have a central role to play in the Tribulation. The enemies of God will try to exterminate the Jews in the Battle of Armageddon. And God will intervene and give his chosen people the victory. It seems to me that you are simply antisemitic. You display all the symptoms

"And Jesus said to him, 'Do you see these great [Temple] buildings? There will not be left here one stone upon another that will not be thrown down.' ... Peter and James and John and Andrew asked him privately, 'Tell us, when'... 'Truly, I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place.'"

The great Tribulation was in the first century, the Jewish-Roman war of 66 to 73 AD. That's when the Temple was destroyed. That's within the life time of that generation.

You've turned the Bible into demonic gibberish. In your demonic doctrine, Jesus either meant another temple would be destroyed, not the one he was pointing to; or that Jesus changed the subject without indicating such. In your demonic doctrine, Jesus never did answer the question "when?" In your demonic doctrine, "this generation" refers to another generation. And, in your demonic doctrine, you've declared the people Jesus identified as the children of Satan to be God's chosen people.

"The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show to his servants the things that must soon take place.... John to the seven churches that are in Asia... I, John, your brother and partner in the Tribulation"

Really, what simple English words there don't you understand? In your demonic doctrine, you've turned "soon" into 2000 years. In your demonic doctrine, you've turned those seven churches into church ages that have no resemblance to church history. In your demonic doctrine, you just assume that "the Tribulation" John says he's in with the other churches isn't the tribulation the book is about.

 

[BulletProof]

Yep. You're a Jew hater, for sure. You reek of it.

Jesus said Jews are children of the Devil. Jesus introduced Hell to the Bible as a place for God to throw Jews (Parable of the Rich man and Lazarus, Parable of the Wedding Supper, etc.). Why don't you accuse Jesus of hating Jews? Better yet, why don't you follow Christ's example and hate Jews, too?

 

[Lysistrata]

This dingbat opted to post an article about Western women who stand for equality in their own countries who don't fight the battles of other women in other countries first. This a a rank deflection. The main focus of people's concerns is what is going on in their home countries. It is not that people in other countries are of no concern, but the chief focus of anyone's energies must be on what is happening in their home countries, whether it be in the U.S., the U.K., India, or anywhere else in the world on any other continent. We have enough trouble with the "bible" crappers over here trying to recruit women and girls into a lifestyle of subjugation right here in the U.S.A. using their sick brand of religion. The same seems to be happening in Iran. This sickness is spread across the world.

You miss the point completely. It's that the very people who claim to be feminists also support the muslim religion of female subjugation.

True. The Left has even made the hijab, a symbol of female oppression. into a fashion statement. Some of the women on the Left have even supported the Iranian regime over the protesters. Do they even realize that if Islam and Shariah law ever gain a foothold in America, that they will be the first ones subjugated and made slaves? The property of their husband.

What you right-wing nitwits never understand is the concept of volition, the operation of the will. A person who wishes to wear the hijab of her own accord is not "oppressed." If an individual voluntarily decides to wear something as a sign of his or faith, this is one thing. If forced to by another, it is subjugation. I don't know that anywhere in the Christian faith in all of its variations around the world, that men are required to wear certain clothing. This is a shame. Then Christian men would face the same choice and understand the matter better. The first thing that I ditched when I got disgusted with Roman Catholicism was my headgear in church, because the issue was presented to me as a requirement of the faith, and I found it to be total bullshit.

I don't think that there is any requirement in the Jewish faith that men wear yarmulkes. The Jewish men whom I've known have not worn them in everyday life, but I understand that this has been an issue, along with similar issues raised by men of other faiths who wanted to wear clothing expressing their faith:

Pentagon Relaxes Rules On Religious Clothing And Appearance In Military Uniforms Allowing Turbans, Head Scarves And Yarmulkes | HuffPost

All fundamentalist sects of all of the three Abrahamic faiths, Christian, Jewish, and Muslim try to subjugate women as a disgusting part of their various penis-centered "religions." But that is a very different issue from an individual's independent decision to don a hijab, a yarmulka, a turban, or anything else because s/he wishes to express her or his beliefs in this way. It's the difference between a choice and being forced.

