Well, that didn't take long. The pushback has begun.

[berg80]

Trump’s executive orders already face pushback, legal challenges​

Two hours after being sworn in, President Donald Trump sat down in the President’s Room at the U.S. Capitol to sign the first of nearly 100 promised executive orders — a historic and hand-cramping effort that he promised would begin “the complete restoration of America and the revolution of common sense.”

But his pen strokes also kicked off a round of objections from opponents, scholars and other groups that said he’d exceeded the limits of his presidential power. They included some critics who filed lawsuits before his signatures were dry, all but guaranteeing that his approval would not be the last word on Monday’s executive actions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/21/trump-executive-orders-challenges-lawsuits/

The biggest concern in pursuing these matters through the courts is of course the degree to which they have been coopted by trumpery.

 

[pknopp]

To note, those starting these actions also did this same thing concerning Biden.

Immigrants’ Rights Groups Sue Biden Administration Over New Anti-Asylum Rule | American Civil Liberties Union

 

[Votto]

Lawyer up!!

I wonder if Trump will write on every day to keep them all busy.

 

[berg80]

Lawyer up!!

I wonder if Trump will write on every day to keep them all busy.

Excellent point. Cuz we all know what's important in governing the country is owning the libs.

Some of Trump’s actions faced immediate legal challenge. Before he had left the U.S. Capitol where he was inaugurated, three lawsuits raised legal questions about his appointment of Tesla founder Elon Musk to run the nongovernmental “Department of Government Efficiency.” The public interest groups behind the lawsuits say the “DOGE” panel violates laws on transparency for government advisory groups.

 

[berg80]

Lawyer up!!

I wonder if Trump will write on every day to keep them all busy.

In a complaint obtained by The Washington Post ahead of its filing, the public interest law firm National Security Counselors says that the DOGE panel is breaking a 50-year-old law, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, that requires advisory committees to the executive branch to follow specific rules on disclosure, hiring and other practices.
“DOGE is not exempted from FACA’s requirements,” states the lawsuit, written by Kel McClanahan, executive director of National Security Counselors. “All meetings of DOGE, including those conducted through an electronic medium, must be open to the public.”

 

[ColonelAngus]

Amazing for people to have legal counters to EOs signed less than 24 hours ago.

SPEEDY LEGAL SERVICES.

Dems want their big government fascism!

The people spoke, they want what Trump promised…BUT THE DEMOCRATS WILL TAKE IT TO COURT TO FUCK OVER THE PEOPLE’S CHOICE.

Fine Americans!

 

[hadit]

Trump’s executive orders already face pushback, legal challenges​

Two hours after being sworn in, President Donald Trump sat down in the President’s Room at the U.S. Capitol to sign the first of nearly 100 promised executive orders — a historic and hand-cramping effort that he promised would begin “the complete restoration of America and the revolution of common sense.”

But his pen strokes also kicked off a round of objections from opponents, scholars and other groups that said he’d exceeded the limits of his presidential power. They included some critics who filed lawsuits before his signatures were dry, all but guaranteeing that his approval would not be the last word on Monday’s executive actions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/21/trump-executive-orders-challenges-lawsuits/

The biggest concern in pursuing these matters through the courts is of course the degree to which they have been coopted by trumpery.

What do you mean, started? You guys have been screeching bloody murder since he was elected.

 

[Billiejeens]

What do you mean, started? You guys have been screeching bloody murder since he was elected.

The First Time

 

[Thunk]

the lawsuits say the “DOGE” panel violates laws on transparency for government advisory groups.

How do you prove a crime in court? FOLLOW THE MONEY!

That's really what DOGE is for & the democrats know it!

They be shitting bricks!

 

[okfine]

Lawyer up!!

I wonder if Trump will write on every day to keep them all busy.

The dooshbag just likes to hear himself talk and listen to his tards scream and yell like it's all great stuff. All part of the shitshow and you are one of his characters.

 

[YoursTruly]

The president. none of them, should have the power to create laws. Even ones we agree with. That's what congress is for.
This is just as bad as judges legislating from the bench.

 

[JohnDB]

So the only ones who will win are the lawyers,

 

[Billiejeens]

The president. none of them, should have the power to create laws. Even ones we agree with. That's what congress is for.
This is just as bad as judges legislating from the bench.

Hey Fringy

President Trump is not making law.

 

[Independent thinker]

Trump’s executive orders already face pushback, legal challenges​

Two hours after being sworn in, President Donald Trump sat down in the President’s Room at the U.S. Capitol to sign the first of nearly 100 promised executive orders — a historic and hand-cramping effort that he promised would begin “the complete restoration of America and the revolution of common sense.”

But his pen strokes also kicked off a round of objections from opponents, scholars and other groups that said he’d exceeded the limits of his presidential power. They included some critics who filed lawsuits before his signatures were dry, all but guaranteeing that his approval would not be the last word on Monday’s executive actions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/21/trump-executive-orders-challenges-lawsuits/

The biggest concern in pursuing these matters through the courts is of course the degree to which they have been coopted by trumpery.

This is the new status quo started by Biden. You sign anything you want and let the courts hash it out later, hoping that you already accomplished what you wanted before the courts decide. Then, as Biden did, if the Supreme Court doesn't side with you, you just ignore them anyway. Glad to see you have confidence in the Supreme Court though. What changed your mind?

 

[hadit]

The dooshbag just likes to hear himself talk and listen to his tards scream and yell like it's all great stuff. All part of the shitshow and you are one of his characters.

And you're doing a great job as an NPC.

 

[struth]

The president. none of them, should have the power to create laws. Even ones we agree with. That's what congress is for.
This is just as bad as judges legislating from the bench.

what EOs do essentially is direct the executive branch on how they will enforce federal laws. Xiden for example, decided not to enforce much of the Immigration and Nationalization Act found here, 8 U.S. Code Chapter 12 - IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY

 

[YoursTruly]

Hey Fringy

President Trump is not making law.

And you're not lying just to defend Trump and his EO's

Can Birthright Citizenship Be Repealed by Executive Order?​

The 14th Amendment. Note the very first words

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

 

[Votto]

The dooshbag just likes to hear himself talk and listen to his tards scream and yell like it's all great stuff. All part of the shitshow and you are one of his characters.

 

[Billiejeens]

And you're not lying just to defend Trump and his EO's

Can Birthright Citizenship Be Repealed by Executive Order?​

The 14th Amendment. Note the very first words

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Asking the 14th amendment to be properly interpreted is not "making law"

 

[Doc7505]

The president. none of them, should have the power to create laws. Even ones we agree with. That's what congress is for.
This is just as bad as judges legislating from the bench.

~~~~~~
Fool! That is why there are three branches of government. It's called Checks and Balances.
I suggest you read up on it....
You shouldn't show your ignorance of such facts of government. That is unless you're not whom you pretend to be..