West Virginia Supreme Ct writes law banning DUI on private property

[ShootSpeeders]

Courts are not supposed to write laws but they do it all the time.

http://www.govtslaves.com/west-virginia-supreme-court-expands-dui-to-private-property/

nov 11 2016 West Virginians can be charged with drunk driving on their own private land, even if they represent no danger to others. The state Supreme Court of Appeals laid down this new precedent last month, overturning previous interpretations of the state’s driving under the influence (DUI) law.

“We hold that an individual may lose his/her driver’s license if they are found driving a vehicle anywhere within the physical boundaries of West Virginia while under the influence of alcohol (and/or drugs), even if the vehicle is driven only upon private property not open to the general public,” Chief Justice Menis E. Ketchum II wrote for the court.

The ruling does not just apply to automobiles driven on one’s own land. The high court reviewed the situation of Joshua D. Beckett, who was arrested on February 4, 2012 for riding an all-terrain vehicle on his family’s farm in Monroe County. Having had a bit too much to drink, Beckett crashed his ATV and a friend called 911 for help. The medical personnel who responded to the scene called the sheriff after noticing Beckett was tipsy and had a blood alcohol level of .17.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Excellent law.

shut up, shoots, your opinion is meaningless.

 

[Vastator]

A common sense ruling. There's still hope!

 

[Fenton Lum]

Private prisons need to be full at all times to be most profitable, more to come.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Excellent law.

shut up, shoots, your opinion is meaningless.

What the fuck you talking about you commie bastard


Charging someone with a dui on there own private fucking land?

Are they insane?


.

 

[Vastator]

Excellent law.

shut up, shoots, your opinion is meaningless.

What the fuck you talking about you commie bastard


Charging someone with a dui on there own private fucking land?

Are they insane?


.

If I'm reading it correctly the law is saying it does not apply on private land.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Why the hell would anyone even consider charging someone with DUI on their own property?
Never should have been an issue to begin with.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Excellent law.

shut up, shoots, your opinion is meaningless.

What the fuck you talking about you commie bastard


Charging someone with a dui on there own private fucking land?

Are they insane?.

You would not know if a commie bit you on your dick if it was a commie. Ask hwga to bit you, then you will have an idea. The far right and alt right are littered with Bolshevik bastards. This is a great law!

 

[Wyatt earp]

Excellent law.

shut up, shoots, your opinion is meaningless.

What the fuck you talking about you commie bastard


Charging someone with a dui on there own private fucking land?

Are they insane?


.

If I'm reading it correctly the law is saying it does not apply on private land.

I had to read it three times

 

[jknowgood]

Excellent law.

shut up, shoots, your opinion is meaningless.

What the fuck you talking about you commie bastard


Charging someone with a dui on there own private fucking land?

Are they insane?.

You would not know if a commie bit you on your dick if it was a commie. Ask hwga to bit you, then you will have an idea. The far right and alt right are littered with Bolshevik bastards. This is a great law!

You like dick. lol

 

[Wyatt earp]

Excellent law.

shut up, shoots, your opinion is meaningless.

What the fuck you talking about you commie bastard


Charging someone with a dui on there own private fucking land?

Are they insane?.

You would not know if a commie bit you on your dick if it was a commie. Ask hwga to bit you, then you will have an idea. The far right and alt right are littered with Bolshevik bastards. This is a great law!

I am talking to a commie right know any dumb mother fucker who thinks charging a dui on private land is OK is a damn pinko

 

[GHook93]

Courts are not supposed to write laws but they do it all the time.

http://www.govtslaves.com/west-virginia-supreme-court-expands-dui-to-private-property/

nov 11 2016 West Virginians can be charged with drunk driving on their own private land, even if they represent no danger to others. The state Supreme Court of Appeals laid down this new precedent last month, overturning previous interpretations of the state’s driving under the influence (DUI) law.

“We hold that an individual may lose his/her driver’s license if they are found driving a vehicle anywhere within the physical boundaries of West Virginia while under the influence of alcohol (and/or drugs), even if the vehicle is driven only upon private property not open to the general public,” Chief Justice Menis E. Ketchum II wrote for the court.

The ruling does not just apply to automobiles driven on one’s own land. The high court reviewed the situation of Joshua D. Beckett, who was arrested on February 4, 2012 for riding an all-terrain vehicle on his family’s farm in Monroe County. Having had a bit too much to drink, Beckett crashed his ATV and a friend called 911 for help. The medical personnel who responded to the scene called the sheriff after noticing Beckett was tipsy and had a blood alcohol level of .17.