In any event, women in places like Iran have the same battles facing them as we women face with the ignorant "religious" nuts right here at home. This battle has more than one front.

You right-wing male crackpots don't seem to understand the concept of free will at all, at least when it comes to female people. This is to your shame. My opinion of Muslims who seek to force these things on us is the same as my opinion of Christians, Jews, Hindus, and anyone else who plot to take our free will away from us. It is very low, indeed.

P.S. Didn't that little "Christian" teenager-chasing monkey who just lost the Senate race in Alabama lend his approval to some nutjob who wanted female citizens to not run for public office?

 

[WillMunny]

Is that surprising? Liberal souls are splattered with so many Islam cum-stains that like muslims and Nazis, they have an intense, violent hatred of Jews. Like muslims and Nazis they have an intense, violent hatred of freedom of speech. Like muslims and Nazis, they have an intense, violent hatred of freedom of speech. Like muslims and Nazis, they have an intense, violent hatred of historical artifacts they don't like. With today's liberalfeces, I wish there was some legal way England's old hang/draw/quarter therapy could be resurrected in America.

 

[RWNJ]

This dingbat opted to post an article about Western women who stand for equality in their own countries who don't fight the battles of other women in other countries first. This a a rank deflection. The main focus of people's concerns is what is going on in their home countries. It is not that people in other countries are of no concern, but the chief focus of anyone's energies must be on what is happening in their home countries, whether it be in the U.S., the U.K., India, or anywhere else in the world on any other continent. We have enough trouble with the "bible" crappers over here trying to recruit women and girls into a lifestyle of subjugation right here in the U.S.A. using their sick brand of religion. The same seems to be happening in Iran. This sickness is spread across the world.

You miss the point completely. It's that the very people who claim to be feminists also support the muslim religion of female subjugation.

True. The Left has even made the hijab, a symbol of female oppression. into a fashion statement. Some of the women on the Left have even supported the Iranian regime over the protesters. Do they even realize that if Islam and Shariah law ever gain a foothold in America, that they will be the first ones subjugated and made slaves? The property of their husband.

what are you talking about, idiot?

I didn't stutter. Did I?

 

[RWNJ]

[Q
But the Bible also says that the Jews will be redeemed. Israel, and the Jews still have a central role to play in the Tribulation. The enemies of God will try to exterminate the Jews in the Battle of Armageddon. And God will intervene and give his chosen people the victory. It seems to me that you are simply antisemitic. You display all the symptoms

"And Jesus said to him, 'Do you see these great [Temple] buildings? There will not be left here one stone upon another that will not be thrown down.' ... Peter and James and John and Andrew asked him privately, 'Tell us, when'... 'Truly, I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place.'"

The great Tribulation was in the first century, the Jewish-Roman war of 66 to 73 AD. That's when the Temple was destroyed. That's within the life time of that generation.

You've turned the Bible into demonic gibberish. In your demonic doctrine, Jesus either meant another temple would be destroyed, not the one he was pointing to; or that Jesus changed the subject without indicating such. In your demonic doctrine, Jesus never did answer the question "when?" In your demonic doctrine, "this generation" refers to another generation. And, in your demonic doctrine, you've declared the people Jesus identified as the children of Satan to be God's chosen people.

"The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show to his servants the things that must soon take place.... John to the seven churches that are in Asia... I, John, your brother and partner in the Tribulation"

Really, what simple English words there don't you understand? In your demonic doctrine, you've turned "soon" into 2000 years. In your demonic doctrine, you've turned those seven churches into church ages that have no resemblance to church history. In your demonic doctrine, you just assume that "the Tribulation" John says he's in with the other churches isn't the tribulation the book is about.

Here ya go.

What did Jesus mean when He said, "this generation will not pass"?

Educate yourself. Your ignorance is offensive.

 

[RWNJ]

This dingbat opted to post an article about Western women who stand for equality in their own countries who don't fight the battles of other women in other countries first. This a a rank deflection. The main focus of people's concerns is what is going on in their home countries. It is not that people in other countries are of no concern, but the chief focus of anyone's energies must be on what is happening in their home countries, whether it be in the U.S., the U.K., India, or anywhere else in the world on any other continent. We have enough trouble with the "bible" crappers over here trying to recruit women and girls into a lifestyle of subjugation right here in the U.S.A. using their sick brand of religion. The same seems to be happening in Iran. This sickness is spread across the world.

You miss the point completely. It's that the very people who claim to be feminists also support the muslim religion of female subjugation.

True. The Left has even made the hijab, a symbol of female oppression. into a fashion statement. Some of the women on the Left have even supported the Iranian regime over the protesters. Do they even realize that if Islam and Shariah law ever gain a foothold in America, that they will be the first ones subjugated and made slaves? The property of their husband.

What you right-wing nitwits never understand is the concept of volition, the operation of the will. A person who wishes to wear the hijab of her own accord is not "oppressed." If an individual voluntarily decides to wear something as a sign of his or faith, this is one thing. If forced to by another, it is subjugation. I don't know that anywhere in the Christian faith in all of its variations around the world, that men are required to wear certain clothing. This is a shame. Then Christian men would face the same choice and understand the matter better. The first thing that I ditched when I got disgusted with Roman Catholicism was my headgear in church, because the issue was presented to me as a requirement of the faith, and I found it to be total bullshit.

I don't think that there is any requirement in the Jewish faith that men wear yarmulkes. The Jewish men whom I've known have not worn them in everyday life, but I understand that this has been an issue, along with similar issues raised by men of other faiths who wanted to wear clothing expressing their faith:

Pentagon Relaxes Rules On Religious Clothing And Appearance In Military Uniforms Allowing Turbans, Head Scarves And Yarmulkes | HuffPost

All fundamentalist sects of all of the three Abrahamic faiths, Christian, Jewish, and Muslim try to subjugate women as a disgusting part of their various penis-centered "religions." But that is a very different issue from an individual's independent decision to don a hijab, a yarmulka, a turban, or anything else because s/he wishes to express her or his beliefs in this way. It's the difference between a choice and being forced.

In any event, women in places like Iran have the same battles facing them as we women face with the ignorant "religious" nuts right here at home. This battle has more than one front.

You right-wing male crackpots don't seem to understand the concept of free will at all, at least when it comes to female people. This is to your shame. My opinion of Muslims who seek to force these things on us is the same as my opinion of Christians, Jews, Hindus, and anyone else who plot to take our free will away from us. It is very low, indeed.

P.S. Didn't that little "Christian" teenager-chasing monkey who just lost the Senate race in Alabama lend his approval to some nutjob who wanted female citizens to not run for public office?

"All fundamentalist sects of all of the three Abrahamic faiths, Christian, Jewish, and Muslim try to subjugate women as a disgusting part of their various penis-centered "religions." "

Give me one example of Christians trying to subjugate women. Even if you can do that, where in Scripture does it teach Christians to do this?

 

[GHook93]

This is simply disgusting. You have to wonder what makes these people tick.

Western feminists ignore Iran and boycott Israel - Geller Report

Stretching the truth are we? I thought you were above that..

She wasn't silent..

Yes she was you stupid ****.

She complains about the Muslims aggressors who are got their asses smacked by Myanmar Buddhists (seriously if you piss off Buddhist you are an asshole). And if you could read further the hypocrite Sarsour complaining Trump, America and Israel (she is such a useless c.u.nt). Yet she is silent on the most repressive regime in the world - which all happen to be Muslim regimes.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[BulletProof]

Here ya go.

What did Jesus mean when He said, "this generation will not pass"?

Educate yourself. Your ignorance is offensive.