Throughout the history of this land "case law" has been created to interpret laws already on the books and many doctrines have been created that run afoul with the constitutional, treaties, Federal Law, State constitution or any supreme law (such as a local ordnance in conflict with a state law).


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Wyatt earp]

This is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard..

What's next they won't let you drive a car on your private property with out insurance..

Hell I can drive our semis on company property with out a CDL


I remember them talking about building a private highway in Colorado decades ago with an unlimited speed limit..

The Supreme Court better throw this bullshit ruling.. You can't fucking do that.


.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Throughout the history of this land "case law" has been created to interpret laws already on the books

That's what judges always say. "We didn't write a law. It's just an interpretation".

 

[WinterBorn]

Throughout the history of this land "case law" has been created to interpret laws already on the books

That's what judges always say. "We didn't write a law. It's just an interpretation".

That's what any intelligent person thinks. Because it is fact.

 

[Zander]

Excellent law.

shut up, shoots, your opinion is meaningless.

What the fuck you talking about you commie bastard


Charging someone with a dui on there own private fucking land?

Are they insane?


.

If I'm reading it correctly the law is saying it does not apply on private land.

Nope.

West Virginians can be charged with drunk driving on their own private land, even if they represent no danger to others. The state Supreme Court of Appeals laid down this new precedent last month, overturning previous interpretations of the state’s driving under the influence (DUI) law.

“We hold that an individual may lose his/her driver’s license if they are found driving a vehicle anywhere within the physical boundaries of West Virginia while under the influence of alcohol (and/or drugs), even if the vehicle is driven only upon private property not open to the general public,” Chief Justice Menis E. Ketchum II wrote for the court.​

 

[JakeStarkey]

Excellent law.

shut up, shoots, your opinion is meaningless.

What the fuck you talking about you commie bastard


Charging someone with a dui on there own private fucking land?

Are they insane?


.

If I'm reading it correctly the law is saying it does not apply on private land.

Nope.

West Virginians can be charged with drunk driving on their own private land, even if they represent no danger to others. The state Supreme Court of Appeals laid down this new precedent last month, overturning previous interpretations of the state’s driving under the influence (DUI) law.

“We hold that an individual may lose his/her driver’s license if they are found driving a vehicle anywhere within the physical boundaries of West Virginia while under the influence of alcohol (and/or drugs), even if the vehicle is driven only upon private property not open to the general public,” Chief Justice Menis E. Ketchum II wrote for the court.​

Excellent decision.

 

[mdk]

Country roads, take my home...

 

[Wyatt earp]

Excellent law.

shut up, shoots, your opinion is meaningless.

What the fuck you talking about you commie bastard


Charging someone with a dui on there own private fucking land?

Are they insane?


.

If I'm reading it correctly the law is saying it does not apply on private land.

Nope.

West Virginians can be charged with drunk driving on their own private land, even if they represent no danger to others. The state Supreme Court of Appeals laid down this new precedent last month, overturning previous interpretations of the state’s driving under the influence (DUI) law.

“We hold that an individual may lose his/her driver’s license if they are found driving a vehicle anywhere within the physical boundaries of West Virginia while under the influence of alcohol (and/or drugs), even if the vehicle is driven only upon private property not open to the general public,” Chief Justice Menis E. Ketchum II wrote for the court.​

Excellent decision.

Again says the commie twinkle toes pinko bastard

 

[JakeStarkey]

Excellent law.

shut up, shoots, your opinion is meaningless.

What the fuck you talking about you commie bastard


Charging someone with a dui on there own private fucking land?

Are they insane?


.

If I'm reading it correctly the law is saying it does not apply on private land.

Nope.

West Virginians can be charged with drunk driving on their own private land, even if they represent no danger to others. The state Supreme Court of Appeals laid down this new precedent last month, overturning previous interpretations of the state’s driving under the influence (DUI) law.

“We hold that an individual may lose his/her driver’s license if they are found driving a vehicle anywhere within the physical boundaries of West Virginia while under the influence of alcohol (and/or drugs), even if the vehicle is driven only upon private property not open to the general public,” Chief Justice Menis E. Ketchum II wrote for the court.​

Excellent decision.

Again says the commie twinkle toes pinko bastard

I approve of the court's ruling, and I recognize bear513 is projecting his desire to dress up in SS gear and get down with his fellow male lovers.