The fact that you provide a link for me shows that you have no understanding yourself, else you'd explain it yourself.

Answer: This quote of Jesus in regards to the end times is found in Matthew 24:34; Mark 13:30; and Luke 21:32. Jesus said, “Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place.” The things that Jesus had been speaking of—the rise of the Antichrist, the desolation of the Holy Place, and the darkening of the sun—did not happen during the lifespan of people alive in Jesus’ day. Obviously, Jesus meant something different when He spoke of “this generation.”

All those things that Jesus said would happen did happen. There's no mention of "Antichrist" in the Olivet discourse, fool. The destruction of the Temple and Jerusalem was desolation, fool. The sun being darkened (and the impossibility of stars falling from the sky, fool) is figurative language used in the Old Testament, educate yourself, fool (e.g. Peter's quote of Joel in Acts 2:20, which Peter declared a verse about the sun being darkened applied to the first Pentecost, as well as Joel's application). The sun and the stars are references to important figures, as any bible study would show you. Fool, what's wrong with you? You're a fool who follows a fool who picks out a few verses out of a whole chapter to claim didn't happen, while ignoring most of the chapter of things that most definitely did happen, like the Temple being destroyed.

How damn stupid are you, fool? Your link argues that "this generation" could mean the time span it'll take for events to unfold, once they start. You fool, don't you believe the Tribulation lasts 7 years? Why would Jesus compare seven years a generation? You fool, Jesus was answering the question of WHEN, not how quickly. "This generation" grammatically means the generation of Jesus' day, not some future generation. Remember, fool, when your fellow fools bet on 1988, 40 years after the establishment of Israel? Damn, you are a fool's fool.

Your ignorant, demonic doctrine is offensive. And, so stupid, too.

 

[BulletProof]

"All fundamentalist sects of all of the three Abrahamic faiths, Christian, Jewish, and Muslim try to subjugate women as a disgusting part of their various penis-centered "religions." "

Give me one example of Christians trying to subjugate women. Even if you can do that, where in Scripture does it teach Christians to do this?

The New Testament teaches that women shouldn't have authority over men, nor speak in church. To the lost, this equals subjugation of women. Jesus chose only males as his Apostles, demonstrating his unwillingness to "hire" women. Jesus supported the Old Testament, which has it's own teachings of supposed subjugation of women.

Your church isn't Christian. You faux-Christians tell lies, vulgar misrepresentations, that the Bible teaches equality between the sexes.

 

[RWNJ]

Here ya go.

What did Jesus mean when He said, "this generation will not pass"?

Educate yourself. Your ignorance is offensive.

The fact that you provide a link for me shows that you have no understanding yourself, else you'd explain it yourself.

Answer: This quote of Jesus in regards to the end times is found in Matthew 24:34; Mark 13:30; and Luke 21:32. Jesus said, “Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place.” The things that Jesus had been speaking of—the rise of the Antichrist, the desolation of the Holy Place, and the darkening of the sun—did not happen during the lifespan of people alive in Jesus’ day. Obviously, Jesus meant something different when He spoke of “this generation.”

All those things that Jesus said would happen did happen. There's no mention of "Antichrist" in the Olivet discourse, fool. The destruction of the Temple and Jerusalem was desolation, fool. The sun being darkened (and the impossibility of stars falling from the sky, fool) is figurative language used in the Old Testament, educate yourself, fool (e.g. Peter's quote of Joel in Acts 2:20, which Peter declared a verse about the sun being darkened applied to the first Pentecost, as well as Joel's application). The sun and the stars are references to important figures, as any bible study would show you. Fool, what's wrong with you? You're a fool who follows a fool who picks out a few verses out of a whole chapter to claim didn't happen, while ignoring most of the chapter of things that most definitely did happen, like the Temple being destroyed.

How damn stupid are you, fool? Your link argues that "this generation" could mean the time span it'll take for events to unfold, once they start. You fool, don't you believe the Tribulation lasts 7 years? Why would Jesus compare seven years a generation? You fool, Jesus was answering the question of WHEN, not how quickly. "This generation" grammatically means the generation of Jesus' day, not some future generation. Remember, fool, when your fellow fools bet on 1988, 40 years after the establishment of Israel? Damn, you are a fool's fool.

Your ignorant, demonic doctrine is offensive. And, so stupid, too.

Hmmm...You call yourself a Christian, yet you called me a fool at least ten times, and stupid several times. Seems to me you have an emotional investment in all of this. There are Biblical scholars, many in fact, who disagree with you. Men who have studied Scripture for decades. Why should I take your word over theirs? All you do is call me a fool. So, who is really the fool? Hmm?

 

[RWNJ]

"All fundamentalist sects of all of the three Abrahamic faiths, Christian, Jewish, and Muslim try to subjugate women as a disgusting part of their various penis-centered "religions." "

Give me one example of Christians trying to subjugate women. Even if you can do that, where in Scripture does it teach Christians to do this?

The New Testament teaches that women shouldn't have authority over men, nor speak in church. To the lost, this equals subjugation of women. Jesus chose only males as his Apostles, demonstrating his unwillingness to "hire" women. Jesus supported the Old Testament, which has it's own teachings of supposed subjugation of women.

Your church isn't Christian. You faux-Christians tell lies, vulgar misrepresentations, that the Bible teaches equality between the sexes.

I have never told a lie on this forum. You may disagree with what I say, but I have never lied. And what does Jesus teach us about judging others, oh judgmental one? You have been doing an awful lot of that lately? Calling everyone stupid fools and claiming their beliefs are demonic. What does that say about you? Nothing good. That's for sure.

 

[RWNJ]

"All fundamentalist sects of all of the three Abrahamic faiths, Christian, Jewish, and Muslim try to subjugate women as a disgusting part of their various penis-centered "religions." "

Give me one example of Christians trying to subjugate women. Even if you can do that, where in Scripture does it teach Christians to do this?

The New Testament teaches that women shouldn't have authority over men, nor speak in church. To the lost, this equals subjugation of women. Jesus chose only males as his Apostles, demonstrating his unwillingness to "hire" women. Jesus supported the Old Testament, which has it's own teachings of supposed subjugation of women.

Your church isn't Christian. You faux-Christians tell lies, vulgar misrepresentations, that the Bible teaches equality between the sexes.

So, who is the head of the family? What does Scripture say about that? The husband is the head of the family. Not because women are inferior, but because there can be only one head of a family. And women should not rule over men. Perhaps it has something to do with what happened in the Garden of Eden. It's not sexist. It's not subjugating women. It's just the way it is. You might also want to recall how the Bible says husbands are to treat their wives. Does that sound like subjugation? You have a lot of strange ideas floating around in your head. Perhaps you should spend some time in prayer and Bible study. If you open your heart and allow the Holy Spirit in, you might find enlightenment and understanding.

 

[BulletProof]

Hmmm...You call yourself a Christian, yet you called me a fool at least ten times, and stupid several times. Seems to me you have an emotional investment in all of this. There are Biblical scholars, many in fact, who disagree with you. Men who have studied Scripture for decades. Why should I take your word over theirs? All you do is call me a fool. So, who is really the fool? Hmm?

Granted, Jesus used much stronger language that I used, but that was just against the Jews. I call you a fool because you hold demonic doctrines that are trivial to refute, yet you don't budge.

Claim: You say Jews are God's chosen people.
Refutation: Jesus said Jews are children of the devil.

Your claim is easily refuted, but you don't budge. What's left to do but call you a fool?

Claim: Jesus means by "this generation" that all the events he told about would unfold quickly in a later generation.
Refutation: The temple, one of the events that Jesus spoke of, was destroyed in 70 AD, this generation of the first century, not a later generation, answering the Apostles' question of When.

Fool.

You can find supposed biblical scholars who fall on any side of any doctrine. The ones who hold your dispensationalist doctrine are clowns.